sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Live cases

Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDI-GENIUS CONSULTING INC Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Kashish Jahan 10 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court is considering a groundbreaking petition that seeks to classify the Right to Privacy as not just a fundamental right but also a civic duty for all Indians. Learn how this could reshape digital behavior, laws, and social responsibility. Introduction: Privacy as a Shared Responsibility A new petition before the Supreme Court of India has sparked a crucial national debate: should the Right to Privacy be recognized not only as a fundamental right but also as a civic duty? The petitioner argues that the celebrated Puttaswamy judgment of 2017 rightly placed privacy under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, but failed to impose any obligation on citizens to respect the privacy of others. The Digital Age: Why Legal Rights Alone Are Not Enough In today’s hyper-connected world, privacy violations are often committed by ordinary individuals, not just by the state. The petition highlights: Leaking of private photos Forwarding of personal chats without consent Spread of digital gossip via social media With the rise of AI tools that can manipulate content and the failure of tech platforms to curb misuse, the petitioner insists that citizen responsibility is essential to preserve digital dignity. Judicial View: Adapting the Constitution to Technological Change During the preliminary hearing, the Chief Justice’s Bench acknowledged that the Constitution’s framers could not have foreseen the threats of the digital era. The Court recognized that the concept of privacy must evolve “in both letter and spirit,” in light of modern technological and societal realities. Real-life incidents were cited where women became victims of viral leaks, facing lifelong trauma with no accountability for those who violated their privacy. Expanding Fundamental Duties: A Modern Need? India’s Constitution already includes Fundamental Duties, such as: Promoting national harmony Protecting public property Preserving the environment The petitioner argues that these were introduced in the 42nd Amendment and must be updated to reflect modern-day risks. Adding a duty to respect the privacy of others could reinforce ethical conduct both online and offline. What Comes Next: Legal and Educational Reforms? In response, the Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Union Government, seeking a detailed reply within four weeks. Legal experts suggest this could lead to: A constitutional amendment A new privacy-respect law passed by Parliament of India Integration of digital ethics in school curricula and public awareness campaigns This debate may also influence how digital literacy programs are designed and how privacy norms are enforced at the grassroots level. Conclusion: Toward a Culture of Digital Responsibility While the petition’s final outcome is yet to be seen, it has succeeded in shifting attention to the shared civic role in protecting privacy. For a country like India—one of the largest and most digitally active societies in the world—this could set a global precedent in balancing individual rights with collective responsibilities. The next hearing will be critical in determining whether the Right to Privacy will also be legally recognized as a duty in India’s digital democracy. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Read More »

Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDI-GENIUS CONSULTING INC LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDIA LAW Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 10 JULY 2025 In a progressive ruling, the Kerala High Court states that married women can reclaim their streedhan gold from in-laws without needing strict proof or documentation. The decision affirms women’s right to personal property and addresses societal realities in Indian marriages. Introduction: Major Relief for Women Seeking Streedhan Recovery In a significant move toward gender justice, the Kerala High Court ruled that married women can reclaim streedhan—gold and valuables given at marriage—without the burden of providing strict photographic or documentary proof. The ruling acknowledges the social reality of informal gift-giving practices in Indian families. A Division Bench comprising Justice Devan Ramachandran and Justice M.B. Snehalatha delivered the verdict, setting a powerful precedent in matrimonial property disputes. The Case: A Woman’s Appeal for Her Gold The case stemmed from a petition filed by a woman before a Family Court, claiming that her in-laws retained 65.5 sovereigns of gold given to her at the time of marriage. The Family Court denied her claim, citing lack of sufficient evidence proving that the gold was in the possession of her husband’s family. She then appealed to the High Court, challenging the lower court’s ruling. Informal Transfers Are Common: Court Recognizes Societal Realities The High Court observed that in Indian marriages, it is common for jewellery and valuables to be handed over without written records or receipts. The judges emphasized that: “The absence of documentary proof cannot be the sole basis for dismissing genuine claims, especially when supported by credible oral testimony and circumstantial evidence.” The Bench ruled that civil disputes are decided based on the preponderance of probability, not strict or conclusive proof. Testimonies and Legal Reasoning The woman and her family members presented consistent oral testimony, while the husband failed to deny the allegations or provide proof that the gold had been returned. The Court found the woman’s claims credible and ruled in her favor. She was granted restoration of 59.5 sovereigns of gold (or its market value). However, the Court denied her claim for household goods and items allegedly gifted by cousins, due to lack of specific evidence. Key Takeaways from the Verdict Streedhan remains the exclusive property of the woman, even after marriage. Lack of written proof should not invalidate genuine claims. Courts must consider oral evidence and practical realities over formalities. The judgment strengthens women’s rights in matrimonial litigation. Societal Impact: Empowering Women Through Law This ruling has far-reaching implications. It reinforces that personal property rights of women should not be hindered by procedural loopholes or unrealistic evidentiary demands. It also serves as a beacon for women facing similar issues, encouraging them to seek legal recourse without fear of being dismissed due to lack of formal proof. Conclusion: A Step Forward in Matrimonial Jurisprudence By upholding the woman’s right to reclaim her streedhan gold, the Kerala High Court has reaffirmed its commitment to gender equality, justice, and social awareness. The judgment is expected to influence future rulings and shape a more empathetic legal approach to property disputes in marriages. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Criticizes Delay in Cooperative Bank Fraud Probe Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Read More »

Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDI-GENIUS CONSULTING INC LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDIA LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT FOX MANDAL & ASSOCIATES, CHENNAI Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 10 JULY 2025 The Kerala High Court upholds creative freedom in the CBFC censorship case against JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala, stressing that names like “Janaki” are not exclusive religious symbols. Read how this decision reshapes the debate on censorship and artistic liberty in Indian cinema. Introduction: A Clash Between Censorship and Creativity In a landmark judgment, the Kerala High Court defended artistic freedom against unjust censorship by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The controversy erupted over the Malayalam film JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala, which centers around a courtroom drama involving a rape survivor named Janaki—a name traditionally associated with the Hindu goddess Sita. CBFC’s Objections and Censorship Demands Produced by Cosmos Entertainments, the film depicts Janaki being cross-examined in a court trial. The CBFC initially refused certification, raising objections over: The use of the name “Janaki” in a sensitive courtroom context. Scenes where a Muslim defense lawyer questions the protagonist on drug use and pornography, potentially impacting religious harmony. The CBFC first demanded 96 cuts, later reducing its conditions to two major alterations: Renaming the character as Janaki V Muting the name “Janaki” in court scenes Kerala High Court’s Ruling: Upholding Expression Justice N. Nagaresh, presiding over the case, criticized the CBFC’s reasoning, stating: “Janaki is a common Indian name and cannot be monopolized as a religious symbol.” The Court warned that such arbitrary censorship could set a dangerous precedent that restricts creative expression. The judge emphasized the difference between genuine religious offense and presumed symbolic sensitivity. Filmmakers Accept Changes Amid Pressure To avoid further delays, the filmmakers agreed to the CBFC’s two suggested modifications. The High Court, acknowledging these changes, directed the CBFC to certify the film within three days of submission. Broader Implications: Creative Freedom vs. Cultural Sensitivity This case has reignited national debate around: Freedom of expression in cinema The role of religious identity in artistic narratives The limits of state censorship in a democracy The court’s verdict affirms that creative storytelling cannot be curtailed merely due to hypothetical offense. It also signals the urgent need for clearer censorship guidelines that balance cultural respect with constitutional freedoms. What Lies Ahead for Janaki V With the character now renamed and the controversial sequences adjusted, JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala is expected to receive certification soon. The film’s theatrical release could mark a turning point in how the Indian film industry navigates creative risk and institutional regulation. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Criticizes Delay in Cooperative Bank Fraud Probe Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Madras High Court Orders Tamil Nadu Government to Tackle Stray Dog Menace Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Read More »

Bombay High Court Criticizes Delay in Cooperative Bank Fraud Probe

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Bombay High Court Criticizes Delay in Cooperative Bank Fraud Probe Madras High Court Orders Tamil Nadu Government to Tackle Stray Dog Menace Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT GOEL AND GOEL’S CO. LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STASHFIN, GURGRAM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SOUL AI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT THOMSON REUTERS, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BOOKING HOLDINGS, BENGALURU INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE LEGAL RENAISSANCE, DELHI Bombay High Court Criticizes Delay in Cooperative Bank Fraud Probe Kashish Jahan 8 JULY 2025 The Bombay High Court slams state police for delays in investigating a multi-crore cooperative bank fraud in Mumbai, urging swift action from the Economic Offences Wing. Read on to learn how this affects depositors and the legal implications. Court Flags Delay in High-Profile Bank Fraud Investigation The Bombay High Court has expressed strong disapproval over the slow progress of a probe into a massive cooperative bank fraud that has impacted hundreds of depositors across suburban Mumbai. The case involves allegations against top management of the bank, accused of diverting crores of rupees through suspicious loan disbursements and shell companies. Judges Slam Police Inaction Despite Repeated Court Orders A Division Bench consisting of Justice Revati Mohite Dere and Justice Manjusha Deshpande criticized the lack of urgency shown by the investigation team. The bench noted that despite multiple court directions, the probe has made negligible progress since the case was first reported in 2022. The case came to light when a group of whistleblowers exposed suspicious withdrawals and fraudulent accounts, causing alarm among depositors—many of whom are retired employees and small business owners. Delay Undermines Justice and Victim Trust The court dismissed police justifications of “complexities” and “manpower shortage,” stating that such excuses only serve to embolden the accused and erode public trust in the criminal justice system. A Pattern of Fraud in Maharashtra’s Cooperative Sector The judges emphasized that financial scams involving cooperative banks are unfortunately common in Maharashtra, often resulting in devastating losses for middle-class citizens who rely on such institutions for their life savings. Economic Offences Wing Called to Account In a decisive move, the High Court has ordered senior officials of the Economic Offences Wing to appear in person and submit a clear timeline for the completion of the investigation and filing of the chargesheet. Hope for Justice Among Depositors Several depositors’ associations have welcomed the court’s intervention. Many hope that this will result in a time-bound and transparent investigation that can finally expose the entire scam and lead to meaningful legal action against those responsible. Conclusion The Bombay High Court’s proactive stance sends a strong message about the urgency of financial fraud investigations, especially when they affect vulnerable citizens. As the case unfolds, depositors and the public at large are watching closely to see if the system will finally deliver justice. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Criticizes Delay in Cooperative Bank Fraud Probe Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Madras High Court Orders Tamil Nadu Government to Tackle Stray Dog Menace Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Criticizes Delay in Cooperative Bank Fraud Probe Read More »

Madras High Court Orders Tamil Nadu Government to Tackle Stray Dog Menace

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Madras High Court Orders Tamil Nadu Government to Tackle Stray Dog Menace Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT GOEL AND GOEL’S CO. LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STASHFIN, GURGRAM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SOUL AI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT THOMSON REUTERS, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BOOKING HOLDINGS, BENGALURU INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE LEGAL RENAISSANCE, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Madras High Court Orders Tamil Nadu Government to Tackle Stray Dog Menace Kashish Jahan 8 JULY 2025 The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to create a time-bound policy to address the rising stray dog menace, stressing public safety, humane animal treatment, and civic accountability. Court Intervenes After Surge in Stray Dog Attacks The Madras High Court has instructed the Tamil Nadu government to develop a comprehensive and time-bound action plan to manage the increasing threat posed by stray dogs in both urban and semi-urban areas. This order follows multiple petitions filed by concerned residents from Chennai and Coimbatore, who raised alarm over the rising number of dog bite incidents, especially involving vulnerable groups like children and senior citizens. Rising Cases Prompt Legal Action A bench led by Justice N. Anand Venkatesh noted a sharp rise in dog bite cases based on recent reports. The court acknowledged India’s constitutional obligation to treat animals with compassion—as highlighted under Article 51A(g) of the Constitution—but emphasized that public safety must remain a priority. Policy Gaps in Animal Birth Control Measures The court highlighted serious lapses in implementing the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001, which mandate: Sterilisation of stray dogs Vaccination against rabies Humane population control by local civic bodies The bench noted that tender failures and poor coordination between municipal agencies have led to ineffective implementation, worsening the stray dog issue. Court’s Directives to the State Government The court called for a state-wide policy that includes: Assigned responsibilities to civic bodies Quantifiable targets for sterilisation and vaccination drives Public awareness campaigns on dog safety Creation of safe animal shelters across the state The government has been instructed to submit a policy blueprint in the upcoming hearing, which will review its effectiveness and ensure accountability. Role of Animal Welfare Groups The court also urged animal welfare organizations to work in collaboration with local authorities. It emphasized that humane treatment of animals must go hand-in-hand with ensuring citizen safety, especially in densely populated regions. What’s Next? The next hearing will assess the proposed action plan’s scope, timelines, and enforcement strategies, ensuring that the policy is not merely on paper but actively implemented. This case not only highlights the urgent need for policy reform but also underscores the balance between animal rights and public health in urban governance. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Madras High Court Orders Tamil Nadu Government to Tackle Stray Dog Menace Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Madras High Court Orders Tamil Nadu Government to Tackle Stray Dog Menace Read More »

Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT GOEL AND GOEL’S CO. LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STASHFIN, GURGRAM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SOUL AI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT THOMSON REUTERS, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BOOKING HOLDINGS, BENGALURU INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE LEGAL RENAISSANCE, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 8 JULY 2025 Senior advocate Rajesh Datar has declined elevation to the Bombay High Court after a nine-month delay by the Centre, highlighting growing concerns over judicial appointment backlogs and lack of transparency. Rajesh Datar Declines High Court Judgeship Amid Prolonged Silence In a strong message to the judiciary and the executive, Rajesh Sudhakar Datar, a respected senior advocate, has withdrawn his consent to become a judge of the Bombay High Court. The move comes nine months after the Central Government failed to act on the Supreme Court Collegium‘s recommendation, dated 24 September 2024. Timeline of Events: From Consent to Withdrawal April 5, 2024: Datar submitted his consent following a request from the then-Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court. September 24, 2024: His name was recommended by the Collegium as first in a group of four advocates. July 5, 2025: Datar formally withdrew his consent due to prolonged government inaction. While the three other nominees—Gautam Ankhad, Mahendra Nerlikar, and Sachin Deshmukh—were recently appointed, Datar’s case remained pending without explanation. Datar’s Statement: Silence and Self-Respect In his withdrawal letter dated July 5, Datar wrote: “There has been no word, no explanation. I made the decision to step back. Both the Bar‘s respect and my own self-respect are at stake.” He added that although he had accepted the offer out of professional obligation, his remaining term as judge would have been brief due to his age of 55. A Pattern of Withdrawals: Not an Isolated Case Datar’s action follows a similar withdrawal by Shwetasree Majumdar, a Delhi-based counsel, further underlining a troubling trend of delays in judicial appointments. Legal commentators have pointed out how these unexplained delays can undermine: Judicial independence Morale of respected legal professionals Integrity of the Collegium system Systemic Issues in Judicial Appointments Critics have long accused the Central Government of “cherry-picking” names while leaving others in limbo. As recently as July 3, 2025, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended 36 more names in an urgent attempt to fill the 370+ vacancies across India’s High Courts. Datar’s case has reignited calls for: Greater transparency in judicial appointments Accountability from the executive Institutional respect for the judiciary What This Means for the Judiciary Datar’s withdrawal symbolizes more than personal disappointment—it highlights a systemic challenge. Delays and lack of transparency are increasingly seen as disrespectful to individual merit and institutional dignity, threatening the independence of India’s judiciary. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Read More »

Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT GOEL AND GOEL’S CO. LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STASHFIN, GURGRAM LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SOUL AI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT THOMSON REUTERS, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BOOKING HOLDINGS, BENGALURU INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE LEGAL RENAISSANCE, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 8 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India has stayed the recruitment of weightlifting coaches by the Sports Authority of Goa after a female candidate alleged bias, conflict of interest, and sexual harassment by an examiner. A full hearing is scheduled in six weeks. Supreme Court Intervenes in Goa Coach Hiring Dispute The Supreme Court of India has issued a stay order on the ongoing recruitment process for weightlifting coaches conducted by the Sports Authority of Goa (SAG). This move comes after serious allegations of bias and misconduct were raised by Vaishnavi S. Ugadekar, a female candidate who participated in the selection process. A bench comprising Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice K.V. Viswanathan accepted Ugadekar’s plea and issued notices to the Goa government, SAG, and other involved parties. Background: Allegations of Bias and Harassment Ugadekar approached the apex court after the Bombay High Court‘s Goa bench dismissed her concerns on June 23, 2025, allowing the recruitment to proceed. She claimed that a former coach, against whom she had previously filed a sexual harassment complaint, was one of the evaluators for the skill test. According to her, this individual not only harassed her during her training but also lacked proper weightlifting credentials, resulting in a one-year suspension from the sport. Breakdown of the Recruitment Process The selection process, announced in February 2024, included: A written examination A skill/practical test A physical fitness test Ugadekar cleared the physical fitness phase but scored only 17.5% in the skill test—below the required 20% passing mark. Her competitor scored 23.5% and qualified. Ugadekar alleged that her examiner’s personal bias led to her unfairly low score. Goa Government’s Offer and High Court Decision In response to the accusations, the Goa government proposed a re-test of the skill and physical assessments using external evaluators and temporarily paused the recruitment. However, the competing candidate challenged this move in the High Court, which allowed the process to continue—without hearing Ugadekar’s side. Supreme Court Calls for Procedural Fairness Now, the Supreme Court has put a hold on the entire selection, including the written examination, citing serious concerns about procedural integrity and fairness. A detailed hearing is scheduled after six weeks. What This Case Highlights This case underscores the importance of: Transparency in public recruitment Avoiding conflicts of interest Protecting whistleblowers and complainants Ensuring fair evaluation in sports and coaching roles It serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities candidates face in government hiring, particularly in fields involving youth mentorship and physical training. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Advocate Rajesh Datar Withdraws Consent for Bombay High Court Judgeship Over Centre’s Delay Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Halts Goa Weightlifting Coach Hiring Amid Bias Allegations Read More »

Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VERTEXLEGAL LLP, NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DIGITAL INDIA CORPORATION LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT RBL BANK LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT REVX CAPITAL LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT UNESCO CHAIR, NLU, DELHI LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HEADS UP FOR TAILS Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 7 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India grants temporary relief to C.K. Abdurahiman in a 1999 cheque bounce case, acknowledging possible mistaken identity and highlighting procedural gaps in financial offence trials. Background: A 20-Year-Old Case Resurfaces In a dramatic turn of events, the Supreme Court of India has provided temporary relief to C.K. Abdurahiman, a man convicted in a cheque bounce case dating back to May 1999. He claims he was wrongly identified and had no involvement in the financial transaction. The dispute arose from a ₹20 lakh cheque issued as part of an agreement to sell a rubber estate to Mukkath Marakkar Haji (not a verified Wikipedia page, leave unlinked if not found). When the cheque bounced, charges were filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which criminalizes cheque dishonor due to insufficient funds. Legal Timeline: From Conviction to Conditional Freedom 2004: A trial court found Abdurahiman guilty despite his claims of non-involvement. 2006: The Sessions Court acquitted him. 2024: The Kerala High Court overturned the acquittal, reinstating the conviction and imposing: A one-day sentence A compensation payment of ₹23 lakh Despite these setbacks, Abdurahiman approached the Supreme Court in 2025, arguing that he had been mistaken for another person with a similar name and house number. Supreme Court Observations: Signs of Misidentification Abdurahiman’s legal team highlighted several inconsistencies: Incomplete witness identification Questionable signature verification Unverified identity evidence Justices Sandeep Mehta and Joymalya Bagchi, after reviewing the case, granted him temporary release. As a condition, he must deposit ₹10 lakh, i.e., half of the disputed cheque amount. The court also suspended his sentence until further review. A new hearing is scheduled for August 12, 2025. Why This Case Matters: Identity, Fair Trial & Financial Justice This ruling underscores the importance of thoroughly investigating identity in financial crimes, especially in cases with: Long litigation periods Disputed documentation Incomplete or vague witness testimonies The Supreme Court’s intervention strikes a balance between the rights of the alleged wrongfully accused and the victim’s financial interests, reinforcing trust in due process and judicial fairness. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Grants Temporary Relief in 1999 Cheque Bounce Case Over Mistaken Identity Read More »

Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VERTEXLEGAL LLP, NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DIGITAL INDIA CORPORATION LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT RBL BANK LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT REVX CAPITAL LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT UNESCO CHAIR, NLU, DELHI LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HEADS UP FOR TAILS LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT TITLEWIZE Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 7 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India stays the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s directive for IPS-level supervision in all serious crime investigations, citing practical and administrative challenges. A crucial hearing is set for July 14, 2025. Background: High Court Mandates IPS Oversight in Criminal Cases In a recent and widely discussed legal development, the Supreme Court of India stayed an order issued by the Madhya Pradesh High Court that mandated Indian Police Service (IPS) supervision for all serious criminal investigations in the state. This High Court directive, dated July 3, 2025, required the formation of a two-member supervisory team in each district—comprising: One senior IPS officer of at least the rank of Superintendent of Police One junior police officer of minimum Sub-Inspector rank The goal was to strengthen investigative standards and bridge quality gaps in district-level policing. Supreme Court’s Intervention: Practicality Over Policy A bench consisting of Justice K.V. Viswanathan and Justice N.K. Singh responded to the Madhya Pradesh government’s appeal, which claimed that the directive was administratively unfeasible. According to NCRB 2022 data: Over 489 lakh cases were filed across the state More than 38,000 cases were categorized as “serious offences” The state has only 63 SP-rank officers to supervise all such cases The state government argued that enforcing such a blanket supervisory mechanism would place an unmanageable burden on its senior officers. Court’s Observation and Stay Order The Supreme Court acknowledged the intent behind the High Court’s ruling—to enhance the quality of investigations—but emphasized that execution must be grounded in reality. The Court, therefore: Stayed the High Court order temporarily Directed the Madhya Pradesh administration to submit a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) within three weeks Aimed to strike a balance between accountability and administrative feasibility A follow-up hearing is scheduled for July 14, 2025. Why This Case Matters This decision sets a significant precedent in Indian policing and legal oversight. Its implications include: A balanced judicial approach that values both reform and realism A possible model for police reform across other Indian states with similar resource limitations Encouragement for state governments to develop customized SOPs for improved investigations without overburdening law enforcement Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Sadalaw • July 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Order Requiring IPS Supervision in All Serious Crime Investigations Read More »

Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VERTEXLEGAL LLP, NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DIGITAL INDIA CORPORATION LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT RBL BANK LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, HYDERABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT REVX CAPITAL LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT UNESCO CHAIR, NLU, DELHI LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HEADS UP FOR TAILS LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT TITLEWIZE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ASA ADVOCATES Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 7 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court of India is set to clarify whether appeals under the stayed Section 124A IPC (sedition law) can proceed. The outcome could shape future constitutional interpretations and protect fundamental rights. Introduction: Section 124A IPC and Its Legal Standstill In a major legal development, the Supreme Court of India is poised to address a crucial question: Can appeals continue under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), even though the sedition provision has been stayed since May 2022? The law in question, Section 124A, is a colonial-era sedition clause that has been the subject of intense legal scrutiny and criticism in recent years. Background: The Sedition Stay and Its Impact In May 2022, the apex court issued a blanket stay on all pending trials and new FIRs under Section 124A while it undertakes a constitutional review. However, this stay order has left uncertainty around cases where appeals are pending — particularly appeals against past convictions. This legal grey area came into focus with a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Safdar Nagori, a former student leader convicted of sedition in 2017. Nagori has now spent over 18 years in prison. The Case of Safdar Nagori Although arguments in Nagori’s appeal before the Madhya Pradesh High Court had already concluded, the final judgment has been indefinitely delayed. The delay stems from the 2022 Supreme Court order in the case of S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India, which stayed all proceedings under Section 124A. Representing Nagori, Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat argued that the 2022 stay was not meant to halt appeals where hearings had concluded. He stressed that prolonged detention without judgment infringes on Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. Supreme Court’s Response and Upcoming Hearing A bench comprising Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice R. Mahadevan acknowledged the urgency of the matter and scheduled the next hearing for July 25, 2025. The key issue is whether the 2022 stay applies only to ongoing trials and fresh prosecutions or whether it also halts appellate proceedings. Why This Matters: Constitutional and Legal Consequences This case carries significant constitutional implications: A ruling that permits appeals to continue could reinforce judicial accountability and protect the rights of long-term detainees. It would also prevent misuse of procedural delays that deny justice to those already convicted. The decision could serve as a landmark precedent for how Indian courts interpret stays on laws under constitutional challenge. Awaiting Clarity: What’s at Stake? The legal community, civil rights activists, and those impacted by past sedition convictions await the Supreme Court’s verdict. A clear directive on this issue will help courts uniformly handle sedition-related appeals until the final constitutionality of Section 124A is determined. This ruling may shape not only the future of sedition law in India but also broader questions of justice, liberty, and procedural fairness. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify Sadalaw • July 7, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Thiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam Timing Dispute Sadalaw • July 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi Petrol Pumps Challenge Penalties on End-of-Life Vehicles in High Court Sadalaw • July 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Can Sedition Appeals Continue Despite Stay on Section 124A IPC? Supreme Court to Clarify Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote