Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court
- Shivani Garg
- 23 September 2025
Introduction
The Delhi High Court issued a stern reprimand to a Delhi Police Sub-Inspector (SI) for misbehavior inside the courtroom, stressing that law enforcement officers must uphold, not undermine, the dignity of judicial proceedings.
Background
Case: Rameshwar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
Date of Incident: September 22, 2025.
Accused Officer: SI Narinder, Delhi Police.
Allegations: The officer verbally abused and threatened both counsels (for complainant and convict) and misbehaved with a senior advocate who intervened.
Key Developments
Court’s Remarks: Justice Arun Monga observed that the officer was “supposed to be a protector of law and not a predator.”
Possible FIR: The High Court considered directing registration of an FIR against the SI for his misconduct.
Apology Accepted: The SI tendered an unconditional apology, leading the court to withhold immediate punitive action.
Written Affidavit: The court ordered the SI to file his apology in writing via an affidavit.
Issues
Misconduct by Law Enforcement – Erosion of public trust when officers intimidate lawyers in court.
Sanctity of Judicial Premises – Ensuring decorum and respect within courtrooms.
Balancing Accountability and Forgiveness – Whether an apology suffices in lieu of formal punitive action.
Current Status
The SI has been directed to submit a written affidavit of apology.
No FIR has been registered yet, though the High Court has left the door open for stronger action if misconduct recurs.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court’s reprimand sends a clear message that courtroom integrity is non-negotiable. By emphasizing that police officers must act as guardians of the law, not intimidators, the ruling reinforces judicial authority while offering an opportunity for correction through the SI’s written apology.
