IAS

UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police

Leave a Comment / Live cases / sadalawpublications@gmail.com

Trending Today UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police NITU KUMARI 19 Mar 2025 SLP(Crl) No. 357 OF 2025 PUJA MANORMA DILIP KHEDKAR … PetitionerVersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI … Respondent Date of Judgment: January 15, 2025Presiding Judges: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma Justice BV Nagarathna Background of the Case Puja Khedkar was selected for the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) and assigned to the Maharashtra Cadre after clearing the 2022 Civil Services Examination (CSE). Initially, she wrote her name as “Khedkar Puja Deelip Rao” and claimed Other Backward Class (OBC) status in most of her attempts, except in CSE-2013, where she applied under the General category. In 2018, she declared herself as a candidate for the Persons with Benchmark Disabilities (PwBD) category, specifically under the vision impairment subcategory, while also claiming OBC non-creamy layer status. Allegations arose regarding fraudulent claims in her UPSC applications, leading to the registration of an FIR on July 19, 2024. According to UPSC, Puja Khedkar circumvented scrutiny over her excessive exam attempts by exploiting eligibility criteria. The Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances, and Pensions (DoPT) issued a show-cause notice questioning her refusal to be released from service under the IAS Probation Rules, 1954. On July 31, 2024, UPSC issued a press release stating that her provisional candidature for CSE-2022 was revoked, and she was permanently barred from appearing for future UPSC exams. After her arrest, she sought anticipatory bail from the District and Sessions Judge at Patiala House, which was denied on August 8, 2024. Following this, she approached the Delhi High Court, which also denied her bail plea. Case Analysis & Decision The Delhi High Court rejected Puja Khedkar’s bail plea on Monday, stating that the case represents fraud against both a constitutional body and society. Justice Chandra Dhari Singh ruled that “interrogation is necessary to uncover the full extent of the fraud committed against the nation.” The court highlighted that Puja Khedkar misused government schemes by forging documents to secure benefits meant for underprivileged sections of society. The judgment noted that: The investigation revealed that she was not eligible for the benefits she claimed. Luxury cars and multiple properties in her name indicated an attempt to misuse reservation policies. Her family held a prominent position in the state, suggesting possible collusion with influential individuals. The court cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in CBI v. Anil Sharma to justify her interrogation, arguing that her actions were part of a broader scheme to manipulate the system. Thus, her bail request was denied, and her interim protection from arrest was revoked. Conclusion On January 15, 2025, the Supreme Court of India granted temporary protection from arrest to Puja Khedkar and sought responses from the Delhi government and UPSC regarding her anticipatory bail plea. Her legal counsel argued that the Delhi High Court had made harsh observations against her while rejecting her petition. Puja Khedkar has denied all allegations of misrepresentation and fraud. However, the case underscores serious concerns regarding the misuse of reservation benefits in competitive examinations. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 7, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 4 Next »

UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police Read More »

PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted.

Trending Today PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. NITU KUMARI 19 Mar 2025 Update: 17 March 2025 The Supreme Court of India today (March 17) denied Pradeep Sharma, a former Gujarat IAS official, his discharge in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), noting that money laundering is a continuous offense rather than a one-time incident. He was charged with using bribes to generate proceeds of crime while serving as Collector. He requested discharge, claiming that the alleged illegal activity that produced the proceeds of crime took place prior to the PMLA’s implementation. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) opposed the plea, claiming that money laundering constituted a persistent criminal offense. The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that since the alleged predicate offense took place prior to the PMLA’s passage, no money laundering offense could be proven. Rather, citing the ruling in Vijay Madanlal Chaudhary vs. Union of India (2023) 12 SCC 1, the Court ruled that money laundering is a crime that persists as long as criminal gains are hidden, put to use, or manifested as pure property. It is commonly known that crimes under the PMLA are ongoing, and money laundering doesn’t cease with a single incident; rather, it continues as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, put to use, or presented as pure property. According to the bench made up of Justices Vikram Nath and Prasanna B. Varale, “the legislative intent behind the PMLA is to combat the menace of money laundering, which by its very nature involves transactions spanning over time.” As long as unlawful gains are held, presented as legitimate, or reintroduced into the economy, the law acknowledges that money laundering is a continuous activity rather than a one-time occurrence. Therefore, neither the law nor the facts support the claim that the offense is not ongoing, and as a result, the High Court‘s decision cannot be overturned on this basis. The appellant’s argument is untenable, even when considered within the framework of the current case. The evidence in the file shows that the appellant has consistently and repeatedly abused his position of authority, which has led to the creation and long-term use of criminal proceeds. The appellant continued to be involved in financial transactions connected to the proceeds of crime after the original point of commission, as the respondent (ED) has successfully shown prima facie. A continuous offense under the PMLA includes the use of such proceeds, the purported layering and integration, and the attempts to portray such money as unadulterated. The Court further stated that the actions taken against the appellant are completely within the bounds of the law and cannot be challenged on this basis. The Court underlined that the PMLA was passed in order to fight money laundering, which by definition entails long-term transactions. As a result, even if the predicate offenses took place earlier, the PMLA may still be applied to acts that persisted after it was passed. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 7, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 4 Next »

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police

PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted.

Editorial message

Quick links

Contact info