sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Sada Law

Air India Flight AI171 Crash: 265 Dead, 1 Survivor in Ahmedabad Tragedy Involving Boeing 787

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Air India Flight AI171 Crash: 265 Dead, 1 Survivor in Ahmedabad Tragedy Involving Boeing 787 LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ADITI MOHONI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDIAMART LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT SHURUWAT FOUNDATION CALL FOR PAPERS BY JAI JAGAT SUMMIT INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF SUSHANT SINGH ADV. LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LEGAL SOLUTIONS INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT KMJ LEGAL Karnataka High Court Upholds POCSO Case Against IISc Professor, Orders Fast-Tracked Trial Bombay High Court Allows 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025, Final Verdict Pending Air India Flight AI171 Crash: 265 Dead, 1 Survivor in Ahmedabad Tragedy Involving Boeing 787 PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 15 June 2025 A devastating Air India crash of Flight AI171 near Ahmedabad leaves 265 dead and only one survivor. Get full details, rescue efforts, government response, and investigation updates in this comprehensive report. Air India Flight AI171 Crash: 265 Dead, 1 Survivor in Ahmedabad Tragedy A tragic aviation disaster occurred on 12 June 2025 when an Air India flight en route to London crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad Airport. The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college dormitory, killing at least 265 people and leaving only one survivor. Location and Circumstances of the Crash Flight AI171 crashed into the densely populated Meghaninagar area shortly after takeoff, heading toward Gatwick Airport. Bystander videos revealed the aircraft struggling to gain altitude before turning into a fireball. Passenger and Crew Details The aircraft carried 230 passengers and 12 crew members. The nationalities included 169 Indians, 53 British, 7 Portuguese, and 1 Canadian. Former Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani was among the deceased. The sole survivor, Vishwaskumar Ramesh (seat 11A), is receiving treatment at Ahmedabad Civil Hospital. Ground Casualties and Rescue Operations The crash killed several individuals on the ground as the plane struck a dormitory during lunchtime. Emergency response included fire brigades, the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF), CISF, and the Indian Army. Rescue workers reported that the explosion of over 125,000 liters of jet fuel caused temperatures to soar to 1,000°C, making survival nearly impossible. Government and Political Response Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the site on 13 June to assess the damage and support ongoing efforts. He directed K. Rammohan Naidu, the Minister of Civil Aviation, to oversee relief operations. Amit Shah, Union Home Minister, described the crash as “impossible to survive” due to the intense heat and destruction. Investigation and Technical Analysis The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) confirmed that the aircraft issued a Mayday call before losing contact. A formal probe has been launched by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau following ICAO protocols. This marks the first crash involving a Boeing 787 Dreamliner since its introduction in 2011. Kelly Ortberg, CEO of Boeing, announced the deployment of a technical team to assist investigators. International Reactions and Support UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer stated that the British Foreign Secretary is coordinating with Indian officials. US President Donald Trump offered condolences and pledged full support to India, saying, “Anything we can do, we will do.” Compensation and Support from Air India and Tata Group The Tata Group, parent company of Air India, announced ₹1 crore in compensation for each family of the deceased, full medical cost coverage for the injured, and reconstruction aid for the damaged medical infrastructure. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Air India Flight AI171 Crash: 265 Dead, 1 Survivor in Ahmedabad Tragedy Involving Boeing 787 Sada Law • June 15, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Karnataka High Court Upholds POCSO Case Against IISc Professor, Orders Fast-Tracked Trial Sada Law • June 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Allows 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025, Final Verdict Pending Sada Law • June 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Air India Flight AI171 Crash: 265 Dead, 1 Survivor in Ahmedabad Tragedy Involving Boeing 787 Read More »

Karnataka High Court Upholds POCSO Case Against IISc Professor, Orders Fast-Tracked Trial

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Karnataka High Court Upholds POCSO Case Against IISc Professor, Orders Fast-Tracked Trial Bombay High Court Allows 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025, Final Verdict Pending Kerala High Court Grants Landmark Bail to Trans Woman, Upholds Rights and Dignity of Trans Community Bombay High Court Rules In-Laws’ Interference as Cruelty Under IPC Section 498A Delhi High Court Orders Social Media Cleanup to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Victim’s Identity Supreme Court Grants Parental Pension Rights to Unmarried Daughters in Landmark Ruling Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Karnataka High Court Upholds POCSO Case Against IISc Professor, Orders Fast-Tracked Trial KASHISH JAHAN 14 June 2025 The Karnataka High Court has upheld POCSO proceedings against an IISc professor accused of child sexual assault. Learn about the court’s judgment, the role of child testimony, and its impact on speedy justice. POCSO FIR Against IISc Professor to Proceed Amidst Allegations On June 12, the Karnataka High Court rejected a plea to quash a 2018 FIR filed under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act against an assistant professor at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru. He was accused of sexually inappropriate behavior involving a 10-year-old girl during a birthday party game referred to as a ‘ghost house.’ Defense Arguments: No Medical Evidence and Inconsistent Testimony The defense claimed procedural lapses, lack of medical examination, and delays in filing the report. They also questioned the consistency of the child’s statements, alleging external influence. However, the prosecution countered these claims by presenting eight corroborating witness testimonies recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, maintaining that the case merited a full trial. Justice Nagaprasanna’s Verdict: Testimony of One Child Can Be Sufficient Presiding Judge Justice M. Nagaprasanna ruled that under Sections 7 (sexual assault) and 8 (aggravated sexual assault) of the POCSO Act, a single credible testimony is adequate for the matter to proceed to trial. He stressed that evaluating the credibility of such testimony is the trial court’s responsibility, not a pre-trial prerogative. Fast-Track Trial Ordered for POCSO Case Noting the extended legal delay, the bench directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings and aim for a conclusion within three months. The court highlighted the importance of timely justice in child sexual abuse cases, in line with the urgent nature of such offenses. Conclusion: Reinforcing Child Protection and Legal Accountability This ruling from the Karnataka High Court reinforces the judiciary’s commitment to upholding child rights and ensuring legal accountability. By prioritizing consistent child testimony and mandating fast-track trials, the court strikes a balance between due process and the pressing need for justice in POCSO cases. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Karnataka High Court Upholds POCSO Case Against IISc Professor, Orders Fast-Tracked Trial Sada Law • June 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Allows 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025, Final Verdict Pending Sada Law • June 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Grants Landmark Bail to Trans Woman, Upholds Rights and Dignity of Trans Community Sada Law • June 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Karnataka High Court Upholds POCSO Case Against IISc Professor, Orders Fast-Tracked Trial Read More »

Bombay High Court Allows 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025, Final Verdict Pending

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Bombay High Court Allows 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025, Final Verdict Pending Kerala High Court Grants Landmark Bail to Trans Woman, Upholds Rights and Dignity of Trans Community Bombay High Court Rules In-Laws’ Interference as Cruelty Under IPC Section 498A Delhi High Court Orders Social Media Cleanup to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Victim’s Identity Supreme Court Grants Parental Pension Rights to Unmarried Daughters in Landmark Ruling Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Bombay High Court Allows 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025, Final Verdict Pending PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 14 June 2025 The Bombay High Court has allowed the continuation of the 10% Maratha reservation in education and employment for 2025, pending the final verdict on petitions challenging the 2024 law. Special hearings are scheduled on alternate Saturdays. Bombay High Court Upholds 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025 In a significant update on the ongoing legal challenge to the Maratha reservation, a newly formed three-judge bench of the Bombay High Court confirmed that the interim order allowing 10% quota for the Maratha community in education and employment will remain effective for 2025. This decision is subject to the outcome of petitions challenging the 2024 Maratha quota law. Special Bench to Hear Final Arguments on Alternate Saturdays The bench, led by Justice Ravindra Ghuge, announced it will conduct special hearings every alternate Saturday to expedite the conclusion of the case. He is joined by Justice Nizamoodin Jamadar and Justice Sandeep Marne—each from different division benches. “We understand the gravity of the matter and are committed to hearing your arguments on non-working days to ensure timely justice,” said the bench during the session. Final Arguments to Begin on July 18 The court has scheduled final arguments to commence on Friday, July 18, from 3 PM to 5 PM. Proceedings will continue the following day, Saturday, July 19, from 11 AM to 5 PM, marking the start of an intensive hearing phase on the Maratha quota case. Debate Over Interim Relief: Advocates Clash Senior advocate Pradeep Sancheti, representing petitioner Sanjeet Shukla, argued that the interim relief granted in April 2024 was limited to that year. He emphasized that since final hearings had commenced under the previous bench led by then Chief Justice Devendra Upadhyay, new deliberations on interim relief were necessary. However, Advocate General Dr. Birendra Saraf countered this request, asserting that detailed arguments had already been presented before and did not require repetition. Court Maintains Interim Relief for 2025 The bench dismissed the demand to revisit interim relief arguments. Justice Ghuge noted that rearguing the matter would equate to prematurely addressing final points of law. “Accepting the plea would effectively suspend the entire act and change the legal landscape entirely,” he stated. The court affirmed that the interim reservation for the Maratha community will continue for both admissions and recruitment in 2025, pending the final judgment. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Allows 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025, Final Verdict Pending Sada Law • June 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Grants Landmark Bail to Trans Woman, Upholds Rights and Dignity of Trans Community Sada Law • June 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Rules In-Laws’ Interference as Cruelty Under IPC Section 498A Sada Law • June 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Allows 10% Maratha Reservation for 2025, Final Verdict Pending Read More »

Kerala High Court Grants Landmark Bail to Trans Woman, Upholds Rights and Dignity of Trans Community

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Grants Landmark Bail to Trans Woman, Upholds Rights and Dignity of Trans Community Bombay High Court Rules In-Laws’ Interference as Cruelty Under IPC Section 498A Delhi High Court Orders Social Media Cleanup to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Victim’s Identity Supreme Court Grants Parental Pension Rights to Unmarried Daughters in Landmark Ruling Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ZEN MEDIA Kerala High Court Grants Landmark Bail to Trans Woman, Upholds Rights and Dignity of Trans Community Kashish jahan 14 june 2025 Kerala High Court delivers a groundbreaking judgment granting bail to a trans woman under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), reinforcing transgender rights and dignity in India. A landmark victory against discrimination and for inclusive justice. Landmark Kerala High Court Bail Order Upholds Transgender Rights In a historic judgment, the Kerala High Court granted bail to a trans woman accused under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO). This ruling marks a significant step forward in recognizing the rights and dignity of transgender individuals within the Indian legal system. Justice Beyond Gender: The Case for Empathy and Equality The case involved a trans woman who was charged under strict provisions of the POCSO Act due to a consensual relationship with a minor. However, the Court identified misuse of her gender identity as a factor in her criminalization. Instead of merely enforcing the law, the Kerala High Court emphasized empathy and fairness, upholding the principles from the landmark NALSA v. Union of India (2014) judgment, which affirms equal rights and legal protections for transgender persons. Why This Judgment Matters: Transgender Rights in India Protecting Transgender Dignity in Criminal Law The Court ruled that gender identity should not be a basis for harsh or unequal treatment in legal proceedings. A trans woman must be recognized and treated with the same respect and legal protections as any other woman, even under criminal law. A Step Towards Inclusive Justice for the Trans Community This verdict goes beyond the issue of bail—it signals the judiciary’s commitment to combating discrimination against transgender individuals. The ruling encourages society and legal institutions to recognize transgender persons’ identities, rights, and dignity. The Broader Impact: A Beacon of Hope for Transgender Rights By granting bail and affirming the trans woman’s identity, the Kerala High Court has reinforced constitutional protections for transgender individuals, emphasizing equality beyond gender binaries. This judgment stands as a powerful precedent for future cases involving transgender rights, promising a more inclusive and just legal system in India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Grants Landmark Bail to Trans Woman, Upholds Rights and Dignity of Trans Community Read More »

Bombay High Court Rules In-Laws’ Interference as Cruelty Under IPC Section 498A

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Bombay High Court Rules In-Laws’ Interference as Cruelty Under IPC Section 498A Delhi High Court Orders Social Media Cleanup to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Victim’s Identity Supreme Court Grants Parental Pension Rights to Unmarried Daughters in Landmark Ruling Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ZEN MEDIA Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Bombay High Court Rules In-Laws’ Interference as Cruelty Under IPC Section 498A Kashish jahan 14 June 2025 The Bombay High Court rules that emotional and mental harassment by in-laws qualifies as cruelty under IPC Section 498A. Learn how this landmark judgment protects women from toxic interference in marriage. Marriage is Between Two People, Not Two Families In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court has recognized that constant interference by in-laws in a woman’s marriage amounts to cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This ruling resonates deeply with many Indian women who suffer from emotional and mental harassment within their marital homes. Emotional Abuse and Mental Cruelty Recognized as Legal Offense In this significant case, the woman complained of emotional and mental harassment by her husband’s family, including their control over her personal decisions, unwarranted interference in private matters, and repeated humiliation. Although there were no physical assaults, the court emphasized that mental cruelty can be as damaging—if not more—than physical violence. The Bombay High Court affirmed that such toxic control and emotional abuse by in-laws disrupt the sanctity of married life and qualify as criminal cruelty under IPC Section 498A. Why This Judgment is a Game-Changer for Women’s Rights in India Traditionally, Section 498A cases focused primarily on physical abuse. However, this judgment broadens the scope to include emotional cruelty, recognizing the invisible wounds caused by constant gaslighting and humiliation. The court’s decision sends a strong message: emotional abuse is real, harmful, and punishable under the law. It reinforces the protection offered to women, not just from physical violence, but from mental and emotional torment inflicted by their in-laws. A Warning to Families: Respect the Boundaries of Marriage This ruling reminds families across India that marriage is a bond between two individuals—not between families. It warns against the damaging consequences of undue interference and control by relatives, especially in-laws. The verdict empowers women trapped in emotionally abusive environments, offering legal recourse against such cruelty and supporting their right to dignity and peace within marriage. Conclusion The Bombay High Court’s decision to include interference by in-laws as cruelty under IPC Section 498A is a significant step forward for women’s legal rights in India. It highlights the importance of recognizing emotional abuse and mental harassment as serious offenses that deserve strict legal action. For women facing emotional cruelty in marriage, this judgment provides hope and a stronger legal framework to protect their well-being. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Rules In-Laws’ Interference as Cruelty Under IPC Section 498A Read More »

Delhi High Court Orders Social Media Cleanup to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Victim’s Identity

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Orders Social Media Cleanup to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Victim’s Identity Supreme Court Grants Parental Pension Rights to Unmarried Daughters in Landmark Ruling Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ZEN MEDIA Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL on Batla House Demolitions; Allows Individual Petitions Delhi High Court Orders Social Media Cleanup to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Victim’s Identity Kashish jahan 14 June 2025 The Delhi High Court takes a strong stand to protect a child sexual abuse survivor’s identity, ordering social media platforms to remove harmful content. Learn how this landmark ruling upholds digital privacy and child protection laws in India. A Major Step Toward Online Privacy for Child Abuse Victims In an era dominated by viral content and social media trends, the Delhi High Court has set a critical precedent by intervening to protect the identity of a minor sexual abuse survivor. The case involved disturbing videos shared on platforms like Instagram, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter) that violated the girl’s right to privacy by revealing her name, face, and address. Legal Framework Ignored as Videos Go Viral Despite the existence of strong child protection laws such as the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and the Juvenile Justice Act, the online circulation of these videos went unchecked until the court intervened. Violations of Child Protection Laws Section 23 of the POCSO Act strictly prohibits revealing the identity of a child in a sexual abuse case. Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act reinforces this protection, especially in criminal cases involving minors. The widespread sharing of these clips not only breached these laws but also put the child’s mental health and safety at significant risk. Court Orders Swift Action from Social Media Platforms In response, the Delhi High Court took immediate action: Ordered Instagram, YouTube, and X to remove the content within 24 hours. Directed the Delhi Police Cyber Cell to track the original uploader and provide a detailed report. This response highlights the growing importance of cyber law enforcement in safeguarding vulnerable individuals from digital harm. A Message to Content Creators and the Public This landmark judgment serves as a wake-up call for: Content creators, who often prioritize reach over ethics. Social media users, who may unknowingly contribute to a child’s trauma by sharing such content. Digital Freedom vs. Responsibility While freedom of speech is a cornerstone of democracy, it does not include the right to exploit or violate others, especially minors. The court’s ruling draws a firm line between public interest and digital exploitation. Why This Ruling Matters for India’s Legal Landscape The Delhi High Court’s action goes beyond one individual case—it sets a legal and moral precedent for how India must handle child safety online. Key Takeaways Upholds the child’s right to dignity and privacy. Reinforces the enforceability of existing child protection laws. Signals stronger accountability for social media platforms. Conclusion: Protecting Children in the Age of Virality This case is a reminder that digital content must not come at the cost of a child’s safety or mental well-being. The Delhi High Court has made it clear that the internet cannot be a lawless space—especially when it comes to protecting minor sexual abuse survivors. By stepping in firmly, the judiciary reinforces that children’s rights in India must be protected both offline and online. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Orders Social Media Cleanup to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Victim’s Identity Read More »

Supreme Court Grants Parental Pension Rights to Unmarried Daughters in Landmark Ruling

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Grants Parental Pension Rights to Unmarried Daughters in Landmark Ruling Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ZEN MEDIA Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL on Batla House Demolitions; Allows Individual Petitions INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CLLRA NLU, DELHI Supreme Court Grants Parental Pension Rights to Unmarried Daughters in Landmark Ruling Kashish Jahan 14 June 2025 In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India declares that unmarried daughters are entitled to receive their deceased parents’ pension. This judgment upholds gender equality and secures financial rights for adult daughters across India. A Historic Win for Unmarried Daughters in India In a progressive and far-reaching decision, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that unmarried daughters are entitled to receive the family pension of their deceased parents. This judgment marks a significant shift in how the Indian legal system recognizes the rights of adult daughters, reinforcing gender equality and social justice. The Case That Sparked Change The case centered around a woman whose father, a retired Indian Railways employee, had passed away. While other eligible family members were granted the parental pension, her claim was rejected on the grounds that, as an adult and unmarried daughter, she was not considered a “dependent.” However, the Supreme Court challenged this outdated notion, asserting that financial dependency should not be judged by age or marital status. The Court emphasized that a pension is a socio-economic support system, not a discretionary benefit limited to select family members. Legal Grounding—Article 14 and the Right to Equality The Court invoked Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the Right to Equality, to dismantle the discriminatory practice. The judges questioned why widowed daughters could receive pensions while unmarried daughters, who may also be financially vulnerable, could not. This ruling is not just a legal correction—it’s a message that women’s financial rights must be protected regardless of their marital status. Implications for Women’s Rights and Financial Security This judgment is a step forward for women’s empowerment in India, especially for daughters who often remain single to care for aging parents or due to personal circumstances. It ensures that they will not be financially abandoned by systems their parents faithfully contributed to. By extending pension eligibility to unmarried daughters, the Court recognizes the evolving role of women in Indian society and provides economic support for single women who may face financial hardship without such benefits. A Quiet Yet Powerful Revolution This ruling does more than change pension eligibility—it reshapes societal attitudes. It reaffirms that unmarried adult daughters are not second-class citizens. They have equal rights, value, and deserve financial protection under the law. Key Takeaways Unmarried daughters are now eligible to receive their deceased parents’ pension. The decision is grounded in Article 14, upholding gender equality. The ruling promotes financial security for adult daughters, especially those caring for elderly parents. This marks a major legal and social step toward women’s rights and empowerment in India. Conclusion: A New Era for Family Pension Rights in India The Supreme Court of India‘s judgment is a monumental win for unmarried daughters across the country. It aligns legal frameworks with modern realities and ensures that family pension benefits are distributed fairly, regardless of gender or marital status. This decision not only supports women’s financial independence but also upholds the dignity and equality they rightfully deserve. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Grants Parental Pension Rights to Unmarried Daughters in Landmark Ruling Read More »

Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ZEN MEDIA Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL on Batla House Demolitions; Allows Individual Petitions INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CLLRA NLU, DELHI Chief Justice of India Warns Against Judicial Terrorism Amid Government Overreach Concerns Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case KASHISH JAHAN 13 June 2025 The Telangana High Court has stayed the conviction and granted interim bail to mining baron and former minister Gali Janardhan Reddy in the Obulapuram illegal mining case, safeguarding his MLA status and stirring major political implications. Telangana High Court Grants Interim Bail to Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case On June 12, 2025, the Telangana High Court delivered a significant ruling by staying the conviction and sentence of former Karnataka minister and mining baron Gali Janardhan Reddy in the notorious Obulapuram illegal mining case. Previously sentenced to seven years, Reddy now receives interim bail—an order that allows him to retain his MLA position, temporarily shielding him from political disqualification. Legal Arguments and Judicial Grounds for Relief Legal counsel representing Reddy argued that the conviction’s suspension was crucial for preserving his legislative privileges. The threat of disqualification under the Representation of the People Act loomed large following the earlier verdict by the Special CBI Court. With appeals pending and notices issued by the Election Commission of India, the High Court recognized the broader political consequences. Justice K. Lakshman responded by staying the sentence and granting interim bail. Impact on Political Career and Pending Appeals The court’s order directly prevents Reddy’s immediate removal from his elected post, offering him political protection while the appeals process continues. This stay also postpones further action under disqualification provisions, allowing Reddy to remain active in Karnataka politics. Simultaneously, related legal proceedings are still underway, which could influence the final outcome of this high-profile mining case. Conclusion: A Landmark Case in Political Judiciary This case stands as a critical example of how interim judicial reliefs intersect with political representation in India. The Telangana High Court’s decision highlights the tension between enforcing legal accountability and maintaining democratic participation. As Gali Janardhan Reddy’s legal battles continue, the implications for Indian political and judicial systems are profound. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Telangana High Court Grants Bail, Stays Conviction of Gali Janardhan Reddy in Illegal Mining Case Read More »

Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ZEN MEDIA Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL on Batla House Demolitions; Allows Individual Petitions INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CLLRA NLU, DELHI Chief Justice of India Warns Against Judicial Terrorism Amid Government Overreach Concerns Supreme Court Rules Unregistered Sale Agreement Cannot Confer Title Despite Later Registration Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case KASHISH JAHAN 13 June 2025 The Chhattisgarh High Court has upheld disciplinary action by SBI under the POSH Act, reinforcing the importance of institutional compliance with anti-harassment protocols in the workplace. Bank’s Disciplinary Action on Sexual Harassment Upheld In a strong affirmation of workplace ethics and compliance, the Chhattisgarh High Court has dismissed the appeal of a State Bank of India (SBI) employee, who challenged the removal of two salary increments. This disciplinary action was imposed after credible findings of sexual harassment involving both fellow employees and external customers. The bank’s POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment) committee investigated the allegations thoroughly and imposed the sanctions following internal policy protocols. Court Validates POSH Compliance and Fair Inquiry The court bench noted that SBI followed the proper legal and procedural framework under the POSH Act. It acknowledged that the internal inquiry process was transparent, provided the accused a fair chance to represent himself, and upheld the right to appeal. The verdict emphasized that the committee’s conclusion was supported by substantial evidence, and the process was devoid of bias or procedural lapses—marking a clear endorsement of due diligence in workplace investigations. Legal Reinforcement for Employers and Institutions Justice XYZ ruled that judicial interference is unwarranted when an institution like SBI operates within the statutory guidelines of the POSH Act. This judgment sends a strong message to corporations and financial institutions, underlining the importance of robust anti-harassment mechanisms and meticulous documentation. It serves as a precedent, encouraging employers to uphold organizational integrity by ensuring transparency and fairness in handling sexual harassment complaints. Conclusion: Strengthening Workplace Ethics Through Law This decision by the Chhattisgarh High Court reinforces the judicial backing for organizations committed to safe and respectful workplaces. It highlights the judiciary’s support for procedural adherence and promotes the effective enforcement of anti-harassment policies in line with India’s legislative standards. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL on Batla House Demolitions; Allows Individual Petitions Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Chhattisgarh High Court Backs SBI’s POSH Action in Sexual Harassment Case Read More »

CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ZEN MEDIA Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL on Batla House Demolitions; Allows Individual Petitions INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CLLRA NLU, DELHI Chief Justice of India Warns Against Judicial Terrorism Amid Government Overreach Concerns Supreme Court Rules Unregistered Sale Agreement Cannot Confer Title Despite Later Registration Kerala High Court Upholds Convict’s Right to Support Child’s Education During Parole CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute KASHISH JAHAN 13 June 2025 The CBI secured one-day custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar Charan Pratap Singh in a ₹3 lakh bribery case tied to a Lonavala hotel dispute. Learn how new evidence and digital forensics are expanding the scope of this high-profile corruption probe. CBI Secures One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Case On June 10, a special court in Mumbai granted the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) one-day custody of Deputy Registrar Charan Pratap Singh of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Mumbai Bench. Singh, along with assistant Karsan Ganesh Ahir, had been in judicial custody since May 29 for allegedly accepting a ₹3 lakh bribe in a case involving a Lonavala hotel ownership dispute. Legal Defense Invokes BNSS to Oppose Extended Custody Singh’s legal counsel, Sak Saxena, filed a bail application invoking the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). Saxena argued that further police custody is not permitted once judicial custody is granted, unless compelling new evidence emerges. He stressed that procedures like witness confrontation and document verification could be conducted within judicial custody itself. New Witness Testimony Justifies Further Interrogation The CBI introduced fresh witness statements recorded after the initial May 29 remand, which hinted at broader collusion within NCLT ranks. Based on this new testimony, the court approved a one-day police remand, enabling deeper interrogation under CBI custody. Bribery Charges Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute According to the CBI, Singh demanded ₹3 lakh from a businessman involved in a property dispute at the NCLT concerning a hotel in Lonavala. He instructed his assistant Ahir to collect the bribe during a meeting in Colaba, where a sting operation led to their immediate arrest. Further investigation revealed that Singh transferred ₹50,000 to fellow NCLT officer Pradeep Kumar Nagarale, believed to be a portion of the bribe. Additionally, the CBI recovered deleted WhatsApp chats from the mobile devices of Singh and Nagarale, now under forensic examination. Digital Forensics and a Widening Corruption Probe The CBI is employing advanced digital forensics to reconstruct deleted messages, analyze metadata, and trace digital footprints. These efforts aim to identify more potential accomplices within the tribunal. The investigation suggests a larger corruption network possibly involving senior staff members at the NCLT. The one-day remand was strategically sought to close critical gaps in the investigation, which could lead to extended custody or additional arrests. Judicial Oversight as CBI Pursues Tribunal Corruption This high-profile bribery case underscores the growing scrutiny of administrative corruption in India’s quasi-judicial institutions. With digital evidence and key testimonies surfacing, the probe could become a landmark in tackling tribunal-level graft. Singh’s one-day CBI custody signifies a crucial step toward justice—balancing legal procedure with effective enforcement. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL on Batla House Demolitions; Allows Individual Petitions Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Chief Justice of India Warns Against Judicial Terrorism Amid Government Overreach Concerns Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Probe Linked to Lonavala Hotel Dispute Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote