sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Presses States on Governors’ Discretion: Federal Structure in Question

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Presses States on Governors’ Discretion: Federal Structure in Question Supreme Court Questions Centre on Algorithmic Policing and AI Bias: A Step Toward Digital Rights Reform LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BOBBLE AI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT SETTLEMENTOFLOAN LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BP, PUNE LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HYPERVERGE, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA Delhi High Court Orders Status Report on Legal Aid Shortage — Justice Must Not Be Costly Supreme Court Pulls Up Centre and States Over Faulty Public Health Infrastructure — A Wake-Up Call for Healthcare Accountability Supreme Court Seeks Update on National DNA Data Bank Compliance — A Turning Point for Forensic Justice Supreme Court Presses States on Governors’ Discretion: Federal Structure in Question Kashish Jahan 30 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India has issued firm deadlines to States for clarifying their stance on the discretionary powers of Governors under Articles 200 and 201. The case could reshape how India balances federal authority and constitutional accountability. Supreme Court Revisits Governor’s Discretion Under Articles 200–201 On 26 July 2025, the Supreme Court of India issued reminder notices to multiple States for failing to respond in a crucial constitutional case. At issue: whether Governors can indefinitely withhold assent to bills passed by State legislatures under Articles 200 and 201 of the Indian Constitution. A Bench led by Chief Justice Vivek Ghosh emphasized that unclear constitutional provisions should not be allowed to override democratic will. The Court is seeking to define limits on gubernatorial discretion. Delay in State Responses Hampers Constitutional Clarity Despite a Presidential reference accepted in June 2025, several key States, including Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, have yet to submit their legal viewpoints. The Court noted that their delay is obstructing much-needed clarity on whether inaction by a Governor can be considered a silent veto. Justice Ghosh Warns of Federal Breakdown Chief Justice Ghosh cautioned that indefinite gubernatorial inaction could erode the very foundation of Indian federalism. He remarked that Raj Bhavans must act as constitutional offices, not political extensions of the Union government. The Bench stressed the need for judicially enforceable limits on such discretion to preserve institutional integrity. Two-Week Deadline for States and Centre The Court has issued a firm two-week deadline for all relevant State governments to file their legal responses. The Central Government must also submit its affidavit within the same period. Once all submissions are complete, oral hearings will be scheduled. Implications for India’s Constitutional Balance Legal scholars suggest this case could set a landmark precedent on the role and responsibilities of Governors. A judicially defined framework for assent powers would help safeguard: The sovereignty of State legislatures The spirit of cooperative federalism The accountability of constitutional authorities This moment is being described as a test of constitutional coherence—with the potential to clarify a long-ambiguous area of Indian governance. Conclusion: Clarifying the Limits of Power With the balance of power between State legislatures and Governors at stake, the Supreme Court’s intervention may lead to stronger protections for India’s federal structure. By demanding timely responses and promising hearings, the judiciary is taking the first step toward constitutional clarity in a long-debated grey area. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Presses States on Governors’ Discretion: Federal Structure in Question Sadalaw • July 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Questions Centre on Algorithmic Policing and AI Bias: A Step Toward Digital Rights Reform Sadalaw • July 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Orders Status Report on Legal Aid Shortage — Justice Must Not Be Costly Sadalaw • July 29, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Presses States on Governors’ Discretion: Federal Structure in Question Read More »

Supreme Court Pulls Up Centre and States Over Faulty Public Health Infrastructure — A Wake-Up Call for Healthcare Accountability

