Sadalaw

Trending Today Supreme Court to Review Sedition-like Provision in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Empowers Senior Citizens: Lawyers Allowed in Maintenance Tribunals Supreme Court to Hear Fresh Plea on Electoral Bonds Transparency Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DENTONS LINK LEGAL, MUMBAI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MZM LEGAL LLP, MUMBAI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE YUVACRACY CENTRE FOR POLICY RESEARCH JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LAW OFFICE OF AARUSHI S. DESAI, AHMEDABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LEAD INDIA Supreme Court to Review Sedition-like Provision in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Shristi singh 10 AUG 2025 The Supreme Court of India will hear a constitutional challenge to Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleged to be a repackaged sedition law. Petitioners argue it infringes free speech under Article 19(1)(a) and revives a colonial-era offence under a new name. A Significant Constitutional Challenge On August 9, 2025, the Supreme Court of India admitted petitions questioning the validity of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). The section mirrors the repealed Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code — the colonial-era sedition law that the Court had effectively suspended in 2022 due to concerns of misuse. Petitioners — including journalists, rights activists, and legal scholars — allege that Parliament has repackaged sedition into the new criminal code, undermining constitutional liberties. What Is the Case About? The BNS replaced the IPC in July 2024, with the government claiming it modernized India’s criminal laws. However, Section 152 criminalizes acts or speech that “endanger the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India” — punishable by life imprisonment or up to seven years in prison. Petitioners argue: The language is nearly identical to the old sedition law. It grants sweeping powers to authorities without safeguards. It risks being abused to silence government critics. It violates Article 19(1)(a) (freedom of speech) and fails the “reasonable restrictions” test in Article 19(2). They also invoke the doctrine of colourable legislation, claiming Parliament cannot bypass judicial scrutiny by re-enacting a struck-down law under a different title. Court’s Stand: ‘Fundamental Rights Cannot Be Revived Under a New Name’ The Supreme Court issued notice to the Union Government and tagged the case with other pending sedition challenges. Observing that the matter concerns Articles 19(1)(a) and 21 (right to life and personal liberty), the Court signaled a detailed constitutional review. The petitioners referenced the Court’s 2022 interim order that kept sedition cases in abeyance, arguing the same principle should apply to Section 152 BNS, as both provisions share the same core prohibitions. “The legislature, in trying to evade constitutional scrutiny, has merely renamed and relocated sedition in the BNS. The chilling effect on free speech remains unchanged,” the petition stated. Potential Impacts of the Ruling Strengthening Free Speech: Striking down or narrowing Section 152 could set a powerful precedent safeguarding dissent. Defining Legislative Limits: It could reaffirm that Parliament cannot reintroduce unconstitutional provisions through new statutes. Effect on Pending Cases: The verdict may influence how both past IPC sedition cases and new BNS prosecutions are handled. Why This Judgment Will Matter 1. Protecting Fundamental Rights It ensures outdated colonial offences cannot be rebranded to suppress democratic freedoms. 2. Judicial Oversight of Legislation It reinforces that constitutional supremacy prevents Parliament from legislating around judicial review. A Larger Constitutional Moment The case goes beyond legal technicalities — it may determine the scope of political dissent in modern India. As the Court’s proceedings unfold, it will send a clear message: justice must evolve with the Constitution, not cling to outdated laws. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court to Review Sedition-like Provision in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Empowers Senior Citizens: Lawyers Allowed in Maintenance Tribunals Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court to Hear Fresh Plea on Electoral Bonds Transparency Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court to Review Sedition-like Provision in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Read More »

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Empowers Senior Citizens: Lawyers Allowed in Maintenance Tribunals

