sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu
Menu

constitutional rights

Supreme Court Dismisses Pleas Seeking SIT Probe Into Murshidabad Communal Violence Over Waqf Amendment Act

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Rebuffs PIL Challenging Obscene Content on OTT Platforms Like Netflix and Amazon Prime Supreme Court Hears Indian Express and Times of India Petitions Against Gujarat HC Over Apology for Misreporting Supreme Court Dismisses Pleas Seeking SIT Probe Into Murshidabad Communal Violence Over Waqf Amendment Act Supreme Court Judge BV Nagarathna Highlights Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality at Book Launch Delhi Court Shocked as Convict Threatens Female Judge After Cheque Bounce Conviction; NCW Action Ordered Allahabad High Court Sentences Lawyer Ashok Pandey to Six Months Jail for Contempt of Court Supreme Court Judges Publicly Declare Assets: A Historic Move Toward Judicial Transparency in India Supreme Court Halts Nashik Dargah Demolition, Questions Bombay High Court Over Plea Listing Delay Wildlife Conservation Laws in India: Legal Framework, Importance & Key Acts “Drone Usage in India: Laws, Regulations, and the Future of UAV Technology” Supreme Court Dismisses Pleas Seeking SIT Probe Into Murshidabad Communal Violence Over Waqf Amendment Act MAHI SINHA 22 Apr 2025 Supreme Court Rejects Hastily Filed PILs on Murshidabad Violence The Supreme Court of India has dismissed two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) seeking a probe into the communal violence that erupted in Murshidabad, West Bengal, following protests against the Waqf (Amendment) Act. The court emphasized the importance of filing well-structured petitions and maintaining decorum in legal language. Background of the Murshidabad Violence After the passing of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, several districts in West Bengal, including Murshidabad and North 24 Parganas, witnessed violent protests. In response, authorities imposed prohibitory orders, suspended internet services, and arrested over 150 individuals. Similar protests were reported in Bengaluru, Chennai, Manipur, and Jammu and Kashmir. Supreme Court Criticism on Procedural Grounds   Allegations Without Proper Impleadment The bench, led by Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh, criticized advocate Shashank Shekhar Jha for filing the plea in haste. The petition included serious allegations against government officials who were not named as parties to the case, a significant procedural flaw. “You are making allegations against individuals who are not before us,” the bench remarked. Inappropriate Language in Pleadings The court also took exception to the tone and terminology used in the petition. It questioned whether such language meets the standards of decency expected in Supreme Court filings. “Supreme Court is a court of record. Posterity will see,” the bench warned. Reliance on Media Reports Jha admitted that his claims about people migrating from West Bengal were based on media reports. The court rejected this as insufficient evidence and emphasized the need for credible material. Liberty to Refile Petitions Granted Advocate Shashank Shekhar Jha withdrew his plea, with the court granting him liberty to file a fresh petition with improved content and proper parties included. Similarly, advocate Vishal Tiwari also withdrew his petition, which called for a five-member judicial inquiry led by a retired Supreme Court judge. The court encouraged him to maintain institutional decorum and include strong legal foundations in his refiled plea. Legal Provisions Invoked The petitioners had invoked Article 32 of the Constitution, which allows individuals to approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights. The court, however, reminded them that while Article 32 is specific, Article 226—applicable in High Courts—has a broader scope and may be more suitable for such cases. Conclusion: Importance of Responsible Legal Filings This case serves as a strong reminder of the significance of proper legal procedure, respectful language, and credible evidence when filing PILs in the Supreme Court. While seeking justice for victims of violence is critical, doing so with well-prepared, structured arguments enhances the credibility and effectiveness of the plea. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Rebuffs PIL Challenging Obscene Content on OTT Platforms Like Netflix and Amazon Prime Supreme Court Rebuffs PIL Challenging Obscene Content on OTT Platforms Like Netflix and Amazon Prime Sadalaw Publications • April 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Hears Indian Express and Times of India Petitions Against Gujarat HC Over Apology for Misreporting Supreme Court Hears Indian Express and Times of India Petitions Against Gujarat HC Over Apology for Misreporting Sadalaw Publications • April 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Dismisses Pleas Seeking SIT Probe Into Murshidabad Communal Violence Over Waqf Amendment Act Supreme Court Dismisses Pleas Seeking SIT Probe Into Murshidabad Communal Violence Over Waqf Amendment Act Sadalaw Publications • April 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Dismisses Pleas Seeking SIT Probe Into Murshidabad Communal Violence Over Waqf Amendment Act Read More »

