sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Sada Law

Supreme Court Finds DDA Officials in Contempt for Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi Ridge Road Project

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Finds DDA Officials in Contempt for Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi Ridge Road Project Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO for Aggravated Sexual Assault LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STANZA LIVING JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ESYA CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SBICAP SECURITIES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NUMEN LAW OFFICE INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT G D BANSAL & ASSOCIATES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT S&T LAW INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VISHRUT AND ASSOCIATES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Supreme Court Finds DDA Officials in Contempt for Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi Ridge Road Project PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 29 May 2025 The Supreme Court holds DDA officials in contempt for unauthorized tree felling in the Delhi Ridge during a road expansion project. Learn about the environmental and legal implications, the court’s directives, and the significance of public interest in this landmark case. Supreme Court Finds DDA Officials in Contempt Over Delhi Ridge Tree Felling In a significant ruling on May 28, 2024, the Supreme Court of India found officials from the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in contempt for unauthorized tree cutting in the ecologically sensitive Delhi Ridge. The tree felling was carried out for a road widening project meant to improve access to the CAPFIMS Paramilitary Hospital, without the Court’s prior approval. Violation of Judicial Orders and Environmental Laws The Court strongly criticized the DDA for willful concealment and non-compliance. According to Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh, deliberate non-disclosure undermines the rule of law and constitutes criminal contempt. Officials responsible were each fined ₹25,000, and the Court emphasized that such disregard for environmental procedures reflects institutional missteps and administrative overreach. Instructions for Transparency in Future Projects To prevent future violations, the Court mandated that all future notices and orders concerning afforestation, tree cutting, or road construction must explicitly mention any ongoing legal proceedings. This is to ensure transparency and prevent the excuse of ignorance. Afforestation and Environmental Restoration Ordered The Court instructed the DDA and the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) to collaboratively develop an afforestation plan within three months. The plan must be implemented by the Forest Department under the supervision of a court-appointed committee. The DDA will bear the full cost. Regular compliance reports are now a legal obligation for both agencies. Dismissal of Case Against Former DDA Vice Chairman The contempt case against Subhashish Panda, former DDA Vice Chairman, was dismissed since he is no longer in office. However, the remaining officials faced both financial penalties and official censure. Balancing Environmental Impact with Public Interest The Court acknowledged the public interest behind the road expansion—ensuring better access to healthcare for paramilitary personnel. While prioritizing constitutional morality and social justice, the Court reiterated that procedural violations and ecological harm cannot be overlooked. Other Pending Contempt Cases in the Area Two other contempt petitions concerning tree felling in the same region remain under consideration—one from the bench of Justice Abhay Oka (MC Mehta case) and the other from Justice B. R. Gavai (TN Godavarman case). An expert report revealed that tree felling for roads between Main Chhattarpur Road, SAARC Chowk, and the CAPFIMS Hospital occurred without proper ecological assessments, including rainwater harvesting and restoration plans. Critics argued that the alternate route—avoiding land acquisition—was chosen to expedite construction, raising further questions about transparency and accountability. Conclusion This ruling underscores the importance of judicial oversight, ecological accountability, and the balance between development and sustainability. As India’s urban infrastructure evolves, legal and environmental compliance must go hand-in-hand to ensure that progress does not come at the cost of nature and public trust. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Finds DDA Officials in Contempt for Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi Ridge Road Project Supreme Court Finds DDA Officials in Contempt for Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi Ridge Road Project Sada Law • May 29, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO for Aggravated Sexual Assault Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO for Aggravated Sexual Assault Sada Law • May 29, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments IB Officer’s Death Case: Accused Sukanth Suresh Moves Kerala High Court Against Police Leak of Sensitive Evidence IB Officer’s Death Case: Accused Sukanth Suresh Moves Kerala High Court Against Police Leak of Sensitive Evidence Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Finds DDA Officials in Contempt for Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi Ridge Road Project Read More »

Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO for Aggravated Sexual Assault

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO for Aggravated Sexual Assault LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STANZA LIVING JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ESYA CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SBICAP SECURITIES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NUMEN LAW OFFICE INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT G D BANSAL & ASSOCIATES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT S&T LAW INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VISHRUT AND ASSOCIATES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION IB Officer’s Death Case: Accused Sukanth Suresh Moves Kerala High Court Against Police Leak of Sensitive Evidence Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO for Aggravated Sexual Assault PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 29 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed that under the POCSO Act, no sentence less than 20 years can be awarded for aggravated penetrative sexual assault. Learn about the Court’s key observations and legal implications in this case. Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO Act On May 26, 2025, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) that sought to reduce a 20-year rigorous imprisonment sentence awarded to a 23-year-old convict under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The case involved a charge of aggravated penetrative sexual assault against a six-year-old minor. Minimum Punishment Under Section 6 of the POCSO Act The petition was rejected by a two-judge bench comprising Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, who cited Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Following the 2019 amendment, the law mandates a minimum sentence of 20 years for aggravated sexual assault. The Court clarified that it has no authority to reduce this punishment, as the statute is clear and binding. Arguments by the Defense and the Court’s Rebuttal The defense argued for leniency based on “extraordinary circumstances,” noting the petitioner’s age (23) and potential life-long impact of the sentence. They also cited a delay of six days in filing the First Information Report (FIR) and questioned the medical awareness of the victim’s parents—both medical assistants—who reportedly did not notice injuries. Justice Nagarathna firmly responded that both lower courts had already applied the minimum punishment allowed by law. She stressed that such claims of exceptional circumstances are routinely made, but in this case, they do not warrant judicial intervention. She also emphasized that the act occurred after the 2019 amendment that increased sentencing for aggravated sexual assault, making the minimum punishment non-negotiable. Claim of Juvenility Denied The convict also claimed to be a juvenile at the time of the offense. After reviewing documentation, the Court determined he was 18 or older, thereby dismissing the juvenility claim as invalid. Final Verdict and Legal Implications The Supreme Court reaffirmed that under the amended Section 6 of the POCSO Act, it cannot use its inherent jurisdiction to alter the mandatory minimum punishment. Consequently, the SLP against the Bombay High Court order dated January 8, 2024, was dismissed. This verdict strengthens legal safeguards for minors and reinforces the serious legal consequences of child sexual abuse. Conclusion: A Clear Message on Child Protection and Judicial Boundaries The Supreme Court’s judgment sends a powerful message: crimes under the POCSO Act will be met with the strictest penalties, as mandated by law. By upholding the 20-year minimum sentence for aggravated penetrative sexual assault, the Court underlines its role in protecting children and respecting the authority of legislative mandates. This case sets a critical precedent, affirming that judicial discretion cannot override clear statutory requirements in the face of such grave offenses. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO for Aggravated Sexual Assault Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO for Aggravated Sexual Assault Sada Law • May 29, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments IB Officer’s Death Case: Accused Sukanth Suresh Moves Kerala High Court Against Police Leak of Sensitive Evidence IB Officer’s Death Case: Accused Sukanth Suresh Moves Kerala High Court Against Police Leak of Sensitive Evidence Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Allahabad High Court Denies Appointment to Jamia Urdu Degree Holders Over Questionable Credentials Allahabad High Court Denies Appointment to Jamia Urdu Degree Holders Over Questionable Credentials Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Upholds 20-Year Minimum Sentence Under POCSO for Aggravated Sexual Assault Read More »

IB Officer’s Death Case: Accused Sukanth Suresh Moves Kerala High Court Against Police Leak of Sensitive Evidence

