Two journalists have filed a Supreme Court petition alleging assault by Madhya Pradesh police over their reporting on the sand mafia. The case highlights concerns around press freedom, fabricated charges, and threats to journalists in India.

Background: Reporting on the Sand Mafia Leads to Trouble

Two Indian journalists have filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India, seeking urgent intervention against alleged police brutality by the Madhya Pradesh Police. Their appeal follows a series of investigative articles exposing activities of the notorious sand mafia in the region.

According to the petition, the journalists were allegedly assaulted inside the office of the Superintendent of Police in Bhind, Madhya Pradesh, during May 2025.

Case Heard by Supreme Court Bench

A bench comprising Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma heard the matter and agreed to list it for urgent consideration. The reporters’ legal counsel claimed they are facing arrest in false and fabricated cases and are under threat after exposing corruption tied to illegal sand mining operations.

“They Were Assaulted in a Police Station” – Advocate’s Appeal

The petitioners, fearing for their safety, have sought refuge in Delhi. Their attorney argued that the journalists lacked financial means to approach the Madhya Pradesh High Court and were instead forced to seek protection from the apex court.

She further alleged that the threats included possible custodial violence and even death. The assault, she noted, was not just a case of police overreach but part of a broader pattern of suppressing journalistic freedom.

Debate Over Anticipatory Bail for Journalists

Justice Sharma questioned whether all journalist-related cases in India should automatically be granted anticipatory bail. The attorney responded by emphasizing the severity of the threats and stated that lives were genuinely at risk.

The Press Club of India has publicly condemned the incident, calling for a transparent investigation and protection of media personnel.

Urgent Listing and Strong Remarks by the Court

The court’s remarks indicated seriousness but also caution. “You are running a risk,” Justice Sharma told the attorney, hinting at the potential outcome if the case returns to the same bench.

Justice Karol added, “We are telling you, if it comes before this bench, you know the conclusion,” prompting the advocate to assure the bench that she would make every effort to convince the court of the petitioners’ plight.

Conclusion: Press Freedom Under Threat?

This developing case has brought renewed attention to the ongoing threats against journalists in India, especially those reporting on powerful and illicit operations like the sand mafia. As the matter progresses, the outcome could set a crucial precedent for media protection, police accountability, and the role of the judiciary in defending press freedom.