Rajya Sabha Adopts Bill 2025 for Waqf (Amendment)

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Rajya Sabha Adopts Bill 2025 for Waqf (Amendment) Destruction in Kancha Gachibowli ‘forest’ area depicts an ‘alarming picture’, says SC NCLT Rejects Insolvency Plea Against Zomato Over Payment Dispute Actor Hansika Motwani files a motion in the Bombay High Court to quash a FIR after being booked in a Section 498A case. Supreme Court slams Telangana CM for “making mockery” of anti-defection law Union Minister Kiren Rijiju: The Waqf Amendment Bill Is Prospective Rather Than Retrospective Supreme Court of India Significance of mitigating factors when awarding the death penalty. The Supreme Court permits the petitioner to get involved in ongoing proceedings but rejects another petition contesting the Places of Worship Act. Punjab & Haryana High Court: Child in Womb During Accident Is Subject To Reimbursement Under MV Act What it implies signifies Sam Altman claims that OpenAI’s GPUs are “melting” over Ghibli-style AI art Rajya Sabha Adopts Bill 2025 for Waqf (Amendment) MAHI SINHA 05 Apr 2025 Update: 04 Apr 2025 After a discussion that lasted more than 14 hours, the Rajya Sabha enacted the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 at around 2.22 AM on April 4, after midnight. The law received 128 votes in favor and 95 votes against it. Abstention did not exist. On April 3, the Lok Sabha approved the bill. It is currently awaiting the President of India‘s approval to become legislation. Waqf is a person’s ongoing commitment to any cause that is accepted by Muslim law as benevolent, religious, or pious. On August 8 of last year, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 was presented to the Lok Sabha. In order to modernize waqf administration, lower litigation, and guarantee the effective management of waqf holdings, some 40 revisions were recommended to the current Waqf Act, 1995 (as revised in 2013). It was turned over to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for a more thorough examination of the suggested modifications following strong opposition criticism. With certain modifications, the Bill has essentially been approved by the JPC. The government and its members made it clear during the discussion on Thursday that the Act aims to guarantee efficient administration of waqf property in order to guarantee that the money received from waqf is distributed fairly for the benefit of Muslims. Kiren Rijiju explained that the user’s provide of waqf is prospective in nature and said that the Government has adopted some of the JPC’s recommendations. Amit Shah of the Ministry of Home Affairs also provided clarification on this. Shah made sure that no one would meddle in Muslims’ religious matters. The Bill seeks to increase efficiency, accountability, and openness, Rijiju noted today. The Waqf Board is only a legal entity, plain and simple, and not an autonomous body of the Muslim body, according to the Kerala High Court‘s ruling in “Syed Fazal Pookoya Thangal vs. Union of India And Ors,” which he referenced. Rijiju defended the choice to include two non-Muslim members, saying that the government has no intention of meddling in religious matters and only wants to make the ruling party more secular. Hazif Mohd Zafar Ahmd v. UP Central Sunni Board of Waqf, another Allahabad High Court ruling that noted that Mutawalli’s function is secular and not a religious ritual, was also mentioned by Rijiju. The federal government guided the 2013 modification introduced during the Indian National Congress‘s longevity,” said House Leader JP Nadda today. However, the government discovered in 2020–21 that the waqf property had only grown by 18 lac hectares between 1913 and 2013, while 21 lac hectares of waqf assets were added between 2013 and 2025. The government introduced this bill to make sure it wasn’t abused. Nadda said that because the 2013 amendment gave the waqf board exceptional powers, it seemed to override the nation’s constitutional structure. He said that it turned into a harsh legislation. He cited Section 40 of the Parent Act in particular, stating that the Waqf Board has the authority to determine whether a property qualified as a waqf asset on its own. Additionally, he cited the clause that prohibited residents from contesting the waqf tribunal’s ruling in ordinary courts, claiming that this was against Article 21. Additionally, Section 54 was cited, which, in Nadda’s opinion, permitted the Tribunal’s decision to remove the encroachment. In contrast, civil courts were prohibited from pursuing any legal action under Sections 5 and 6 of the Parent Act. The Leader of the Opposition, Mallikarjun Kharge, queried why, if the government wants the wellbeing of Muslims, it has halted five programs that assist them. Additionally, he stated that the Ministry of Minority Affairs funding is still being cut by the governing body. Kharge noted that the Government initially granted the Collector jurisdiction and then transferred that authority to a designated State official above the Collector’s legitimacy, rather than the Survey Inspector doing an initial investigation into the waqf land. The opponents claimed that the government was attempting to split the populace along religious lines and criticized the bill for breaching Article 25 of the Constitution. A few members also had concerns about how the JPC operated. According to Dr. Syed Naseer Hussain, the government welcomed non-stakeholders for the first time today since they were aware that the vast majority of people opposed the proposal. According to Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, the Bill blatantly disregards Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution. He went on to say that he has participated in some important cases, including those involving the Sabarimala temple and the Dawoodi Bohra community, and in these rulings, the Supreme Court has unequivocally declared that a custom or execute fully falls under the safeguards of fundamental rights provided by Articles 25 and 26 once it is deemed a necessary part of religion. Singhvi cited Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. State of Bombay, saying that a statute that completely removes a religious denomination’s administrative power and transfers it to a different, more secular body would violate Article 26 rights. Singhvi of Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj vs. The State of Rajasthan also cited this

Rajya Sabha Adopts Bill 2025 for Waqf (Amendment) Read More »

“Battle Between Law, Faith, and Politics”: New Controversy Is Sparked by Namaz Curbs in Uttar Pradesh

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today “Battle Between Law, Faith, and Politics”: New Controversy Is Sparked by Namaz Curbs in Uttar Pradesh Shattering the Stereotypes: Separating Fact from Fiction in Personal Injury Lawsuits Punjab Government Notifies Supreme Court of Farmers’ Protest | Dallewal Ends Quickly, NH Opens After Removing Demonstrators The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that law schools who admit candidates with no BCI authorization would face criminal charges. Supreme Court: Motor Accident Claims | Multiplier Cannot Be Dropped Since Complainant Was Making Foreign Currency Due to jurisdictional errors in TADA sworn statements, the Supreme Court maintains the acquittal of six convicts in the 1990 Kashmir University VC murder case. Supreme Court of India: Breaking Chains – Ending Caste-Based Discrimination in Prisons The Supreme Court rejects the Writ Petition against the Allahabad High Court, holding that grabbing breasts and severing the pyjama string does not amount to an attempt at rape. In the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the CBI files a closure report. Men Accused of Vandalizing the spot Where Artist Kunal Kamra Played Are Released on Bail by Mumbai Court “Battle Between Law, Faith, and Politics”: New Controversy Is Sparked by Namaz Curbs in Uttar Pradesh NITU KUMARI 29 Mar 2025 Yogi Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh bans offering Namaz on the roads across the state: Introduction: The state government’s decision to forbid the offering of Namaz on rooftops and roadways during Alvida Jumma (the final Friday of Ramadan) and Eid-ul-Fitr in districts like Sambhal, Aligarh, Lucknow, and Meerut has put Uttar Pradesh at the center of controversy once more. The UP government’s directive to prohibit Namaz on roads and rooftops during Alvida Jumma and Eid has triggered sharp political and community reactions. Although authorities point to traffic and public safety issues, some contend the action exacerbates an already existing conflict between government, religion, and the law. After a limited ban on performing Namaz on roads was successfully implemented in a few areas of the state, including Meerut and Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh decided to completely outlaw the practice. Director-General of Police (DGP) OP Singh on the Ban: DGP confirmed the ban on Tuesday, stating that all district police chiefs and other authorities had received instructions to make sure that no Namaz was offered by blocking roads. “The district administration may permit this practice on special occasions, such as when a sizable crowd gathers to offer prayers on festivals, but it will not be permitted as a regular practice during every Friday prayer,” he stated. The DGP added that district authorities have been requested to meet with clerics and mosque administrations in different districts to raise awareness of how Namaz on roads disrupts smooth traffic flow and causes other issues, following their success in places like Meerut and Aligarh. He attested that the Aligarh district administration had successfully enforced a comprehensive circular prohibiting Namaz on roadways in addition to hosting similar sessions with clergy and mosque administrations. Singh said that if such religious groups disrupted traffic or inconvenienced other communities, they would not be permitted to take place on public highways. For a long time, the Uttar Pradesh government has been very strict, prohibiting all religious activities, including Namaz, on public highways. On June 8, namazis gathered outside Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh’s Chowki Chouraha Masjid to offer Friday Namaz in the street, but were stopped by the UP police. They were thwarted, nevertheless, when the UP police decided to obey the order and prevented the crowd from performing Namaz on the street. WHY IS IT BANNED? QUESTIONS OF SAFETY OR POLITICAL STRATEGY? In Uttar Pradesh, the state government has implemented a number of steps in recent years, including the Namaz limitations, which were not a sudden decision. Public safety and traffic control are the two main justifications offered by the government for the action. “A peace committee meeting was held in Kotwali, Sambhal, with people from all religions and communities. It was clearly communicated and ensured that prayers will be conducted inside mosques and Eidgahs only, and not on the streets. Issues related to electricity and water were also addressed and will be resolved in time. Compliance with the rules was also emphasized. The zonal sector arrangement remains in place as before, and an adequate police force will be deployed. It will be ensured that prayers are not conducted on rooftops,” ASP Shrish Chandra stated during a peace committee meeting held at Sadar Kotwali, Sambhal. In districts such as Meerut and Aligarh, authorities pointed to past incidents where rooftops had collapsed under the weight of too many people, posing a significant safety hazard. A POLITICAL FALLOUT: Strong political reactions have been sparked by the government’s action, especially from the Samajwadi Party (SP), which has a sizable Muslim support base. Ziaur Rahman Barq, the MP for Sambhal, charged that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government was trying to restrict Muslim religious freedoms in the name of upholding law and order. “Safety is not the issue here. The BJP government is systematically erasing our traditions and does not want Muslims to pray in public,” Barq claimed, threatening to appeal the ruling in the Allahabad High Court. Nonetheless, the ruling BJP defended the ruling, claiming that the action was meant to standardize the laws governing religious assemblies in public areas. In Lucknow, a BJP spokeswoman stated: “Every community must abide by the norms. The government has simply made sure that Namaz is held in approved locations; it has not outright prohibited it. Religious ceremonies of other faiths are also subject to similar limitations.” Despite the government’s defense, Opposition parties — including the Indian National Congress and All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (AIMIM) — have criticized the restrictions, calling them politically motivated and an attempt to polarize communities ahead of the upcoming elections. THE VIEWS OF LEGAL EXPERTS: Lucknow-based senior counsel S. Mohammed Haider, an authority in constitutional law, offered his thoughts on the dispute. Terming it “a battle between law, faith, and politics,” he stated that the Uttar Pradesh government’s directive raises important questions

“Battle Between Law, Faith, and Politics”: New Controversy Is Sparked by Namaz Curbs in Uttar Pradesh Read More »

Daughter-In-Law Integral Part Of Family, Entitled To Compassionate Appointment: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Daughter-In-Law Integral Part Of Family, Entitled To Compassionate Appointment: Andhra Pradesh High Court Decoding Nagpur violence: Aurangzeb Tomb Row : 69 Rioters Arrested,Section 144 Imposed Six Supreme Court Judges Will Lead NALSA’s Legal Aid and Humanitarian Assistance Mission to Manipur Relief Camps UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Daughter-In-Law Integral Part Of Family, Entitled To Compassionate Appointment: Andhra Pradesh High Court NITU KUMARI 21 Mar 2025 Update: 19-03-2025 The Andhra Pradesh High Court has affirmed that a daughter-in-law is an essential member of her husband’s family and is entitled to compassionate appointment upon the death of her spouse. This decision broadens the scope of compassionate appointments, which are traditionally reserved for immediate family members like spouses, sons, and daughters, to include daughters-in-law. The court emphasized that excluding daughters-in-law from compassionate appointments contradicts the equality principles enshrined in Articles 14 and 15 of the Indian Constitution. By acknowledging daughters-in-law as eligible, the court hopes to provide financial stability to families affected by the untimely death of a government employee. This ruling is expected to have an impact on state policies regarding compassionate appointments, leading authorities to update current guidelines to ensure they are inclusive and non-discriminatory. This development highlights the judiciary‘s role in upholding constitutional rights and promoting social justice by extending benefits to all deserving family members. This ruling is consistent with previous decisions where the court acknowledged that a daughter’s eligibility for compassionate appointments should not be affected by her marital status. Sons and daughters, regardless of their marital status, remain integral members of their parents’ families. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 7, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 4 Next »

Daughter-In-Law Integral Part Of Family, Entitled To Compassionate Appointment: Andhra Pradesh High Court Read More »

