The Supreme Court of India has granted bail to senior Andhra journalist Kommineni Srinivasa Rao, arrested over derogatory remarks made by a panelist on his Sakshi TV show. The court upheld his freedom of speech and journalistic integrity.

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Journalist Kommineni Srinivasa Rao Over Talk Show Controversy

On June 13, 2025, the Supreme Court of India granted bail to veteran journalist Kommineni Srinivasa Rao, arrested in connection with controversial remarks made by a guest panelist on his live television show aired on Sakshi TV.

Context: Arrest Over Panelist’s Derogatory Remarks

The arrest occurred on June 9 after a panelist on Rao’s talk program, KSR Live Show, allegedly referred to Amaravati as a “capital of prostitutes” and claimed “only AIDS patients live there.” The remarks sparked outrage and led to legal complaints citing offense to women’s sentiments.

Supreme Court Upholds Free Speech and Press Freedom

The bench, comprising Justices P.K. Mishra and Manmohan, emphasized that Rao had not made the statement himself. Highlighting the importance of safeguarding press freedom, the Court stated:

“Considering that the petitioner has not made the statement himself, his journalistic participation in a live TV show needs protection, and so does his freedom of speech. He is to be released on bail.”

Defense and Counterarguments in Court

Senior Advocate Siddharth Dave, representing Rao, argued that the journalist bore no responsibility for the guest’s comments. Meanwhile, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the State, insisted that Rao encouraged the offensive remarks by laughing during the broadcast.

However, the court found no merit in the prosecution’s claim. “When someone says something shocking, we find it funny,” the bench observed. The phrase “Er äußert es nicht” (“He did not express it”) summarized the Court’s position on Rao’s role.

Rao’s Age and Journalistic Career Considered

The Court also took into account Rao’s age—approximately 70 years—and his longstanding career in journalism. Recognizing his contribution to Indian media and the importance of a free press, bail was duly granted.

Conclusion:

The ruling marks a critical moment in the ongoing debate around freedom of speech in India and the responsibilities of media professionals. The Supreme Court’s decision reinforces the importance of context, intent, and the protection of journalistic voices in a democratic society.