Delhi Court Stunned by Accused’s Threats After Conviction

A Delhi court witnessed a shocking incident when a convict, recently sentenced in a cheque bounce case, verbally abused and threatened Judicial Magistrate Shivangi Mangla inside the courtroom. The disturbing behavior unfolded after the accused was found guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to 22 months of imprisonment along with a ₹6.65 lakh fine.

Shocking Courtroom Misconduct by Convict and Lawyer

Following the announcement of the verdict, the convict displayed violent behavior, even attempting to throw an object toward the judge. In a shocking statement recorded in the court’s order dated April 2, the accused allegedly told the judge:

“Tu hai kya cheez… bahar mil, dekhte hai kaise zinda ghar jaati hai…”

This direct threat to the female judge left the court in disbelief. The accused further instructed his attorney to “do whatever it takes” to secure a favorable ruling.

Judge Harassed and Pressured to Resign

According to the court’s observations, both the convict and his lawyer repeatedly harassed Judge Shivangi Mangla after the sentencing. They attempted to coerce her into changing the verdict and even pressured her to resign by threatening to file false complaints.

Despite the intimidation, Judge Mangla stood her ground, stating in her order:

“Still, the undersigned stands against all the odds and always does the needful in favor of justice.”

NCW and Legal Action Underway

In response to the threats and harassment, the judge has directed the matter to the National Commission for Women, Delhi. The commission is expected to initiate appropriate action against the accused for his conduct toward the female judicial officer.

Show-Cause Notice to Accused’s Lawyer

Adding to the seriousness of the incident, the court has also issued a show-cause notice to the convict’s lawyer, Atul Kumar, asking him to explain his behavior. The court has questioned why he should not face criminal contempt charges for his misconduct.

“Court notice be issued to counsel for accused Sh. Atul Kumar… to explain why he shall not be referred to the Hon’ble High Court for initiating criminal contempt proceedings.”

He is expected to respond on the next hearing date.

Conclusion

This incident raises serious concerns about judicial safety, especially for women judges. The case also highlights the importance of strict enforcement of contempt of court laws and protection of judicial officers. As legal proceedings continue, the National Commission for Women will play a crucial role in ensuring justice for the threatened judge.