sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

September 3, 2025

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PERITUM PARTNERS

Leave a Comment / JOB /

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PERITUM PARTNERS Sweta Kumari About Peritum Partners Peritum Partners is a law practice based in Chennai. They provide legal services in the transactional and advisory realms and focus on mergers and acquisitions, startups, joint ventures, private equity, venture capital, private client practice, general corporate, intellectual property, civil and corporate litigation. About the Job Peritum Partners is looking for a motivated Disputes Lawyer with 2–3 years of court experience to join their team. Eligibility Experience: 2–3 years PQE in disputes Strong foundation in litigation and arbitration Excellent research, drafting, and communication skills Ability to work collaboratively in a fast-paced environment Commitment to high-quality, client-focused work Location Chennai How to Apply? If this sounds like you, we’d love to hear from you. Please share your CV at careers@peritumpartners.com with the subject line “Application – Disputes Lawyer”. Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PERITUM PARTNERS Sadalaw • September 3, 2025 LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT QWICK JUSTICE Sadalaw • September 3, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AEQUITAS JURIS LAW FIRM Sadalaw • September 3, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PERITUM PARTNERS Read More »

LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT QWICK JUSTICE

Leave a Comment / Internship /

LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT QWICK JUSTICE Sweta Kumari About the Internship Opportunity for Internship – October 2025 Qwick Justice, Rohini, Delhi is inviting applications for Legal Interns for the month of October 2025. Gain hands-on experience in court proceedings, drafting, and case management. Stipend No stipend, but travel allowance will be provided. How to Apply? Interested candidates can send their CV/Resume via: Email: qwickjustice@rediffmail.com and advbittuqwickjustice@gmail.com Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT QWICK JUSTICE Sadalaw • September 3, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AEQUITAS JURIS LAW FIRM Sadalaw • September 3, 2025 LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MY DESIGNATION Sadalaw • September 3, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT QWICK JUSTICE Read More »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AEQUITAS JURIS LAW FIRM

Leave a Comment / JOB /

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AEQUITAS JURIS LAW FIRM Sweta Kumari About the Job Aequitas Juris Law Firm is a team of legal practitioners handling matters across all areas of law and appearing before various courts and tribunals in and around Hyderabad. That we also assist and engage Senior Counsel Ramakanth Reddy in various matters in the High Court & Supreme Court. They are inviting applications for the position of Associate in their firm. Salary As per prevailing market standards. Location Hyderabad, Punjagutta How to Apply? Interested candidates may send their CV to aequitaslawfirm@gmail.com (CC: raghug5451@gmail.com And ashish.changavalli@gmail.com). Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AEQUITAS JURIS LAW FIRM Sadalaw • September 3, 2025 LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MY DESIGNATION Sadalaw • September 3, 2025 LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CYRALAW Sadalaw • September 2, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AEQUITAS JURIS LAW FIRM Read More »

LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MY DESIGNATION

Leave a Comment / Internship /

LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MY DESIGNATION Sweta Kumari About the Job My Designation is looking for a dynamic legal intern to join their team. This is an opportunity to apply your legal knowledge in a creative corporate environment. Eligibility Law student (3rd year & above, or pursuing LLM). Strong research, drafting, and communication skills. Detail-oriented, proactive, and organised. Interest in fashion law, contracts, and IP is an advantage. Location MYDESIGNATION Corporate Office, Kowdiar, Thiruvananthapuram How to Apply? Apply at: careers@mydesignation.com Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MY DESIGNATION Sadalaw • September 3, 2025 LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CYRALAW Sadalaw • September 2, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CENTRE FOR CIVIL SOCIETY Sadalaw • September 2, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MY DESIGNATION Read More »

DHCBA Expresses Concerns to CJI, Collegium Over Transfer of Delhi High Court Judges

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today DHCBA Expresses Concerns to CJI, Collegium Over Transfer of Delhi High Court Judges Bombay High Court Pulls Up Maratha Quota Protestors for Citywide Disruption Thailand’s Political Thaw Hinges on People’s Party Decision Amid PM Uncertainty China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin SC Calls SIR Confusion a “Trust Deficit”; EC: Objections Accepted After Deadline “Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Reply to Tamil Nadu Plea on EWS Quota Reimbursements System that lets rapists walk free: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Men Who Raped 12-Year-Old Supreme Court Calls for Paralegal Volunteers to Assist Voters in Bihar SIR Exercise LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CYRALAW DHCBA Expresses Concerns to CJI, Collegium Over Transfer of Delhi High Court Judges   Kashak Agarwala 01 SEPTEMBER 2025 Introduction The Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) has written to Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai and the Supreme Court Collegium, raising objections to the recent transfer of judges from the Delhi High Court. The Bar Association flagged issues of transparency, judicial continuity, and the marginalization of local lawyers in the elevation process. Doubts of the Bar Association Unease Over Transfers In its letter dated September 1, the DHCBA said that the recent judicial transfers have created unease not only among practicing lawyers but also within the institution itself. Demand for Transparency The Association demanded greater transparency and consultation in judicial appointments and transfers, arguing that secrecy undermines confidence in the system. Significance of Judicial Continuity Judges who rise from the Delhi Bar bring unique insights into the capital’s legal ecosystem. Their presence strengthens trust between the Bench and the Bar. Arbitrary transfers, DHCBA said, dilute this judicial continuity. Disregarding Local Elevation The Association highlighted concerns that lawyers from the Delhi Bar are being overlooked for elevation. Currently, one-third of the Delhi High Court judges belong to other jurisdictions. This, DHCBA warned, could widen the divide between the Bench and litigants’ lived experiences in Delhi. Threat to Telesom* and Trust in the System (*likely intended as “Telesis” or “Telos” in source — i.e., long-term purpose/stability) DHCBA cautioned that unchecked transfer patterns could: Erode the morale of the Bar. Weaken trust in the judicial appointment system. Undermine the stability and continuity needed for the effective functioning of the High Court. Recent Transfers in Focus The Collegium recently recommended the transfer of two judges from the Delhi High Court: Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju → transferred to Calcutta High Court. Justice Arun Monga → transferred to Rajasthan High Court. Notably, Justice Monga’s transfer came barely a month after his oath-taking in July 2025, when he joined five other judges elevated from across India. Conclusion DHCBA concluded that the Delhi High Court, as the custodian of justice in the nation’s capital, requires stability, continuity, and mutual confidence between the Bench and the Bar. Without this, the association warned, public trust in judicial processes could erode. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases DHCBA Expresses Concerns to CJI, Collegium Over Transfer of Delhi High Court Judges Sada Law • September 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Pulls Up Maratha Quota Protestors for Citywide Disruption Sada Law • September 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Thailand’s Political Thaw Hinges on People’s Party Decision Amid PM Uncertainty Sada Law • September 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

DHCBA Expresses Concerns to CJI, Collegium Over Transfer of Delhi High Court Judges Read More »

Bombay High Court Pulls Up Maratha Quota Protestors for Citywide Disruption

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Bombay High Court Pulls Up Maratha Quota Protestors for Citywide Disruption Thailand’s Political Thaw Hinges on People’s Party Decision Amid PM Uncertainty China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin SC Calls SIR Confusion a “Trust Deficit”; EC: Objections Accepted After Deadline “Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Reply to Tamil Nadu Plea on EWS Quota Reimbursements System that lets rapists walk free: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Men Who Raped 12-Year-Old Supreme Court Calls for Paralegal Volunteers to Assist Voters in Bihar SIR Exercise LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CYRALAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CENTRE FOR CIVIL SOCIETY Bombay High Court Pulls Up Maratha Quota Protestors for Citywide Disruption Kashak Agarwala 01 SEPTEMBER 2025 Introduction The Bombay High Court on Monday came down strongly against the ongoing Maratha quota protests led by activist Manoj Jarange Patil, directing demonstrators to vacate Mumbai’s public roads by Tuesday noon. The Court observed that the agitation had crossed legal boundaries, paralysing South Mumbai and disrupting civic life during the festive season. [Amy Foundation v State of Maharashtra] Background & Context On August 26, the Court allowed protests only at Azad Maidan with prior police clearance. On August 27, permissions capped the gathering at 5,000 participants, limited from 9 AM to 6 PM, valid till August 29. Despite this, protestors occupied multiple key areas: CSMT, Marine Drive, Flora Fountain, Mantralaya, Oval Maidan, and even blocked access to the High Court itself. Violations of Earlier Orders Media reports and photographs showed protestors cooking, bathing, and playing games such as kabaddi and tug-of-war on public roads. The Bench of Justice Ravindra Ghuge and Justice Gautam Ankhad criticized organisers for openly defying restrictions. The judges remarked:“They are right outside the High Court, blocking entry to lawyers and judges. You even boasted that more people will come. How do we deal with someone who refuses to obey the law?” State’s Stand Advocate General Birendra Saraf, representing the State, said the agitation crippled schools and colleges around Fort and Azad Maidan. He confirmed that violation notices were issued on August 31, though protestors refused to accept them. Saraf maintained that adequate facilities for toilets and food had been arranged, rejecting claims that poor conditions forced protestors onto the roads. Protestors’ Response Counsel for protestors admitted that roads were occupied but sought leniency for the overwhelming number of participants. He argued that many demonstrators acted independently, beyond Jarange’s control. Jarange himself has been on a hunger strike since August 29, demanding 10% OBC reservation for Marathas as Kunbis. Court’s Directions The High Court issued the following orders: All protestors, except those at Azad Maidan, must vacate public areas by Tuesday noon. The State must block entry of new protestors into the city until further orders. Food and medical aid must continue for demonstrators at Azad Maidan. Medical assistance must be provided to Jarange if his health worsens. Conclusion The Bench stressed that the Maratha quota agitation had crossed permissible bounds of dissent, disrupting public order and court functioning. Urging compliance, the judges concluded:“We hope and trust that good counsel will prevail upon the protestors and they will obey the directions of this Court.” Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Pulls Up Maratha Quota Protestors for Citywide Disruption Sada Law • September 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Thailand’s Political Thaw Hinges on People’s Party Decision Amid PM Uncertainty Sada Law • September 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin Sada Law • September 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Pulls Up Maratha Quota Protestors for Citywide Disruption Read More »

Thailand’s Political Thaw Hinges on People’s Party Decision Amid PM Uncertainty

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Thailand’s Political Thaw Hinges on People’s Party Decision Amid PM Uncertainty China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin SC Calls SIR Confusion a “Trust Deficit”; EC: Objections Accepted After Deadline “Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Reply to Tamil Nadu Plea on EWS Quota Reimbursements System that lets rapists walk free: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Men Who Raped 12-Year-Old Supreme Court Calls for Paralegal Volunteers to Assist Voters in Bihar SIR Exercise LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CYRALAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CENTRE FOR CIVIL SOCIETY LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MALABAR GROUP Thailand’s Political Thaw Hinges on People’s Party Decision Amid PM Uncertainty Shristi Singh  01 SEPTEMBER 25 Introduction Thailand’s political future hangs in the balance after the Constitutional Court’s removal of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra. With rival factions scrambling for power, the People’s Party, which controls nearly one-third of parliamentary seats, has emerged as the decisive force. Their backing now hinges on two conditions: a national referendum on constitutional reform and the dissolution of parliament within four months. Background & Context On 29 August, the Constitutional Court ousted Paetongtarn Shinawatra over ethics violations, making her the sixth Shinawatra-linked premier removed by judicial or military action since 2006. The ruling collapsed an already fragile coalition and triggered intense negotiations among political parties. The People’s Party, an anti-establishment force sidelined from power in 2023 by military-aligned elites, now holds the swing votes essential for coalition building. Key Developments The People’s Party has issued two non-negotiable demands: A nationwide referendum on constitutional reform. Dissolution of parliament within four months to pave the way for fresh elections. Both the ruling Pheu Thai Party and rival Bhumjaithai Party have signaled willingness to consider these conditions in exchange for support. Once reluctant to enter formal coalitions, the People’s Party now appears ready to leverage the political vacuum to push structural change. Political Calculations For Pheu Thai: Backing the referendum and early dissolution could secure short-term governance and a chance to renew their mandate. For Bhumjaithai: Aligning with the People’s Party could boost credibility but risks bringing elections sooner than desired. For the People’s Party: Their unprecedented bargaining power offers a historic chance to reshape constitutional rules and curb entrenched military-judicial interventions. Analysis Flashpoint for Reform: A referendum could pave the way for decentralization or new limits on judicial power—potentially breaking Thailand’s long cycle of coups and court-driven ousters. Electoral Momentum: The People’s Party’s stance resonates with public frustration over stagnant governance and recurring instability. Geopolitical Stakes: The next government’s orientation will influence Thailand’s balancing act between Western partners and China, with implications for ASEAN and the Indo-Pacific. Potential Scenarios Scenario 1: People’s Party sides with Pheu Thai → Referendum scheduled, parliament dissolved within four months. Scenario 2: People’s Party aligns with Bhumjaithai → Demands met, but coalition remains fragile. Scenario 3: People’s Party withholds support → Caretaker government persists, prolonging uncertainty. Conclusion The People’s Party has become Thailand’s kingmaker in the wake of Paetongtarn’s removal. Their conditions—referendum and early dissolution—could mark the start of a democratic reset or plunge the country into deeper instability if rival factions fail to reach consensus. The coming weeks will determine whether Thailand embraces reform or relives its familiar cycle of political deadlock. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Thailand’s Political Thaw Hinges on People’s Party Decision Amid PM Uncertainty Sada Law • September 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin Sada Law • September 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments SC Calls SIR Confusion a “Trust Deficit”; EC: Objections Accepted After Deadline Sada Law • September 2, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Thailand’s Political Thaw Hinges on People’s Party Decision Amid PM Uncertainty Read More »

China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin SC Calls SIR Confusion a “Trust Deficit”; EC: Objections Accepted After Deadline “Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Reply to Tamil Nadu Plea on EWS Quota Reimbursements System that lets rapists walk free: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Men Who Raped 12-Year-Old Supreme Court Calls for Paralegal Volunteers to Assist Voters in Bihar SIR Exercise LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CYRALAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CENTRE FOR CIVIL SOCIETY LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MALABAR GROUP LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMLEGALS China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin Shristi Singh 1 September 2025 Introduction At the two-day Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Tianjin, Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin jointly unveiled a blueprint for a “Regional Security-Economic Architecture” rooted in Global South solidarity. The move signals an attempt to position the SCO as a counterweight to the U.S.-led global order, stressing multipolar governance, infrastructure investment, and security cooperation. Background & Context The summit coincides with China’s upcoming Victory Day military parade, amplifying Sino-Russian camaraderie. More than 20 heads of state from Central and South Asia attended, boosting Xi’s campaign for expanded Eastern leadership. Beijing and Moscow framed Western-led structures as outdated and exclusionary, while presenting the SCO as inclusive and development-focused, particularly for emerging economies. Key Developments at the Summit Joint Security Vision: Xi and Putin declared the SCO’s role as a platform for shared defense and anti-Western alignment. Non-Interference Doctrine: Xi stressed sovereignty and non-interference as cornerstones of the new order. Counter to Sanctions: Putin claimed that Western sanctions and military alliances had only strengthened Eastern resolve. Economic Initiatives: Pledges were made for SCO-led infrastructure projects, new trade corridors, and financing mechanisms that bypass IMF/World Bank channels. Military Cooperation: Plans for expanded joint drills to deepen Eurasian defense partnerships. Domestic & International Reactions Global South Reception: Emerging economies welcomed the rhetoric, seeing it as a chance to reduce reliance on Western-backed institutions. Western View: Analysts downplayed the SCO as more symbolic than functional, but acknowledged its growing narrative appeal. Security Lens: Experts see Eurasian military coordination as a balancing act against U.S.-led alliances like NATO and AUKUS. Analysis Narrative Shift: The summit reinforces efforts to reframe global governance outside Western frameworks. Strategic Significance: Pairing the SCO meeting with the military parade underscores a dual message of political vision backed by hard power. Risks Ahead: Unless member states commit resources, SCO promises could remain rhetorical rather than transformative. Conclusion By staging a unified front in Tianjin, Xi and Putin advanced a Global South-centric vision of world order, challenging the U.S.-led system with an alternative rooted in sovereignty, security, and economic independence. While its long-term impact depends on follow-through by SCO members, the summit marked another step in the march toward a multipolar geopolitical landscape. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin Sada Law • September 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments SC Calls SIR Confusion a “Trust Deficit”; EC: Objections Accepted After Deadline Sada Law • September 2, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments “Hydrogen Bomb Ahead”: Rahul Gandhi Vows Exposure of Massive Vote Theft Sada Law • September 2, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

China and Russia Tout “Global South” Security Order at SCO Summit in Tianjin Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote