sadalawpublications.com

Sadalaw Publications

Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch

Trending Today Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch NITU KUMARI 21 Apr 2025 At a recent book launch, Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna highlighted the increasing presence of women in traditionally male-dominated fields, stressing that this shift is not an intrusion but a rightful restitution after years of patriarchal exclusion. Women’s Presence in Judiciary and Boardrooms: Reclaiming Spaces Judge BV Nagarathna emphasized that women entering the judiciary, boardrooms, and other influential sectors are not intruding but reclaiming spaces that were once inaccessible due to systemic gender discrimination. She pointed out how language often frames women’s participation in power structures as an “intrusion,” such as describing women “entering” the judiciary or “claiming” seats in boardrooms. This narrative, she argued, subtly suggests that these spaces were never meant for women. However, Nagarathna strongly disagrees with this view, asserting that women are not outsiders but legitimate participants in all spheres of power. She dismissed outdated stereotypes that suggest men are inherently better decision-makers or leaders. Instead, she emphasized that women are citizens, contributors, and leaders in their own right, deserving of their place in these domains. Breaking Down Patriarchal Barriers Justice Nagarathna believes that the growing presence of women in leadership roles is not about expanding boundaries but about dismantling long-standing patriarchal barriers that excluded them for generations. “Every woman stepping into a courtroom, legislature, or boardroom today is not expanding her boundaries—she is reclaiming her fair share of this nation’s intellectual and institutional legacy,” she remarked. The Need for Gender Equality in India: Implementing the 33% Reservation At the book launch, Justice Nagarathna also discussed the importance of the Constitution (128th Amendment) Act, 2023, which proposes a 33% reservation for women in the Indian Parliament and State legislatures. She argued that the passage of this amendment would mark the end of centuries of struggle for gender equality in India. “We are not anti-men. We are pro-women,” Justice Nagarathna stated, stressing that the implementation of this amendment would significantly advance the cause of women’s rights and political representation. Addressing the Abuse of Legal Provisions Justice Nagarathna also raised concerns about the misuse of legal provisions, particularly Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with cruelty committed by a husband or his family against a woman. With the recent replacement of this law by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, she emphasized the need for the judiciary to carefully discern between false claims and legitimate pleas for justice. She called for a balanced approach in handling such cases to ensure the protection of both women’s rights and the integrity of the law. Empowering Women Through Legal Knowledge The book launch featured Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani, author of Women Laws from the Womb to the Tomb: Rights and Remedies. Pavani shared how her book aims to empower women by providing them with crucial knowledge about their legal rights, often obscured by a lack of awareness. She highlighted that the book was written for every woman who dreams of a brighter future and seeks to understand her legal entitlements. Legal Empowerment for Every Woman Retired Supreme Court Judge Justice Hima Kohli introduced Pavani’s book, praising its ability to make complex legal concepts accessible to a wider audience, particularly women. She noted that, despite the sophistication of the law, it remains largely inaccessible to the general population. Pavani’s book bridges this gap, offering a comprehensive guide on legal issues such as reproductive rights, sexual harassment, marital rape, and bride trafficking. Justice Kohli emphasized that the book serves as a valuable resource for legislators, students, citizens, and attorneys alike. Its 25 chapters not only inform but also humanize women’s rights, filling a significant void in legal knowledge for many. The Lasting Impact of Women in Law and Leadership Justice KV Viswanathan, who also attended the event, remarked on the profound impact that women’s involvement in traditionally male-dominated fields has had on public life, science, the arts, and law. He lauded the growing number of women making strides in these sectors, noting that their contributions have transformed these fields in incalculable ways. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch Read More »

Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered

Trending Today Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered MAHI SINHA 21 Apr 2025 Delhi Court Stunned by Accused’s Threats After Conviction A Delhi court witnessed a shocking incident when a convict, recently sentenced in a cheque bounce case, verbally abused and threatened Judicial Magistrate Shivangi Mangla inside the courtroom. The disturbing behavior unfolded after the accused was found guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to 22 months of imprisonment along with a ₹6.65 lakh fine. Shocking Courtroom Misconduct by Convict and Lawyer Following the announcement of the verdict, the convict displayed violent behavior, even attempting to throw an object toward the judge. In a shocking statement recorded in the court’s order dated April 2, the accused allegedly told the judge: “Tu hai kya cheez… bahar mil, dekhte hai kaise zinda ghar jaati hai…” This direct threat to the female judge left the court in disbelief. The accused further instructed his attorney to “do whatever it takes” to secure a favorable ruling. Judge Harassed and Pressured to Resign According to the court’s observations, both the convict and his lawyer repeatedly harassed Judge Shivangi Mangla after the sentencing. They attempted to coerce her into changing the verdict and even pressured her to resign by threatening to file false complaints. Despite the intimidation, Judge Mangla stood her ground, stating in her order: “Still, the undersigned stands against all the odds and always does the needful in favor of justice.” NCW and Legal Action Underway In response to the threats and harassment, the judge has directed the matter to the National Commission for Women, Delhi. The commission is expected to initiate appropriate action against the accused for his conduct toward the female judicial officer. Show-Cause Notice to Accused’s Lawyer Adding to the seriousness of the incident, the court has also issued a show-cause notice to the convict’s lawyer, Atul Kumar, asking him to explain his behavior. The court has questioned why he should not face criminal contempt charges for his misconduct. “Court notice be issued to counsel for accused Sh. Atul Kumar… to explain why he shall not be referred to the Hon’ble High Court for initiating criminal contempt proceedings.” He is expected to respond on the next hearing date. Conclusion This incident raises serious concerns about judicial safety, especially for women judges. The case also highlights the importance of strict enforcement of contempt of court laws and protection of judicial officers. As legal proceedings continue, the National Commission for Women will play a crucial role in ensuring justice for the threatened judge. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Sadalaw Publications • April 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Read More »

Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court

Trending Today Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court MAHI SINHA 21 Apr 2025 Overview of the Court Verdict In a strong move to uphold judicial dignity, the Allahabad High Court‘s Lucknow bench sentenced lawyer Ashok Pandey to six months of simple imprisonment for criminal contempt. The ruling, delivered on April 19, 2025, stems from a 2021 contempt case in which Pandey used offensive language and made derogatory remarks during an open court session. What Did the Lawyer Say? Pandey reportedly said that “the judges are behaving like goondas,” a statement the court deemed highly inappropriate and disrespectful. His comments were seen as a direct attack on the integrity of the judiciary and disrupted the decorum of the courtroom. Court’s Ruling and Penalties Imposed The division bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Brij Raj Singh directed Pandey to: Serve six months of simple imprisonment Pay a fine of ₹2,000 Face an additional one-month jail term if the fine isn’t paid within a month In addition, the court asked why Pandey should not be barred from practicing law for three years at the Allahabad High Court and its Lucknow bench. Court’s Observation on Repeated Misconduct The court stated that this was not an isolated incident. Pandey had reportedly shown similar misconduct in the past, indicating a pattern of behavior that undermines judicial authority. The contempt jurisdiction, as emphasized by the bench, is meant to protect public trust in the legal system—not individual judges. Next Steps in the Case Pandey has been instructed to: Submit his response to the court’s notice Appear in person at the next hearing scheduled for May 1, 2025 Action Taken by the Court Administration To ensure transparency and enforcement, the court ordered that a copy of the ruling be forwarded to the Registrar General and senior registrars of both the Allahabad and Lucknow benches. Conclusion The Allahabad High Court has taken a firm stand on contempt of court, sending a strong message that disrespect towards the judiciary will not be tolerated. This case is a reminder of the importance of maintaining courtroom decorum and upholding the sanctity of legal institutions. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Sadalaw Publications • April 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Sadalaw Publications • April 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Sadalaw Publications • April 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Read More »

Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India

Trending Today Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India MAHI SINHA 20 Apr 2025 Introduction: A Landmark Moment for Indian Judiciary In a time when public trust in institutions is under scrutiny, the Supreme Court of India has taken a historic step to strengthen judicial transparency and accountability. On April 1, 2025, during a full-court meeting, all Supreme Court judges unanimously agreed to declare their personal assets publicly—a move that is already earning widespread praise. Why This Decision Is a Big Deal   Breaking the Norms of Secrecy While civil servants and politicians in India are routinely required to disclose their assets, the higher judiciary has traditionally remained exempt. The Supreme Court’s decision to change that narrative breaks long-standing norms and signals a new era of openness. A Message of Integrity and Accountability By voluntarily sharing their assets, Supreme Court judges are making a strong statement of integrity. They are showing the nation that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done—by those who deliver it. What This Means for the Public   Rebuilding Public Trust in the Judiciary In a country where concerns over corruption and misuse of power often dominate headlines, this decision serves as a powerful tool to rebuild public confidence. Citizens now have an opportunity to see that the judiciary is willing to hold itself to the same standards of honesty, fairness, and transparency that it expects from others. Aligning With Global Standards Globally, judicial transparency is a key element of a trustworthy legal system. By taking this initiative, India’s Supreme Court joins a growing number of judiciaries around the world that are working to become more transparent and accountable to the people they serve. Final Thoughts: A Statement, Not Just a Step This is not merely a procedural change—it’s a symbolic and transformative statement. The Supreme Court judges’ decision to disclose their assets could mark the beginning of a wider cultural shift in Indian governance, where transparency becomes the norm, not the exception. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Sadalaw Publications • April 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Sadalaw Publications • April 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Sadalaw Publications • April 18, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Read More »

Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay

Trending Today Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay MAHI SINHA 19 Apr 2025 Introduction In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has intervened in the controversial demolition of the Hazrat Satpeer Sayed Baba Dargah in Nashik, Maharashtra. The court questioned the Bombay High Court regarding allegations that a plea filed to prevent the demolition was not given urgent consideration, raising serious concerns about judicial response and due process. Background of the Case Case Title: Hazrat Satpeer Sayed Baba Dargah v. Nashik Municipal Corporation and Another On April 1, 2025, the Nashik Municipal Corporation issued a demolition notice to the historic dargah. In response, the dargah administration promptly filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court on April 7. However, their urgent request for case listing was allegedly denied on April 9, prompting them to approach the Supreme Court. Supreme Court’s Response and Interim Relief On April 16, the matter was heard by Justice P. S. Narasimha and Justice Joymalya Bagchi. The bench expressed surprise at the apparent delay in listing the plea, especially considering the religious and cultural importance of the structure in question. “We can’t comprehend what happened between April 9 and now,” the bench noted, emphasizing the urgency due to the impending demolition of a holy site. Citing the seriousness of the claim—that the High Court failed to list the matter despite repeated requests—the Supreme Court issued an interim stay order, temporarily halting the demolition. Supreme Court Seeks Accountability The bench highlighted the gravity of the petitioner’s claims and insisted that the senior counsel take responsibility for the statements made: “This is a significant statement. The learned counsel will accept responsibility for the fallout.” The Registrar General of the Bombay High Court has now been directed to submit a detailed report on the status of the plea’s listing. The matter will be heard again on April 21, 2025. Demolition Already Executed? Adding to the controversy, several media reports claim that the dargah was demolished just hours before the Supreme Court issued its stay order. If confirmed, this may lead to further judicial scrutiny and potential consequences for the municipal authorities. The petitioner is being represented by Senior Advocate Navin Pahwa and Advocate-on-Record Jasmeet Singh (currently no Wikipedia pages available). Conclusion The Supreme Court’s proactive stance in questioning procedural lapses and issuing an interim stay underlines the importance of judicial transparency, religious freedom, and due process. With a final hearing scheduled, all eyes will be on the upcoming developments in this sensitive legal battle. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Sadalaw Publications • April 18, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Sadalaw Publications • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Sadalaw Publications • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Read More »

Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts

Trending Today Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts 19 Apr 2025 Yashasvi Panwar Understanding the Laws Governing Wildlife Conservation in India Wildlife conservation in India plays a vital role in preserving biodiversity and maintaining ecological balance. As one of the most biodiverse nations, India is home to iconic species such as the Bengal tiger, Asian elephant, and Indian rhinoceros. Conservation efforts aim to curb threats like poaching, deforestation, pollution, and climate change. India’s approach to wildlife conservation involves scientific methods, habitat protection, and legislation. It is not only about saving animals—it contributes to sustainable development, tourism, ecosystem services, and community well-being. The Importance of Wildlife Conservation in India India holds nearly 8% of the world’s biodiversity. Projects like Project Tiger and Project Elephant have been instrumental in protecting endangered species. Notably, India’s tiger population rose from 1,706 in 2010 to 3,682 in 2022. Human-Wildlife Conflict and Technological Solutions Conflicts, especially in states like Kerala and Assam, often result in casualties on both sides. In Kerala, about 50 elephants and 50 people die annually due to such encounters. Innovative tools like the Haati App alert locals about elephant movements, reducing risk and enhancing coexistence. Funding Challenges Despite success stories, funding remains a challenge. The Wildlife Habitat Development Fund decreased from ₹165 crore in 2018–19 to just ₹56 crore in 2022–23. Strengthening public participation and government commitment is essential. Constitutional Provisions for Wildlife Protection   Article 48A This Directive Principle mandates the State to protect the environment and wildlife. Article 51A(g) Citizens have a fundamental duty to safeguard forests, lakes, rivers, and wildlife. Article 21 The Supreme Court of India has interpreted the Right to Life to include the right to a healthy environment, linking it directly to wildlife conservation. Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: The Cornerstone Law The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 offers comprehensive protection to wild animals, birds, and plants. It classifies species under six schedules, with Schedule I and II providing the highest protection and severe penalties. Key Provisions: Prohibition on hunting endangered species. Establishment of national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, and community reserves. Community involvement through conservation reserves. Regulation of wildlife trade in line with CITES. Empowerment of forest officials for enforcement. Supporting Environmental Laws   The Indian Forest Act, 1927 Focuses on forest conservation and management. Forests are crucial habitats, and this act indirectly supports biodiversity protection. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Prevents forest land diversion without Central Government approval, protecting natural habitats. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Empowers the central government to protect and improve environmental quality, especially after disasters like the Bhopal Gas Tragedy. Air & Water Pollution Control Acts The Air Act (1981) and Water Act (1974) are essential for maintaining ecosystem health, directly impacting wildlife survival. Landmark Case Laws   1. State of Bihar v. Murad Ali Khan (1988) The court highlighted the impact of commercial hunting and poaching on wildlife depletion. 2. Bairam Kumawat v. Union of India (2003) Reaffirmed the ban on African elephant ivory trade and upheld the constitutionality of restrictions under Article 19(2). Conclusion India’s wildlife conservation journey is guided by robust laws, constitutional support, and scientific planning. However, rising threats such as habitat loss, human-animal conflict, and inadequate funding demand more inclusive efforts. Legal enforcement, community engagement, and technological innovation must go hand in hand to preserve India’s rich biodiversity.   References https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/wildlife-conservation/ https://apnews.com/article/tigers-india-population-figures-study-7c09fec9b973c91dd659cd14d9858f13 https://www.thetimes.com/world/asia/article/elephant-warning-app-assam-india-protect-villagers-jwscmlwlb?utm_source=chatgpt.com&region=global https://indiankanoon.org/doc/871328/ https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1644544/ https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1199182/ https://blog.ipleaders.in/the-wildlife-protection-act-1972-and-its-impact-in-protecting-wildlife-in-india/ https://www.drishtiias.com/to-the-points/Paper2/indian-forest-act-1927 https://blog.ipleaders.in/need-know-forest-conservation-act-1980/ https://www.drishtiias.com/to-the-points/paper3/environment-protection-act-1986 https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V4ISSUE10/IJRPR18300.pdf https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1871696/ https://indiankanoon.org/doc/53127/ Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* LATEST BLOGS Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts Sadalaw Publications • April 19, 2025 • General • No Comments A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work Sadalaw Publications • April 15, 2025 • General • No Comments Opening the Monument Examining the Long-Term Effects of the 1981 Case Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi on Individual Liberty and Indian Jurisprudence Opening the Monument Examining the Long-Term Effects of the 1981 Case Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi on Individual Liberty and Indian Jurisprudence Sadalaw Publications • April 5, 2025 • General • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts Read More »

“Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology”

Trending Today “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Supreme Court Verdict on Same-Sex Marriage in India: Supriyo vs Union of India Case Explained Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology 19 Apr 2025 Yashasvi Panwar Introduction: The Rise of Drone Technology in India In the digital era, technological advancements are reshaping how we connect and operate. One of the most significant innovations in recent years is the drone, or Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). These pilotless flying devices are transforming industries across the globe, from defense and construction to e-commerce and entertainment. In India, the increased adoption of drones is paving the way for a new technological revolution. Their applications range from aerial surveillance, delivery services, and infrastructure monitoring to media production and agriculture. As drone use expands, India has implemented robust regulatory frameworks to ensure safe and legal drone operations. Global Evolution of Drone Technology   International Standards and Frameworks Worldwide, countries have embraced drones with varying levels of regulation. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has provided guidance for safely integrating drones into national airspace, encouraging innovation without compromising public safety. For example: United States: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates commercial drones under Part 107, emphasizing a risk-based approach. Europe: The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) uses a similar system, categorizing drones by risk level. Australia & Japan: These countries have stricter drone laws, especially in urban and high-density zones. Drone Regulations in India: An Overview   Initial Framework: Civil Aviation Requirements (2018) India began regulating drone activity through the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The 2018 Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR) laid the foundation for legal drone use. The Drone Rules, 2021 To streamline and modernize regulations, the Drone Rules, 2021 replaced previous guidelines. Key highlights include: Weight Limit Increased: Drones up to 500 kg now fall under the rules (previously capped at 300 kg). Simplified Licensing: Registration and pilot certification are now easier via the Digital Sky platform. Safety Guidelines: Carrying weapons, explosives, or hazardous materials is strictly prohibited. Categorization Based on Weight: Drones are now categorized as Nano, Micro, Small, Medium, or Large, based solely on weight. UAS (Unmanned Aircraft System) Classifications in India The UAS Rules, 2021 introduced detailed classifications for drones: Remote Pilot Aircraft System (RPAS): Controlled remotely by licensed operators. Autonomous UAS: Operates without real-time pilot input. Model RPAS: Used for educational and visual-line-of-sight purposes. Hybrid Drones: A combination of fixed-wing and rotorcraft systems. Drone Ownership and Operation Guidelines in India   Who Can Own and Operate Drones? Foreign ownership is prohibited. However, foreign entities can lease drones to Indian companies. All drones must be registered and issued a Unique Identification Number (UIN). Operators must be 18+ years old, undergo DGCA-approved training, and pass a written test. Usage Restrictions Drones cannot be flown near airports, military bases, or crowded areas. Time-of-day restrictions apply, and drone activity in restricted airspace is prohibited without authorization. The Drone (Amendment) Rules, 2022: What Changed? In February 2022, the Ministry of Civil Aviation released key amendments: No Remote Pilot License required for micro drones used for non-commercial purposes. Registration deadlines were updated for drones manufactured or imported before November 30, 2021. Remote Pilot Training Organizations now receive certificates instead of licenses. Drones now receive either a Unique Identification Number (UIN) or Drone Acknowledgment Number (DAN), depending on purchase date. Additionally, the Indian government promoted the Drone-as-a-Service (DaaS) business model, encouraging entrepreneurship and innovation in the drone sector. Future Outlook: Drones as a Catalyst for Innovation in India India is quickly becoming a global hub for drone innovation. With evolving laws, increased government support, and rising commercial interest, drones are expected to play a pivotal role in: E-commerce delivery systems Smart infrastructure monitoring Agricultural automation Disaster response and surveillance The government’s commitment to ease of doing business and the push for indigenous technology development marks a promising future for this sector. Conclusion: Embracing the Drone Revolution With progressive policies and an innovation-friendly ecosystem, India is well on its way to becoming a world leader in drone technology. Whether you’re a tech entrepreneur, a business owner, or an enthusiast, now is the time to understand the scope and compliance landscape of drones in India. References https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2301117.pdf https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/articles/drone-laws-in-india-an-analysis-15028.asp https://www.juscorpus.com/an-analysis-of-indias-drone-regulatio https://indiansocietyforlegalresearch.in/2021/11/02/surveying-the-legal-landscape-of-drones-in-india/ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10829009 https://theamikusqriae.com/the-legal-landscape-of-drone-technology-in-india-navigating-privacy-security-and-commercial-use/ Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* LATEST BLOGS A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work Sadalaw Publications • April 15, 2025 • General • No Comments Opening the Monument Examining the Long-Term Effects of the 1981 Case Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi on Individual Liberty and Indian Jurisprudence Opening the Monument Examining the Long-Term Effects of the 1981 Case Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi on Individual Liberty and Indian Jurisprudence Sadalaw Publications • April 5, 2025 • General • No Comments AN ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF CSR IN THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 AN ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF CSR IN THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 Sadalaw Publications • March 31, 2025 • General • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

“Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” Read More »

RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad

Trending Today RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Supreme Court Verdict on Same-Sex Marriage in India: Supriyo vs Union of India Case Explained A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad MAHI SINHA 18 Apr 2025 RCB vs Uber: Delhi High Court Case Over Alleged Trademark Defamation in YouTube Ad RCB has filed a trademark defamation case against Uber in the Delhi High Court over its viral “Baddies in Bengaluru ft. Travis Head” ad. Learn why RCB claims the ad damages its brand and how Uber is defending its creative freedom. Background: RCB Files Lawsuit Against Uber Over YouTube Ad In a high-profile legal dispute, Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) has taken Uber to the Delhi High Court over a YouTube advertisement titled “Baddies in Bengaluru ft. Travis Head.” According to RCB, the ad allegedly defamed the franchise’s trademark and portrayed the team in a derogatory manner. The Indian Premier League (IPL) team filed for an interim injunction—a court order to restrain Uber from airing the ad—but the High Court has withheld its decision for now. What Sparked the Controversy? The ad in question features Travis Head, a Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) batter and former RCB player, pulling pranks ahead of an IPL match between Bengaluru and Hyderabad. In the video, Travis—nicknamed the “Hyderabaddie”—is shown wearing flashy gold chains and white attire while entering the stadium with his “gang.” What triggered the legal battle was the visible alteration of match signage that originally read “Bengaluru vs Hyderabad,” defaced to read “Royally Challenged Bengaluru vs Hyderabad.” RCB claims this directly mocks their trademarked name, “Royal Challengers Bengaluru,” and affects the team’s public image. RCB’s Legal Stand Representing RCB, advocate Shwetasree Majumder argued that the term “Royally Challenged” was a mockery of the team’s trademark and that Uber—being a commercial sponsor of SRH—had no legal right to use or parody RCB’s brand identity. Majumder stated: “There were countless inventive ways to create an ad. Was it necessary to use our trademark and a former player to target us?” She emphasized that public comments under the video make it clear the ad was perceived as disparaging RCB, not just a creative take. Uber’s Defense: It’s Just a Joke Uber, on the other hand, dismissed the lawsuit as preposterous, claiming that the advertisement is protected under the right to commercial free speech. According to Uber’s legal counsel: “The term ‘Royally Challenged’ has been used before in media commentary, and Travis Head wasn’t mocking the team but rather hyping up the upcoming match.” Uber also emphasized that the use of satire and humor is well within the bounds of creative advertising and does not constitute trademark infringement. What’s at Stake for Both Sides?   For RCB: Protection of brand integrity Preventing misleading associations with rival franchises Addressing public perception in a high-visibility tournament like the IPL For Uber: Upholding creative freedom in advertising Defending the legitimacy of satire and parody in sports marketing Avoiding a legal precedent that restricts promotional creativity With the ad surpassing 54 million views on Instagram alone, the case has gained massive attention from fans, media, and legal experts alike. Conclusion: Satire or Trademark Violation? This case raises important questions around trademark usage, advertising freedom, and the fine line between satire and defamation in the world of sports marketing. While the Delhi High Court has yet to make a final ruling, the outcome could set a crucial precedent for how brands interact with sports franchises in promotional content moving forward. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sanoj kumar paul. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Sanoj kumar paul • April 18, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

RCB vs Uber Trademark Dispute: Delhi High Court Case Over Viral Travis Head YouTube Ad Read More »

Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained

Trending Today Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Supreme Court Verdict on Same-Sex Marriage in India: Supriyo vs Union of India Case Explained A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work Murshidabad Waqf Bill Protest: Families Mourn Loved Ones Amid Violent Clashes and Police Inaction Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained MAHI SINHA 18 Apr 2025 Supreme Court of India Pushes for Clarity in Royalty Calculation: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India   Explore the key takeaways from the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India, addressing royalty calculation anomalies under MCR 2016 and MCDR 2017. Learn how this case may reshape mineral royalty norms in India. Introduction: A Landmark Case in Mining Royalty Disputes In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India addressed long-standing concerns about the calculation of mining royalties under two central laws—MCR, 2016 and MCDR, 2017. The case, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited v. Union of India (W.P. (C) No. 715 of 2024), raised critical questions about the “royalty on royalty” effect and its impact on the average sale price of minerals. Background: The Legal Challenge The petitioner, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd., challenged the legality and fairness of the methodology used for estimating royalties. The challenge centered on: Rule 38 (Explanation) of the Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 Rule 45 of the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 2017 The main contention was the cascading effect of applying royalty on previously taxed royalties, which distorted the calculation of ASP and increased the financial burden on mining companies. Supreme Court’s Observations: Royalty Calculation Is a Policy Matter The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justice J. B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan (not available on Wikipedia), acknowledged the existence of an anomaly in the current royalty framework. However, the Court reiterated that: Policy formulation—especially in technical and economic matters like royalty—is the sole domain of the executive branch. Courts will not interfere with such decisions unless they are arbitrary, unconstitutional, or made in bad faith. Key Directives and Timelines Despite dismissing the petition, the Court issued clear directives to the Union Government: Initial Order: The Union was given two months to review the royalty calculation process and address the cascading effect. Extension Granted: Following a request for more time, the Court granted an additional two-month extension, considering the ongoing public consultation process. Rejection and Resistance: The proposed amendments were reportedly rejected by the Ministry of Finance (India) and mineral-rich states of India, further delaying progress. Final Warning: In light of continued delays, the Court recently issued a final warning, directing the Cabinet Secretariat of India to draft a new proposal within four weeks and submit it to the Union Cabinet. The Court emphasized that appropriate action would follow if the Secretariat failed to comply. Why This Case Matters This ruling is a critical development in India’s mining sector, as it: Recognizes the financial impact of flawed royalty mechanisms Pushes for transparent and fair mineral pricing Upholds the principle of executive accountability in policy enforcement The outcome of this directive could have far-reaching consequences for mining companies in India, affecting both regulatory frameworks and investor confidence. Conclusion: A Call for Policy Reform in Mining Royalties While the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the executive’s authority over royalty rules, it has also underscored the need for responsible policy action. The ball is now in the Union Government’s court to address systemic issues in royalty computation and ensure a balanced, industry-friendly framework going forward. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sanoj kumar paul. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Directs Policy Reform in Mining Royalty: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. v. Union of India Explained Read More »

Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking

Trending Today Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Upholds Validity of IPC Section 498A, Rejects Misuse Claims Under Article 14 Supreme Court Deems Tamil Nadu Bills Approved Without Governor’s Assent in Historic Ruling Kerala High Court Declares GST on Club Services to Members Unconstitutional: Major Relief for Associations Supreme Court Verdict on Same-Sex Marriage in India: Supriyo vs Union of India Case Explained A Creative’s Guide to Intellectual Property: Protecting and Profiting from Your Work Murshidabad Waqf Bill Protest: Families Mourn Loved Ones Amid Violent Clashes and Police Inaction Bombay High Court Acquits Father in Minor Daughter’s Rape Case: Legal Loopholes vs Child Protection Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking MAHI SINHA 17 Apr 2025 PINKI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR | CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1927 OF 2025 On Tuesday, April 15, the Supreme Court of India issued a strict order to stop newborn trafficking, declaring that hospitals that are discovered to be involved in such horrible activities shall immediately have their licenses revoked. The Court underlined that any case of baby trafficking from a hospital must result in both legal repercussions and regulatory measures, such as the facility’s operating license being suspended.According to the bench’s ruling, which was signed by Justices J. B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, if a newborn baby is smuggled from a hospital, the facility shall be immediately subject to a suspension of its operating license in addition to other legal measures. The Court further emphasized the duty of care that healthcare facilities have, noting that when a woman gives birth in a hospital, the facility’s administration has an obligation to safeguard the newborn in every way.While rescinding the bail granted to thirteen individuals accused of child trafficking throughout the State of Uttar Pradesh, the court made this statement. The Court remarked that the State of Uttar Pradesh did not handle the issue seriously and criticized the State for not contesting the bail rulings. The Allahabad High Court was also criticized by the court for awarding the defendants bail in a “very callous manner”.Referring to an April 14 Times of India story, the Court noted that a large gang seemed to be operating dangerously both inside and outside of Delhi, selling trafficked babies and children in several States for prices ranging from Rs. 5,00,000 to Rs. 10,000,000. The Court observed that the traffickers in the current child abduction ring are well connected via their smartphones, exchanging whereabouts, photos, money transfers, and other information. They demonstrate that they understand technology, recognize demand, and understand the need of working as a network by their operations and the relative ease with which they are able to function and find purchasers for the children they sell outside of their states. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi National Herald Case: ED Files ₹2,000 Crore Money Laundering Complaint Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts Supreme Court Reviews Waqf Amendment Act 2025: Questions Muslim Role in Hindu Trusts sadalawpublications@gmail.com • April 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Orders Immediate License Suspension for Hospitals Involved in Baby Trafficking Read More »