June 19, 2025

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹538 Crore Arbitration Award Against BCCI in Kochi Tuskers Case

Trending Today Bombay High Court Upholds ₹538 Crore Arbitration Award Against BCCI in Kochi Tuskers Case Supreme Court Slams Karnataka High Court Over Thug Life Ban, Defends Kamal Haasan’s Free Speech Lucknow Court Sentences Woman for Filing False SC/ST Gangrape Case, Highlights Misuse of Protective Laws ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GREENFINCH LEGAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ANDHRA PRADESH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BURGEON LAW Bombay High Court Upholds ₹538 Crore Arbitration Award Against BCCI in Kochi Tuskers Case KASHISH JAHAN 19 June 2025 Bombay High Court upholds ₹538 crore arbitral award against BCCI in favor of Kochi Tuskers Kerala. Explore the legal battle, IPL franchise termination, and arbitration outcome in this landmark cricket dispute. Kochi Tuskers Kerala Win ₹538 Crore Arbitration Case Against BCCI In a major legal development, the Bombay High Court upheld an arbitral award of over ₹538 crore in favor of the now-defunct Kochi Tuskers Kerala against the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). The ruling in the case BCCI v Kochi Cricket Private Limited and Another marks a significant victory for the franchise once part of the Indian Premier League (IPL). Court Rejects BCCI’s Appeal Under Arbitration Act Justice R.I. Chagla ruled that the BCCI’s appeal was unfounded, reinforcing the limited scope under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. “BCCI’s dissatisfaction regarding the findings on evidence or merits cannot form a basis for setting aside the award.” The Court emphasized that the arbitrator’s conclusion—that BCCI’s termination of the franchise constituted a repudiatory breach of contract—was supported by a fair evaluation of the evidence. Franchise Termination and the Legal Dispute The dispute began in 2011 when the BCCI terminated the Kochi Tuskers franchise. The team was originally awarded to a consortium led by Rendezvous Sports World (RSW) and later operated by Kochi Cricket Private Limited (KCPL). According to the BCCI, KCPL failed to provide a required bank guarantee by March 2011. However, KCPL cited challenges such as: Lack of stadium availability Pending approvals for shareholding Reduction in the number of IPL matches Despite ongoing engagement and financial payments, BCCI abruptly terminated the franchise and encashed a prior guarantee. Arbitration Ruling in Favor of Kochi Cricket Private Limited In 2012, KCPL and RSW initiated arbitration proceedings claiming wrongful termination. The tribunal in 2015 awarded: Over ₹384 crore in damages to KCPL Ordered RSW to return ₹153 crore with interest and costs BCCI challenged the award, arguing: The arbitrator exceeded their legal authority KCPL’s failure to submit the bank guarantee was a fundamental breach The award for lost profits and wasted expenditure exceeded contractual limits RSW’s arbitration claim was invalid under the Indian Partnership Act High Court Finds BCCI Waived Bank Guarantee Requirement The Court dismissed BCCI’s arguments and agreed that their prolonged engagement with KCPL implied a waiver of the original bank guarantee deadline. “BCCI, through its actions, relinquished the requirement under Clause 8.4 of the KCPL Franchise Agreement to submit the guarantee by March 22, 2011.” The judge concluded there was no procedural illegality or breach of arbitration norms. The arbitration process was deemed valid, and both KCPL and RSW were allowed to withdraw the awarded sums. BCCI was granted six weeks to file an appeal. Conclusion: A Precedent in Cricket Arbitration This judgment is a significant precedent in Indian sports law, affirming the integrity of arbitration in franchise disputes. As the BCCI considers its next move, the ruling highlights the importance of fair treatment and adherence to contractual obligations in the IPL and beyond. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Upholds ₹538 Crore Arbitration Award Against BCCI in Kochi Tuskers Case Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Slams Karnataka High Court Over Thug Life Ban, Defends Kamal Haasan’s Free Speech Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Lucknow Court Sentences Woman for Filing False SC/ST Gangrape Case, Highlights Misuse of Protective Laws Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹538 Crore Arbitration Award Against BCCI in Kochi Tuskers Case Read More »