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration JAMMU AND KASHMIR POST ARTICLE 370 ANIMAL CRUELTY CONTROVERSY: HOW THE 2023 SCC DECISION AFFECT JALIKATTU ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 13 Mar 2025 Table of contents OVERVIEW OF THE CASE OF ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS V. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS BACKGROUND AND HISTORY OF THE CASE KEY PLAYERS INVOLVED IN THE CASE LEGAL ISSUES AND ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY BOTH SIDES ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT’S RULING IN 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE DECISION ON DEMOCRACY AND POLITICS IN INDIA CRITICISMS AND CONTROVERSIES SURROUNDING CONCLUSION: FINAL THOUGHTS ON THE ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER V UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS SSC ONLINE SC VIDEO OF SUPREME COURT VERDICT REFERENCES OVERVIEW OF THE CASE OF ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS V. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS The case of Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) v. UOI was a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by ADR, a non-political arrangement occupied towards transparency and accountability in Indian elections. The basic objective concerning this case search out challenge Section 33B (1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (RPA), that admitted governmental bodies to withhold facts about their capital beginnings, containing gifts taken from alien companies or things. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY OF THE CASE The petition was ground for one Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), two non-administration arrangements active towards electoral corrects in the country. The case generally disputed sure supplying of the Representation of People Act, 1951, that admitted political bodies to accept unknown gifts from things or associations through Electoral Bonds. This practice produced concerns about transparency and responsibility in governmental capital, that are critical details of a fair and democratic electing process. The culture chief until this case may be tracked back to the approvals made for one Indrajit Gupta Committee Report on State Funding of Elections in 1998.In order to address these issues, the commission submitted measures to a degree state capital of elections, revelation of electing expenditures by competitors, and better investigation over choosing loan. In line with these pieces of advice, Parliament passed important corrections to the Representation of People Act in 2002, individual being Section 29B (1) that made acquainted a new supplying admitting Electoral Bonds as an additional fashion for making gifts to governmental bodies. However, ADR and PUCL discussed that this correction was illegal as it went against fundamental law like transparency honestly existence, free and fair voting process sure-fire under Article 19(1)(a) and Article 14 respectively. They more argued that unknown gifts manage conceivably admit illegal services laundering actions through structure associations or external systems outside any responsibility. In reaction, the principal management protected their resolution to introduce Electoral Bonds by way of to advance gifts through legal and obvious channels. Thus, this case nurtured important questions about the balance between secrecy and transparency in electing capital, and allure affect fair and self-governing elections in India. The outcome concerning this case has the potential to shape future tactics had connection with voting loan and advance greater responsibility between governmental bodies and contenders. KEY PLAYERS INVOLVED IN THE CASE The case of Association for Democratic Reforms and Another v Union of India and so forth SSC Online SC has collect significant consideration and bred main questions about the duty of services in Indian campaigning. At the heart of this milestone case, there are various key performers the one has existed complicated in differing capacities. Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR): ADR is a non-political institution that was made in 1999 accompanying a dream to advance transparency and accountability in Indian government. Union of India: The Union of India refers to the main administration in this place case as it arrange accomplishing standards related to governmental capital and choosing processes. The Ministry of Law & Justice shows the joining before the Supreme Court as respondent no.1. Election Commission of India (ECI): In allure answer to this case, ECI contended that binding announcement grant permission bring about harassment or revenge against benefactors by rival governmental bodies. Law Commission: Law Commission refers to an executive party start apiece Government periodically burdened accompanying learning allowable issues had connection with choosing laws containing campaign finance rules. 5.Member Secretaries – Screen Scrutiny Committee (SSC) & Financial Affairs Subcommittee (FAS): These juries were comprised by ECI later taking afflictions against sure politicians and person in government who makes laws the one had purportedly taken different offerings outside prior consent from ECI. 6.Candidates/Petitioners: The main petitioners in this place case are ADR and Common Cause, presented by advocate Prashant Bhushan. The top court has admitted six additional individual competitors to intervene in the case, disputing their right to see the beginnings of capital taken by governmental parties. LEGAL ISSUES AND ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY BOTH SIDES The permissible battle betwixt the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and Union of India, and so forth, concerning connected to the internet examinations transported apiece Staff Selection Commission (SSC) has been a continuous issue. On individual help, ADR contends that the use of science in administering exams poses a risk to bidders’ data freedom and solitude. ADR’s debate is established Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, that guarantees similarity

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote