Actor Ajaz Khan seeks anticipatory bail from the Bombay High Court after being accused of rape under false promises of marriage and career advancement. The court earlier denied his plea citing possible tampering with evidence.

Ajaz Khan Moves Bombay High Court for Anticipatory Bail in Rape Case

Actor Ajaz Khan has approached the Bombay High Court seeking anticipatory bail after a lower court rejected his initial request. He faces serious allegations of raping a fellow actress by misleading her with false promises of marriage and career opportunities.

FIR Accuses Khan of Deception and Sexual Assault

According to the FIR, Khan, 40, allegedly lured the complainant—an aspiring actress—by offering her a role in the reality show “House Arrest”, which he hosts. The victim stated that Khan used this professional opportunity to gain her trust and then violated her consent.

Details of the Complaint and Timeline of Incidents

The complaint outlines two major incidents. The first allegedly occurred on April 4 at Khan’s residence in Lodha Bel, Jogeshwari (West), and the second on April 24 at the complainant’s home. During both occasions, the actress claimed Khan sexually assaulted her while making promises of marriage and financial support.

Legal Strategy and Defense Argument

Khan, whose full name is Ajaz Shafi Mohammad Guliwala, filed his bail plea through prominent lawyer Ashok Saraogi. The application argues that the complaint is legally flawed and asserts that custodial interrogation is unnecessary.

Previous Bail Plea Rejected by Sessions Court

Previously, the Dindoshi Sessions Court had denied Khan’s pre-arrest bail, citing risks of tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses. The court emphasized the importance of retrieving Khan’s mobile phone and verifying digital evidence such as WhatsApp chats and voice recordings. It also called for the collection of his voice samples to support the investigation.

Court Notes Consent Was Not Informed or Voluntary

Although the complainant is legally an adult, the court observed that her consent may not have been free and voluntary, a key requirement under Indian law in such cases. It highlighted the actor’s prior criminal record and justified the need for custodial interrogation.

Conclusion:

The ongoing case against Ajaz Khan adds to his controversial public image, bringing to light serious concerns about the misuse of influence and celebrity status. With the matter now in the hands of the Bombay High Court, the coming days will be crucial in determining the next steps in this high-profile legal battle.