Supreme Court Slams Karnataka High Court Over Thug Life Ban, Defends Kamal Haasan’s Free Speech

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Supreme Court Slams Karnataka High Court Over Thug Life Ban, Defends Kamal Haasan’s Free Speech Lucknow Court Sentences Woman for Filing False SC/ST Gangrape Case, Highlights Misuse of Protective Laws ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GREENFINCH LEGAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ANDHRA PRADESH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BURGEON LAW Tamil Nadu ADGP Arrested Following Madras High Court Order in Teenage Abduction Case Involving MLA Supreme Court Slams Karnataka High Court Over Thug Life Ban, Defends Kamal Haasan’s Free Speech PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 19 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India rebukes the Karnataka High Court over the proposed ban on Thug Life, defending Kamal Haasan’s freedom of expression and condemning mob threats. Learn how this ruling reinforces the rule of law and artistic freedom in Indian cinema. Supreme Court Defends Kamal Haasan and Criticizes Thug Life Ban in Karnataka On June 18, 2025, the Supreme Court of India strongly criticized the proposed ban on the Tamil film Thug Life in Karnataka, starring acclaimed actor Kamal Haasan. The apex court condemned the pressure from groups attempting to suppress the film’s release over alleged controversial remarks made by Haasan. Supreme Court: Rule of Law Must Prevail Over Mob Intimidation The bench emphasized that the rule of law cannot be overridden by threats from “groups of hooligans.” The justices stated firmly that public disagreement should be expressed through civil discourse—not through threats of violence or cinema vandalism. “If someone has made a statement, counter it with another statement. You cannot threaten to burn down theatres,” the court remarked. Freedom of Expression is Fundamental, Says the Bench While recognizing that residents of Karnataka and Bengaluru may oppose Kamal Haasan’s statements, the court insisted that constitutional freedoms must be upheld. The right to dissent does not justify intimidation or coercion. “If the enlightened individuals of Karnataka believe Haasan was wrong, they can respond publicly—not with threats,” the court noted. SC Questions Karnataka High Court’s Role in Seeking Apology The Supreme Court transferred the plea submitted by Thug Life’s producer from the Karnataka High Court and requested a response from the state government. The justices expressed concern over the High Court’s alleged suggestion that Kamal Haasan apologize to diffuse the controversy. “Why should the High Court ask for an apology? That is not its function,” the bench asserted. Film Certified by CBFC Must Be Allowed to Release Reiterating legal precedent, the court stated that any film cleared by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) must be permitted to release nationwide. Citizens may choose to watch—or not watch—the film, but no one has the right to block its release through threats. “We cannot let mob mentality dictate the release of films,” the court declared. Previous Rulings Reaffirm Artistic Freedom in India To reinforce its judgment, the court cited past decisions, including the Bombay High Court verdict on the Mi Nathuram Boltoy play and a case involving Imran Pratapgarhi. These precedents emphasize the importance of protecting diverse opinions in a democracy. “We Are the Custodians of the Rule of Law” The Supreme Court concluded with a strong reminder of its duty: to uphold constitutional values and defend free speech. It reaffirmed that judicial institutions must protect filmmakers and artists from unlawful censorship. “We are the custodians of the rule of law. That is the purpose of the Supreme Court,” the bench concluded. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Slams Karnataka High Court Over Thug Life Ban, Defends Kamal Haasan’s Free Speech Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Lucknow Court Sentences Woman for Filing False SC/ST Gangrape Case, Highlights Misuse of Protective Laws Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Slams Karnataka High Court Over Thug Life Ban, Defends Kamal Haasan’s Free Speech Read More »

Lucknow Court Sentences Woman for Filing False SC/ST Gangrape Case, Highlights Misuse of Protective Laws

