The Allahabad High Court has denied teaching appointments to candidates holding Adib-e-Kamil degrees from Jamia Urdu, Aligarh, citing lack of proper classes and UGC recognition. Read the full case update and implications.

Introduction

In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court declined to grant appointment relief to candidates holding Adib-e-Kamil degrees from Jamia Urdu, Aligarh. The court stated that the institution was “distributing degrees without conducting proper classes”, making the degree holders ineligible for the post of Assistant Teacher (Urdu) under the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board.

Background of the Case

The case, titled Azhar Ali v. State of U.P. and Others, involved petitioners who had cleared the U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test (UPTET) and were on the merit list for Assistant Teacher (Urdu Language) positions. Many of them had received postings, while others were awaiting appointments.

However, during verification, it was found that:

• Candidates obtained the Adib-e-Kamil degree in less than the prescribed one-year duration.

• Some completed their Intermediate exam and Adib-e-Kamil in the same academic year.

• An investigation raised concerns about the legitimacy of their educational background.

Court’s Observations

Questionable Timeline of Degree Completion

Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery noted inconsistencies, including a petitioner completing both Intermediate and Adib-e-Kamil exams within five months—well below the standard course duration. This raised red flags about the credibility of the degrees.

Lack of UGC Recognition

The respondents argued that Jamia Urdu lacked recognition from the University Grants Commission (UGC) and did not follow a regular academic structure involving classes, faculty, or examination protocols.

Key Arguments by Petitioners

• Jamia Urdu, Aligarh was claimed to be a legitimate minority educational institution.

• They cited a government order (G.O. dated 05.01.2016) that recognized Moallim-E-Urdu degrees obtained before August 11, 1997, for teaching eligibility.

• Petitioners contended that natural justice was violated and that dual study courses were not legally prohibited.

Final Verdict

The court ruled that the degrees were issued without appropriate academic conduct, stating that Jamia Urdu was essentially distributing degrees without holding classes. As a result:

• Petitioners were declared not eligible for the post of Assistant Teacher (Urdu).

• The lead writ petition, along with related ones, was dismissed.

Implications for Future Teaching Appointments

This judgment sets a clear precedent for education boards and candidates alike. Valid degrees, course durations, and institutional recognition will now be scrutinized more closely in teacher recruitment processes. Institutions that do not follow academic norms could face serious credibility issues.

Conclusion

The Allahabad High Court‘s decision reinforces the importance of quality education and the authenticity of academic qualifications. Aspiring teachers must ensure that their degrees come from UGC-recognized institutions with transparent academic practices.