The Chhattisgarh High Court has awarded ₹2 lakh compensation in a custodial death case, emphasizing police accountability, human rights, and the urgent need for reform in India’s law enforcement system.

Justice for Suresh Haththel: A Case of Custodial Violence

In a significant development, the Chhattisgarh High Court has ordered the state government to pay ₹2 lakh in compensation to the mother of Suresh Haththel, a 27-year-old man who died while in police custody in 2021. Contrary to official claims of a natural death, the court cited multiple injuries indicating clear signs of custodial violence. This decision came after a writ petition filed by the victim’s family seeking justice.

Accountability and State Responsibility

The court underscored the state’s constitutional duty to safeguard the lives of individuals in custody. It criticized the police for failing to preserve crucial evidence such as CCTV footage and for poor documentation—raising serious concerns about attempts to cover up the incident. This landmark ruling sends a strong signal about the need for transparency and accountability in Indian law enforcement.

Strengthening Human Rights Jurisprudence in India

This verdict contributes to the expanding body of jurisprudence on human rights in India, especially relating to state liability in custodial death cases. The court emphasized that while financial compensation cannot bring back a lost life, it serves as a minimal recognition of the state’s failure and a deterrent to future misconduct.

Calls for Systemic Reform in Custodial Practices

The judgment highlighted the urgent need for systemic reforms in custodial institutions. This includes better training for officers, real-time monitoring, independent audits, and mandatory medical checkups and videography during custody. These measures are essential to prevent future instances of police brutality and uphold constitutional protections.

A Step Toward Justice and Institutional Reform

This ruling by the Chhattisgarh High Court is a firm reminder that the state’s authority must be exercised within legal and humane boundaries. It reflects the Indian judiciary’s commitment to uphold the fundamental rights of life and liberty guaranteed by the Constitution of India.