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Empowers Senior Citizens: Lawyers Allowed in Maintenance Tribunals Supreme Court to Hear Fresh Plea on Electoral Bonds Transparency Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DENTONS LINK LEGAL, MUMBAI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MZM LEGAL LLP, MUMBAI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE YUVACRACY CENTRE FOR POLICY RESEARCH JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LAW OFFICE OF AARUSHI S. DESAI, AHMEDABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LEAD INDIA INDIA Bloc Strategy Meeting Held at Rahul Gandhi’s Residence Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Empowers Senior Citizens: Lawyers Allowed in Maintenance Tribunals Shristi singh 10 AUG 2025 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has ruled that senior citizens can now be represented by lawyers in Maintenance Tribunals, striking down Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. This landmark verdict strengthens fairness, equality, and access to justice for the elderly. A Landmark Verdict for Senior Citizens In a historic decision on August 9, 2025, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court struck down Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The provision previously barred elderly litigants from having legal representation in tribunal proceedings. Now, senior citizens can appoint lawyers to represent them, ensuring they have equal access to justice. The Case and the Constitutional Challenge Multiple petitions challenged the constitutional validity of Section 17, arguing that denying legal representation placed the elderly at a severe disadvantage. Petitioners highlighted that many senior citizens are: Vulnerable and frail Facing health issues Lacking familiarity with legal processes They argued that although the Act aimed to protect the elderly, it paradoxically limited their ability to defend themselves effectively. Court’s Observations: Fairness Over Procedural Shortcuts The High Court ruled that “procedural barriers cannot override fundamental rights”. Referring to Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the Bench emphasized that the right to legal representation is integral to the right to life and personal liberty. The judges noted that while the Act aimed for quick and informal trials, speed must not come at the expense of fairness. The Court also cited similar rulings from the Kerala High Court, Delhi High Court, and Goa Bench of the Bombay High Court. “It is unrealistic to expect senior citizens, who may be battling frailty, ill health, or social isolation, to present their own cases effectively. The law must empower them, not diminish their voice,” the judgment stated. Impact of the Verdict With this ruling: Senior citizens can now appoint legal counsel in tribunal cases under the Act. The concept of “speedy justice” is reframed to ensure justice is both fast and fair. The judgment reinforces that welfare laws must empower beneficiaries rather than create new barriers. Why This Judgment Matters This decision upholds two vital legal principles: 1. Accessibility Over Expediency Laws designed to assist vulnerable groups must be implemented in ways that empower, not hinder, those they are meant to protect. 2. Constitutional Supremacy No procedural rule in special statutes can take precedence over the constitutional right to legal aid and fair hearing. Broader Implications This verdict is a reminder that welfare legislation must be regularly reviewed to ensure it delivers on its promises. As the Court noted, justice is not a race—it is a commitment to fairness, dignity, and equality. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Empowers Senior Citizens: Lawyers Allowed in Maintenance Tribunals Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court to Hear Fresh Plea on Electoral Bonds Transparency Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Empowers Senior Citizens: Lawyers Allowed in Maintenance Tribunals Read More »

Supreme Court to Hear Fresh Plea on Electoral Bonds Transparency

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today Supreme Court to Hear Fresh Plea on Electoral Bonds Transparency Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DENTONS LINK LEGAL, MUMBAI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MZM LEGAL LLP, MUMBAI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE YUVACRACY CENTRE FOR POLICY RESEARCH JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LAW OFFICE OF AARUSHI S. DESAI, AHMEDABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LEAD INDIA INDIA Bloc Strategy Meeting Held at Rahul Gandhi’s Residence LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GEETANSH NAGPAL LAW CHAMBERS Supreme Court to Hear Fresh Plea on Electoral Bonds Transparency Shristi singh 10 AUG 2025 The Supreme Court of India will hear a petition challenging the government’s electoral bonds scheme, reigniting the debate on transparency in political funding and donor disclosure. Introduction The Supreme Court of India will on Monday hear a new petition challenging the government’s electoral bonds scheme.Filed by a coalition of civil society groups and former bureaucrats, the plea demands that political parties disclose donor details to promote accountability and prevent anonymous corporate influence in elections. Scene Outside the Supreme Court On Friday morning, lawyers and activists gathered on the lawns of the Supreme Court, holding placards reading “Democracy Needs Transparency” and “End Anonymous Funding.”The case is listed before a bench headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, with Justices Sanjiv Khanna and B.V. Nagarathna. This hearing comes less than two years after the court struck down parts of the scheme — a ruling the government sought to bypass via legislative amendments in early 2025. Background: The Electoral Bonds Scheme Introduced in 2018, electoral bonds allow individuals and companies to donate to political parties through banking channels without publicly revealing their identities.While the government claims the system curbs black money, critics argue it enables opaque funding and shields donors from scrutiny. In 2024, the Supreme Court directed the State Bank of India to release donor and recipient data, revealing a concentration of funding towards ruling parties.In March 2025, Parliament amended the Representation of the People Act, 1951 to restore donor anonymity citing “national security and privacy” — sparking protests by opposition parties and transparency advocates. Petitioners’ Core Arguments The petitioners contend that the amended scheme violates democratic principles: Right to Information – Citizens must know who funds political parties that seek to govern. Threat to Electoral Equality – Large corporate donations without disclosure tilt the field towards wealthier parties. Risk of Policy Capture – Secret funding could influence laws to benefit select donors. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioners, stated: “Political finance without transparency breeds corruption. The amendments are unconstitutional and must be struck down.” Government’s Expected Defence The Union government is likely to argue that the scheme eliminates cash-based donations and ensures traceable bank transactions.Officials suggest donor privacy prevents “political retribution” against corporate contributors.BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla defended the system: “We have brought clean money into politics through banking channels. Opposition outrage is selective.” Opposition’s Reaction Indian National Congress leader Jairam Ramesh hailed the hearing as “a step towards saving Indian democracy from becoming a corporate auction.” Aam Aadmi Party and All India Trinamool Congress also welcomed the move. Regional parties like the Naga People’s Front and Asom Gana Parishad expressed mixed views, citing funding concerns for smaller outfits. Expert Analysis Dr. R.K. Sanjoy (Imphal-based commentator): “In smaller states, modest donations can decide contests. Opaque funding benefits nationally connected parties.” Prof. Meera Sood (election law expert): “The court will assess if donor privacy outweighs citizens’ right to know — a test of proportionality in constitutional law.” Public Opinion Rajesh Jain (trader, Guwahati’s Panbazar): “If the money comes via banks, it’s legal — anonymity doesn’t matter.” Nabanita Saikia (college student): “We vote based on trust. Without knowing fund sources, how can we trust policies?” Looking Ahead The bench may fast-track proceedings, given the implications for upcoming state elections in Bihar, Maharashtra, and Assam.A verdict could reshape India’s political funding landscape, especially in regions where close contests are common. Conclusion This hearing is more than a legal dispute — it is a constitutional test of transparency in democracy. With political power and corporate interests at stake, the judgment could be among the most influential decisions ahead of the 2029 general elections. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court to Hear Fresh Plea on Electoral Bonds Transparency Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court to Hear Fresh Plea on Electoral Bonds Transparency Read More »

Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DENTONS LINK LEGAL, MUMBAI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MZM LEGAL LLP, MUMBAI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE YUVACRACY CENTRE FOR POLICY RESEARCH JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LAW OFFICE OF AARUSHI S. DESAI, AHMEDABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LEAD INDIA INDIA Bloc Strategy Meeting Held at Rahul Gandhi’s Residence LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GEETANSH NAGPAL LAW CHAMBERS India–US Trade Talks Collapse Over Agriculture Disputes Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections Shristi singh 10 AUG 2025 Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) chief Chirag Paswan attended a key National Democratic Alliance strategy meet in Patna ahead of the 2025 Bihar elections, discussing seat-sharing, campaign themes, and voter outreach plans. Introduction In a strong display of coalition unity, Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) (LJP-R) president Chirag Paswan joined the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) leadership for a high-level strategy meeting in Patna on August 9, 2025.The session marked the NDA’s first coordinated planning meet for the upcoming Bihar Legislative Assembly election and focused on seat-sharing arrangements, campaign messaging, and voter outreach strategies to counter the opposition’s INDIA bloc. Scene at the Venue The closed-door meeting was held in a private conference hall near Bailey Road, Patna, under heavy Bihar Police security.The saffron flags of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) flew alongside LJP-R’s tricolour-with-wheel emblem, setting a symbolic stage for unity.Notable arrivals included: Samrat Choudhary, BJP Bihar president Nityanand Rai, Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Chirag Paswan, in his signature blazer-and-jeans look Inside, digital displays showcased constituency-level voter data while traditional litti-chokha and chai were served — blending modern analytics with Bihar’s cultural roots. Political Context The NDA in Bihar currently includes: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) Hindustani Awam Morcha, led by former CM Jitan Ram Manjhi Earlier this year, Nitish Kumar and his Janata Dal (United) rejoined the INDIA bloc, intensifying the political battle.Paswan’s LJP-R gained leverage after winning five Lok Sabha seats in the 2024 general election without a formal alliance, strengthening his bargaining power. Key Discussion Points Seat-Sharing FormulaEarly negotiations suggested: BJP: ~160 of 243 seats LJP-R: 50–55 seats HAM: 10–12 seatsFinal numbers will depend on winnability data. Campaign NarrativeThe NDA will likely focus on “development with stability,” highlighting: PM Awas Yojana Free ration schemes Infrastructure and welfare initiatives Youth and Women OutreachInspired by models in the Northeast India, plans include: Sports events Skill training camps Women’s self-help group meetings Paswan also stressed targeted outreach to urban Dalit voters, many of whom will be first-time assembly poll participants. Statements from Leaders Chirag Paswan: “We are united in purpose and clear in our goal — a stable, development-oriented government for Bihar. Seat-sharing will be fair and merit-based.” Samrat Choudhary: “This is not just about numbers; it’s about chemistry. The NDA will go to the people as one team.” Jitan Ram Manjhi: Emphasised rural development and the need to prevent opposition misinformation. Opposition Response The Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) dismissed the meeting as “optics without substance.”Spokesperson Shakti Yadav accused NDA allies of private disputes.Former Deputy CM Tejashwi Yadav criticised the NDA on social media, suggesting opportunistic outreach to Dalit voters. Expert Opinions Dr. Abhay Kumar (Patna-based political analyst): “Chirag’s early inclusion is a calculated move to avoid public rifts, which can be damaging in Bihar politics.” Rajen Sharma (Guwahati journalist): “This mirrors coalition strategies in Arunachal and Manipur, where early consensus prevented last-minute seat-sharing disputes.” Public Sentiment Kankarbagh, Patna: Locals welcomed unity but demanded job creation as a priority. Hajipur (Paswan’s base): Supporters viewed him as a young leader who could align with Narendra Modi’s vision for Bihar’s progress. Looking Ahead The NDA will hold district-level coordination meetings later this month. A joint rally featuring PM Modi and Chirag Paswan is expected in September at Gandhi Maidan, Patna, likely serving as the formal campaign launch.The focus remains on resolving seat-sharing early to prevent internal conflicts. Conclusion This NDA strategy meet marks a shift toward early, inclusive election planning in Bihar, placing Chirag Paswan at the centre of the campaign. Whether this unity withstands the pressures of negotiations and ground-level politics will define the NDA’s chances against a revitalised opposition. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments INDIA Bloc Strategy Meeting Held at Rahul Gandhi’s Residence Sadalaw • August 9, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Chirag Paswan’s LJP-R Joins NDA Strategy Meeting Ahead of Bihar Assembly Elections Read More »

Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sadalaw

Trending Today Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DENTONS LINK LEGAL, MUMBAI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MZM LEGAL LLP, MUMBAI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE YUVACRACY CENTRE FOR POLICY RESEARCH JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LAW OFFICE OF AARUSHI S. DESAI, AHMEDABAD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LEAD INDIA INDIA Bloc Strategy Meeting Held at Rahul Gandhi’s Residence LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GEETANSH NAGPAL LAW CHAMBERS India–US Trade Talks Collapse Over Agriculture Disputes Manipur Violence: Supreme Court Seeks Data on 6,000 FIRs Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country Shristi singh 10 AUG 2025 In a major electoral reform, the Election Commission of India has delisted 334 unrecognised political parties for non-compliance and inactivity. Discover the reasons, state-wise breakdown, political reactions, and implications for upcoming elections. Introduction In one of its largest administrative clean-ups, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has removed 334 unrecognised political parties from its registry. The decision, announced on August 9, 2025, cites non-compliance with reporting rules and failure to participate in elections over the past decade.The move aims to streamline the electoral process, curb misuse of party status, and ensure greater transparency. The Announcement from Nirvachan Sadan The ECI issued a two-page press release from its Nirvachan Sadan headquarters in New Delhi. Although no press conference was held, the news quickly became a topic of discussion in political circles. In cities like Guwahati and Shillong, political analysts compared it to past efforts to deregister inactive parties. In Delhi’s old commercial hubs like Daryaganj and Karol Bagh, shuttered offices of some delisted parties served as a reminder that many existed only on paper. Background: The Status of Political Parties in India India has over 2,500 registered political parties, but only a few are officially recognised as national or state parties based on electoral performance.Unrecognised political parties enjoy certain benefits such as tax exemptions on donations but must submit: Annual financial statements Audited accounts Details of office-bearers The ECI found that hundreds had neither contested elections nor filed mandatory reports for years. Some were suspected of being “shell entities” involved in money laundering, flagged in investigations by the Income Tax Department and Enforcement Directorate. Details of the Action According to the ECI: 334 parties delisted for persistent non-compliance under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 States with the highest removals: Uttar Pradesh (82), Maharashtra (51), Bihar (37) In the Northeast: Assam (9), Tripura (3), Meghalaya (2) Chief Election Commissioner Rajiv Kumar stressed the move was “procedural, not political” and confirmed annual registry reviews will continue. Political Reactions Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) welcomed the step, calling it a boost to electoral integrity. The Indian National Congress supported the action but questioned its delay. Northeast parties like the Naga People’s Front and Mizo National Front agreed it could improve voter representation. Some smaller parties from Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh feared legitimate outfits might be penalised for temporary inactivity caused by local unrest or lack of funds. Expert Analysis Political scientist Dr. Sushmita Dev observed that this reflects a broader trend of financial scrutiny in Indian politics, especially regarding electoral bonds. Governance analyst Sanjoy Hazarika noted that in smaller states, clearing inactive parties reduces political clutter and eases coalition-building. Public Response Reactions varied across India: In Guwahati’s Beltola market, traders recalled some delisted outfits contesting local polls decades ago. On social media, urban voters framed the move as part of an anti-corruption drive, though some warned of the risk of politically motivated removals. The Road Ahead Delisted parties may apply for re-registration if they meet all legal requirements, submit pending reports, and demonstrate political activity.The updated list of registered parties is expected in September 2025 ahead of state elections in Assam and Manipur, potentially reshaping multi-cornered contests. Conclusion This mass delisting is one of the ECI’s biggest single-day actions in years. While it strengthens electoral integrity and financial transparency, the real challenge will be balancing reform with the need to protect grassroots democratic movements. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country Sadalaw • August 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments INDIA Bloc Strategy Meeting Held at Rahul Gandhi’s Residence Sadalaw • August 9, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments India–US Trade Talks Collapse Over Agriculture Disputes Sadalaw • August 9, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Election Commission of India Delists 334 Unrecognised Political Parties Across the Country Read More »