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Pulls Up Centre and States Over Faulty Public Health Infrastructure — A Wake-Up Call for Healthcare Accountability Supreme Court Seeks Update on National DNA Data Bank Compliance — A Turning Point for Forensic Justice LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ABHINAV BHATIA & ASSOCIATES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NATIONAL INSURANCE ACADEMY LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PODDAR BRIO COLLEGE OF LAW, THANE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF DEVASHISH CHAUHAN LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLE FOR ANIMALS (PFA), NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT OUTLAWED INDIA, BANGALORE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BENETTON Supreme Court Pulls Up Centre and States Over Faulty Public Health Infrastructure — A Wake-Up Call for Healthcare Accountability Kashish Jahan 29 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court has slammed the Centre and States for failing to fix India’s crumbling rural healthcare system. With sharp deadlines and accountability demands, the judiciary may force long-overdue public health reforms. Healthcare Infrastructure Under Judicial Scrutiny On 26 July 2025, the Supreme Court of India voiced strong concern over the deteriorating state of rural healthcare infrastructure in the country. The focus was primarily on the failing conditions of Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs). A bench led by Justice R.K. Sharma declared that the right to health under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution is meaningless if the infrastructure remains underfunded, understaffed, and overlooked by authorities. Data Speaks Louder Than Promises This judicial intervention stems from a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by several health rights groups. The petition cited shocking statistics: Over 40% of PHCs lack specialists or have non-functional operation theatres Numerous CHCs are missing essential medicines and diagnostic tools Despite National Health Mission (NHM) mandates and repeated court directions, compliance remains weak, especially in tribal and hilly districts Court Calls Out Systemic Failures Justice Sharma firmly reminded both State and Central governments that ailing communities cannot afford bureaucratic delays or endless policy reviews. He criticised the constant justification of funding delays and staff shortages as unacceptable. Importantly, the Bench made it clear that inadequate healthcare in state-run facilities, including prisons and protective homes, cannot be excused under the pretext of administrative constraints. Sharpened Orders for Action To restore accountability, the Court directed all States and the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to submit a comprehensive report within three weeks, including: 1. District-Wise Infrastructure Status Number and condition of PHCs and CHCs Vacant medical posts Availability of medical equipment and facilities 2. Budget Utilisation Data Expenditure reports for the last three years Details on fund allocation and actual disbursal 3. Corrective Action Plans Specific timelines for upgrades Appointed accountability officers for every region Toward Constitutional Healthcare According to legal and healthcare experts, India’s public health obligations stem from both its constitutional guarantees and international human rights treaties, such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which recognises health as a fundamental human right. This Supreme Court hearing could become a policy-shifting moment—forcing states and central agencies to move from promises to action, especially in long-neglected rural and tribal regions. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Pulls Up Centre and States Over Faulty Public Health Infrastructure — A Wake-Up Call for Healthcare Accountability Sadalaw • July 29, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Seeks Update on National DNA Data Bank Compliance — A Turning Point for Forensic Justice Sadalaw • July 29, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Slams Rajasthan Pollution Control Board Over Severe Staffing Shortage Sadalaw • July 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Pulls Up Centre and States Over Faulty Public Health Infrastructure — A Wake-Up Call for Healthcare Accountability Read More »

Supreme Court Slams Rajasthan Pollution Control Board Over Severe Staffing Shortage

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Slams Rajasthan Pollution Control Board Over Severe Staffing Shortage Supreme Court Backs Himachal Pradesh’s Claim to Higher Hydropower Royalties Haryana Moves Supreme Court to Shield Aravalli Hills from Cross-Border Mining LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMAZON WEB SERVICES, GURUGRAM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV MOKSH JAIN, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CIPLA, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ELEVATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ANB LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NAKS LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JP LAW ASSOCIATES Supreme Court Slams Rajasthan Pollution Control Board Over Severe Staffing Shortage Kashish Jahan 19 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court has criticized the Rajasthan Pollution Control Board for operating at just 35% staffing capacity. Learn why this judicial warning could trigger urgent reforms in India’s environmental enforcement system. Supreme Court Issues Stern Warning to Rajasthan Government In a sharp rebuke, the Supreme Court of India has reprimanded the Rajasthan government for failing to adequately staff the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board. The court has warned of contempt proceedings if immediate corrective steps are not taken to address the staffing crisis. Staffing Crisis: Just 35% Operational Capacity The Pollution Control Board is currently operating at only 35% capacity, with numerous critical posts remaining vacant. A major reason behind the shortfall is the rigid promotion policy, which mandates at least five years of experience for engineers to be eligible for advancement. However, the majority of junior engineers have only 2–3 years of experience, effectively blocking upward mobility and contributing to the manpower vacuum. Consequences of Inadequate Staffing Environmental experts warn that this staffing gap is seriously weakening the state’s ability to: Conduct pollution monitoring Perform industrial inspections Enforce environmental regulations This leaves key urban and industrial hubs such as Jaipur, Udaipur, and Kota vulnerable to rising levels of air, water, and industrial pollution. Stopgap Measures Under Scrutiny In an attempt to manage the crisis, the Board temporarily hired 40 interns. However, the Supreme Court strongly objected, stating that: “Interns cannot replace trained officers with statutory enforcement powers.” The court emphasized that such interim fixes do not meet the legal and operational requirements expected from a regulatory body. Court’s Directive: Rethink Policy, Recruit Staff The bench has directed the state government to: Revise its promotion policy Submit a clear timeline for new recruitments Provide a roadmap for sustainable staffing reforms The matter is set to be reviewed again during the next hearing on July 18, 2025, where the state must demonstrate concrete action. A Wake-Up Call for Environmental Governance Nationwide This case serves as a stark reminder that environmental legislation is only effective if backed by functional regulatory bodies. Without adequate staffing, agencies like the Pollution Control Board risk becoming symbolic rather than effective. It also signals to other states that judicial scrutiny will not tolerate administrative inertia in matters of public health and environmental safety. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Slams Rajasthan Pollution Control Board Over Severe Staffing Shortage Sadalaw • July 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Backs Himachal Pradesh’s Claim to Higher Hydropower Royalties Sadalaw • July 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Haryana Moves Supreme Court to Shield Aravalli Hills from Cross-Border Mining Sadalaw • July 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Slams Rajasthan Pollution Control Board Over Severe Staffing Shortage Read More »

Supreme Court Backs Himachal Pradesh’s Claim to Higher Hydropower Royalties

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Backs Himachal Pradesh’s Claim to Higher Hydropower Royalties Haryana Moves Supreme Court to Shield Aravalli Hills from Cross-Border Mining LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMAZON WEB SERVICES, GURUGRAM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV MOKSH JAIN, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CIPLA, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ELEVATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ANB LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NAKS LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JP LAW ASSOCIATES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IVY LAW OFFICES LLP Supreme Court Backs Himachal Pradesh’s Claim to Higher Hydropower Royalties Kashish Jahan 19 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Himachal Pradesh, restoring 18% royalty from JSW Energy’s hydropower project. This landmark verdict secures state revenue and sets a powerful precedent for resource-sharing agreements in India. Supreme Court’s Landmark Verdict: A Victory for State Revenue Rights In a major win for Himachal Pradesh, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that the state is entitled to an 18% royalty from the Karcham–Wangtoo Hydropower Project, overriding the 12% cap previously defended by JSW Energy. The verdict reinforces the terms of a 1999 agreement and is expected to significantly boost the state’s revenue. Background: The Royalty Dispute Unfolds The core issue stemmed from a 1999 power-sharing agreement that mandated: 12% royalty for the first 12 years of operations A rise to 18% royalty thereafter However, in 2023, JSW Energy refused to implement the hike, arguing that the 12% cap should remain in place indefinitely. This led to a legal standoff that impacted the state’s fiscal health. Himachal’s Fiscal Future Looks Brighter Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu welcomed the verdict, calling it a “significant boost” to the hill state’s economy. With tourism and horticulture revenues fluctuating due to climate and market factors, the court’s decision brings stability. Financial Impact: ₹150 crore in immediate annual revenue gain ₹250 crore more annually if similar verdicts are passed on other projects These funds can be redirected to essential infrastructure and welfare schemes. Legal and Economic Precedent for Other States Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who represented the Himachal government, noted that the ruling reinforces the legal sanctity of resource-sharing contracts. This sets a precedent for other Indian states seeking equitable terms from private developers utilizing local resources like rivers, forests, and mineral reserves. Implications for India’s Hydropower Sector This judgment sends a strong signal to the hydropower industry. Experts believe it will encourage: Contractual clarity in public-private partnerships Review of outdated agreements by private players Risk reassessment in large-scale infrastructure investments Citizens stand to benefit as increased state earnings could fund development in roads, education, healthcare, and rural electrification. What’s Next for Himachal Pradesh? The state is now focused on: Recovering arrears from JSW Energy Ensuring timely payments of future royalties Auditing other hydropower contracts for similar discrepancies This bold move may inspire other Himalayan states—like Uttarakhand and Sikkim—to demand fair compensation for the exploitation of their natural resources. Conclusion: Strengthening State Autonomy in Resource Management The Supreme Court’s judgment is not just a legal win but a political and financial milestone. It empowers states to enforce contractual obligations and protect their economic sovereignty in the face of corporate interests. This ruling has the potential to reshape India’s federal approach to natural resource governance. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Backs Himachal Pradesh’s Claim to Higher Hydropower Royalties Sadalaw • July 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Haryana Moves Supreme Court to Shield Aravalli Hills from Cross-Border Mining Sadalaw • July 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala Government Grants Early Release to Sherin After 14 Years in Familial Murder Case Sadalaw • July 18, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Backs Himachal Pradesh’s Claim to Higher Hydropower Royalties Read More »

Haryana Moves Supreme Court to Shield Aravalli Hills from Cross-Border Mining

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Haryana Moves Supreme Court to Shield Aravalli Hills from Cross-Border Mining LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMAZON WEB SERVICES, GURUGRAM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV MOKSH JAIN, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CIPLA, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ELEVATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ANB LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NAKS LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JP LAW ASSOCIATES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IVY LAW OFFICES LLP LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MAMMOET, MUMBAI Haryana Moves Supreme Court to Shield Aravalli Hills from Cross-Border Mining Kashish Jahan 19 JULY 2025 Haryana has approached the Supreme Court to halt mining within 5 km inside Rajasthan’s Aravalli range, citing ecological damage. Learn why this legal move could set a national precedent in forest conservation. A Legal Push to Save the Ancient Aravallis In a bold environmental move, the Haryana government has filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India to ban mining operations within five kilometres of the Aravalli Hills on the Rajasthan side of the border. This legal plea highlights growing concerns over rampant extraction activities damaging one of the world’s oldest mountain ranges. Why Haryana Intervened Despite state-level bans and the creation of green buffer zones, illegal and unchecked mining activities just across the Haryana-Rajasthan border persist. According to officials, mining leases granted in Rajasthan allow heavy equipment and trucks to cross the boundary easily, bypassing Haryana’s environmental safeguards. This undermines the state’s conservation efforts and accelerates ecological degradation. What Haryana Is Demanding The Haryana government is requesting the Supreme Court to establish a legally enforceable mining-free buffer zone stretching at least five kilometres inside Rajasthan territory. The aim is to protect: Water recharge zones Wildlife corridors Air and soil quality Such a buffer would act as a green belt, preventing further deforestation and mining-related damage to the fragile ecosystem. The Stakes for Rajasthan While Rajasthan‘s government has yet to officially respond, mining leaseholders in districts like Alwar are raising concerns about economic losses and job cuts. However, environmentalists argue that short-term employment cannot justify irreversible ecological loss. “The Aravallis don’t follow state lines, and neither should our conservation efforts,” one activist commented. Why the Aravalli Range Matters The Aravalli Range plays a critical environmental role in North India. It acts as a: Green barrier against desertification from the Thar Desert Air purifier for NCR cities like Gurgaon and Delhi Groundwater recharge zone Unchecked mining and deforestation here contribute to: Groundwater depletion Air pollution Soil erosion Loss of biodiversity What Happens Next? The Supreme Court’s verdict could mark a turning point in India’s environmental policy. If the court agrees with Haryana’s request, it may set a legal precedent for cross-border conservation zones—paving the way for cooperative ecological protection that transcends state boundaries. Final Thoughts As climate change intensifies, India’s fragile ecosystems need stronger legal protection. Haryana’s proactive move might spark a national conversation on sustainable development, interstate environmental cooperation, and the need to prioritize long-term ecological health over short-term economic gains. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Haryana Moves Supreme Court to Shield Aravalli Hills from Cross-Border Mining Sadalaw • July 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala Government Grants Early Release to Sherin After 14 Years in Familial Murder Case Sadalaw • July 18, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Exempts Stem Cell Banking from Service Tax: A Landmark Healthcare Ruling Sadalaw • July 18, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Haryana Moves Supreme Court to Shield Aravalli Hills from Cross-Border Mining Read More »

Supreme Court Directs ECI to Consider Aadhaar, Voter ID, and Ration Cards for Bihar Voter Roll Revision

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Directs ECI to Consider Aadhaar, Voter ID, and Ration Cards for Bihar Voter Roll Revision Supreme Court to Hear Cartoonist Hemant Malviya’s Bail Plea in PM Modi Caricature Case LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV BIDYA LOK LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EXCELSIS ENERGY JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CYS LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BMW GROUP FINANCIAL SERVICES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LEX CHAMBERS INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT NM LAW CHAMBERS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SILVER PUSH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDI-GENIUS CONSULTING INC. Supreme Court Directs ECI to Consider Aadhaar, Voter ID, and Ration Cards for Bihar Voter Roll Revision Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 13 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court has instructed the Election Commission of India to consider Aadhaar, Voter ID, and ration cards during the Bihar voter roll revision process, aiming to prevent disenfranchisement ahead of the 2025 Assembly elections. Supreme Court Steps In on Bihar Voter Roll Controversy On July 10, 2025, the Supreme Court of India granted the Election Commission of India (ECI) the go-ahead to proceed with the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, ahead of the upcoming 2025 Assembly elections. However, the Court issued a crucial instruction: to avoid the exclusion of legitimate voters, the ECI must consider including identity documents such as the Aadhaar card, Voter ID (EPIC), and ration card during the voter verification process. Petitioners Raise Concerns Over Disenfranchisement The voter list revision process, officially announced on June 24, faced legal challenge from petitioners who argued it posed an unfair burden on voters, particularly those from marginalised and underprivileged communities. They warned that the short timeline—just weeks before the draft list is due on August 1, with elections expected in October or November—could lead to widespread disenfranchisement. Court Calls for Inclusive and Transparent Electoral Practices Although the Supreme Court declined to halt the voter list revision altogether, it emphasized the need for an inclusive approach. The bench advised the ECI to assess the usefulness of identity documents like Aadhaar, EPIC, and ration cards, and to provide a valid explanation if it chooses to exclude any. This move aims to prevent rigid interpretations of the SIR guidelines that could potentially disqualify eligible voters from being added to the revised electoral rolls. Legal Concerns Over ECI’s Powers and Timeline The Court also expressed doubts over whether the ECI had the constitutional authority to initiate the SIR without explicit parliamentary backing. It questioned whether a rapid revision under these conditions can uphold the principles of free and fair elections—a core component of India’s democratic framework. What’s Next: Key Dates to Watch July 21, 2025: ECI must file its counter-affidavit July 28, 2025: Follow-up hearing in the Supreme Court August 1, 2025: Deadline for releasing the draft electoral roll The Court’s guidance is expected to influence not just Bihar but also electoral roll practices across India. Political Reaction and Broader Implications Opposition parties have welcomed the Supreme Court’s interim directions, calling them a positive step toward protecting democratic rights and ensuring electoral transparency. This case is likely to set a nationwide precedent for how voter roll revisions are carried out, prompting a broader dialogue on inclusivity, documentation requirements, and voter rights in India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Directs ECI to Consider Aadhaar, Voter ID, and Ration Cards for Bihar Voter Roll Revision Sadalaw • July 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court to Hear Cartoonist Hemant Malviya’s Bail Plea in PM Modi Caricature Case Sadalaw • July 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Upholds Free Speech in Journalist Sedition Case Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Directs ECI to Consider Aadhaar, Voter ID, and Ration Cards for Bihar Voter Roll Revision Read More »

Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDI-GENIUS CONSULTING INC Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Kashish Jahan 10 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court is considering a groundbreaking petition that seeks to classify the Right to Privacy as not just a fundamental right but also a civic duty for all Indians. Learn how this could reshape digital behavior, laws, and social responsibility. Introduction: Privacy as a Shared Responsibility A new petition before the Supreme Court of India has sparked a crucial national debate: should the Right to Privacy be recognized not only as a fundamental right but also as a civic duty? The petitioner argues that the celebrated Puttaswamy judgment of 2017 rightly placed privacy under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, but failed to impose any obligation on citizens to respect the privacy of others. The Digital Age: Why Legal Rights Alone Are Not Enough In today’s hyper-connected world, privacy violations are often committed by ordinary individuals, not just by the state. The petition highlights: Leaking of private photos Forwarding of personal chats without consent Spread of digital gossip via social media With the rise of AI tools that can manipulate content and the failure of tech platforms to curb misuse, the petitioner insists that citizen responsibility is essential to preserve digital dignity. Judicial View: Adapting the Constitution to Technological Change During the preliminary hearing, the Chief Justice’s Bench acknowledged that the Constitution’s framers could not have foreseen the threats of the digital era. The Court recognized that the concept of privacy must evolve “in both letter and spirit,” in light of modern technological and societal realities. Real-life incidents were cited where women became victims of viral leaks, facing lifelong trauma with no accountability for those who violated their privacy. Expanding Fundamental Duties: A Modern Need? India’s Constitution already includes Fundamental Duties, such as: Promoting national harmony Protecting public property Preserving the environment The petitioner argues that these were introduced in the 42nd Amendment and must be updated to reflect modern-day risks. Adding a duty to respect the privacy of others could reinforce ethical conduct both online and offline. What Comes Next: Legal and Educational Reforms? In response, the Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Union Government, seeking a detailed reply within four weeks. Legal experts suggest this could lead to: A constitutional amendment A new privacy-respect law passed by Parliament of India Integration of digital ethics in school curricula and public awareness campaigns This debate may also influence how digital literacy programs are designed and how privacy norms are enforced at the grassroots level. Conclusion: Toward a Culture of Digital Responsibility While the petition’s final outcome is yet to be seen, it has succeeded in shifting attention to the shared civic role in protecting privacy. For a country like India—one of the largest and most digitally active societies in the world—this could set a global precedent in balancing individual rights with collective responsibilities. The next hearing will be critical in determining whether the Right to Privacy will also be legally recognized as a duty in India’s digital democracy. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Read More »

Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT GOEL AND GOEL’S CO. LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STASHFIN, GURGRAM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SOUL AI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT THOMSON REUTERS, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BOOKING HOLDINGS, BENGALURU INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE LEGAL RENAISSANCE, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 8 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India has stayed the recruitment of weightlifting coaches by the Sports Authority of Goa after a female candidate alleged bias, conflict of interest, and sexual harassment by an examiner. A full hearing is scheduled in six weeks. Supreme Court Intervenes in Goa Coach Hiring Dispute The Supreme Court of India has issued a stay order on the ongoing recruitment process for weightlifting coaches conducted by the Sports Authority of Goa (SAG). This move comes after serious allegations of bias and misconduct were raised by Vaishnavi S. Ugadekar, a female candidate who participated in the selection process. A bench comprising Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice K.V. Viswanathan accepted Ugadekar’s plea and issued notices to the Goa government, SAG, and other involved parties. Background: Allegations of Bias and Harassment Ugadekar approached the apex court after the Bombay High Court‘s Goa bench dismissed her concerns on June 23, 2025, allowing the recruitment to proceed. She claimed that a former coach, against whom she had previously filed a sexual harassment complaint, was one of the evaluators for the skill test. According to her, this individual not only harassed her during her training but also lacked proper weightlifting credentials, resulting in a one-year suspension from the sport. Breakdown of the Recruitment Process The selection process, announced in February 2024, included: A written examination A skill/practical test A physical fitness test Ugadekar cleared the physical fitness phase but scored only 17.5% in the skill test—below the required 20% passing mark. Her competitor scored 23.5% and qualified. Ugadekar alleged that her examiner’s personal bias led to her unfairly low score. Goa Government’s Offer and High Court Decision In response to the accusations, the Goa government proposed a re-test of the skill and physical assessments using external evaluators and temporarily paused the recruitment. However, the competing candidate challenged this move in the High Court, which allowed the process to continue—without hearing Ugadekar’s side. Supreme Court Calls for Procedural Fairness Now, the Supreme Court has put a hold on the entire selection, including the written examination, citing serious concerns about procedural integrity and fairness. A detailed hearing is scheduled after six weeks. What This Case Highlights This case underscores the importance of: Transparency in public recruitment Avoiding conflicts of interest Protecting whistleblowers and complainants Ensuring fair evaluation in sports and coaching roles It serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities candidates face in government hiring, particularly in fields involving youth mentorship and physical training. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Read More »

Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VERTEXLEGAL LLP, NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DIGITAL INDIA CORPORATION LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT RBL BANK LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT REVX CAPITAL LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT UNESCO CHAIR, NLU, DELHI LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HEADS UP FOR TAILS Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 7 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India grants temporary relief to C.K. Abdurahiman in a 1999 cheque bounce case, acknowledging possible mistaken identity and highlighting procedural gaps in financial offence trials. Background: A 20-Year-Old Case Resurfaces In a dramatic turn of events, the Supreme Court of India has provided temporary relief to C.K. Abdurahiman, a man convicted in a cheque bounce case dating back to May 1999. He claims he was wrongly identified and had no involvement in the financial transaction. The dispute arose from a ₹20 lakh cheque issued as part of an agreement to sell a rubber estate to Mukkath Marakkar Haji (not a verified Wikipedia page, leave unlinked if not found). When the cheque bounced, charges were filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which criminalizes cheque dishonor due to insufficient funds. Legal Timeline: From Conviction to Conditional Freedom 2004: A trial court found Abdurahiman guilty despite his claims of non-involvement. 2006: The Sessions Court acquitted him. 2024: The Kerala High Court overturned the acquittal, reinstating the conviction and imposing: A one-day sentence A compensation payment of ₹23 lakh Despite these setbacks, Abdurahiman approached the Supreme Court in 2025, arguing that he had been mistaken for another person with a similar name and house number. Supreme Court Observations: Signs of Misidentification Abdurahiman’s legal team highlighted several inconsistencies: Incomplete witness identification Questionable signature verification Unverified identity evidence Justices Sandeep Mehta and Joymalya Bagchi, after reviewing the case, granted him temporary release. As a condition, he must deposit ₹10 lakh, i.e., half of the disputed cheque amount. The court also suspended his sentence until further review. A new hearing is scheduled for August 12, 2025. Why This Case Matters: Identity, Fair Trial & Financial Justice This ruling underscores the importance of thoroughly investigating identity in financial crimes, especially in cases with: Long litigation periods Disputed documentation Incomplete or vague witness testimonies The Supreme Court’s intervention strikes a balance between the rights of the alleged wrongfully accused and the victim’s financial interests, reinforcing trust in due process and judicial fairness. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Read More »

Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VERTEXLEGAL LLP, NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DIGITAL INDIA CORPORATION LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT RBL BANK LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT REVX CAPITAL LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT UNESCO CHAIR, NLU, DELHI LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HEADS UP FOR TAILS LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT TITLEWIZE Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 7 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India stays the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s directive for IPS-level supervision in all serious crime investigations, citing practical and administrative challenges. A crucial hearing is set for July 14, 2025. Background: High Court Mandates IPS Oversight in Criminal Cases In a recent and widely discussed legal development, the Supreme Court of India stayed an order issued by the Madhya Pradesh High Court that mandated Indian Police Service (IPS) supervision for all serious criminal investigations in the state. This High Court directive, dated July 3, 2025, required the formation of a two-member supervisory team in each district—comprising: One senior IPS officer of at least the rank of Superintendent of Police One junior police officer of minimum Sub-Inspector rank The goal was to strengthen investigative standards and bridge quality gaps in district-level policing. Supreme Court’s Intervention: Practicality Over Policy A bench consisting of Justice K.V. Viswanathan and Justice N.K. Singh responded to the Madhya Pradesh government’s appeal, which claimed that the directive was administratively unfeasible. According to NCRB 2022 data: Over 489 lakh cases were filed across the state More than 38,000 cases were categorized as “serious offences” The state has only 63 SP-rank officers to supervise all such cases The state government argued that enforcing such a blanket supervisory mechanism would place an unmanageable burden on its senior officers. Court’s Observation and Stay Order The Supreme Court acknowledged the intent behind the High Court’s ruling—to enhance the quality of investigations—but emphasized that execution must be grounded in reality. The Court, therefore: Stayed the High Court order temporarily Directed the Madhya Pradesh administration to submit a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) within three weeks Aimed to strike a balance between accountability and administrative feasibility A follow-up hearing is scheduled for July 14, 2025. Why This Case Matters This decision sets a significant precedent in Indian policing and legal oversight. Its implications include: A balanced judicial approach that values both reform and realism A possible model for police reform across other Indian states with similar resource limitations Encouragement for state governments to develop customized SOPs for improved investigations without overburdening law enforcement Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Sadalaw • July 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote