sadalawpublications.com

Pankaj Mithal

Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations

Trending Today Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT GOEL AND GOEL’S CO. LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STASHFIN, GURGRAM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SOUL AI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT THOMSON REUTERS, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BOOKING HOLDINGS, BENGALURU INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE LEGAL RENAISSANCE, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 8 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India has stayed the recruitment of weightlifting coaches by the Sports Authority of Goa after a female candidate alleged bias, conflict of interest, and sexual harassment by an examiner. A full hearing is scheduled in six weeks. Supreme Court Intervenes in Goa Coach Hiring Dispute The Supreme Court of India has issued a stay order on the ongoing recruitment process for weightlifting coaches conducted by the Sports Authority of Goa (SAG). This move comes after serious allegations of bias and misconduct were raised by Vaishnavi S. Ugadekar, a female candidate who participated in the selection process. A bench comprising Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice K.V. Viswanathan accepted Ugadekar’s plea and issued notices to the Goa government, SAG, and other involved parties. Background: Allegations of Bias and Harassment Ugadekar approached the apex court after the Bombay High Court‘s Goa bench dismissed her concerns on June 23, 2025, allowing the recruitment to proceed. She claimed that a former coach, against whom she had previously filed a sexual harassment complaint, was one of the evaluators for the skill test. According to her, this individual not only harassed her during her training but also lacked proper weightlifting credentials, resulting in a one-year suspension from the sport. Breakdown of the Recruitment Process The selection process, announced in February 2024, included: A written examination A skill/practical test A physical fitness test Ugadekar cleared the physical fitness phase but scored only 17.5% in the skill test—below the required 20% passing mark. Her competitor scored 23.5% and qualified. Ugadekar alleged that her examiner’s personal bias led to her unfairly low score. Goa Government’s Offer and High Court Decision In response to the accusations, the Goa government proposed a re-test of the skill and physical assessments using external evaluators and temporarily paused the recruitment. However, the competing candidate challenged this move in the High Court, which allowed the process to continue—without hearing Ugadekar’s side. Supreme Court Calls for Procedural Fairness Now, the Supreme Court has put a hold on the entire selection, including the written examination, citing serious concerns about procedural integrity and fairness. A detailed hearing is scheduled after six weeks. What This Case Highlights This case underscores the importance of: Transparency in public recruitment Avoiding conflicts of interest Protecting whistleblowers and complainants Ensuring fair evaluation in sports and coaching roles It serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities candidates face in government hiring, particularly in fields involving youth mentorship and physical training. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Read More »

Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles

Trending Today The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration JAMMU AND KASHMIR POST ARTICLE 370 ANIMAL CRUELTY CONTROVERSY: HOW THE 2023 SCC DECISION AFFECT JALIKATTU Role of technology in transforming the Indian judiciary COMMON CAUSE v. UNION OF INDIA 2018 Legal Framework governing reproductive rights and abortion law The Impact of Contract Law on E-Commerce and Online Transactions Indian Parliament Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles: Supreme Court on 6th November, 2024 04 Mar 2025 CIVIL APPEAL No. 841 of 2018 M/s BAJAJ ALLIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.                           …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RAMBHA DEVI & ORS.                           …RESPONDENT(S) Date of the Judgement- 6th November, 2024 Presideng Judges: DY Chandrachud, CJI, Hrishikesh Roy, PS Narasimha, Pankaj Mithal, and Manoj Misra, JJ Introduction In a case addressing whether an individual with a driving license for a ‘Light Motor Vehicle’ (LMV) is permitted to drive a ‘transport vehicle’ within the LMV category with an unladen weight not exceeding 7500 kg, a five-judge bench ruled that a person holding an LMV license can operate such a transport vehicle without requiring a specific endorsement. The issue at hand originated in the case of Mukund Dewangan v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2017) 14 SCC 663, where a 3-judge bench ruled that no separate endorsement was needed on an LMV driving license to operate a transport vehicle with an unladen weight below 7500 kg. The Court held that a person with an LMV license could drive a “transport vehicle of light motor vehicle class” weighing up to 7500 kg. However, in 2022, a coordinate bench raised doubts about this ruling, and the matter was subsequently referred to a larger 5-judge bench for further consideration. Adopting a harmonious interpretation of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (‘MV Act’), the Court upheld the decision in Mukund Dewangan (supra). Decisions:- The Court gave the following conclusions: A driver holding a license for LMV for vehicles underweight 7500 kg is permitted to operate a transport vehicle without needing additional authorisation under Section 10(2)(e) of the MV Act. For licensing purposes, LMVs and transport vehicles are not completely distinct categories, as there is some overlap between the two. A driver holding an LMV license can, under certain conditions, operate light commercial transport vehicles. However, there are still specific eligibility requirements that apply to certain types of vehicles, such as e-carts, e-rickshaws, and vehicles transporting hazardous goods. The second part of Section 3(1), which emphasises the necessity of a specific requirement to drive transport vehicle, does not supersede the definition of LMV provided in Section 2(21) of the MV Act. The additional eligibility criteria specified in the MV Act and MV Rules generally for driving transport vehicles would apply only to those intending to operate transport vehicles exceeding 7500 kgs, i.e medium goods vehicle, medium passenger vehicle, heavy goods vehicle and heavy passenger vehicles. … 2 Comments ANIMAL CRUELTY CONTROVERSY: HOW THE 2023 SCC DECISION AFFECT JALIKATTU – sadalawpublications.comFebruary 27, 2025 at 8:17 am | Edit[…] rights and abortion law The Impact of Contract Law on E-Commerce and Online Transactions Indian Parliament Addressing Judicial Issues in Revenge Porn Cases Triviality section 95 INDIAN YOUNG […]Reply RAVI KUMARFebruary 8, 2025 at 2:48 am | EditThe freedom we enjoy today is ours due to the lifelong struggle of our ancestors who fought tooth and nail for it. People from different backgrounds joined the show, inspired by the ideology of freedom, equality and democracy. Its a very good xplanation. #goodarticleReply Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message*

Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Read More »