Introduction

The Delhi High Court issued a stern reprimand to a Delhi Police Sub-Inspector (SI) for misbehavior inside the courtroom, stressing that law enforcement officers must uphold, not undermine, the dignity of judicial proceedings.

Background

• Case: Rameshwar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi.

• Date of Incident: September 22, 2025.

• Accused Officer: SI Narinder, Delhi Police.

• Allegations: The officer verbally abused and threatened both counsels (for complainant and convict) and misbehaved with a senior advocate who intervened.

Key Developments

• Court’s Remarks: Justice Arun Monga observed that the officer was “supposed to be a protector of law and not a predator.”

• Possible FIR: The High Court considered directing registration of an FIR against the SI for his misconduct.

• Apology Accepted: The SI tendered an unconditional apology, leading the court to withhold immediate punitive action.

• Written Affidavit: The court ordered the SI to file his apology in writing via an affidavit.

Issues

1. Misconduct by Law Enforcement – Erosion of public trust when officers intimidate lawyers in court.

2. Sanctity of Judicial Premises – Ensuring decorum and respect within courtrooms.

3. Balancing Accountability and Forgiveness – Whether an apology suffices in lieu of formal punitive action.

Current Status

• The SI has been directed to submit a written affidavit of apology.

• No FIR has been registered yet, though the High Court has left the door open for stronger action if misconduct recurs.

Conclusion

The Delhi High Court’s reprimand sends a clear message that courtroom integrity is non-negotiable. By emphasizing that police officers must act as guardians of the law, not intimidators, the ruling reinforces judicial authority while offering an opportunity for correction through the SI’s written apology.