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today IB Officer’s Death Case: Accused Sukanth Suresh Moves Kerala High Court Against Police Leak of Sensitive Evidence Allahabad High Court Denies Appointment to Jamia Urdu Degree Holders Over Questionable Credentials Supreme Court Clarifies Order VII Rule 11: Plaints Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to One Barred Relief Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Three New Justices, Appoints Five High Court Chief Justices in Historic Reshuffle JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF SHAHRUKH EJAZ IB Officer’s Death Case: Accused Sukanth Suresh Moves Kerala High Court Against Police Leak of Sensitive Evidence Mahi Sinha 28 May 2025 Sukanth Suresh—an IB officer accused in a high-profile suicide case—petitions the Kerala High Court to stop the police from leaking sensitive case files to the media. Read the latest legal developments and implications. Overview of the Case In a controversial legal development, Intelligence Bureau (IB) officer Sukanth Suresh—accused of aiding the suicide of a colleague or romantic partner—has filed a petition in the Kerala High Court. His petition seeks to prevent the police from leaking confidential investigation materials to the media. Suresh claims that this unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information has violated his legal rights and compromised the integrity of the judicial process. Allegations Against the Police Media Leak Sparks Legal Backlash The petition was prompted by the publication of private chat messages in a widely read Malayalam daily newspaper. These messages, allegedly retrieved from Suresh’s deleted social media accounts, were reportedly under the control of the Station House Officer (SHO) at Pettah Police Station. According to Suresh, the documents were leaked just one day after his bail application hearing on May 24, 2025, implying a deliberate attempt to: Incite public outrage Influence judicial proceedings Tarnish his professional reputation Legal Grounds Cited in the Petition Suresh’s legal team has cited violations of several Indian laws, including: Section 193 of the BNSS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code – Restricting the disclosure of the identity of certain individuals Section 31 of the Kerala Police Act, 2011 – Addressing misconduct by police personnel These provisions are meant to protect the sanctity of legal investigations and ensure fair judicial processes. Court’s Response and Bail Status On May 26, 2025, the Kerala High Court denied bail to Suresh. In this latest move, he seeks an official probe into the media leak and has requested the court to: Order a report from the second respondent (the SHO at Pettah Police Station) Direct senior police officials to investigate the unauthorized disclosure This action aims to safeguard both his rights and the integrity of the ongoing legal proceedings. Conclusion: A Case That Raises Legal and Ethical Questions The case of the leaked investigation files involving an IB officer accused in a suicide case is now a focal point for discussions on: Media ethics in India Judicial fairness Investigative accountability As the legal process unfolds, this high-profile petition may set significant precedents for how sensitive information is handled in criminal investigations in India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Urges Compounding in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/S New Win Export vs A. Subramaniam (2024) Supreme Court Urges Compounding in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/S New Win Export vs A. Subramaniam (2024) Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

IB Officer’s Death Case: Accused Sukanth Suresh Moves Kerala High Court Against Police Leak of Sensitive Evidence Read More »

Allahabad High Court Denies Appointment to Jamia Urdu Degree Holders Over Questionable Credentials

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Allahabad High Court Denies Appointment to Jamia Urdu Degree Holders Over Questionable Credentials Supreme Court Clarifies Order VII Rule 11: Plaints Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to One Barred Relief Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Three New Justices, Appoints Five High Court Chief Justices in Historic Reshuffle JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF SHAHRUKH EJAZ JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KANDIVALI EDUCATION SOCIETY’S SHRI JAYANTILAL H. PATEL LAW COLLEGE Allahabad High Court Denies Appointment to Jamia Urdu Degree Holders Over Questionable Credentials Mahi Sinha 28 May 2025 The Allahabad High Court has denied teaching appointments to candidates holding Adib-e-Kamil degrees from Jamia Urdu, Aligarh, citing lack of proper classes and UGC recognition. Read the full case update and implications. Introduction In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court declined to grant appointment relief to candidates holding Adib-e-Kamil degrees from Jamia Urdu, Aligarh. The court stated that the institution was “distributing degrees without conducting proper classes”, making the degree holders ineligible for the post of Assistant Teacher (Urdu) under the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board. Background of the Case The case, titled Azhar Ali v. State of U.P. and Others, involved petitioners who had cleared the U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test (UPTET) and were on the merit list for Assistant Teacher (Urdu Language) positions. Many of them had received postings, while others were awaiting appointments. However, during verification, it was found that: Candidates obtained the Adib-e-Kamil degree in less than the prescribed one-year duration. Some completed their Intermediate exam and Adib-e-Kamil in the same academic year. An investigation raised concerns about the legitimacy of their educational background. Court’s Observations Questionable Timeline of Degree Completion Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery noted inconsistencies, including a petitioner completing both Intermediate and Adib-e-Kamil exams within five months—well below the standard course duration. This raised red flags about the credibility of the degrees. Lack of UGC Recognition The respondents argued that Jamia Urdu lacked recognition from the University Grants Commission (UGC) and did not follow a regular academic structure involving classes, faculty, or examination protocols. Key Arguments by Petitioners Jamia Urdu, Aligarh was claimed to be a legitimate minority educational institution. They cited a government order (G.O. dated 05.01.2016) that recognized Moallim-E-Urdu degrees obtained before August 11, 1997, for teaching eligibility. Petitioners contended that natural justice was violated and that dual study courses were not legally prohibited. Final Verdict The court ruled that the degrees were issued without appropriate academic conduct, stating that Jamia Urdu was essentially distributing degrees without holding classes. As a result: Petitioners were declared not eligible for the post of Assistant Teacher (Urdu). The lead writ petition, along with related ones, was dismissed. Implications for Future Teaching Appointments This judgment sets a clear precedent for education boards and candidates alike. Valid degrees, course durations, and institutional recognition will now be scrutinized more closely in teacher recruitment processes. Institutions that do not follow academic norms could face serious credibility issues. Conclusion The Allahabad High Court‘s decision reinforces the importance of quality education and the authenticity of academic qualifications. Aspiring teachers must ensure that their degrees come from UGC-recognized institutions with transparent academic practices. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Urges Compounding in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/S New Win Export vs A. Subramaniam (2024) Supreme Court Urges Compounding in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/S New Win Export vs A. Subramaniam (2024) Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Allahabad High Court Denies Appointment to Jamia Urdu Degree Holders Over Questionable Credentials Read More »

Supreme Court Clarifies Order VII Rule 11: Plaints Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to One Barred Relief

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Clarifies Order VII Rule 11: Plaints Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to One Barred Relief Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Three New Justices, Appoints Five High Court Chief Justices in Historic Reshuffle JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF SHAHRUKH EJAZ JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KANDIVALI EDUCATION SOCIETY’S SHRI JAYANTILAL H. PATEL LAW COLLEGE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GEHI LAW Supreme Court Clarifies Order VII Rule 11: Plaints Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to One Barred Relief PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 28 May 2025 The Supreme Court clarifies that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC just because one relief is barred, provided other valid causes of action exist. Read the latest legal update with expert analysis. Key Ruling on Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Supreme Court The Supreme Court of India has ruled that a plaint cannot be rejected merely because one of the reliefs sought is barred by law, as long as the plaint discloses other maintainable reliefs based on independent causes of action. Understanding Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code As per Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), a plaint can only be dismissed if, on a plain reading, it discloses no cause of action, is barred by law, is undervalued, or lacks proper court fees. The Court emphasized that this provision does not allow for selective severance of reliefs if they arise from different factual situations. Case Background: Agricultural Land Dispute and Revoked Power of Attorney The case involved an appellant who purchased agricultural land and later took a ₹7.5 crore loan from the respondent. Two unregistered documents—a sale agreement and a power of attorney—were executed in favor of the respondent. These documents were later revoked. However, in July 2022, the respondent executed registered sale deeds transferring the property to himself and others. Civil Suit and High Court Dismissal The appellant filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that the sale deeds were invalid and also requested possession and injunctions. However, the Rajasthan High Court dismissed the plaint entirely, holding that since the first relief was not maintainable, the suit should fail altogether. The High Court did not consider the triable issues relating to the second relief. Supreme Court’s Clarification on Rejection of Plaints Overruling the High Court, the Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan observed that the dismissal was improper. Justice Mahadevan noted that distinct causes of action supported by separate facts must not be severed simply because one relief appears untenable. If a plaint presents any triable issue, it must proceed to trial. Reference to Central Bank of India v. Prabha Jain The Court relied on the precedent set in Central Bank of India v. Prabha Jain, emphasizing that partial rejection of plaints is impermissible. In that case, the Court held that if a court finds one relief permissible and another potentially barred, it should not comment on the barred relief at the Order VII Rule 11 stage, as the plaint must be treated as a whole. Final Judgment and Legal Takeaway The Supreme Court concluded that the trial court was correct in identifying triable issues, and the High Court erred by rejecting the plaint entirely. The ruling reaffirmed that under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, courts must focus solely on the contents of the plaint during the initial stage and cannot delve into the merits of the case. Conclusion: A Landmark Ruling Upholding Access to Justice This decision marks a significant development in Indian civil litigation, reinforcing that access to justice should not be curtailed by technical interpretations. As long as a plaint raises legitimate, triable issues—even if one relief fails—it deserves its day in court. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Clarifies Order VII Rule 11: Plaints Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to One Barred Relief Supreme Court Clarifies Order VII Rule 11: Plaints Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to One Barred Relief Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Clarifies Order VII Rule 11: Plaints Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to One Barred Relief Read More »

Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Three New Justices, Appoints Five High Court Chief Justices in Historic Reshuffle JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF SHAHRUKH EJAZ JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KANDIVALI EDUCATION SOCIETY’S SHRI JAYANTILAL H. PATEL LAW COLLEGE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GEHI LAW JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADV. SHASHI PRATAP SINGH Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 28 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India has called for the exclusive creation of special courts to fast-track cases under UAPA and MCOCA, citing severe trial delays and violation of fundamental rights due to prolonged undertrial detention. Supreme Court Recommends Exclusive Special Courts for UAPA and MCOCA Trials On May 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of India issued a strong recommendation for the establishment of exclusive special courts to address long-pending cases under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). Why the Supreme Court Demands Special Courts The bench highlighted alarming delays in the trial of hundreds of special statute cases, where accused individuals often face prolonged incarceration without trial. The Court stated that assigning UAPA and MCOCA cases to dedicated special courts, free from civil and other criminal duties, would expedite proceedings. “Specialized courts, entrusted solely with trials under these laws, can provide the most effective remedy to the problem of delay,” the bench stated, emphasizing the need for daily hearings to ensure timely justice. Raja Thakre Given Deadline for Government Action The Court granted Additional Solicitor General Raja Thakre four weeks to receive directions from the Executive branch, as the creation of new courts is a policy decision. The Court reiterated that this decision must be made in coordination with the Chief Justice of the High Court, following a complete assessment of pending cases across the state. Justices Call Out Delay in NIA Case Trials The ruling, issued by Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh, highlighted how judges handling both civil and criminal matters are unable to prioritize sensitive cases handled by the National Investigation Agency (NIA). “The courts are faced with a conundrum when a defendant has been incarcerated for years but the trial hasn’t begun,” the bench observed. “This may lead to an indirect violation of Article 21 of the Constitution.” Overburdened Justice System Needs Structural Reform The Supreme Court also pointed out that high-profile cases often involve hundreds of witnesses and massive documentation, yet no system exists for auditing or prioritizing such cases. The Court expressed concern over the strain on judicial resources, which prolongs justice and impacts the accused’s rights. Conclusion: A Call to Action for Faster Justice The Supreme Court’s direction to create exclusive special courts for UAPA and MCOCA is a crucial step toward reducing judicial backlog and safeguarding the rights of undertrials. Structural reforms and policy decisions, backed by data and coordination with the judiciary, are now critical to ensure the right to a speedy and fair trial under India’s legal system. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Urges Exclusive Special Courts to Expedite UAPA and MCOCA Trials Read More »

Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Three New Justices, Appoints Five High Court Chief Justices in Historic Reshuffle JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF SHAHRUKH EJAZ JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KANDIVALI EDUCATION SOCIETY’S SHRI JAYANTILAL H. PATEL LAW COLLEGE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GEHI LAW JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADV. SHASHI PRATAP SINGH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF AKSHAY MOHILEY Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 28 May 2025 The Supreme Court upholds Adani Power’s right to compensation under “Change in Law” in Power Purchase Agreement, dismissing JVVNL’s appeal and reinforcing key legal principles for power sector regulations in India. Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation Under “Change in Law” On May 27, 2024, the Supreme Court of India affirmed that power generators are entitled to compensation, including Late Payment Surcharge (LPS), under Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) for cost escalations arising from regulatory changes. Background: Dispute Between JVVNL and Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. The case involved a dispute over a PPA between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (JVVNL) and Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. (APRL) for the supply of 1200 MW of electricity at a fixed tariff. A key point of contention emerged after a notification issued by Coal India Limited (CIL) on December 19, 2017, imposed a ₹50/tonne coal charge under “Evacuation Facility Charges” (EFC). This new cost burden led APRL to seek compensation under the “Change in Law” clause of the PPA. Supreme Court Dismisses JVVNL’s Appeal, Upholds APTEL Ruling After the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) ruled in favor of APRL, JVVNL challenged the decision in the Supreme Court. However, the bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal upheld APTEL’s order. The Court emphasized the principle of restitution, which mandates restoring the affected party to its original economic condition as if the regulatory change had not occurred. Evacuation Facility Charges Recognized as “Change in Law” The Supreme Court found that CIL’s ₹50/tonne EFC represented a legal modification. Hence, APRL was rightfully entitled to compensation due to increased operational costs. The Court also cited the case of GMR Warora Energy Ltd., where compensation was granted following similar regulatory changes. The ruling reaffirmed that any financial burden resulting from post-cutoff-date government directives must be treated as a “change in law” event. Late Payment Surcharge (LPS) Validated by the Court Justice Sundresh ruled that APRL was entitled to LPS at 2% above the State Bank Advance Rate (SBAR), starting from the EFC notification date of December 19, 2017. The LPS functions as compound interest with monthly rests, meant to offset financing costs due to delayed recovery. Restitution Principle Reinforced in PPA Interpretation The judgment reiterated that Article 10.2.1 of the PPA was crafted based on the restitution principle. This clause obligates a return to the pre-change economic state of the generator, ensuring fairness and financial stability in power sector contracts. Final Verdict: APRL Entitled to Full Compensation and LPS The Supreme Court concluded by dismissing JVVNL’s appeal and affirming the right of APRL to both compensation and LPS from the date of regulatory imposition. The Court’s decision strengthens legal clarity for power generators impacted by government-imposed cost escalations. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Upholds Adani Power’s Right to Compensation for Regulatory Cost Hike; Dismisses JVVNL Appeal Read More »

NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Three New Justices, Appoints Five High Court Chief Justices in Historic Reshuffle JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF SHAHRUKH EJAZ JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KANDIVALI EDUCATION SOCIETY’S SHRI JAYANTILAL H. PATEL LAW COLLEGE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GEHI LAW JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADV. SHASHI PRATAP SINGH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF AKSHAY MOHILEY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT A&N LAW OFFICES LLP NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 28 May 2025 The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has dismissed an insolvency plea against Dunzo filed by invoice discounters. Learn more about the legal proceedings, creditor claims, and Dunzo’s ongoing financial troubles. NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Petition Filed by Invoice Discounters Against Dunzo On 27 May 2025, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Bengaluru rejected an insolvency petition filed by invoice discounters against Dunzo, a prominent player in the quick commerce industry. Tribunal Finds Petition Against Dunzo Not Maintainable The plea was filed by invoice discounters associated with Dunzo Digital, claiming partial non-payment of dues. However, the bench—comprising Judicial Member Sunil Kumar Aggarwal and Technical Member Radha Krishna Sreepada—ruled that the petition was not maintainable. This verdict was delivered after multiple delays spanning over six weeks. Dunzo Faces Multiple Insolvency Petitions from Creditors Despite this dismissal, Dunzo is still battling multiple insolvency applications filed by various creditors. Here are the key players involved: Invoice Discounters: Filed an application alleging that Dunzo had fulfilled only 50% of its payment obligations. The specific amount in question remains undisclosed. Velvin Packaging Solutions: This eco-friendly packaging company filed an insolvency plea in November 2023. The NCLT has issued notices to Dunzo in response. Betterplace Safety Solutions: An operational creditor that initiated proceedings in February 2024, citing unpaid dues of ₹4 crore. These were for services including background checks, asset management, recruitment of delivery personnel, and merchandise supply. NCLT Questions Dunzo’s Delayed Responses The Tribunal has expressed concern over Dunzo’s delays in responding to these legal proceedings. In September 2024, the NCLT noted that Dunzo failed to submit its replies despite being granted extra time—resulting in forfeiture of its right to respond. Although Dunzo’s legal counsel requested further time due to ongoing settlement talks, the NCLT emphasized that any settlement should be initiated by the creditor and required a joint affidavit within 48 hours. Dunzo’s Ongoing Financial Crisis and Vendor Dues Dunzo is currently navigating a significant liquidity crunch, which has led to delayed salary payments, unpaid vendor dues, and workforce reductions. In FY 2023, Dunzo reported losses amounting to ₹1,801.8 crore. Major Vendors Serving Legal Notices to Dunzo Several prominent vendors have served legal notices to Dunzo, demanding repayment of dues totaling ₹11.4 crore. These vendors include: Google India Facebook India Glance Koo Cupshup Conclusion Although the NCLT rejected the invoice discounters’ petition, Dunzo remains under pressure from multiple legal and financial fronts. The company’s struggle to resolve its liabilities and stabilize operations continues to attract regulatory attention. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Read More »

Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Three New Justices, Appoints Five High Court Chief Justices in Historic Reshuffle JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF SHAHRUKH EJAZ JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KANDIVALI EDUCATION SOCIETY’S SHRI JAYANTILAL H. PATEL LAW COLLEGE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GEHI LAW JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADV. SHASHI PRATAP SINGH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF AKSHAY MOHILEY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT A&N LAW OFFICES LLP Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 28 May 2025 The Supreme Court urges a high-profile couple, a fashion entrepreneur and a food business tycoon, to resolve their child custody dispute amicably over coffee, highlighting the human side of family law. Supreme Court Suggests Coffee Meeting to Resolve High-Profile Child Custody Dispute In a high-stakes legal battle, the Supreme Court of India advised an elite couple involved in a child custody case to settle their differences over a casual meeting—perhaps “over coffee or dinner.” The case involves a separated couple: a wife who is a successful fashion entrepreneur and a husband who runs a major packaged food business. Dispute Over Child’s International Travel Sparks Legal Tension The dispute intensified when the wife sought court permission to travel to Europe with their 3-year-old daughter during June and July. The husband refused to sign the necessary travel documents, expressing fears that the child might “disappear” overseas. Supreme Court Encourages Direct Communication Between Parents The court urged the estranged couple to meet privately—without lawyers or family members—to “talk out the issues.” The bench also questioned why the pair, still legally married, couldn’t spend a short vacation together for their child’s sake. The justices remarked, “Traveling abroad is pure luxury,” emphasizing practical parenting over extravagant travel. Father Requests Custody of Child’s Passport The husband argued that he should retain custody of the child’s passport to ensure her safe return to India. He proposed that the wife could travel with her own family while their daughter stayed with paternal grandparents in Mumbai. Legal Mediation and Allegations of Abuse Representing the wife, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi stated that his client was open to mediation. However, he asserted that reconciliation was impossible due to an allegedly abusive relationship—a claim the husband strongly denied. The wife also stated she did not want her husband to accompany them on the European trip. Supreme Court Hopes for Positive Outcome The bench encouraged the couple to focus on the future and consider reconciliation. The hearing was adjourned with hopes that time spent together might yield a positive resolution. Previous Custody Ruling and Visitation Concerns Previously, the Mumbai High Court granted custody of the child to the mother, allowing her to reside with the child in Delhi. The husband, who lives in Mumbai, told the Supreme Court he had only been allowed supervised visits at the wife’s family home, an environment he deemed unfit for private discussions. Justice Abhay Oka Proposed as Mediator To navigate the complex legal and emotional terrain, the Supreme Court suggested appointing retired Justice Abhay Oka as a mediator. His involvement is expected to facilitate a balanced resolution for both custody and divorce proceedings. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters NCLT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Dunzo Filed by Invoice Discounters Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Sada Law • May 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Urges Elite Couple to Resolve Child Custody Dispute Over Coffee Read More »

Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Three New Justices, Appoints Five High Court Chief Justices in Historic Reshuffle JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF SHAHRUKH EJAZ JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KANDIVALI EDUCATION SOCIETY’S SHRI JAYANTILAL H. PATEL LAW COLLEGE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GEHI LAW JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADV. SHASHI PRATAP SINGH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF AKSHAY MOHILEY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT A&N LAW OFFICES LLP LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LAKSHMIKUMARAN AND SRIDHARAN ATTORNEYS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VAISH ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Mahi Sinha 28 May 2025 A second bomb threat call in one week has triggered a security alert at Mumbai’s Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. Authorities rushed to respond as investigation links emerge with the 2001 Indian Parliament attack and 26/11 Mumbai attacks. Mumbai Airport Receives Another Bomb Threat Mumbai’s Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport was placed on high alert on Tuesday after police received a threatening phone call about a potential bomb attack. This marks the second bomb threat targeting Mumbai airport in just one week. Authorities responded swiftly, deploying bomb detection squads and security teams to secure the premises. After a thorough investigation, no explosives or suspicious items were discovered, and the situation was declared safe. Timeline of Recent Threats May 17: Email Threat Mentions Taj Mahal Palace Hotel and Airport The first threat was reported on May 17, when an email was sent to authorities warning of bombs at both the Mumbai airport and the iconic Taj Mahal Palace Hotel. The email also mentioned Afzal Guru, convicted for his role in the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, claiming his execution was unjust. In response, security forces conducted extensive searches at both the airport and the hotel—both notable sites from the 2008 Mumbai attacks—but no explosives were found. Third Threat Sent to Maharashtra Secretariat Adding to the growing concerns, a separate email threat was also sent to the Maharashtra Secretariat’s disaster control department earlier this month, indicating a possible pattern or coordinated campaign to spread panic. Police Investigation Underway Mumbai Police have filed a case against an unknown individual and launched a full-scale investigation into the series of bomb threats. Authorities are exploring possible connections between the incidents and any extremist motivations. Heightened Security Across Key Locations As a precaution, security measures at Mumbai’s major landmarks and transit hubs have been intensified. Passengers at the airport and guests at high-profile hotels are advised to remain alert and cooperate with security protocols. Conclusion: Mumbai on Alert Amid Ongoing Threats With two threats in a week and a third incident involving the Maharashtra Secretariat, Mumbai remains on high alert. While no actual explosives have been found, the threats have significantly strained local security resources and raised public concerns. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Urges Compounding in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/S New Win Export vs A. Subramaniam (2024) Supreme Court Urges Compounding in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/S New Win Export vs A. Subramaniam (2024) Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Second Bomb Threat in a Week Disrupts Mumbai Airport Operations Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote