Live cases

Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators

Trending Today Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case. Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators MAHI SINHA 28 Mar 2025 Update: 28 March 2025 On Friday, March 28, the administration of Punjab told the Supreme Court that it had ordered the farmers who were demonstrating to leave the Shambhu and Khanauri borders, which are close to Haryana, and that the National Highway was now open for traffic. Punjab’s Advocate General Gurminder Singh told the bench, which included Justices Surya Kant and N.K. Singh, that the hunger protest, which began in November of last year, had been called off by veteran protest leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal. “Today, Mr. Dallewal sipped water and had breakfast,” AG Singh stated. The bench also declined to consider an indifference case against Punjabi officials for allegedly violating a Supreme Court ruling last year by allowing demonstrators to be cleared. The bench stated that the government has been urged for opening the HC by the court. They have been requesting that the highway be opened. Advocate Angrej Singh, who was representing the contempt petitioner, was informed by Justice Kant that the contempt case was misconceived. The petitioner decided to take out the disdain lawsuit after this. Additionally, the court dismissed the disdain case that had been brought against the DGP and the Punjab Chief Secretary for failing to take action to hospitalize Dallewal, who was then fasting. The Court ordered the High Powered Committee, which it had established to negotiate with the governing bodies and the farmers who were speaking out, to submit its supplemental report. When the farmers who were outraged agreed to meet with Justice (Retired) Nawab Singh, the Chairperson of the High-Powered Committee, the standoff between the Punjab government and the farmers broke out in January of this year. Following the Union’s commencement of negotiations with farmers protesting over issues like the bare essential support price, the Court was notified on January 22 that farmers’ spokesman Jagjit Singh Dallewal had consented to medical assistance. Following a decline in his health, Dallewal, who has been on an indefinite fast since November of last year, was directed to be moved to the medical hospital. Last February, the farmers began protesting, calling for legal safeguards of the Minimum Support Price (MSP), among other things. To stop farmers from marching to Delhi, the Haryana government closed the NH boundaries. The demonstrators decided to set up camp at the borders of New Hampshire (likely meant to be National Highway borders). After being ordered to unblock the Shambhu border by the P&H High Court last year, the Haryana government went to the Supreme Court. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 27, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators Read More »

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges.

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case. Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. PMLA | Supreme Court: The person who is accused in the complaint does not have to be named in order to keep the property that has been seized. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. MAHI SINHA 28 Mar 2025 Update: 28 March 2025 In a case involving the State Bar Council denying admission to law school alumni because they attended an institution that had not been acknowledged by the Bar Council of India (BCI), the Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that, going forward, an establishment will face criminal charges if it recognizes students with the required approval. The Court further mandated that all procedures pertaining to registration renewal be finished by December 31 of the prior year and that all correspondence with the Bar Council of India be finished by February 15 of the same year. The present State Bar Council denied some law pupils’ requests to be enrolled as “Advocates” on the grounds that defendant number 5-Central India Law Institute, Jabalpur, the college from which they graduated, failed to renew its approval with the BCI after 2008-2009. “With the above instructions we hereby dispose of the demands by guiding the appropriate authority that if a university in the future without acknowledgment gives enrollment other than an educational intent, criminal charges shall be taken in opposition to such institutions as per law,” noted the division of the bench of Chief Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Vivek Jain. At this point, we learned from the institution counsel that the institution does not finish the association renewing procedure till December 31st of the preceding year, which prevents colleges from applying to the Bar Council of India by that date. Therefore, when organizations submit applications to the College for an upsurge of affiliation, we mandate that all procedures be finished by December 31 of the year prior and that all correspondence with the Bar Council of India be finished by February 15 of the same year. Regarding the current case, the court observed that the applicants’ college did not submit the required amount to the Bar Council of India, and as a result, the identification was not extended. However, the court ruled that the pupils were not at blame and that the Bar Council of India ought to have taken strong action against these establishments. The plea claimed that the responding officials failed to disclose the institution’s failure to revoke permission when admitting the petitioners and other comparable students, so endangering their future as well as that of numerous other learners. In order to remedy the issue with the institution’s approved continuation and extend it by the required date, the petitioner requested that the responding body no. 2 Bar Council of India be directed to reclaim the cost of renewal from the institution. Additionally, the State Bar Council, Respondent No. 3, was ordered to enroll the appellants as proponents with all associated benefits. With retroactive effect, the Court’s most recent ruling, issued March 7, condemned the Bar Council of India’s practice of still recognizing some universities after 20 years. The Bar Council of India was therefore instructed to “make its house in order” in order to prevent institutions from interfering with students’ academic pursuits. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 27, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case. Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 27, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. Read More »

Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today Shattering the Stereotypes: Separating Fact from Fiction in Personal Injury Lawsuits Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case. Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency MAHI SINHA 27 Mar 2025 Update: 26 March 2025 In recent times, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the multiplier in motor accident assertions cannot be lowered because the person who perished had been making foreign currency; the multiplier is set based on the victim’s chronological age and cannot be changed because of foreign earnings; additionally, the Court ruled that a currency exchange rate that was in effect on the date the petition for compensation was filed must be used. In Jiju Kuruvila v. Kunjujamma Mohan (2013) and DLF Ltd. v. Koncar Generators & Motors Ltd., the court pointed out that the rate of exchange should be determined by the date the petition for reimbursement was filed. The previous case law was cited by a bench consisting of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra. The complainants had contested the Telangana High Court‘s ruling upholding the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) conclusions, and it raised the amount that the tribunal had granted them. The deceased’s foreign currency earnings were used by the High Court to lower the multiplier from 14 to 10. Background of the case: After a deadly collision with a vehicle, the appellants—the deceased’s spouse and two daughters—had applied for reimbursement from MACT. When her automobile clashed with one operated by the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, the person who died, a 43-year-old software engineer living in the United States, perished. After deducting income tax and setting future possibilities at 30%, the Tribunal determined the deceased individual’s monthly income to be $11,600. The Appeal Tribunal determined that Rs. 8.05 crores would be the total amount to be compensated. The Court of Appeal, however, applied a 10-multiplier to lower the settlement amount, citing the decedent’s foreign currency earnings as justification. The grant was for Rs. 5.75 crore. The Supreme Court rejected the High Court’s justification for lowering the multiplier. In National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi (2017), the Court reaffirmed that a 43-year-old person should be subject to a 14-multiplier, irrespective of their overseas revenues. According to National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, the law has established that a person 43 years of age must have a multiplier of 14. For someone who earns foreign currency, there is no exemption whatsoever. The Supreme Court ruled that the rate of currency exchange should be set at Rs. 57/-, reflecting the going rate when the claim case was filed in 2012. The remuneration was adjusted to Rs. 9.64 crores after the Court decided in favor of the petitioners. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 27, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency Read More »

Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case.

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case. Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. PMLA | Supreme Court: The person who is accused in the complaint does not have to be named in order to keep the property that has been seized. Assam Government Notifies Supreme Court of Deportation of 13 Bangladeshi Nationals; Verification Continues for Others Supreme Court Petition Challenges SEBI Inquiry on Adani, Demands SIT Formation Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case. MAHI SINHA 27 Mar 2025 The Beginning In the first hearing, insurgents abducted and killed Dr. Mushir-ul-Haq, the interim chancellor of Kashmir University, along with Abdul Gani Zargar, his personal secretary. The case was then turned over to the CBI for investigation after the first FIR was filed in 1990. In order to request the liberation of their associates, the militants, under the leadership of Hilal Beg, had abducted the victims. Following the victims’ deaths, the CBI charged a number of defendants with murder under a number of different laws, including Section 302 of the RPC and the TADA Act. The subsequent appeal was based on the claimed abduction and murder by the accused of H.L. Khera, the managing director of HMT Watch Factory in Srinagar at the time. To spread panic in the public and force the government to free their accomplices, they were charged with engaging in an illegal alliance. In 2009, the accused were found not guilty despite the allegations when the Special Court dismissed some important evidence and found that the state’s attorney had not proven the accuser’s innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Under Section 19 of the TADA Act, the State filed a criminal appeal against the conviction, which the Supreme Court accepted in 2009. Evaluation and Choice Prior to discussing whether the confessional remarks were admissible or not, the Court examined the pertinent sections of the TADA Act and the TADA Rules pertaining to confessional statement recording. The Court underlined that the TADA Act was a unique piece of law that was passed in order to provide particular measures for dealing with a nuisance and terrorist actions, as well as for matters related to or ancillary to them. Reviewing Section 15 of the TADA Act and Rule 15 of the TADA Rules, the jury observed that the main idea of Section 15 is that a voluntary admission of guilt made by an individual in front of a police officer with a rank higher than Superintendent of Police (or “SP”) will be allowed in the individual’s trial for a TADA Act offense. Additionally, Rule 15 addresses the administrative components of documenting confessions given to police officers in accordance with Section 15. Therefore, because TADA was a Special Act, it included an additional clause in Section 15 that allowed confessions recorded by police officers with a rank of at least SP to be accepted as testimony in the trial of the admitting statement maker or the co-accused, abettor, or conspirator if they were brought forward in the same case as the statement maker. The Court emphasized that confessions given to a police officer are typically not admissible as evidence under criminal jurisprudence that has been evolved over a century. A statement of guilt given to a police officer by someone who is accused of a crime is not admissible against him, according to Section 25 of the Evidence Act. Only a magistrate in charge has the authority to record confessions, and Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (the “CrPC”) establishes stringent rules for doing so. The Court further stated that the well-established idea that a confession constitutes a confession of guilt serves as the foundation for these protections. Normally, no one would voluntarily acknowledge their wrongdoing because they are well aware that it may be used upon them. Furthermore, the accused is essentially and legally guaranteed from being forced to provide a testimonial. The Court further pointed out that these long-standing standards were superseded by Section 15 of the TADA Act, which substantially changed the basic rules of testimony. The Court witnessed that in Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab, the TADA Act’s provisions were contested before the Supreme Court. The judiciary’s Constitution upheld the legality of Section 15 of the TADA Act and the Act in its entirety, but it also established guidelines to guarantee that an admission derived during pre-indictment surveillance by a police officer not lower in rank than an SP is free from undue influence. The purpose of these rules was to guarantee that the apology is made strictly in accordance with widely acknowledged aesthetic standards and basic justice. In the case of SN Dube v. NB Bhoir, (2000) 2 SCC 254, the Court observed that a two-judge panel of this Court dismissed the defense’s argument that an admission of guilt under Section 15 of the TADA Act should be documented in two stages. The court held that the discussion and identification carried out during the initial phase, when the initial component was documented, could not be deemed sufficient to comply with Rule 15(2). Before what he really is private portion starts, the police officer must give the statutory advice and explain the rights, the Court clarified. Only at that time does the officer

Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case. Read More »

Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. PMLA | Supreme Court: The person who is accused in the complaint does not have to be named in order to keep the property that has been seized. Assam Government Notifies Supreme Court of Deportation of 13 Bangladeshi Nationals; Verification Continues for Others Supreme Court Petition Challenges SEBI Inquiry on Adani, Demands SIT Formation Punjab & Haryana High Court Issues Notice on Habeas Corpus Plea for Arrested Farmer Leader Jagjit Singh Dhallewal Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons NITU KUMARI 26 Mar 2025 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONWrit Petition (C) No. 1404 of 2023 Sukanya Shantha …PetitionerVersusUnion of India & Ors. …Respondents Date Of Judgment: October 3, 2024Case Citation: 2024 INSC 753Presiding judges:Chief Justice (Dr.) Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud,Justice Jamshed B. Pardiwala,Justice Manoj Misra Introduction A bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra gave a slew of directions prohibiting caste-based discrimination in prisons. Factual Background The article “From Segregation to Labour, Manu’s Caste Law Governs the Indian Prison System” was written by journalist Sukanya Shantha (“Petitioner”) and published on December 10, 2020. Discrimination in prisons based on caste was emphasized in the article. Subsequently, the Petitioner challenged the legitimacy of certain clauses of State Prison Manuals before the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Some of the Prison Manual provisions challenged stated that:(i) A convict sentenced to simple imprisonment shall not be called upon to perform duties of a degrading or menial character unless he belongs to a class or community accustomed to performing such duties;(ii) A convict overseer may be appointed as a night guard provided he does not belong to any class that may have a strong natural tendency to escape, such as men of wandering tribes;(iii) Food shall be cooked and carried to the cells by prisoner-cooks of suitable caste;(iv) Sweepers should be chosen from the Mether or Hari caste, also from the Chandal or other castes, if by the custom of the district they perform similar work when free; and(v) Any prisoner in a jail who is of so high a caste that he cannot eat food cooked by the existing cooks shall be appointed a cook and be made to cook for the full complement of men. The Petitioner argued that caste-based discrimination continues to persist in prisons. The States of Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Odisha, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu appeared before the Supreme Court. Issue Of The Case Whether provisions in the Prison Manuals of various States that distinguish between inmates based on caste are unconstitutional. Whether using vague and indeterminate criteria like “habit,” “custom,” “superior mode of living,” and “natural tendency to escape” as a basis for classifying prisoners serves as a valid differentia or merely acts as a proxy for caste-based discrimination against marginalized communities. Whether prison authorities’ practice of segregating inmates based on caste identity, justified as a measure to prevent conflicts and maintain discipline, is constitutional and compatible with fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Indian Constitution. Observations The Court ruled that caste-based segregation in jails breaches core constitutional safeguards and continues to discriminate against underprivileged people, even when it is justified under the guise of maintaining discipline. The Court categorically rejected the “separate but equal” theory, concluding that it is incompatible with the Indian Constitution and cannot be utilized to support caste-based prison segregation. The Court observed that prison authorities’ duty to maintain discipline cannot be discharged at the cost of violating fundamental rights and correctional needs of inmates, stating that alternative non-discriminatory measures must be adopted. The Court concluded that definitions of “habit,” “custom,” “superior mode of living,” and “natural tendency to escape” that were used to categorize prisoners were unconstitutionally ambiguous and imprecise, acting only as stand-ins for discrimination based on caste. The Court ruled that, with the exception of certain limited uses to advance equality and social justice, caste-based classification—whether direct or indirect—is prohibited under the Constitution. The Court found that caste-based prisoner classification is arbitrary and unlawful since it lacks any logical connection to the justifiable goals of security, reform, or rehabilitation. The Court pointed out that caste-based isolation will exacerbate caste tensions and hostility rather than address them, undermining the prison system’s rehabilitative goals. Judgment A three-judge Supreme Court bench ruled that the challenged Prison Manual provisions breached Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23. The Court ordered the States to amend their jail manuals within three months. It also asked each state to provide a status report. The court’s decision was written by Chief Justice Chandrachud. Conclusion In addition to ordering extensive reforms in all States and Union Territories and establishing a monitoring system to guarantee compliance and stop prejudice inside the prison system, the Supreme Court ruled that caste-based prison segregation was unconstitutional. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at

Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons Read More »

The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape.

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. PMLA | Supreme Court: The person who is accused in the complaint does not have to be named in order to keep the property that has been seized. Assam Government Notifies Supreme Court of Deportation of 13 Bangladeshi Nationals; Verification Continues for Others Supreme Court Petition Challenges SEBI Inquiry on Adani, Demands SIT Formation Punjab & Haryana High Court Issues Notice on Habeas Corpus Plea for Arrested Farmer Leader Jagjit Singh Dhallewal Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act Protection Not Available If Person Entered Into Agreement Knowing About Pending Litigation: Supreme Court The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. MAHI SINHA 26 Mar 2025 Updated: 24th march,2025 The Allahabad High Court‘s ruling that grasping a young girl’s bosom, severing the thread of her pajamas, and making an effort to pull her under a culvert wouldn’t qualify as rape or an attempted rape was overturned by the Supreme Court of India today in a writ case. A party who has never heard of the criminal proceedings submitted the writ petition. Under Article 136, a Special Leave Petition must be submitted to the SC in order to contest a High Court order. Many rulings by the Supreme Court have found that a writ petition filed under Article 32 cannot be maintained against a High Court decision. According to the prosecution, the 11-year-old victim’s bosom was grabbed by the accused, Pawan and Akash, who then snapped the thread of her pajamas and made an effort to pull her under the culvert. The concerned trial court invoked Section 376 and Section 18 (attempt to commit an offence) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, deeming it an attempt to commit penetrative sexual assault or rape, and issued a summons order in accordance with these provisions. Nonetheless, the High Court mandated that the accused be tried in accordance with Section 354-B IPC (assault or use of criminal force with purpose to disrobe) and Section 9/10 of the POCSO Act, which are minor charges. There was a great deal of debate surrounding the edict, and many people were against it. The Advocate’s opening remarks before a bench of Justices Bela M. Trivedi and PB Varale stated that the motto “Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao” exists. He was about to continue when Justice Bela interrupted, saying that “no lecture baazi” should be permitted in the courtroom. She also asked why the counsel who filed the writ petition was not in the courtroom and who his name was on file. Although he was not there, the Advocate retorted that the AOR had given him permission to debate. After that, Justice Bela asked why the petitioner, who was also absent, was there. After that, the Court dismissed the writ petition. The Union Government, the Ministry of Women and Child Welfare, and the Allahabad High Court were all cited as respondents in the case by the petitioner. The High Court made a distinction in this case between preparation and attempt. According to the facts of the case and the accusations made against Pawan and Akash, the accused hardly ever attempted rape. To file a charge of attempted rape, the prosecution must prove that the case had progressed past the preparatory stage. As the bench of Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra partially granted the criminal revision petition made by three accused, it noted that the main distinction is that there is more determination between planning and actually attempting to conduct an offense. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. Read More »

In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report.

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. Read More »

Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Read More »

Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra:

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. PMLA | Supreme Court: The person who is accused in the complaint does not have to be named in order to keep the property that has been seized. Assam Government Notifies Supreme Court of Deportation of 13 Bangladeshi Nationals; Verification Continues for Others Supreme Court Petition Challenges SEBI Inquiry on Adani, Demands SIT Formation Punjab & Haryana High Court Issues Notice on Habeas Corpus Plea for Arrested Farmer Leader Jagjit Singh Dhallewal Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act Protection Not Available If Person Entered Into Agreement Knowing About Pending Litigation: Supreme Court The Supreme Court declines to step in to stop the implementation of the Haj Policy 2025. On May 8, the Supreme Court will consider arguments about the deportation and living conditions of Rohingya refugees. Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: NITU KUMARI 26 Mar 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION (L) NO. 9792 OF 2023 Kunal Kamra …PetitionerVersusUnion of India …Respondents Date Of Judgment: January 31, 2024Presiding judges:Justice Gautam PatelJustice A.S. ChandurkarJustice Dr. Neela Gokhale Introduction Who is Kunal Kamra? Kunal Kamra is an Indian stand-up comedian and political satirist. In his shows, he quips about the peculiarities of life, popular culture, the economy, politics, and big business.Born and reared in Mumbai, Kamra is often embroiled in controversy due to his polarizing remarks about BJP politicians, especially Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In 2017, he started a show called Shut Up Ya Kunal, in which he had informal discussions with politicians and activists from both sides. He’s previously made headlines for a mid-air confrontation with news anchor Arnab Goswami in 2020. Who is Eknath Shinde? Eknath Sambhaji Shinde, an Indian politician who was born on February 9, 1964, has been serving under Devendra Fadnavis as Maharashtra‘s Deputy Chief Minister since December 2024 alongside Ajit Pawar. He has been the head of the Shiv Sena since February 2023 and was the Chief Minister of Maharashtra from June 2022 to December 2024. He was an MLA for the Thane seat from 2004 to 2009 and has been a member of the Legislative Assembly since 2009 for the Kopri-Pachpakhadi constituency. Factual Background When Kunal Kamra performed at the Habitat Studio at the Unicontinental Hotel in the Khar neighborhood of Mumbai, he called Shiv Sena leader and Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde a “traitor” and proceeded to sing a parody about him. Kamra described Shinde’s 2022 mutiny against his then-boss Uddhav Thackeray using a modified version of a Hindi song from the film Dil To Pagal Hai. According to PTI, which cited the police, a number of Shiv Sena employees allegedly vandalized the studio and the hotel on Sunday night. Due to Kamra’s alleged defamatory remarks against Shinde, the Mumbai Police filed a formal complaint against him on Monday. According to the PTI report, Shiv Sena official Rahul Kanal and 11 other people were also taken into custody by the police for looting the hotel. According to ANI, the Mahayuti ruling alliance has claimed that the Shiv Sena, led by Uddhav Thackeray, bribed Kamra. Kamra’s comments have been supported by the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliance, which has criticized the state administration for the collapse of law and order and brought up the subject of freedom of speech. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) demolition team took hammers to the Habitat Studio on Monday. The H West ward staff was instructed to perform an inspection by BMC Commissioner Bhushan Gagrani following a conversation with State Transport Minister Pratap Sarnaik. Maharashtra’s State Home Minister, Yogesh Kadam, said Monday that the legislation will be strictly implemented and that Kamra’s whereabouts were being investigated. What is the Kunal Kamra–Eknath Shinde Controversy all about? During a recent stand-up show, comedian Kunal Kamra is once again at the center of a political storm after his recent performance in Mumbai. During his latest show ‘Naya Bharat’ at the Habitat Comedy Club in Khar, he humorously parodied a popular Shah Rukh Khan Hindi song by calling Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde a “gaddar” (traitor). The comment made reference to Shinde’s 2022 political rebellion, which led to the dissolution of the Shiv Sena party. In a spoof of a song from Dil To Pagal Hai, Kamra sang:“Meri nazar se tum dekho to gaddar nazar wo aaye, haaye.” After being posted on social media, the video swiftly gained popularity and attracted the attention of political supporters. A case was filed against comedian Kunal Kamra after a video of him surfaced showing him taking a jibe at Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde for switching sides. What was the reaction of Eknath Shinde? The joke was taken seriously by the Shiv Sena section led by Eknath Shinde. In a police complaint, Shiv Sena MLA Murji Patel called for Kunal Kamra‘s arrest and an apology from the public. He threatened to hold rallies and deny Kamra the freedom to “move freely” in Mumbai unless he apologized within two days. The Habitat Studio in Mumbai, where Kamra had performed, was vandalized by Shiv Sena supporters in outrage. As a result, more than 40 Sena members were arrested by the Mumbai Police for unlawful assembly and property damage. Kunal Kamra’s Response “Not Against the Law… I Don’t Fear”: Kunal Kamra’s Initial Response to the Eknath Shinde Joke Scandal. In a forceful initial statement regarding the uproar he sparked, stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra said he does not “fear this mob” that damaged his show’s venue and refused to apologize for his traitorous “joke” about Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde on Monday. Kamra defended his act, arguing that comedy and satire are essential tools in democracy. In response to the controversy, he posted an image of

Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra: Read More »

N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association.

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. PMLA | Supreme Court: The person who is accused in the complaint does not have to be named in order to keep the property that has been seized. Assam Government Notifies Supreme Court of Deportation of 13 Bangladeshi Nationals; Verification Continues for Others Supreme Court Petition Challenges SEBI Inquiry on Adani, Demands SIT Formation Punjab & Haryana High Court Issues Notice on Habeas Corpus Plea for Arrested Farmer Leader Jagjit Singh Dhallewal Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act Protection Not Available If Person Entered Into Agreement Knowing About Pending Litigation: Supreme Court The Supreme Court declines to step in to stop the implementation of the Haj Policy 2025. On May 8, the Supreme Court will consider arguments about the deportation and living conditions of Rohingya refugees. The issue of recovering money from an HC judge’s home is discussed by the Rajya Sabha. Delhi judge Yashwant Varma transferred amid cash row, Allahabad court says we are not trash bin: N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. MAHI SINHA 25 Mar 2025 Updated: 24th march,2025 The Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) elected Senior Advocate N Hariharan as its president with 2967 votes. On March 21, the elections took place. Senior Advocate Kirti Uppal received 2880 votes to take second place.Senior Advocates Vivek Sood and Abhijat received 339 and 1429 votes, respectively.Sacchin Puri, a Senior Advocate, received 4515 votes to become the DHCBA’s vice president. Advocates Shyam Sharma and Inderbir Singh Alagh, two other contenders, received 1895 and 1080 votes, respectively. The DHCBA Secretary, advocate Vikram Singh Panwar, was chosen with 4389 votes.Advocate Kunal Malhotra was chosen as the Joint Secretary with 3381 votes, and Advocate Kanika Singh was elected Treasurer with 4493 votes. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments PMLA | Supreme Court: The person who is accused in the complaint does not have to be named in order to keep the property that has been seized. PMLA | Supreme Court: The person who is accused in the complaint does not have to be named in order to keep the property that has been seized. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Assam Government Notifies Supreme Court of Deportation of 13 Bangladeshi Nationals; Verification Continues for Others Assam Government Notifies Supreme Court of Deportation of 13 Bangladeshi Nationals; Verification Continues for Others sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. Read More »

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges.

Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency

Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case.

The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape.

In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report.

Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court

Kunal Kamra’s Joke On Eknath Shinde Sparks Political Storm In Maharashtra:

N Hariharan, a senior advocate, was elected president of the Delhi High Court Bar Association.

Editorial message

Quick links

Contact info