sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Live cases

Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Delhi Petrol Pumps Challenge Penalties on End-of-Life Vehicles in High Court LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRIYA NAGAR LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT KARAN GUPTA LAW CHAMBERS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MASTERCARD, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MALHOTRA AND MALHOTRO LAW FIRM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU RANCHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HIMT GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SHREE CEMENT LTD Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 5 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India refuses to determine the “auspicious time” for the Thiruchendur Temple consecration, reaffirming judicial non-interference in religious affairs. Read more on the legal and cultural implications of this ruling. Supreme Court Refuses to Decide on Temple Ritual Timing On 3 July 2025, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a petition challenging the scheduled timing of the Kumbhabhishekam (consecration ceremony) at the historic Sri Subramaniya Swamy Temple in Thiruchendur, Tamil Nadu. The Court made it clear that constitutional courts have no authority to determine what qualifies as an “auspicious time” for religious ceremonies, emphasizing the judiciary’s restrained approach in spiritual and ritual matters. Background of the Dispute: Vidhayāhar’s Petition The case was initiated by the Vidhayāhar, a hereditary temple ritual authority, who challenged the consecration timing of 6:00 to 6:47 a.m. on 7 July 2025. He argued that the chosen time was astrologically inauspicious and proposed the Abhijit Muhurtham, from 12:05 to 12:45 p.m., as more spiritually appropriate. The dispute arose after a five-member expert committee, appointed by the Madras High Court, recommended the morning slot by a 4:1 majority. Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Decide What Is “Auspicious” A bench comprising Justice Manoj Misra and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh firmly rejected the petition, stating: “We cannot decide what is auspicious.” The Court reaffirmed that matters of faith and religious timing fall outside judicial purview and should be left to agamic experts and temple authorities. It also declined to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, citing insufficient legal grounds. High Court’s Role and the Importance of Consultation Although the Supreme Court refused to intervene, it upheld the Madras High Court’s directive requiring that the Vidhayāhar be consulted in writing before finalizing any future festival decisions. This nuance distinguishes between draft opinions and final recommendations, reinforcing the role of ritual custodians in temple affairs while maintaining the administrative hierarchy. Broader Implications: Secularism and Religious Autonomy This judgment reiterates the secular framework of India’s judiciary, which respects religious autonomy in the absence of civil or fundamental rights violations. It also upholds the traditional governance of temples through agamic traditions, expert consensus, and established customs, reinforcing the boundary between law and religion. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene in the Kumbhabhishekam timing dispute reaffirms the judiciary’s non-involvement in ritual matters, especially when constitutional rights are not at stake. As the consecration proceeds on 7 July 2025 as scheduled, the ruling serves as a precedent emphasizing respect for religious tradition and autonomy within the legal framework. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Sadalaw • July 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi Petrol Pumps Challenge Penalties on End-of-Life Vehicles in High Court Sadalaw • July 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Orders Government Action on Deepfake Menace in India Sadalaw • July 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Read More »

Delhi Petrol Pumps Challenge Penalties on End-of-Life Vehicles in High Court

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Delhi Petrol Pumps Challenge Penalties on End-of-Life Vehicles in High Court LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRIYA NAGAR LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT KARAN GUPTA LAW CHAMBERS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MASTERCARD, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MALHOTRA AND MALHOTRO LAW FIRM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU RANCHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HIMT GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SHREE CEMENT LTD Delhi Petrol Pumps Challenge Penalties on End-of-Life Vehicles in High Court Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 5 JULY 2025 The Delhi Petrol Dealers Association challenges penalties for refuelling End-of-Life Vehicles in the Delhi High Court, raising legal and environmental concerns. Learn about the case and its broader implications. Delhi High Court Case: An Overview The Delhi High Court is currently reviewing a petition filed by the Delhi Petrol Dealers Association (DPDA), challenging the recent penalties imposed on petrol pumps for refuelling End-of-Life Vehicles (ELVs). The challenge stems from the Delhi Government‘s directive that prohibits: Refuelling petrol vehicles older than 15 years Refuelling diesel vehicles older than 10 years This regulation came into effect on 1 July 2025. What the Law Says: Penalties Under Motor Vehicles Act Under the policy, petrol pump operators face action under Section 192 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Violators may receive: A fine of up to ₹10,000 Or a jail term of up to one year This move is in line with previous rulings by the Supreme Court of India and the National Green Tribunal (NGT), both advocating stricter control over vehicle pollution in Delhi. Dealers Support Green Goals but Raise Practical Issues While the DPDA supports the goal of reducing pollution, it argues that petrol pump operators are not adequately equipped to enforce these regulations. Their concerns include: Lack of legal authority to verify vehicle age Limited staff training on identifying ELVs Traffic congestion making verification impractical Inaccurate data from the VAHAN database Technical issues with ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) cameras The association believes enforcement responsibility should remain with government agencies, not private fuel dealers. Delhi High Court Issues Notice The Delhi High Court has issued notices to both the Delhi Government and the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM). A detailed hearing is scheduled for September 2025. Broader Implications for Law and Environment This case could set a precedent for how environmental regulations are implemented across India. The key legal questions include: Is it lawful for the government to delegate environmental enforcement to private entities? Are petrol pump operators being held responsible for actions beyond their control? What role should private businesses play in public policy enforcement? Conclusion: A Call for Balanced Enforcement The DPDA’s petition underscores the need for a fair and collaborative enforcement framework that supports environmental goals without overburdening private stakeholders. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Sadalaw • July 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi Petrol Pumps Challenge Penalties on End-of-Life Vehicles in High Court Sadalaw • July 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Orders Government Action on Deepfake Menace in India Sadalaw • July 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi Petrol Pumps Challenge Penalties on End-of-Life Vehicles in High Court Read More »

Supreme Court Orders Government Action on Deepfake Menace in India

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Orders Government Action on Deepfake Menace in India Karnataka High Court Halts BBMP’s Controversial Demolition Drive in Bengaluru Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Student’s Right to Hostel Accommodation LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ASTRO ARUN PANDIT LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT STRAIVE INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LEX LAW OFFICES LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT PATINE LAW OFFICES LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VANKINA, ALLU & PARTNERS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SNDT WOMEN’S UNIVERSITY, MUMBAI CALL FOR PAPERS BY IILM LAW JOURNAL Supreme Court Orders Government Action on Deepfake Menace in India KASHISH JAHAN 4 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India directs the Centre to regulate deepfake technology with stricter laws and accountability measures, marking a major step in protecting citizens’ privacy and democracy. Deepfakes: A New Threat to Privacy and Democracy In a significant move, the Supreme Court of India has asked the Central Government of India to frame robust legal guidelines to tackle the growing threat of deepfakes. These AI-generated videos, often used for misinformation, defamation, and harassment, are raising serious concerns about digital safety, privacy, and democratic integrity. The Court warned that if left unregulated, deepfakes could cause irreparable damage to individual reputations and erode public trust in media and institutions. Rise of Deepfakes: A Looming Crisis in India India has seen a sharp rise in AI-generated content, especially deepfake videos targeting celebrities, politicians, and even ordinary citizens. Petitioners highlighted that the current Information Technology laws are insufficient to address the complexities of this new form of digital manipulation. Experts fear that deepfakes in elections could be used to amplify fake news, manipulate public opinion, and worsen political polarisation. Supreme Court Calls for Legal Reforms The bench acknowledged that the current legal infrastructure is outdated in dealing with AI-based threats. The judges emphasized the need for: Clear rules and penalties for the creation and distribution of deepfakes Accountability mechanisms for individuals and platforms Laws that balance free speech with protection from misuse This legal push reflects the Court’s commitment to tech accountability in the digital age. Accountability of Social Media Platforms The Court didn’t spare social media platforms either. It criticized major tech companies for their slow response to user complaints about deepfake content. The bench clarified that intermediary status cannot be used to escape responsibility. Instead, platforms like Meta, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter) must adopt advanced detection tools, quick takedown mechanisms, and align with global best practices to prevent misuse. Government’s Response and Future Outlook The Solicitor General of India assured the Court that the Centre is already working on new IT Rules and will soon consult stakeholders, tech experts, and civil society groups to draft effective legislation. The government also emphasized that the goal is to protect users without hindering AI innovation. A Crucial Step Toward Digital Safety This proactive intervention by the Supreme Court marks a turning point in India’s digital governance. As deepfakes become more realistic and accessible, strong regulatory frameworks are essential to preserve individual rights, ensure ethical AI usage, and protect the democratic process. Whether the government’s upcoming measures strike the right balance between innovation and regulation will be closely watched. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Orders Government Action on Deepfake Menace in India Sadalaw • July 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Karnataka High Court Halts BBMP’s Controversial Demolition Drive in Bengaluru Sadalaw • July 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Student’s Right to Hostel Accommodation Sadalaw • July 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Orders Government Action on Deepfake Menace in India Read More »

Karnataka High Court Halts BBMP’s Controversial Demolition Drive in Bengaluru

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Karnataka High Court Halts BBMP’s Controversial Demolition Drive in Bengaluru Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Student’s Right to Hostel Accommodation LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ASTRO ARUN PANDIT LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT STRAIVE INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LEX LAW OFFICES LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT PATINE LAW OFFICES LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VANKINA, ALLU & PARTNERS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SNDT WOMEN’S UNIVERSITY, MUMBAI CALL FOR PAPERS BY IILM LAW JOURNAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MINDSPRING ADVISORS, MUMBAI Karnataka High Court Halts BBMP’s Controversial Demolition Drive in Bengaluru KASHISH JAHAN 4 JULY 2025 The Karnataka High Court issues a stay on BBMP’s demolition of houses in Bengaluru, stressing due process and citizens’ rights to shelter and livelihood. A landmark case balancing urban development and human rights. Court Intervenes in Large-Scale Evictions The Karnataka High Court has issued a temporary stay on the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)’s extensive demolition campaign in Bengaluru, aimed at removing houses allegedly built on encroached public land. The decision follows petitions from residents who claimed that they received no proper notice and were facing sudden eviction from homes they had occupied for decades. Citizens Cry Foul Over Sudden Evictions Several residents affected by the demolitions argued that they had been paying taxes and utility bills, reinforcing their long-term occupancy. They claimed that the overnight demolitions, without any prior warning or alternative housing, violated their right to shelter and livelihood under the Constitution of India. The Court acknowledged the need to clear encroachments but firmly stated that no citizen should be rendered homeless without due process. Due Process Must Prevail The bench criticised the BBMP for bypassing legal procedures such as issuing prior notices, conducting hearings, and allowing time for appeals. The Court called such actions a violation of constitutional safeguards against forced evictions and stressed that transparency and fairness are non-negotiable in governance. Human Rights vs. Urban Development While the BBMP defended its actions as necessary for infrastructure development, the High Court made it clear that urban planning must not trample on basic human rights. The Court instructed the civic body to first present a rehabilitation and resettlement plan for the displaced families before proceeding with any future demolitions. Next Steps: Hearing and Investigation The stay order will remain effective until the next scheduled hearing later this month. The Court has also appointed a fact-finding committee to assess the legitimacy of the residents’ claims and investigate procedural lapses by the authorities. A Step Towards Equitable Urban Governance This ruling offers temporary relief to thousands of families facing imminent displacement, and it could become a precedent for how Indian cities handle future eviction and encroachment disputes. It highlights the urgent need for compassionate urban policy that balances public interest with individual rights. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Karnataka High Court Halts BBMP’s Controversial Demolition Drive in Bengaluru Sadalaw • July 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Student’s Right to Hostel Accommodation Sadalaw • July 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on PIL to Regulate Deepfake Content Amid Rising AI Misuse Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Karnataka High Court Halts BBMP’s Controversial Demolition Drive in Bengaluru Read More »

Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Student’s Right to Hostel Accommodation

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Student’s Right to Hostel Accommodation LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ASTRO ARUN PANDIT LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT STRAIVE INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LEX LAW OFFICES LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT PATINE LAW OFFICES LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VANKINA, ALLU & PARTNERS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SNDT WOMEN’S UNIVERSITY, MUMBAI CALL FOR PAPERS BY IILM LAW JOURNAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MINDSPRING ADVISORS, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VAHURA, BANGALORE Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Student’s Right to Hostel Accommodation KASHISH JAHAN 4 JULY 2025 The Kerala High Court affirms the right of a transgender student to access hostel accommodation according to their gender identity, reinforcing dignity, equality, and inclusion in Indian educational institutions. Introduction: A Landmark Judgment on Gender Equality In a progressive ruling, the Kerala High Court has upheld the rights of a transgender student who was denied hostel accommodation in accordance with her gender identity. The Court ruled that such denial violates the fundamental rights to equality, dignity, and non-discrimination under the Constitution of India. Student’s Struggle for Recognition The petitioner, a postgraduate student, had all legal documents affirming her female gender identity. Despite this, the college denied her a room in the women’s hostel, forcing her to live off-campus, leading to financial hardship and emotional stress. The Court declared this treatment to be in violation of the existing transgender rights framework in India. The NALSA Judgment: A Legal Precedent The judgment heavily cited the landmark case of NALSA v. Union of India, which recognized the right of transgender individuals to self-identify their gender. The Court emphasized that educational institutions must align with this precedent and eliminate arbitrary barriers that infringe on gender identity and basic rights. Court’s Directive to Educational Institutions The High Court ordered the college to immediately allot a hostel room to the student in line with her gender identity. Furthermore, it directed the Government of Kerala to issue comprehensive guidelines to all educational institutions, ensuring that no transgender student faces such discrimination again. The Court also recommended sensitization programs for hostel wardens and administrative staff to create a safer and more inclusive environment. Broader Impact on Campus Inclusion LGBTQ+ rights activists and legal scholars have welcomed this ruling as a milestone for transgender inclusion in higher education. It reinforces that constitutional rights must prevail over institutional biases and logistical excuses. The verdict sets a precedent for universities across the country. Building Inclusive Campuses for All This decision reinforces the idea that educational spaces must reflect the constitutional values of equality, inclusivity, and dignity. By ensuring equal access to hostel accommodation, the judiciary is paving the way for discrimination-free campuses, where every student, regardless of gender identity, can learn and grow without fear or prejudice. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Student’s Right to Hostel Accommodation Sadalaw • July 4, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on PIL to Regulate Deepfake Content Amid Rising AI Misuse Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Student’s Right to Hostel Accommodation Read More »

Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on PIL to Regulate Deepfake Content Amid Rising AI Misuse

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on PIL to Regulate Deepfake Content Amid Rising AI Misuse INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CCR, NUSRL, RANCHI Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT K&G TECHLAW PARTNERS Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Court Orders FIR Against Zed News and News18 for Defamatory Reporting During Operation Sindoor in Jammu & Kashmir Delhi High Court Rules Arbitration Clause Doesn’t Automatically Override Civil Court Jurisdiction Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on PIL to Regulate Deepfake Content Amid Rising AI Misuse KASHISH JAHAN 1 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India has sought the Centre’s response on a PIL demanding legal regulations for deepfake content. Learn how this move could shape India’s AI and digital misinformation laws. Supreme Court Demands Centre’s Stand on Regulating Deepfake Content In response to the increasing misuse of AI-generated fake videos, the Supreme Court of India has issued a notice to the Union Government on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). The plea calls for the creation of a comprehensive legal framework to regulate deepfake content, especially when used for character assassination and electoral misinformation. PIL Highlights Deepfake Threat to Privacy and Electoral Integrity The PIL, filed by a lawyer based in Delhi, underscores recent cases where deepfake videos of women, celebrities, and political leaders have gone viral. These fabricated videos have often been used to manipulate public perception, spread false information, and inflict reputational harm. Justice Sanjiv Khanna Warns of Deepfake Dangers A bench led by Justice Sanjiv Khanna emphasized the grave risks posed by deepfake technologies to privacy, freedom of speech, and the integrity of elections. The court noted the urgent need for India to implement strong digital content regulations in line with international best practices. Need for Clarity on Legal Coverage Under IT Act The Centre has been asked to explain whether the existing provisions under the Information Technology Act and its associated rules are sufficient to address AI-based fake content, or if new legislation is necessary to close existing legal loopholes. The matter is scheduled for further hearing in August. Experts Anticipate India’s First Deepfake Law Legal experts believe that this case could pave the way for India’s first dedicated law or policy targeting the misuse of deepfakes. The challenge lies in striking a delicate balance between freedom of expression and the right to privacy, ensuring that the digital public space remains trustworthy and secure. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on PIL to Regulate Deepfake Content Amid Rising AI Misuse Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on PIL to Regulate Deepfake Content Amid Rising AI Misuse Read More »

Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CCR, NUSRL, RANCHI Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT K&G TECHLAW PARTNERS Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Court Orders FIR Against Zed News and News18 for Defamatory Reporting During Operation Sindoor in Jammu & Kashmir Delhi High Court Rules Arbitration Clause Doesn’t Automatically Override Civil Court Jurisdiction Supreme Court Affirms Right to Close Business Under Article 19 of Indian Constitution Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture KASHISH JAHAN 1 JULY 2025 The Gujarat High Court has ordered a fresh SIT probe into the alleged custodial death of a 27-year-old Dalit man in Rajkot, highlighting critical concerns about police accountability and custodial violence in India. High Court Steps In Amid Allegations of Custodial Torture The Gujarat High Court has ordered the formation of a new Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the alleged custodial death of a 27-year-old Dalit man in Rajkot. The man died within 24 hours of being detained over a minor theft allegation. Family Alleges Torture and Post-Mortem Tampering According to the victim’s family, he was subjected to severe custodial torture. They also claimed that the post-mortem report was tampered with to conceal the actual cause of death, contradicting physical injuries and witness statements. Initial Police Investigation Under Scrutiny The original investigation conducted by the district police cleared all involved officers, citing natural causes. However, ongoing protests by Dalit rights groups and mounting public pressure prompted the victim’s family to petition the court for an independent probe. Justice Biren Vaishnav Highlights Major Lapses Justice Biren Vaishnav stated that initial findings pointed to procedural irregularities, destruction of CCTV footage, and conflicting witness testimonies. The court ordered that a new SIT, led by an independent IPS officer, be formed and that a detailed report be submitted within two months. Debate Rekindled Over Police Accountability in India This incident has reignited national debate on police accountability and custodial violence. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has frequently raised concerns over custodial deaths in India. The victim’s family called the court’s decision a “ray of hope for justice.” Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Gujarat High Court Orders Fresh SIT Probe Into Dalit Man’s Custodial Death Amid Allegations of Police Torture Read More »

Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Court Orders FIR Against Zed News and News18 for Defamatory Reporting During Operation Sindoor in Jammu & Kashmir Delhi High Court Rules Arbitration Clause Doesn’t Automatically Override Civil Court Jurisdiction Supreme Court Affirms Right to Close Business Under Article 19 of Indian Constitution Bombay High Court Halts Aarey Forest Demolition: Legal Win for Environment and Tribal Rights Delhi High Court Orders Centre to Draft Deepfake Guidelines: Major Step for Digital Privacy and Free Speech in India Supreme Court Clears Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code: A Historic Step Toward Gender Equality and Secular Law in India Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom KASHISH JAHAN 1 JULY 2025 The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR against an investigative journalist under the Official Secrets Act, marking a major victory for press freedom and free speech in India. A Landmark Ruling for Press Freedom in India In a major win for democratic values and the rights of the media, the Delhi High Court has quashed a First Information Report (FIR) filed against an investigative journalist under the Official Secrets Act (OSA). The journalist had published leaked government documents related to sensitive defense procurements. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani: Publishing Public Interest Documents Is Not a Crime Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, while hearing a joint plea by the journalist and a prominent media watchdog, stated that mere possession or publication of documents—if of public importance—does not violate the OSA. He emphasized that such actions are not criminal unless there is clear evidence of espionage or intent to harm national security. Background: FIR Filed After Journalist Exposed Defense Irregularities The FIR, originally filed in 2024, followed a series of investigative reports by the journalist that revealed alleged irregularities in defense procurement deals. These articles were based on internal files from the Ministry of Defence. While the government claimed the leaked documents posed a national security risk, several civil society organizations argued the exposé served the public interest. Reaffirming the Right to Free Speech and Journalistic Integrity The ruling is a significant reinforcement of the Supreme Court’s precedent in the landmark Vinod Dua judgment. The High Court emphasized that the right to report on matters of national relevance cannot be suppressed by the misuse of outdated secrecy laws like the OSA. Court Urges Clearer Guidelines for Press and National Security Balance The Court also directed the Central Government to establish clear, updated guidelines to ensure a fair balance between protecting national interests and respecting press freedom. Verdict Welcomed by Media Rights Groups The decision has been widely praised by media rights groups and legal experts as a reaffirmation that investigative journalism is not a threat to the state—it is a vital pillar of a transparent and democratic society. The verdict sends a strong message that journalism is not sedition or spying, but a safeguard of public accountability. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Official Secrets Act Case, Cites Press Freedom Read More »

Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Court Orders FIR Against Zed News and News18 for Defamatory Reporting During Operation Sindoor in Jammu & Kashmir Delhi High Court Rules Arbitration Clause Doesn’t Automatically Override Civil Court Jurisdiction Supreme Court Affirms Right to Close Business Under Article 19 of Indian Constitution Bombay High Court Halts Aarey Forest Demolition: Legal Win for Environment and Tribal Rights Delhi High Court Orders Centre to Draft Deepfake Guidelines: Major Step for Digital Privacy and Free Speech in India Supreme Court Clears Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code: A Historic Step Toward Gender Equality and Secular Law in India Supreme Court Reviews CAA Rules 2024: Fresh Petitions Challenge Citizenship Law on Constitutional Grounds Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India KASHISH JAHAN 1 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India has agreed to urgently hear a pivotal case challenging the exclusion of same-sex couples from adoption rights. This ruling could reshape India’s family law and LGBTQIA+ rights landscape. Supreme Court of India to Hear Petition on Same-Sex Adoption Rights In a significant move, the Supreme Court of India has agreed to urgently hear a new petition that challenges the denial of adoption rights to same-sex married couples. The petition calls into question the constitutional validity of India’s current family law framework, which excludes same-sex couples from legally adopting children. Petition Challenges Unequal Adoption Rights for LGBTQIA+ Couples Filed by a coalition of LGBTQIA+ rights activists and couples, the petition argues that despite the Court’s 2023 verdict recognizing civil unions for same-sex partners, the lack of adoption rights violates key constitutional protections—namely Article 14 (Right to Equality), Article 15 (Prohibition of Discrimination), and Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty). Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud Highlights Constitutional Morality The bench, led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, acknowledged the seriousness of the matter, calling it one that involves “important questions of constitutional morality and equal protection of law.” The court has scheduled a detailed hearing for mid-July 2025. Ongoing Discrimination Despite Recognition of Same-Sex Unions Petitioners emphasize that although they can now register as civil partners, they still face systemic discrimination when attempting to adopt from government-run or private agencies. This disparity undermines the spirit of the Court’s previous landmark rulings, including the Navtej Singh Johar (2018) case, which decriminalized homosexuality, and the Supriyo Chakraborty (2023) case, which recognized same-sex civil unions. Centre Cites Traditional Family Values in Opposition In its preliminary affidavit, the Indian government referenced the Juvenile Justice Act and the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, stating that these laws are based on “traditional family structures” that do not account for same-sex parenting. Potential Landmark in India’s LGBTQIA+ Civil Rights Journey If the Court rules in favor of the petitioners, it could significantly reshape India’s family law system and set a progressive precedent for the adoption rights of same-sex couples. This hearing could mark a historic milestone in the long-standing fight for equal civil rights for LGBTQIA+ individuals across the country. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court to Urgently Hear Petition on Same-Sex Couples’ Adoption Rights in India Read More »

Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Court Orders FIR Against Zed News and News18 for Defamatory Reporting During Operation Sindoor in Jammu & Kashmir Delhi High Court Rules Arbitration Clause Doesn’t Automatically Override Civil Court Jurisdiction Supreme Court Affirms Right to Close Business Under Article 19 of Indian Constitution Bombay High Court Halts Aarey Forest Demolition: Legal Win for Environment and Tribal Rights Delhi High Court Orders Centre to Draft Deepfake Guidelines: Major Step for Digital Privacy and Free Speech in India Supreme Court Clears Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code: A Historic Step Toward Gender Equality and Secular Law in India Supreme Court Reviews CAA Rules 2024: Fresh Petitions Challenge Citizenship Law on Constitutional Grounds Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam: Political Fallout and Fight Against Corruption Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom KASHISH JAHAN 1 JULY 2025 In a historic verdict, the Madras High Court affirms women’s constitutional right to participate in Tamil Nadu’s traditional temple chariot procession, striking down a discriminatory centuries-old ban. Historic Ruling by Madras High Court on Women’s Temple Entry In a landmark judgment, the Madras High Court has upheld the right of women to participate in the annual temple chariot procession at a centuries-old temple in Tamil Nadu. This progressive ruling overturns a long-standing ban that prevented women from pulling the sacred chariot ropes during the festival. Legal Challenge Based on Constitutional Rights A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by a group of female devotees. They argued that the restriction violated their fundamental rights under Article 14 (Right to Equality) and Article 25 (Freedom of Religion) of the Indian Constitution. The temple management, however, defended the ban as a “customary tradition” tied to ritual purity. Justice Anita Sumanth: Tradition Cannot Override the Constitution Delivering the verdict, Justice Anita Sumanth ruled that traditional customs cannot override the constitutionally protected rights of citizens. The Court emphasized that “constitutional morality must prevail over traditional patriarchy,” reinforcing the supremacy of gender equality and individual religious freedom. Inspiration from the Supreme Court’s Sabarimala Verdict The ruling draws parallels with the groundbreaking Sabarimala verdict by the Supreme Court of India, which allowed women of all ages to enter the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. Like that case, this decision marks a significant step forward in breaking gender barriers in religious practices. Support from Gender Rights Activists and Devotees The judgment has been celebrated by gender rights groups and devotees across the country. Advocates hailed it as a powerful move against outdated and discriminatory religious norms that restrict women’s participation in sacred rituals and festivals. Temple Authorities Ordered to Facilitate Women’s Participation In closing, the Court directed temple authorities to ensure the smooth and safe inclusion of women in this year’s temple festival, scheduled to begin next week. This ensures immediate enforcement of the ruling and sets a strong precedent for inclusive temple practices across India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Telangana High Court Cancels Free Land Allotment to IAMC Hyderabad in Landmark Ruling Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Court Orders FIR Against Zed News and News18 for Defamatory Reporting During Operation Sindoor in Jammu & Kashmir Sada Law • July 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Madras High Court Allows Women to Join Temple Chariot Festival, Citing Equality and Religious Freedom Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote