sadalawpublications.com

Live cases

Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch

Trending Today Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch NITU KUMARI 21 Apr 2025 At a recent book launch, Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna highlighted the increasing presence of women in traditionally male-dominated fields, stressing that this shift is not an intrusion but a rightful restitution after years of patriarchal exclusion. Women’s Presence in Judiciary and Boardrooms: Reclaiming Spaces Judge BV Nagarathna emphasized that women entering the judiciary, boardrooms, and other influential sectors are not intruding but reclaiming spaces that were once inaccessible due to systemic gender discrimination. She pointed out how language often frames women’s participation in power structures as an “intrusion,” such as describing women “entering” the judiciary or “claiming” seats in boardrooms. This narrative, she argued, subtly suggests that these spaces were never meant for women. However, Nagarathna strongly disagrees with this view, asserting that women are not outsiders but legitimate participants in all spheres of power. She dismissed outdated stereotypes that suggest men are inherently better decision-makers or leaders. Instead, she emphasized that women are citizens, contributors, and leaders in their own right, deserving of their place in these domains. Breaking Down Patriarchal Barriers Justice Nagarathna believes that the growing presence of women in leadership roles is not about expanding boundaries but about dismantling long-standing patriarchal barriers that excluded them for generations. “Every woman stepping into a courtroom, legislature, or boardroom today is not expanding her boundaries—she is reclaiming her fair share of this nation’s intellectual and institutional legacy,” she remarked. The Need for Gender Equality in India: Implementing the 33% Reservation At the book launch, Justice Nagarathna also discussed the importance of the Constitution (128th Amendment) Act, 2023, which proposes a 33% reservation for women in the Indian Parliament and State legislatures. She argued that the passage of this amendment would mark the end of centuries of struggle for gender equality in India. “We are not anti-men. We are pro-women,” Justice Nagarathna stated, stressing that the implementation of this amendment would significantly advance the cause of women’s rights and political representation. Addressing the Abuse of Legal Provisions Justice Nagarathna also raised concerns about the misuse of legal provisions, particularly Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with cruelty committed by a husband or his family against a woman. With the recent replacement of this law by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, she emphasized the need for the judiciary to carefully discern between false claims and legitimate pleas for justice. She called for a balanced approach in handling such cases to ensure the protection of both women’s rights and the integrity of the law. Empowering Women Through Legal Knowledge The book launch featured Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani, author of Women Laws from the Womb to the Tomb: Rights and Remedies. Pavani shared how her book aims to empower women by providing them with crucial knowledge about their legal rights, often obscured by a lack of awareness. She highlighted that the book was written for every woman who dreams of a brighter future and seeks to understand her legal entitlements. Legal Empowerment for Every Woman Retired Supreme Court Judge Justice Hima Kohli introduced Pavani’s book, praising its ability to make complex legal concepts accessible to a wider audience, particularly women. She noted that, despite the sophistication of the law, it remains largely inaccessible to the general population. Pavani’s book bridges this gap, offering a comprehensive guide on legal issues such as reproductive rights, sexual harassment, marital rape, and bride trafficking. Justice Kohli emphasized that the book serves as a valuable resource for legislators, students, citizens, and attorneys alike. Its 25 chapters not only inform but also humanize women’s rights, filling a significant void in legal knowledge for many. The Lasting Impact of Women in Law and Leadership Justice KV Viswanathan, who also attended the event, remarked on the profound impact that women’s involvement in traditionally male-dominated fields has had on public life, science, the arts, and law. He lauded the growing number of women making strides in these sectors, noting that their contributions have transformed these fields in incalculable ways. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch Read More »

Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered

Trending Today Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered MAHI SINHA 21 Apr 2025 Delhi Court Stunned by Accused’s Threats After Conviction A Delhi court witnessed a shocking incident when a convict, recently sentenced in a cheque bounce case, verbally abused and threatened Judicial Magistrate Shivangi Mangla inside the courtroom. The disturbing behavior unfolded after the accused was found guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to 22 months of imprisonment along with a ₹6.65 lakh fine. Shocking Courtroom Misconduct by Convict and Lawyer Following the announcement of the verdict, the convict displayed violent behavior, even attempting to throw an object toward the judge. In a shocking statement recorded in the court’s order dated April 2, the accused allegedly told the judge: “Tu hai kya cheez… bahar mil, dekhte hai kaise zinda ghar jaati hai…” This direct threat to the female judge left the court in disbelief. The accused further instructed his attorney to “do whatever it takes” to secure a favorable ruling. Judge Harassed and Pressured to Resign According to the court’s observations, both the convict and his lawyer repeatedly harassed Judge Shivangi Mangla after the sentencing. They attempted to coerce her into changing the verdict and even pressured her to resign by threatening to file false complaints. Despite the intimidation, Judge Mangla stood her ground, stating in her order: “Still, the undersigned stands against all the odds and always does the needful in favor of justice.” NCW and Legal Action Underway In response to the threats and harassment, the judge has directed the matter to the National Commission for Women, Delhi. The commission is expected to initiate appropriate action against the accused for his conduct toward the female judicial officer. Show-Cause Notice to Accused’s Lawyer Adding to the seriousness of the incident, the court has also issued a show-cause notice to the convict’s lawyer, Atul Kumar, asking him to explain his behavior. The court has questioned why he should not face criminal contempt charges for his misconduct. “Court notice be issued to counsel for accused Sh. Atul Kumar… to explain why he shall not be referred to the Hon’ble High Court for initiating criminal contempt proceedings.” He is expected to respond on the next hearing date. Conclusion This incident raises serious concerns about judicial safety, especially for women judges. The case also highlights the importance of strict enforcement of contempt of court laws and protection of judicial officers. As legal proceedings continue, the National Commission for Women will play a crucial role in ensuring justice for the threatened judge. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Sadalaw Publications • April 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Read More »

Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court

Trending Today Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court MAHI SINHA 21 Apr 2025 Overview of the Court Verdict In a strong move to uphold judicial dignity, the Allahabad High Court‘s Lucknow bench sentenced lawyer Ashok Pandey to six months of simple imprisonment for criminal contempt. The ruling, delivered on April 19, 2025, stems from a 2021 contempt case in which Pandey used offensive language and made derogatory remarks during an open court session. What Did the Lawyer Say? Pandey reportedly said that “the judges are behaving like goondas,” a statement the court deemed highly inappropriate and disrespectful. His comments were seen as a direct attack on the integrity of the judiciary and disrupted the decorum of the courtroom. Court’s Ruling and Penalties Imposed The division bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Brij Raj Singh directed Pandey to: Serve six months of simple imprisonment Pay a fine of ₹2,000 Face an additional one-month jail term if the fine isn’t paid within a month In addition, the court asked why Pandey should not be barred from practicing law for three years at the Allahabad High Court and its Lucknow bench. Court’s Observation on Repeated Misconduct The court stated that this was not an isolated incident. Pandey had reportedly shown similar misconduct in the past, indicating a pattern of behavior that undermines judicial authority. The contempt jurisdiction, as emphasized by the bench, is meant to protect public trust in the legal system—not individual judges. Next Steps in the Case Pandey has been instructed to: Submit his response to the court’s notice Appear in person at the next hearing scheduled for May 1, 2025 Action Taken by the Court Administration To ensure transparency and enforcement, the court ordered that a copy of the ruling be forwarded to the Registrar General and senior registrars of both the Allahabad and Lucknow benches. Conclusion The Allahabad High Court has taken a firm stand on contempt of court, sending a strong message that disrespect towards the judiciary will not be tolerated. This case is a reminder of the importance of maintaining courtroom decorum and upholding the sanctity of legal institutions. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Sadalaw Publications • April 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Sadalaw Publications • April 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Read More »

Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India

Trending Today Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India MAHI SINHA 20 Apr 2025 Introduction: A Landmark Moment for Indian Judiciary In a time when public trust in institutions is under scrutiny, the Supreme Court of India has taken a historic step to strengthen judicial transparency and accountability. On April 1, 2025, during a full-court meeting, all Supreme Court judges unanimously agreed to declare their personal assets publicly—a move that is already earning widespread praise. Why This Decision Is a Big Deal   Breaking the Norms of Secrecy While civil servants and politicians in India are routinely required to disclose their assets, the higher judiciary has traditionally remained exempt. The Supreme Court’s decision to change that narrative breaks long-standing norms and signals a new era of openness. A Message of Integrity and Accountability By voluntarily sharing their assets, Supreme Court judges are making a strong statement of integrity. They are showing the nation that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done—by those who deliver it. What This Means for the Public   Rebuilding Public Trust in the Judiciary In a country where concerns over corruption and misuse of power often dominate headlines, this decision serves as a powerful tool to rebuild public confidence. Citizens now have an opportunity to see that the judiciary is willing to hold itself to the same standards of honesty, fairness, and transparency that it expects from others. Aligning With Global Standards Globally, judicial transparency is a key element of a trustworthy legal system. By taking this initiative, India’s Supreme Court joins a growing number of judiciaries around the world that are working to become more transparent and accountable to the people they serve. Final Thoughts: A Statement, Not Just a Step This is not merely a procedural change—it’s a symbolic and transformative statement. The Supreme Court judges’ decision to disclose their assets could mark the beginning of a wider cultural shift in Indian governance, where transparency becomes the norm, not the exception. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Sadalaw Publications • April 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Sadalaw Publications • April 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Sadalaw Publications • April 18, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Read More »

Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay

Trending Today Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay MAHI SINHA 19 Apr 2025 Introduction In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has intervened in the controversial demolition of the Hazrat Satpeer Sayed Baba Dargah in Nashik, Maharashtra. The court questioned the Bombay High Court regarding allegations that a plea filed to prevent the demolition was not given urgent consideration, raising serious concerns about judicial response and due process. Background of the Case Case Title: Hazrat Satpeer Sayed Baba Dargah v. Nashik Municipal Corporation and Another On April 1, 2025, the Nashik Municipal Corporation issued a demolition notice to the historic dargah. In response, the dargah administration promptly filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court on April 7. However, their urgent request for case listing was allegedly denied on April 9, prompting them to approach the Supreme Court. Supreme Court’s Response and Interim Relief On April 16, the matter was heard by Justice P. S. Narasimha and Justice Joymalya Bagchi. The bench expressed surprise at the apparent delay in listing the plea, especially considering the religious and cultural importance of the structure in question. “We can’t comprehend what happened between April 9 and now,” the bench noted, emphasizing the urgency due to the impending demolition of a holy site. Citing the seriousness of the claim—that the High Court failed to list the matter despite repeated requests—the Supreme Court issued an interim stay order, temporarily halting the demolition. Supreme Court Seeks Accountability The bench highlighted the gravity of the petitioner’s claims and insisted that the senior counsel take responsibility for the statements made: “This is a significant statement. The learned counsel will accept responsibility for the fallout.” The Registrar General of the Bombay High Court has now been directed to submit a detailed report on the status of the plea’s listing. The matter will be heard again on April 21, 2025. Demolition Already Executed? Adding to the controversy, several media reports claim that the dargah was demolished just hours before the Supreme Court issued its stay order. If confirmed, this may lead to further judicial scrutiny and potential consequences for the municipal authorities. The petitioner is being represented by Senior Advocate Navin Pahwa and Advocate-on-Record Jasmeet Singh (currently no Wikipedia pages available). Conclusion The Supreme Court’s proactive stance in questioning procedural lapses and issuing an interim stay underlines the importance of judicial transparency, religious freedom, and due process. With a final hearing scheduled, all eyes will be on the upcoming developments in this sensitive legal battle. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Sadalaw Publications • April 18, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Sadalaw Publications • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Sadalaw Publications • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Read More »

RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad

Trending Today RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Supreme Court Verdict on Same-Sex Marriage in India: Supriyo vs Union of India Case Explained A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad MAHI SINHA 18 Apr 2025 RCB vs Uber: Delhi High Court Case Over Alleged Trademark Defamation in YouTube Ad RCB has filed a trademark defamation case against Uber in the Delhi High Court over its viral “Baddies in Bengaluru ft. Travis Head” ad. Learn why RCB claims the ad damages its brand and how Uber is defending its creative freedom. Background: RCB Files Lawsuit Against Uber Over YouTube Ad In a high-profile legal dispute, Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) has taken Uber to the Delhi High Court over a YouTube advertisement titled “Baddies in Bengaluru ft. Travis Head.” According to RCB, the ad allegedly defamed the franchise’s trademark and portrayed the team in a derogatory manner. The Indian Premier League (IPL) team filed for an interim injunction—a court order to restrain Uber from airing the ad—but the High Court has withheld its decision for now. What Sparked the Controversy? The ad in question features Travis Head, a Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) batter and former RCB player, pulling pranks ahead of an IPL match between Bengaluru and Hyderabad. In the video, Travis—nicknamed the “Hyderabaddie”—is shown wearing flashy gold chains and white attire while entering the stadium with his “gang.” What triggered the legal battle was the visible alteration of match signage that originally read “Bengaluru vs Hyderabad,” defaced to read “Royally Challenged Bengaluru vs Hyderabad.” RCB claims this directly mocks their trademarked name, “Royal Challengers Bengaluru,” and affects the team’s public image. RCB’s Legal Stand Representing RCB, advocate Shwetasree Majumder argued that the term “Royally Challenged” was a mockery of the team’s trademark and that Uber—being a commercial sponsor of SRH—had no legal right to use or parody RCB’s brand identity. Majumder stated: “There were countless inventive ways to create an ad. Was it necessary to use our trademark and a former player to target us?” She emphasized that public comments under the video make it clear the ad was perceived as disparaging RCB, not just a creative take. Uber’s Defense: It’s Just a Joke Uber, on the other hand, dismissed the lawsuit as preposterous, claiming that the advertisement is protected under the right to commercial free speech. According to Uber’s legal counsel: “The term ‘Royally Challenged’ has been used before in media commentary, and Travis Head wasn’t mocking the team but rather hyping up the upcoming match.” Uber also emphasized that the use of satire and humor is well within the bounds of creative advertising and does not constitute trademark infringement. What’s at Stake for Both Sides?   For RCB: Protection of brand integrity Preventing misleading associations with rival franchises Addressing public perception in a high-visibility tournament like the IPL For Uber: Upholding creative freedom in advertising Defending the legitimacy of satire and parody in sports marketing Avoiding a legal precedent that restricts promotional creativity With the ad surpassing 54 million views on Instagram alone, the case has gained massive attention from fans, media, and legal experts alike. Conclusion: Satire or Trademark Violation? This case raises important questions around trademark usage, advertising freedom, and the fine line between satire and defamation in the world of sports marketing. While the Delhi High Court has yet to make a final ruling, the outcome could set a crucial precedent for how brands interact with sports franchises in promotional content moving forward. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sanoj kumar paul. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Sanoj kumar paul • April 18, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Read More »

Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking

Trending Today Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Supreme Court Verdict on Same-Sex Marriage in India: Supriyo vs Union of India Case Explained A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work Murshidabad Waqf Bill Protest: Families Mourn Loved Ones Amid Violent Clashes and Police Inaction Bombay High Court Acquits Father in Minor Daughter’s Rape Case: Legal Loopholes vs Child Protection Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking MAHI SINHA 17 Apr 2025 PINKI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR | CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1927 OF 2025 On Tuesday, April 15, the Supreme Court of India issued a strict order to stop newborn trafficking, declaring that hospitals that are discovered to be involved in such horrible activities shall immediately have their licenses revoked. The Court underlined that any case of baby trafficking from a hospital must result in both legal repercussions and regulatory measures, such as the facility’s operating license being suspended.According to the bench’s ruling, which was signed by Justices J. B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, if a newborn baby is smuggled from a hospital, the facility shall be immediately subject to a suspension of its operating license in addition to other legal measures. The Court further emphasized the duty of care that healthcare facilities have, noting that when a woman gives birth in a hospital, the facility’s administration has an obligation to safeguard the newborn in every way.While rescinding the bail granted to thirteen individuals accused of child trafficking throughout the State of Uttar Pradesh, the court made this statement. The Court remarked that the State of Uttar Pradesh did not handle the issue seriously and criticized the State for not contesting the bail rulings. The Allahabad High Court was also criticized by the court for awarding the defendants bail in a “very callous manner”.Referring to an April 14 Times of India story, the Court noted that a large gang seemed to be operating dangerously both inside and outside of Delhi, selling trafficked babies and children in several States for prices ranging from Rs. 5,00,000 to Rs. 10,000,000. The Court observed that the traffickers in the current child abduction ring are well connected via their smartphones, exchanging whereabouts, photos, money transfers, and other information. They demonstrate that they understand technology, recognize demand, and understand the need of working as a network by their operations and the relative ease with which they are able to function and find purchasers for the children they sell outside of their states. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Read More »

National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi

Trending Today National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Supreme Court Verdict on Same-Sex Marriage in India: Supriyo vs Union of India Case Explained A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work Murshidabad Waqf Bill Protest: Families Mourn Loved Ones Amid Violent Clashes and Police Inaction Bombay High Court Acquits Father in Minor Daughter’s Rape Case: Legal Loopholes vs Child Protection Lily Thomas vs Union of India: Landmark Supreme Court Verdict That Transformed Indian Election Law National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi NITU KUMARI 17 Apr 2025 BJP leader Subramanian Swamy has alleged that there was misappropriation of assets of over ₹2,000 crore in an equity transaction.In the National Herald money laundering case, Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi were the targets of a prosecution complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Tuesday.Sam Pitroda of Congress and a number of other people have also been named in the complaint, according to sources.Vishal Gogne, the Rouse Avenue Courts‘ Special Judge (PC Act), reviewed the case today and stated that it will be heard again on April 25 to consider the cognisance aspect.“A fresh prosecution complaint under sections 44 and 45 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002 for commission of offence of money laundering as defined under section 3 read with section 70 and punishable under section 4 of PMLA, 2002 filed by the ED, has been received by way of assignment. Let the complaint be checked and registered,” the Court said. The National Herald case pertains to the assignment of a ₹90 crore loan advanced by the Congress party to Associated Journals Ltd (AJL) – owner of the National Herald – to Young Indian for a consideration of ₹50 lakh.It has been alleged that there was misappropriation of assets of over ₹2,000 crore in an equity transaction.Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Motilal Vora, Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and the Gandhi family-controlled Young Indian were all charged by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy in his private complaint with defrauding, criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, and property theft.The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate is currently hearing the trial in the predicate criminal case at Rouse Avenue Court.Judge Gogne pointed out that the predicate offense must be tried in the same court that has jurisdiction over the money laundering offense under Section 3 of the PMLA, as required by Section 44(1)(c) of the PMLA.He went on to say that the same jurisdiction must decide both offenses.In the meantime, the ED attorney stated that he would submit a request to transfer the case to the Principal District & Sessions Judge.On April 25, the case will be heard again. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Read More »

Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts

Trending Today Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Supreme Court Verdict on Same-Sex Marriage in India: Supriyo vs Union of India Case Explained A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work Murshidabad Waqf Bill Protest: Families Mourn Loved Ones Amid Violent Clashes and Police Inaction Bombay High Court Acquits Father in Minor Daughter’s Rape Case: Legal Loopholes vs Child Protection Lily Thomas vs Union of India: Landmark Supreme Court Verdict That Transformed Indian Election Law Supreme Court Landmark Ruling: Tamil Nadu Laws Enacted Without Governor’s Assent for the First Time in India Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts MAHI SINHA 17 Apr 2025 In order to continue hearing arguments at 2:00 p.m. on April 17, the Supreme Court asked the Center if Muslims would be permitted to participate in Hindu religious trusts. On Wednesday, April 16, 2025, the Supreme Court intended to order that assets designated as waqf, including “waqf by user,” not be de-notified. The Center objected to the proposal and requested a hearing before such a direction was issued. The Supreme Court also questioned the Center about the possibility of Muslim participation in Hindu religious trusts. When the top court took up the case, it also voiced concern over the violence that ensued after the law was passed and described it as unsettling. At 2 p.m. on April 17, the highest court will resume hearing arguments about appeals against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. On April 3, 2025, 288 members of the Lok Sabha and 232 members of the Rajya Sabha voted in favor of the Bill, whereas on April 4, 2025, 128 members voted against it. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Read More »

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Supreme Court Verdict on Same-Sex Marriage in India: Supriyo vs Union of India Case Explained A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work Murshidabad Waqf Bill Protest: Families Mourn Loved Ones Amid Violent Clashes and Police Inaction Bombay High Court Acquits Father in Minor Daughter’s Rape Case: Legal Loopholes vs Child Protection Lily Thomas vs Union of India: Landmark Supreme Court Verdict That Transformed Indian Election Law Supreme Court Landmark Ruling: Tamil Nadu Laws Enacted Without Governor’s Assent for the First Time in India Karnataka High Court: Professors Not Public Officers, Quo Warranto Writ Inapplicable in Academic Appointments Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 NITU KUMARI 16 Apr 2025 Courts will have to look into allegations of misuse of such legal provisions on a case to case basis, the Supreme Court said.On Tuesday, the Supreme Court declared that Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which makes cruelty to women by their husbands or their relatives illegal, does not violate Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh‘s bench was considering a petition that raised concerns about women allegedly abusing the law in matrimonial disputes, specifically Section 498A of the IPC.“The court finds no reason to interfere. The plea that such provision (Section 498A IPC) is violative of Article 14 of Constitution is wholly misconceived and misdirected. Article 15 explicitly empowers to enact a special law for protection of women, etc. This (misuse) needs to be examined on case-to-case basis,” the Court said while rejecting the plea. The petitioner’s attorney argued that only women in India have the legal right to file a complaint against domestic abuse, whereas in many other nations, anyone, regardless of gender, can do so.However, the Court said,“We maintain our sovereignty. Why should we follow other others, they should follow us.” The Court further stated that any law can be abused, and that the courts must consider these claims of abuse on an individual basis.It also emphasized the positive purpose of such clauses, such as safeguarding women from “bad practices” in the community. “There are cases of misuse of every law. Do you want us to make sweeping statements? There may be instance where the women have been victimised. There might be cases where the provision would have been misused. So it is the duty of the court to decide each case based on its peculiar facts,” the Court remarked. Crucially, a number of courts, including the highest courts, have previously noted how women have abused domestic violence laws to target their husbands and in-laws. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Read More »