The Supreme Court of India restricts the scope of the probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, safeguarding due process and reaffirming constitutional protections in criminal investigations.

Supreme Court Restricts Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’: Safeguards Fair Investigation

In a landmark move reinforcing judicial integrity, the Supreme Court of India has stepped in to protect the legal rights of Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, a renowned academic associated with Ashoka University. The decision comes amidst rising concerns over an expanding police investigation in Haryana under the controversial ‘Operation Sindoor’.

Background: FIRs Against Professor Ali Spark Concerns

The case began when the Haryana Police lodged two First Information Reports (FIRs) against Professor Ali, leading to the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT). However, legal experts and civil rights advocates raised alarm bells about the possibility of investigative overreach.

Supreme Court’s Order: Probe Must Stay Within Legal Limits

Recognizing the potential for misuse of authority, the Supreme Court directed that the SIT’s inquiry must remain strictly confined to the allegations detailed in the original FIRs. The Court explicitly warned against “fishing expeditions” or any broad, unauthorized investigations—emphasizing the protection of individual rights and due process.

Legal Principle Reaffirmed: Limited Scope of Investigation

This judicial intervention underscores a fundamental principle in Indian criminal law: the limited scope of investigation. The Court’s decision serves as a reminder that investigative agencies must adhere to the precise boundaries set by registered allegations and cannot exploit their power for open-ended pursuits.

Why This Matters: Protecting Constitutional Rights

The verdict carries significant weight in preserving constitutional safeguards. It ensures that law enforcement operates within the rule of law, and that accused individuals like Professor Ali are not subjected to arbitrary or politically motivated probes. Upholding fairness in investigation is not just a legal necessity—it is a cornerstone of a just democracy.

Conclusion: A Victory for Rule of Law and Judicial Accountability

By drawing clear boundaries for the SIT in ‘Operation Sindoor’, the Supreme Court has sent a strong message: criminal investigations must be legally justified, not politically driven. The ruling is a reaffirmation of India’s commitment to justice, transparency, and the protection of civil liberties—even in the face of high-profile controversies.