sadalawpublications.com

July 10, 2025

Bombay High Court Upholds Free Speech in Journalist Sedition Case

Trending Today Bombay High Court Upholds Free Speech in Journalist Sedition Case Delhi High Court Takes Action Against Deepfake Threat in India Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD Bombay High Court Upholds Free Speech in Journalist Sedition Case Kashish Jahan 10 JULY 2025 The Bombay High Court grants interim bail to journalist Sameer Kulkarni in a sedition case, reaffirming the constitutional right to dissent and citing key precedents. Learn how this ruling reinforces free speech in India. Introduction: Relief for Journalist Booked Under Sedition Law In a major win for freedom of expression, the Bombay High Court has granted interim bail to journalist Sameer Kulkarni, who was charged with sedition for criticizing Maharashtra’s civic policies through a series of strongly worded posts on Facebook. The case has reignited national debate on the misuse of sedition laws to silence dissent and the need to balance public order with constitutional liberties. Legal Defense: Criticism is Not Incitement Kulkarni’s legal team argued that while his posts were provocative, they did not call for violence or public disorder—an essential condition established in the landmark Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962) ruling by the Supreme Court of India. The High Court agreed, stating that sedition charges must be rooted in real incitement to violence, not mere political dissent. SG Vombatkere Precedent: Sedition Law on Hold The defense further cited the 2022 ruling in S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India, in which the Supreme Court put a temporary freeze on new sedition cases, pending legislative review of the colonial-era law. This precedent played a key role in the Court’s decision to grant interim relief, reinforcing the idea that free speech cannot be criminalized arbitrarily. Judicial Observation: Democracy Must Tolerate Criticism Justice Shukre, while delivering the order, made a significant remark: “A healthy democracy must allow space for sharp and uncomfortable criticism of the government. So long as words do not directly incite violence, they remain protected by Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.” This observation underlines the judiciary’s evolving stance on civil liberties in the digital age. What’s Next: Awaiting Final Hearing While this is only interim bail, the case’s final hearing—regarding the quashing of the FIR—could set a critical precedent for similar sedition cases nationwide. Until then, the decision sends a powerful message: free speech and constructive dissent cannot be suppressed on flimsy grounds. Conclusion: A Boost for Press Freedom in India Kulkarni’s release is not just personal relief—it represents a broader affirmation of press freedom and democratic values in India. As the country confronts outdated laws in a modern digital society, the judiciary’s active role in safeguarding journalistic expression becomes ever more vital. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Upholds Free Speech in Journalist Sedition Case Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Takes Action Against Deepfake Threat in India Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Upholds Free Speech in Journalist Sedition Case Read More »

Delhi High Court Takes Action Against Deepfake Threat in India

Trending Today Delhi High Court Takes Action Against Deepfake Threat in India Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Kashish Jahan 10 JULY 2025 The Delhi High Court is taking urgent steps to combat deepfake abuse on social media, calling on tech platforms and the government to tighten AI regulations and protect victims. Learn how this could shape India’s digital laws. Introduction: Deepfakes Trigger Judicial Alarm In a major move to address the rising deepfake crisis, the Delhi High Court has intervened to hold both the Indian government and tech giants accountable. The Court is currently hearing petitions filed by multiple victims—mostly women—whose lives have been upended by AI-generated deepfake videos and morphed images. These videos, often circulated millions of times on social media, depict victims in compromising scenarios they were never involved in, leaving them with severe reputational harm and little legal recourse. Justice Pratibha Singh: Tech Platforms Cannot Escape Accountability During a recent hearing, Justice Pratibha Singh issued a strong warning to platforms like Meta (formerly Facebook) and X (formerly Twitter), stating that the era of hiding behind “platform neutrality” is over. The bench observed: “When artificial intelligence is used to create disturbingly real fake content, platforms and the government must act decisively to protect citizens.” India’s IT Rules Are Outdated in the AI Age The Court noted that the current Information Technology Rules, last updated in 2021, are inadequate to tackle the speed, scale, and sophistication of AI-powered deepfakes. Although these rules require platforms to remove content once flagged, they lack provisions for: Rapid detection of deepfakes Efficient grievance redressal Clear accountability mechanisms Government Ordered to Respond: Next Steps in Regulation The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has been directed to submit a detailed affidavit by August 1, outlining a plan to curb deepfake content. The Court suggested several key areas for improvement: Deployment of advanced AI detection tools Faster takedown procedures Penal action against non-compliant platforms Real-Life Impact: Victims Face Harassment and Trauma Lawyers representing the petitioners shared horrific accounts of how deepfakes are used to: Blackmail and harass victims Destroy personal reputations Inflict lasting mental health trauma Many victims, especially women and minors, have faced social exclusion, anxiety, and long-term psychological effects. The Court emphasized that privacy and dignity, protected under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, must not remain theoretical rights. Impact on Future Legislation: Toward a Safer Digital India This case is poised to play a major role in shaping the upcoming Digital India Act, which will replace the outdated IT Act of 2000. Experts suggest that India could benefit from adopting deepfake-specific laws similar to those in the European Union or the United States. The Court’s stance may encourage Parliament to create: Targeted deepfake laws Stricter compliance standards for tech companies Robust safeguards for victims Conclusion: Can India Lead the Fight Against Deepfakes? With the next hearing scheduled in the coming weeks, all eyes are on how India will respond to the deepfake menace. This case could set a vital precedent for holding both content creators and platforms accountable—ensuring that emerging technologies are harnessed responsibly, not destructively. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Takes Action Against Deepfake Threat in India Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Takes Action Against Deepfake Threat in India Read More »

Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India

Trending Today Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDI-GENIUS CONSULTING INC Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Kashish Jahan 10 JULY 2025 The Supreme Court is considering a groundbreaking petition that seeks to classify the Right to Privacy as not just a fundamental right but also a civic duty for all Indians. Learn how this could reshape digital behavior, laws, and social responsibility. Introduction: Privacy as a Shared Responsibility A new petition before the Supreme Court of India has sparked a crucial national debate: should the Right to Privacy be recognized not only as a fundamental right but also as a civic duty? The petitioner argues that the celebrated Puttaswamy judgment of 2017 rightly placed privacy under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, but failed to impose any obligation on citizens to respect the privacy of others. The Digital Age: Why Legal Rights Alone Are Not Enough In today’s hyper-connected world, privacy violations are often committed by ordinary individuals, not just by the state. The petition highlights: Leaking of private photos Forwarding of personal chats without consent Spread of digital gossip via social media With the rise of AI tools that can manipulate content and the failure of tech platforms to curb misuse, the petitioner insists that citizen responsibility is essential to preserve digital dignity. Judicial View: Adapting the Constitution to Technological Change During the preliminary hearing, the Chief Justice’s Bench acknowledged that the Constitution’s framers could not have foreseen the threats of the digital era. The Court recognized that the concept of privacy must evolve “in both letter and spirit,” in light of modern technological and societal realities. Real-life incidents were cited where women became victims of viral leaks, facing lifelong trauma with no accountability for those who violated their privacy. Expanding Fundamental Duties: A Modern Need? India’s Constitution already includes Fundamental Duties, such as: Promoting national harmony Protecting public property Preserving the environment The petitioner argues that these were introduced in the 42nd Amendment and must be updated to reflect modern-day risks. Adding a duty to respect the privacy of others could reinforce ethical conduct both online and offline. What Comes Next: Legal and Educational Reforms? In response, the Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Union Government, seeking a detailed reply within four weeks. Legal experts suggest this could lead to: A constitutional amendment A new privacy-respect law passed by Parliament of India Integration of digital ethics in school curricula and public awareness campaigns This debate may also influence how digital literacy programs are designed and how privacy norms are enforced at the grassroots level. Conclusion: Toward a Culture of Digital Responsibility While the petition’s final outcome is yet to be seen, it has succeeded in shifting attention to the shared civic role in protecting privacy. For a country like India—one of the largest and most digitally active societies in the world—this could set a global precedent in balancing individual rights with collective responsibilities. The next hearing will be critical in determining whether the Right to Privacy will also be legally recognized as a duty in India’s digital democracy. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Explores Whether Privacy Should Be a Civic Duty in India Read More »

Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof

Trending Today Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDI-GENIUS CONSULTING INC LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDIA LAW Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 10 JULY 2025 In a progressive ruling, the Kerala High Court states that married women can reclaim their streedhan gold from in-laws without needing strict proof or documentation. The decision affirms women’s right to personal property and addresses societal realities in Indian marriages. Introduction: Major Relief for Women Seeking Streedhan Recovery In a significant move toward gender justice, the Kerala High Court ruled that married women can reclaim streedhan—gold and valuables given at marriage—without the burden of providing strict photographic or documentary proof. The ruling acknowledges the social reality of informal gift-giving practices in Indian families. A Division Bench comprising Justice Devan Ramachandran and Justice M.B. Snehalatha delivered the verdict, setting a powerful precedent in matrimonial property disputes. The Case: A Woman’s Appeal for Her Gold The case stemmed from a petition filed by a woman before a Family Court, claiming that her in-laws retained 65.5 sovereigns of gold given to her at the time of marriage. The Family Court denied her claim, citing lack of sufficient evidence proving that the gold was in the possession of her husband’s family. She then appealed to the High Court, challenging the lower court’s ruling. Informal Transfers Are Common: Court Recognizes Societal Realities The High Court observed that in Indian marriages, it is common for jewellery and valuables to be handed over without written records or receipts. The judges emphasized that: “The absence of documentary proof cannot be the sole basis for dismissing genuine claims, especially when supported by credible oral testimony and circumstantial evidence.” The Bench ruled that civil disputes are decided based on the preponderance of probability, not strict or conclusive proof. Testimonies and Legal Reasoning The woman and her family members presented consistent oral testimony, while the husband failed to deny the allegations or provide proof that the gold had been returned. The Court found the woman’s claims credible and ruled in her favor. She was granted restoration of 59.5 sovereigns of gold (or its market value). However, the Court denied her claim for household goods and items allegedly gifted by cousins, due to lack of specific evidence. Key Takeaways from the Verdict Streedhan remains the exclusive property of the woman, even after marriage. Lack of written proof should not invalidate genuine claims. Courts must consider oral evidence and practical realities over formalities. The judgment strengthens women’s rights in matrimonial litigation. Societal Impact: Empowering Women Through Law This ruling has far-reaching implications. It reinforces that personal property rights of women should not be hindered by procedural loopholes or unrealistic evidentiary demands. It also serves as a beacon for women facing similar issues, encouraging them to seek legal recourse without fear of being dismissed due to lack of formal proof. Conclusion: A Step Forward in Matrimonial Jurisprudence By upholding the woman’s right to reclaim her streedhan gold, the Kerala High Court has reaffirmed its commitment to gender equality, justice, and social awareness. The judgment is expected to influence future rulings and shape a more empathetic legal approach to property disputes in marriages. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Criticizes Delay in Cooperative Bank Fraud Probe Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Rules Married Women Can Reclaim Streedhan Gold Without Strict Proof Read More »

Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala

Trending Today Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDI-GENIUS CONSULTING INC LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDIA LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT FOX MANDAL & ASSOCIATES, CHENNAI Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 10 JULY 2025 The Kerala High Court upholds creative freedom in the CBFC censorship case against JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala, stressing that names like “Janaki” are not exclusive religious symbols. Read how this decision reshapes the debate on censorship and artistic liberty in Indian cinema. Introduction: A Clash Between Censorship and Creativity In a landmark judgment, the Kerala High Court defended artistic freedom against unjust censorship by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The controversy erupted over the Malayalam film JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala, which centers around a courtroom drama involving a rape survivor named Janaki—a name traditionally associated with the Hindu goddess Sita. CBFC’s Objections and Censorship Demands Produced by Cosmos Entertainments, the film depicts Janaki being cross-examined in a court trial. The CBFC initially refused certification, raising objections over: The use of the name “Janaki” in a sensitive courtroom context. Scenes where a Muslim defense lawyer questions the protagonist on drug use and pornography, potentially impacting religious harmony. The CBFC first demanded 96 cuts, later reducing its conditions to two major alterations: Renaming the character as Janaki V Muting the name “Janaki” in court scenes Kerala High Court’s Ruling: Upholding Expression Justice N. Nagaresh, presiding over the case, criticized the CBFC’s reasoning, stating: “Janaki is a common Indian name and cannot be monopolized as a religious symbol.” The Court warned that such arbitrary censorship could set a dangerous precedent that restricts creative expression. The judge emphasized the difference between genuine religious offense and presumed symbolic sensitivity. Filmmakers Accept Changes Amid Pressure To avoid further delays, the filmmakers agreed to the CBFC’s two suggested modifications. The High Court, acknowledging these changes, directed the CBFC to certify the film within three days of submission. Broader Implications: Creative Freedom vs. Cultural Sensitivity This case has reignited national debate around: Freedom of expression in cinema The role of religious identity in artistic narratives The limits of state censorship in a democracy The court’s verdict affirms that creative storytelling cannot be curtailed merely due to hypothetical offense. It also signals the urgent need for clearer censorship guidelines that balance cultural respect with constitutional freedoms. What Lies Ahead for Janaki V With the character now renamed and the controversial sequences adjusted, JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala is expected to receive certification soon. The film’s theatrical release could mark a turning point in how the Indian film industry navigates creative risk and institutional regulation. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Criticizes Delay in Cooperative Bank Fraud Probe Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Madras High Court Orders Tamil Nadu Government to Tackle Stray Dog Menace Sadalaw • July 8, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Upholds Artistic Freedom in CBFC vs. JSK – Janaki v. State of Kerala Read More »

LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA

LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA Sweta Kumari About the Opportunity Barowalia & Associates, a reputed law firm based in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, is pleased to announce an on-site internship opportunity for law students eager to gain valuable legal experience under the mentorship of Advocate Ganesh Barowalia. Established in 1987, the firm has consistently upheld a legacy of legal excellence and integrity, serving clients at the Supreme Court of India, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, and District Courts in and around Shimla. This internship provides a rare opportunity for law students to immerse themselves in the field of litigation. Selected interns will assist in legal research, drafting, case preparation, and client briefings. They will also gain first-hand exposure to court proceedings and receive one-on-one mentorship from Advocate Ganesh Barowalia and his team of experienced associates. Eligibility Applicants must be currently pursuing an LL.B. degree from a UGC and BCI recognized university. Candidates should possess strong research and analytical skills, excellent communication abilities, and a deep interest in litigation. Familiarity with legal research tools such as Manupatra and SCC Online is desirable. Internship Details Position: Legal Intern Mode: On-site (Shimla) Duration: 30 Days (From July 15 to August 15, 2025) Stipend: Performance-based Application Deadline: July 14, 2025 (No applications will be entertained beyond this date) How to Apply? Interested candidates must send their resume and a cover letter expressing their interest to contact@barowalia.in before July 14, 2025. Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA Read More »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI Sweta Kumari About Netflix Netflix is one of the world’s leading entertainment services, with over 300 million paid memberships in over 190 countries enjoying TV series, films and games across a wide variety of genres and languages. Members can play, pause and resume watching as much as they want, anytime, anywhere, and can change their plans at any time. Job Description Netflix is currently looking for an experienced Coordinator to join the India Legal Team in Mumbai, India. APAC is one of our fastest growing regions and, in this role, you will be instrumental in helping the India Legal team work faster, smarter, and more efficiently. The candidate will assist in scaling our regional business, working alongside core cross-functional teams. The successful candidate will have some prior contract or rights management experience in a business or legal affairs setting. They will be highly-organized, self-motivated, quick-thinking, flexible, technology-oriented, and be able to juggle multiple responsibilities on a large portfolio of deals with unwavering attention to detail. They will also be excited and inspired by Netflix culture, and will be energized at the prospect of helping others work more effectively and efficiently. This is a demanding and fast-paced role that requires curiosity and significant initiative. Eligibility Experience in contract management, rights management, or paralegal experience at either a global company/ film studio or law firm A bachelor’s degree is required; however, a law degree is not necessary Passion for technology, media and innovation in the legal space Strong understanding of reviewing and analyzing contracts and legal documents required to produce and exhibit content  Exceptional organizational and planning skills with ability to track multiple projects, obligations and deadlines on-track in a very fast-paced setting. Required Skills Excellent interpersonal and communication skills, with the ability to effectively coordinate cross-functionally and regionally Fast learner with the ability to quickly learn new tools and identify improvement opportunities Ability to manage high volume of information with accuracy Practical, solution-oriented, and positive response to change. Ability to pivot quickly and be open to new ideas, with a willingness to tackle matters outside one’s area of expertise Curiosity in seeking to understand broader business objectives and priorities, and a deep appreciation of how other teams affect, and are affected by, their work Embrace and advocate for diversity in all its forms Proficiency in Google Suite; knowledge of Airtable or other equivalent information, contract or rights management highly valued Flexible to work across different time zones How to Apply? Interested candidates can apply online via the link given below. Click here to apply. Click here for the official notification. Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BAROWALIA & ASSOCIATES, SHIMLA Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NETFLIX, MUMBAI Read More »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE Eshika Sahay About the Job Online applications are invited from Indian Nationals (Citizens of India as defined in the Constitution of India or under any law made by the Parliament to regulate the rights of citizenship) who fulfil the Essential Qualifications and other eligibility conditions for filling up of 03 (Three) posts of Law Researchers and for preparation of a panel of suitable candidates, purely on contractual basis, at the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, S-Block, High Court of Delhi. Salary ₹65,000/month Eligibility Must be an Advocate under Advocates Act, 1961 Minimum 2 years’ experience (as on 01.07.2025) Age limit: Not more than 27 years Good research & writing skills LLM/Diploma in Arbitration/ADR preferred (desirable) Duration Contract: 6 months, extendable up to 3 years No of Seats 3 Location Delhi High Court Important Date Apply between: 01.07.2025 (10 AM) to 15.07.2025 (5 PM) How to Apply? Click Here To Apply The official notification is here Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE Read More »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA Eshika Sahay About King Stubb & Kasiva King Stubb & Kasiva (KSK) is a full-service Indian law firm with a national presence and global outlook. They are known for their expertise in various legal areas, including corporate and commercial law, banking and finance, real estate, and dispute resolution. The firm has a strong focus on client service and integrity, with a team of over 200 lawyers across multiple locations. About the Job King Stubb & Kasiva is looking for Associates with at least 3 years of experience in Commercial Litigation to join our growing team in Chennai. Eligibility Experience: Minimum 3 years in commercial litigation Location Chennai How to Apply? Apply: Send your CV to ankita@ksandk.com Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KING STUBB & KASIVA Read More »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD Eshika Sahay About Steer World STEER World is a leading global company with deep capabilities in materials transformation and continuous manufacturing in plastics, polymers, pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, food, biomaterials, and biorefining. It is committed to enhancing the quality of life for people, and rejuvenating the planet, through technological innovation. About the Job Steer World is looking for a driven law graduate (LLB/LLM) with 0–2 years of experience to join the Legal team. Eligibility If you’re skilled in contract drafting, legal research, and regulatory compliance—and ready to grow in a fast-paced corporate setting—we want to hear from you. Bonus if you have exposure to Corporate Litigation and Non-Litigation. Familiarity with intellectual property law, employment law, contract Law and regulatory compliance. Location Bangalore How to Apply? Reach out at bindu.swamy@steerworld.com to explore this exciting opportunity. Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV PRANAV KRISHNA Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 JOB OPPORTUNITY AT INDI-GENIUS CONSULTING INC Sadalaw • July 10, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT STEER WORLD Read More »