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Lucknow Court Sentences Woman for Filing False SC/ST Gangrape Case, Highlights Misuse of Protective Laws ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GREENFINCH LEGAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ANDHRA PRADESH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BURGEON LAW Tamil Nadu ADGP Arrested Following Madras High Court Order in Teenage Abduction Case Involving MLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT A. K. SINGH & ASSOCIATES, MUMBAI Lucknow Court Sentences Woman for Filing False SC/ST Gangrape Case, Highlights Misuse of Protective Laws KASHISH JAHAN 19 June 2025 A special court in Lucknow convicts a woman for filing a false gangrape case under the SC/ST Act. Explore the verdict’s legal, social, and judicial impact, highlighting the implications of misusing protective laws in India. Landmark Verdict on Misuse of Protective Laws In a significant ruling, a special SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act court in Lucknow sentenced a 29-year-old woman to seven and a half years of rigorous imprisonment for filing a false gangrape case. Filed in 2021, the case alleged gangrape and caste-based violence by five men. After reviewing the evidence, the court found the complaint was fabricated and motivated by personal enmity. The verdict is attracting national attention due to its strong message against the misuse of laws meant to protect marginalized communities. Court’s Reasoning and Evaluation of Evidence The court cited multiple contradictions in the complainant’s statements, inconsistencies in the medical reports, and testimony from independent witnesses that exposed the falsehood of the claims. The court emphasized that false accusations can destroy innocent lives and erode the credibility of protective legislation. A fine of ₹2.01 lakh was also imposed on the convict, to be paid as compensation to the five wrongfully accused men who faced severe social and emotional repercussions during the course of the legal proceedings. Broader Legal and Social Implications This case brings attention to the urgent need to balance protection and fairness within special legislation like the SC/ST Act. While this law is vital for addressing oppression against Dalits and Adivasis, even isolated incidents of misuse can undermine its public support and moral foundation. The judgment stresses the importance of preliminary scrutiny and due diligence before proceeding with serious accusations under special provisions. Legal Precedent and Future Safeguards This ruling serves as a cautionary precedent, urging lawmakers to consider procedural reforms that detect false allegations without weakening the law’s original intent. Legal experts caution that while punishing misuse is necessary, it should not become an excuse to delegitimize real victims of atrocities. Going forward, courts and lawmakers must aim to uphold justice while preserving the integrity of protective laws. Conclusion: A Call for Judicial Balance and Integrity The Lucknow court’s decision is a powerful reminder of the responsibilities tied to protective legislation. It underscores the need for a legal culture that is fair, evidence-driven, and protective of both victims and the falsely accused. This case will likely influence how future cases under the SC/ST Act are evaluated across India, reinforcing the need for a judicious and balanced approach to justice. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Lucknow Court Sentences Woman for Filing False SC/ST Gangrape Case, Highlights Misuse of Protective Laws Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Lucknow Court Sentences Woman for Filing False SC/ST Gangrape Case, Highlights Misuse of Protective Laws Read More »

ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GREENFINCH LEGAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ANDHRA PRADESH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BURGEON LAW Tamil Nadu ADGP Arrested Following Madras High Court Order in Teenage Abduction Case Involving MLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT A. K. SINGH & ASSOCIATES, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ZIMYO, GURUGRAM ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case KASHISH JAHAN 19 June 2025 The Enforcement Directorate is expediting the framing of charges against Lalu Prasad Yadav, Rabri Devi, and Tejashwi Yadav in connection with the IRCTC scam and land-for-jobs case, signaling a crucial phase in high-profile political corruption cases ahead of Bihar elections. ED to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in Corruption Scandals In a pivotal move that has stirred national attention, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) informed a Delhi court of its readiness to expedite the framing of charges against prominent Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Lalu Prasad Yadav, his wife Rabri Devi, and their son Tejashwi Yadav. The charges relate to alleged money laundering activities tied to the high-profile IRCTC scam and the controversial land-for-jobs scandal, both reportedly committed during Lalu Yadav’s tenure as Railway Minister. The ED counsel indicated that arguments on charge framing are nearing conclusion, potentially setting the stage for a full-scale criminal trial. IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case: A Timeline of Controversy The cases have lingered in pre-trial stages for several years, drawing criticism for prolonged delays in prosecuting alleged political corruption. The IRCTC scam involves accusations of awarding contracts in exchange for illicit financial benefits, while the land-for-jobs case claims land was acquired at throwaway prices from job seekers in return for employment in the Indian Railways. ED’s Legal Push Marks Shift Toward Swift Justice The ED’s decision to fast-track these cases underlines a renewed focus on preventing economic offences from being lost in procedural backlogs. This move is seen as part of a broader strategy to ensure accountability in high-profile corruption cases, especially those involving political figures. Political Fallout and Allegations of Vendetta Defense lawyers representing the Yadav family argue that the charges are politically motivated and lack substantial evidence of personal financial gain. They assert that the investigation is a result of political vendetta, aimed at damaging the family’s image ahead of the upcoming Bihar elections. Despite these claims, the judicial process is now likely to center on evidentiary review and witness testimony, moving from speculation to legal substantiation. Implications for Bihar Politics As Bihar approaches a critical election cycle, the trial’s outcome could significantly impact public sentiment and electoral dynamics. The Yadav family, with deep roots in Bihar’s political fabric, continues to be a central figure in state politics. The legal developments in the IRCTC and land-for-jobs cases are expected to shape not just courtroom outcomes but also influence the political landscape of Bihar in the coming months. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case Read More »

Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GREENFINCH LEGAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ANDHRA PRADESH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BURGEON LAW Tamil Nadu ADGP Arrested Following Madras High Court Order in Teenage Abduction Case Involving MLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT A. K. SINGH & ASSOCIATES, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ZIMYO, GURUGRAM CALL FOR BLOGS BY LAWFUL LEGAL Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct KASHISH JAHAN 19 June 2025 The Chhattisgarh High Court has awarded ₹2 lakh compensation in a custodial death case, emphasizing police accountability, human rights, and the urgent need for reform in India’s law enforcement system. Justice for Suresh Haththel: A Case of Custodial Violence In a significant development, the Chhattisgarh High Court has ordered the state government to pay ₹2 lakh in compensation to the mother of Suresh Haththel, a 27-year-old man who died while in police custody in 2021. Contrary to official claims of a natural death, the court cited multiple injuries indicating clear signs of custodial violence. This decision came after a writ petition filed by the victim’s family seeking justice. Accountability and State Responsibility The court underscored the state’s constitutional duty to safeguard the lives of individuals in custody. It criticized the police for failing to preserve crucial evidence such as CCTV footage and for poor documentation—raising serious concerns about attempts to cover up the incident. This landmark ruling sends a strong signal about the need for transparency and accountability in Indian law enforcement. Strengthening Human Rights Jurisprudence in India This verdict contributes to the expanding body of jurisprudence on human rights in India, especially relating to state liability in custodial death cases. The court emphasized that while financial compensation cannot bring back a lost life, it serves as a minimal recognition of the state’s failure and a deterrent to future misconduct. Calls for Systemic Reform in Custodial Practices The judgment highlighted the urgent need for systemic reforms in custodial institutions. This includes better training for officers, real-time monitoring, independent audits, and mandatory medical checkups and videography during custody. These measures are essential to prevent future instances of police brutality and uphold constitutional protections. A Step Toward Justice and Institutional Reform This ruling by the Chhattisgarh High Court is a firm reminder that the state’s authority must be exercised within legal and humane boundaries. It reflects the Indian judiciary’s commitment to uphold the fundamental rights of life and liberty guaranteed by the Constitution of India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct Read More »

Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GREENFINCH LEGAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ANDHRA PRADESH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BURGEON LAW Tamil Nadu ADGP Arrested Following Madras High Court Order in Teenage Abduction Case Involving MLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT A. K. SINGH & ASSOCIATES, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ZIMYO, GURUGRAM CALL FOR BLOGS BY LAWFUL LEGAL Supreme Court Judgment on SBI vs Rajesh Agarwal: Borrowers’ Right to Hearing Under SARFAESI Act and RBI Fraud Classification Guidelines Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment KASHISH JAHAN 19 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India has ruled that registered property documents do not confer ownership unless supported by a valid title deed. This significant judgment reshapes property law and real estate practices, especially in unauthorized colonies. Supreme Court Clarifies: Title Deed Is Essential for Legal Land Ownership In a crucial clarification on property law, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that the mere registration of a property document is not enough to establish ownership rights. Ownership, the court emphasized, must be supported by a lawful and valid title deed. Understanding the Case: Odisha Land Dispute Sparks Legal Clarity The judgment was delivered in the context of a land dispute in Odisha, where individuals were attempting to regularize property transactions in unauthorized colonies. These properties had been registered, but lacked proper title documentation. The court held that while statutory registration is necessary, it alone does not confer legal ownership. Legal Basis: Ownership Requires Proven Legal Title The court’s reasoning was clear: ownership rights must be traceable to valid legal documents executed by lawful property holders. Registration serves as a procedural safeguard against fraud, but it does not replace the need for a verified title. Recognizing registration as conclusive proof of ownership, the court warned, would embolden unscrupulous actors and destabilize the integrity of real estate transactions. Real Estate Impact: A Shift Toward Due Diligence This ruling is expected to significantly affect real estate practices, particularly in areas with widespread unauthorized or informal colonies. Stakeholders — including buyers, sellers, and government authorities — will now be required to conduct more rigorous title verification before completing transactions. While this may initially slow the pace of deals, it is likely to enhance legal certainty and market discipline. Regulatory Takeaways: Reforms in Title and Registration Needed The judgment sends a strong signal to lawmakers and regulators about the urgent need for reform. It calls for better alignment between land registration systems and title verification protocols. Measures such as digitization of land records, implementation of title insurance, and increased public access to ownership data will be key to preventing future disputes and enhancing transparency. Conclusion: Registration Is Not Ownership Without Legal Title This landmark decision reiterates a fundamental principle of Indian property law — that registration alone does not confer ownership. A valid and lawful title deed is essential. The Supreme Court’s verdict reinforces the role of the judiciary in upholding the legal framework governing land and real estate transactions, ensuring that procedural compliance never overshadows substantive legal rights. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment Read More »

Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GREENFINCH LEGAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ANDHRA PRADESH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BURGEON LAW Tamil Nadu ADGP Arrested Following Madras High Court Order in Teenage Abduction Case Involving MLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT A. K. SINGH & ASSOCIATES, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ZIMYO, GURUGRAM CALL FOR BLOGS BY LAWFUL LEGAL Supreme Court Judgment on SBI vs Rajesh Agarwal: Borrowers’ Right to Hearing Under SARFAESI Act and RBI Fraud Classification Guidelines Supreme Court Judgment on Enforcement Directorate v. Kapil Wadhawan: Interpretation of Remand Date for Default Bail under Section 167(2) CrPC Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua KASHISH JAHAN 19 June 2025 Fugitive businessman Mehul Choksi has filed a civil lawsuit against the Indian government in London, alleging abduction from Antigua and Barbuda. This international legal dispute could set a precedent in transnational law and extradition protocols. International Legal Battle Over Alleged Abduction Fugitive businessman Mehul Choksi, a key accused in the Punjab National Bank fraud case, has initiated a civil suit in the High Court of London. Choksi alleges that in May 2021, he was forcibly abducted from Antigua and Barbuda by individuals acting on behalf of the Indian government. He claims he was assaulted, detained unlawfully, and denied due process in an effort to bypass extradition procedures. Allegations of State-Sponsored Kidnapping According to Choksi’s legal team, the actions constitute state-sponsored transnational kidnapping, raising serious questions about state immunity and international legal norms. The case underscores the complex intersection of domestic criminal law, international human rights, and diplomatic conduct. Challenges for India’s Extradition Efforts This lawsuit presents a major hurdle in India’s extradition strategy as it tries to bring back economic fugitives from overseas. The Indian government has firmly denied any role in the alleged abduction, asserting that it is pursuing Choksi’s return through legal and diplomatic channels. However, the case could lead to broader scrutiny of the tactics used by states to repatriate high-profile fugitives. Potential Impact on International Law If the London court proceeds with the case, it may become a landmark in international law. The judicial review of alleged state actions conducted abroad could influence future rulings involving transnational crime and sovereignty. It raises critical questions about balancing national interests with adherence to global legal standards. Conclusion: A Precedent in the Making? Mehul Choksi’s legal challenge adds a new layer of complexity to his ongoing legal troubles. With significant implications for diplomatic conduct and international justice, this high-profile case is set to be closely monitored by legal experts, scholars, and global policymakers alike. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Tamil Nadu ADGP Arrested Following Madras High Court Order in Teenage Abduction Case Involving MLA Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua Read More »

Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GREENFINCH LEGAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ANDHRA PRADESH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BURGEON LAW Tamil Nadu ADGP Arrested Following Madras High Court Order in Teenage Abduction Case Involving MLA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT A. K. SINGH & ASSOCIATES, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ZIMYO, GURUGRAM CALL FOR BLOGS BY LAWFUL LEGAL Supreme Court Judgment on SBI vs Rajesh Agarwal: Borrowers’ Right to Hearing Under SARFAESI Act and RBI Fraud Classification Guidelines Supreme Court Judgment on Enforcement Directorate v. Kapil Wadhawan: Interpretation of Remand Date for Default Bail under Section 167(2) CrPC Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council of India’s Power to Conduct AIBE; Overrules V. Sudeer Judgment Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 19 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India has issued an interim stay on contempt proceedings against six West Bengal police officers related to the 2019 Howrah lathicharge incident. Learn more about the case, key developments, and legal implications. Overview of the Supreme Court’s Interim Stay On Monday, the Supreme Court of India granted an interim stay on the contempt proceedings initiated by the Calcutta High Court against six senior police officials from West Bengal. Among those named are four IPS officers and the Howrah Police Commissioner. Background: The 2019 Howrah Municipal Incident The case dates back to 2019 when police used a lathicharge during a protest at the Howrah Municipal Corporation. The demonstration, which was related to a parking dispute, reportedly resulted in several lawyers being injured. Following the incident, the High Court took suo motu cognizance and initiated contempt proceedings. High Court’s Summons and Legal Developments In response to the alleged police misconduct, the Calcutta High Court summoned the officers to appear on June 25. Notices were also issued to the West Bengal government, the Registrar General of the High Court, and other relevant parties, requiring them to file their responses within six weeks. Arguments Presented in the Supreme Court Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra, representing the petitioners, argued that the contempt proceedings were initiated via a suo motu writ petition without due cause. Recognizing the complexity and seriousness of the issue, the Supreme Court issued formal notices and stayed the proceedings to allow time for comprehensive review. Ram Janmabhoomi Case Reference During the hearing, the bench referred to the precedent set in the Ram Janmabhoomi case, where action against IAS officers was withheld due to a lack of charges for over a year. This comparison further underscored the need for careful judicial scrutiny before moving forward. Current Status and What Lies Ahead The Supreme Court concluded that the matter “needs to be heard” and granted a six-week window for replies from all involved parties. Until then, all further proceedings have been officially stayed. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Tamil Nadu ADGP Arrested Following Madras High Court Order in Teenage Abduction Case Involving MLA Sada Law • June 19, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments US Court Convicts 6 NRIs in $15 Million Hawala Scam Tied to Dark Web and Money Laundering Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident Read More »

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹538 Crore Arbitration Award Against BCCI in Kochi Tuskers Case

Supreme Court Slams Karnataka High Court Over Thug Life Ban, Defends Kamal Haasan’s Free Speech

ED Moves to Fast-Track Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Family in IRCTC Scam and Land-for-Jobs Case

Chhattisgarh High Court Orders ₹2 Lakh Compensation in Custodial Death Case, Cites Police Misconduct

Supreme Court Rules Title Deed Essential for Property Ownership in Landmark Judgment

Mehul Choksi Sues Indian Government in London Over Alleged Abduction From Antigua

Supreme Court Stays Contempt Proceedings Against Bengal Police Officers Over 2019 Howrah Lathicharge Incident

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GREENFINCH LEGAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ANDHRA PRADESH

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BURGEON LAW

Editorial message

Quick links

Contact info