sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

June 3, 2025

Supreme Court Emphasizes Judicial Hierarchy: Contempt Case Against NCDRC Members in Ireo Grace Realtech vs Sanjay Gopinath (2024)

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Supreme Court Emphasizes Judicial Hierarchy: Contempt Case Against NCDRC Members in Ireo Grace Realtech vs Sanjay Gopinath (2024) Supreme Court Judgment on ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA: No Arrest After Special Court Cognizance | Tarsem Lal Case Analysis 2024 Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION BY TNNLU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Supreme Court Emphasizes Judicial Hierarchy: Contempt Case Against NCDRC Members in Ireo Grace Realtech vs Sanjay Gopinath (2024) REHA BHARGAV 02 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark case of Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanjay Gopinath, emphasized the importance of respecting judicial hierarchy while upholding consumer rights in real estate disputes. Learn about the court’s judgment, the NCDRC, role, and key takeaways for developers and buyers. Introduction: A Landmark Supreme Court Judgment on Judicial Discipline and Consumer Protection On April 15, 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant verdict in M/s Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanjay Gopinath, addressing conflicts between the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) and Supreme Court orders. The case highlights crucial aspects of judicial hierarchy, consumer rights enforcement, and real estate contractual obligations. Case Background: The Dispute Over Real Estate Possession and Consumer Rights Sanjay Gopinath booked an apartment in the residential project “The Corridors,” developed by Ireo Grace Realtech, paying over ₹1.55 crore. The developer promised possession within 42 months plus six months grace but failed to deliver on time. Gopinath filed a complaint with the NCDRC alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practices. The NCDRC ordered the developer to hand over possession and pay compensation. However, when the developer did not comply, the NCDRC issued non-bailable warrants against its directors, despite an existing Supreme Court restraining order. Key Legal Issues in the Case 1. Was the NCDRC justified in issuing non-bailable warrants despite the Supreme Court’s restraining order? 2. Did the NCDRC violate the judicial hierarchy by ignoring Supreme Court directives? 3. What are the limits of consumer forums’ powers in enforcing orders conflicting with higher court rulings? 4. How accountable are quasi-judicial bodies like the NCDRC in adhering to judicial discipline? 5. Were the consumer’s rights to possession and compensation protected lawfully? Arguments from Both Sides Petitioner’s (Ireo Grace Realtech) Arguments The NCDRC violated the Supreme Court’s restraining order dated March 1, 2024, by issuing warrants. Once the Supreme Court issued a stay, the NCDRC lacked jurisdiction to take coercive action. The NCDRC misused its powers, undermining the judicial hierarchy and causing harm to the company’s directors. The company already had appropriate legal remedies underway before the Supreme Court. Respondent’s (Sanjay Gopinath) Arguments The NCDRC acted within its authority to enforce consumer rights and ensure compliance. Non-compliance by the developer justified coercive measures like warrants. Consumer forums have broad powers critical to protecting consumers. The NCDRC acted in good faith, not willfully violating Supreme Court orders. Justice and consumer interests outweighed procedural technicalities. Supreme Court Judgment: Upholding Judicial Discipline and Consumer Protection The Supreme Court condemned the NCDRC for issuing non-bailable warrants despite a restraining order, emphasizing that no lower forum can override or ignore Supreme Court orders. The Court issued a show-cause notice to the NCDRC members responsible for the breach. While consumer rights and enforcement are vital, they must be balanced with strict respect for the judicial hierarchy and the rule of law (Rule of Law). Conclusion: Lessons from the Ireo Grace Realtech Case for Developers and Consumers This landmark ruling reinforces that judicial discipline is paramount, and all authorities, including consumer forums, must respect the Supreme Court’s orders. It underscores that consumer protection is crucial but must operate within legal boundaries. For real estate developers and buyers alike, this case serves as a reminder of the importance of lawful enforcement and adherence to procedural fairness. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Emphasizes Judicial Hierarchy: Contempt Case Against NCDRC Members in Ireo Grace Realtech vs Sanjay Gopinath (2024) Supreme Court Emphasizes Judicial Hierarchy: Contempt Case Against NCDRC Members in Ireo Grace Realtech vs Sanjay Gopinath (2024) Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA: No Arrest After Special Court Cognizance | Tarsem Lal Case Analysis 2024 Supreme Court Judgment on ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA: No Arrest After Special Court Cognizance | Tarsem Lal Case Analysis 2024 Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Emphasizes Judicial Hierarchy: Contempt Case Against NCDRC Members in Ireo Grace Realtech vs Sanjay Gopinath (2024) Read More »

Supreme Court Judgment on ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA: No Arrest After Special Court Cognizance | Tarsem Lal Case Analysis 2024

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Supreme Court Judgment on ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA: No Arrest After Special Court Cognizance | Tarsem Lal Case Analysis 2024 Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION BY TNNLU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Supreme Court Quashes False Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage: A Landmark Judgment on Misuse of Law Supreme Court Judgment on ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA: No Arrest After Special Court Cognizance | Tarsem Lal Case Analysis 2024 REHA BHARGAV 02 June 2025 Discover the landmark Supreme Court judgment on May 16, 2024, clarifying that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) cannot arrest an accused after the Special Court takes cognizance under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Learn about bail provisions, judicial oversight, and the balance between enforcement and fundamental rights. Introduction: Understanding ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA On May 16, 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a crucial judgment in the case of Tarsem Lal v. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office. This ruling addresses the powers and limitations of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) when arresting accused individuals under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The judgment emphasizes due process, the role of Special Courts, and safeguards to protect individual liberties in money laundering investigations. Facts of the Case In June 2023, Tarsem Lal was accused of money laundering related to illegal land allotments in Punjab. The ED registered a case under the PMLA, and the Special Court took cognizance. Lal failed to appear in court, leading to warrants and rejection of his anticipatory bail by the Punjab and Haryana High Court under stringent PMLA conditions. Lal challenged this before the Supreme Court of India, raising questions about the ED’s arrest powers post-cognizance and bail rights under the PMLA and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). Key Legal Issues Addressed Can the ED arrest an accused under Section 19 of the PMLA after the Special Court has taken cognizance? How does anticipatory bail under Section 45 of the PMLA interact with bail provisions under the CrPC? Does furnishing bonds under Section 88 of the CrPC equate to bail under the PMLA? Arguments from Both Sides Petitioner’s Arguments The ED loses arrest powers under Section 19 of the PMLA once the Special Court takes cognizance. Anticipatory bail under PMLA should protect accused from arbitrary arrest. Bonds under Section 88 CrPC are not equivalent to PMLA bail. Denying anticipatory bail violates fundamental rights like liberty and fair procedure. Judicial oversight is necessary to prevent misuse of ED’s arrest powers. Respondent’s Arguments ED’s power to arrest continues even after cognizance. Strict bail conditions under Section 45 PMLA must be applied. Bonds under Section 88 CrPC amount to bail, triggering PMLA bail conditions. Robust enforcement is essential to combat money laundering effectively. All actions comply with law; no fundamental rights violations occurred. Supreme Court Judgment Highlights ED Cannot Arrest After Cognizance The Supreme Court of India ruled that after a Special Court takes cognizance under Section 44(1)(b) of the PMLA, the ED cannot arrest the accused under Section 19 without the Court’s permission. Arrests beyond this stage are unlawful. Bail Provisions under CrPC Prevail Post-Cognizance Post-cognizance, bail procedures follow the CrPC (Sections 437, 439), not the stringent “twin conditions” under Section 45 of the PMLA. This provides more accessible bail options for the accused. Bonds Under Section 88 CrPC Are Not Bail The Court clarified that furnishing a bond to ensure appearance is not the same as bail under PMLA, rejecting the ED’s claim equating the two. Protection of Fundamental Rights The judgment emphasized protecting personal liberty and ensuring enforcement agencies act within legal limits. Conclusion: Impact of the Tarsem Lal Judgment on PMLA Enforcement This Supreme Court decision marks a pivotal point in PMLA jurisprudence. It restricts the ED’s arrest powers after Special Court cognizance, upholds judicial oversight, and prioritizes fundamental rights and due process. By allowing CrPC bail provisions to apply post-cognizance, the Court balances effective crime control with protection against arbitrary arrests in money laundering cases. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA: No Arrest After Special Court Cognizance | Tarsem Lal Case Analysis 2024 Supreme Court Judgment on ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA: No Arrest After Special Court Cognizance | Tarsem Lal Case Analysis 2024 Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Judgment on ED’s Arrest Powers Under PMLA: No Arrest After Special Court Cognizance | Tarsem Lal Case Analysis 2024 Read More »

Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION BY TNNLU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Supreme Court Quashes False Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage: A Landmark Judgment on Misuse of Law Anna University Sexual Assault Case: Convict Gets 30 Years Rigorous Imprisonment in Landmark Verdict Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional NITU KUMARI 3 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India ruled that only Parliament can amend the Scheduled Castes (SC) list under Article 341, striking down Bihar‘s resolution to include the Tanti caste. Read the full case analysis and its implications on caste-based reservations. Introduction On July 15, 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark ruling in the case Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar Vichar Manch Bihar, Patna vs. The State of Bihar & Others. The case challenged a 2015 notification by the Bihar government attempting to move the Tanti-Tantwa caste from the Extremely Backward Class (EBC) category to the Scheduled Castes (SC) list. The Court found this action unconstitutional, affirming that such changes can only be made by Parliament under Article 341 of the Constitution of India. Case Details at a Glance Case Name: Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar Vichar Manch Bihar, Patna vs. State of Bihar & Others Judgment Date: July 15, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 528 Presiding Judges: Hon’ble Justices Vikram Nath and Prashant Kumar Mishra Background and Context State Action in 2015 On July 1, 2015, the Government of Bihar issued a resolution to move the Tanti-Tantwa caste from the EBC category to the SC list, citing cultural and historical similarity with the Pan/Sawasi caste. Legal Challenge Petitioners argued the move violated Article 341 of the Constitution, which gives only the Parliament of India the power to modify the Scheduled Castes list. Despite this, the Patna High Court upheld the state’s action, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court. Key Legal Issues Does the State Government have the authority to change the SC list under Article 341? Is the classification of Tanti-Tantwa as synonymous with Pan/Sawasi justified? Can a state extend SC benefits through a notification without parliamentary approval? Arguments Presented Petitioners’ Arguments Violation of Article 341: Only Parliament has authority over SC list amendments. Rejection by Registrar General of India: The RGI had already rejected the state’s 2011 recommendation. Mala Fide Intent: Petitioners claimed it was a political move to bypass constitutional procedure. Non-Severability: The removal from EBC and addition to SC were inseparable and both must be invalidated. Respondent’s Defense Clarification, Not Amendment: The State claimed the move was merely a clarification about caste synonymy. Commission Recommendations: It followed the State Backward Commission’s recommendations. Ethnographic Support: Previous reports claimed Tanti-Tantwa was similar to Pan/Sawasi. Supreme Court Verdict Judgment Summary Justice Vikram Nath delivered the judgment, ruling that only Parliament of India can make changes to the SC list. The notification issued by the Bihar Government was found to exceed state powers and was declared unconstitutional. Union Government’s Position The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment supported the petitioners, stating that Tanti-Tantwa is not listed under Bihar’s SC list. It had repeatedly advised the state against issuing SC certificates to members of this caste. Key Takeaways Ratio Decidendi Only Parliament has the power to alter Scheduled Caste lists under Article 341. Obiter Dicta The Court stressed the necessity of respecting constitutional processes to avoid abuse of reservation policies. Guidelines Issued SC quota jobs held by Tanti-Tantwa individuals must be reassigned. The caste will return to its EBC status. No recovery of previous benefits due to the State’s mistake. Conclusion This landmark ruling reinforces the constitutional principle that state governments cannot independently amend the Scheduled Castes list. It protects the integrity of India’s reservation system, ensuring that affirmative action is implemented fairly and lawfully. By quashing the Bihar government’s 2015 notification, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the constitutional process and safeguarded the rights of genuinely marginalized communities. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act Sada Law • June 2, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s SC List Amendment: Tanti-Tantwa Merger Declared Unconstitutional Read More »

Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024)

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION BY TNNLU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Supreme Court Quashes False Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage: A Landmark Judgment on Misuse of Law Anna University Sexual Assault Case: Convict Gets 30 Years Rigorous Imprisonment in Landmark Verdict Supreme Court Directs Gauhati High Court to Hear Assam Deportation Petition First Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) REHA BHARGAV 03 June 2025 In a landmark 2024 judgment, the Supreme Court of India ruled that bail conditions requiring real-time tracking via Google Maps and embassy certificates are unconstitutional and violate the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Introduction: A Landmark Verdict on Bail and Privacy Rights The Supreme Court of India delivered a crucial verdict on July 8, 2024, in the case of Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau. This judgment reaffirms that bail conditions must be reasonable and must not infringe on fundamental rights, particularly the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Frank Vitus, a Nigerian national, challenged two conditions imposed by the Delhi High Court while granting him interim bail in a narcotics case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: Sharing a live Google Maps PIN to enable real-time location tracking Submitting a certificate from the Nigerian High Commission confirming his commitment to stay in India Case Background: Arrest Under the NDPS Act Key Facts Name: Frank Vitus Nationality: Nigerian Arrested: May 2014 by the Narcotics Control Bureau Charges: Sections 8, 22, 23, and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 Interim Bail Granted: 2022 by the Delhi High Court Bail Conditions: Drop a PIN on Google Maps to allow location tracking Submit a certificate from the Nigerian High Commission These bail conditions were challenged by Vitus on the grounds of being arbitrary, invasive, and violative of personal liberty. Legal Issue: Are These Bail Conditions Constitutional? Central Legal Question Whether the Delhi High Court’s bail conditions—specifically requiring Google Maps-based tracking and a foreign embassy certificate—are arbitrary, unreasonable, and unconstitutional under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution? Supreme Court Judgment: Bail Conditions Must Respect Fundamental Rights On July 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered its judgment, striking down both bail conditions as unconstitutional. Key Findings 1. Google Maps PIN for Tracking – Unconstitutional The Court ruled that requiring a Google Maps PIN amounted to constant surveillance. Google LLC confirmed via affidavit that dropping a PIN does not allow real-time tracking, making the condition technologically ineffective and legally unsound. The Court held this condition violates the right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21. 2. Embassy Certificate – Unjust and Impractical The Court found that demanding a certificate from the Nigerian High Commission was unreasonable, especially when it is outside the control of the accused. It clarified that such conditions were not meant to be uniformly imposed on all foreign nationals. If such a certificate cannot be furnished within a reasonable time (7 days), bail proceedings should continue without it. Final Verdict The Supreme Court removed both bail conditions and reaffirmed that bail terms must be fair, reasonable, and constitutional, regardless of the seriousness of the charges or the nationality of the accused. Significance of the Judgment: Upholding Privacy and Liberty This ruling sets an important precedent for bail jurisprudence in India by: Reiterating that personal liberty and privacy are essential rights under Article 21 Ensuring that foreign nationals are not subjected to discriminatory or impractical bail conditions Clarifying the limits of judicial discretion in bail matters, especially concerning surveillance and embassy requirements Conclusion: A Win for Constitutional Rights The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau is a strong statement on the importance of upholding human dignity, liberty, and privacy in criminal justice proceedings. Even in serious offenses under the NDPS Act, bail conditions must not become tools of excessive control or procedural injustice. This case reinforces the judiciary’s role in protecting fundamental rights—a critical step forward in ensuring fair treatment for all accused individuals, regardless of nationality. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Women Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Alongside 1986 Act Sada Law • June 2, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Limits Appellate Powers Under Arbitration Act: Avoid Bulky Submissions, Stresses Efficiency Supreme Court Limits Appellate Powers Under Arbitration Act: Avoid Bulky Submissions, Stresses Efficiency Sada Law • June 2, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Bail Conditions Violating Privacy in Frank Vitus v. NCB (2024) Read More »

ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION BY TNNLU

Leave a Comment / Competitions /

ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION BY TNNLU Sweta Kumari About TNNLU & CRDT-CLCS The Tamil Nadu National Law University (TNNLU) was established by the Government of Tamil Nadu by an Act of the State Legislature (Act No. 9 of 2012) to provide quality legal education globally. The Centre for Research, Development, and Training in Cyber Laws and Cyber Security (CRDT-CLCS) was established in 2022 with support from the Tamil Nadu Government. It focuses on creating awareness, conducting research, and offering training to prevent cybercrimes, misuse of technology, and to support better enforcement of cyber laws. The Centre has conducted various competitions, webinars featuring eminent scholars and conferences for these purposes. About the Competition The “National Essay Writing Competition on Challenges to Rights and Privacy in AI and Cyberspace” is theonline essay writing competition conductedby CRDT-CLCS, Tamil Nadu National Law University. This competition aims to encourage students from a wide array of interests to deliberate on topics of contemporary prominence through prompt articulation in written form. The topics of this competition would be concerning the significant issues taking place with rights and privacy within cyberspace, and the creative outlooks participants can provide on such matters.  Eligibility Criteria Students pursuing any degree, UG or PG, from any recognised college/university are eligible to participate in the competition.  Students from any school moving from Class 9 to Class 12 in the forthcoming academic year are also eligible to participate in a separate category from college students. Theme The topic for the essay writing competition will be informed to the respective participants two days prior to the submission deadline. Timeline The Registration will close by 5thJune, 2025 The Topic for the essay will be revealed on 6thJune, 2025 The Submission Deadline for the completed essay will be on 8thJune, 2025 The Results will be announced on 15thJune, 2025 Registration Process Interested students can register for the competition through the link provided within the brochure.  Contact Info Ms. Gurupriya T R, Research Volunteer:  +91 9025939625 Mr. Nidharsan Ram S, Research Volunteer: +91 9342627659 In case of any queries, you can reach at: cyberlawcenter@tnnlu.ac.in The brochure is here – https://drive.google.com/file/d/127TTaUGTSQby-rEPhvgT7TKrQbYByoQx/view   Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION BY TNNLU ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION BY TNNLU Sadalaw • June 3, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA Sadalaw • June 3, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS Sadalaw • June 3, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION BY TNNLU Read More »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA

Leave a Comment / JOB /

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA Sweta Kumari About NLU, Odisha National Law University Odisha is a public law school and a National law University in India located at Cuttack, Odisha. It was established in 2008 under the National Law University Odisha Act, commencing its first batch from July 2009. The NLUO offers undergraduate, and post-graduate courses in law. About the Job National Law University Odisha (NLUO), Cuttack, invites applications for the positions of Assistant Professor (Contractual) in English and Political Science, and Guest Faculty in various law-related subjects.  Eligibility Criteria Assistant Professor Contractual (02 Posts One each) English & Political Science Guest Faculty (08 Posts – One each) – Indian Legal System, Advocacy for Marginalised Communities, Access to Justice, Legal Drafting, Equality and Inclusiveness, Social Entrepreneurship, IT Expertise I, Case Knowledge Management. Salary For Assistant Professor Contractual- Rs 50,000 Guest Faculty- Rs 1500 Important Date The last date for receipt of applications is 10th June 2025 by 5:00 PM. How to Apply? The filled-in application form along with the relevant_documents, all proof of qualifications, experiences and required Demand Draft should reach the Registrar, National Law University Odisha, Kathjodi Campus, C.D.A., Sector-13, Cuttack-753 015 on 10.06.2025 by 5.00 P.M. The application forms and official notifications can be found here –  https://nluo.ac.in/career/contractual-and-guest-faculty-recruitment/   Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA Sadalaw • June 3, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS Sadalaw • June 3, 2025 INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Sadalaw • June 3, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU, ODISHA Read More »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS

Leave a Comment / JOB /

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS Sweta Kumari About Mind Merchants Mind Merchants is an ITeS company incorporated in India and caters to legal departments of leading corporates in India and around the globe. Built on the concept of ‘Alternative Legal Services & Solutions ’, its products and services are aimed at streamlining legal functions for the clients. Executing legal functions are very costly for any company and do not fall within the domain of their core competence. About the Job Manager/Senior Manager – Legal (Contracts) | Gurgaon (Work from Home) | Are you a legal eagle with a knack for SaaS, IT agreements, and media contracts? Can you draft, redline, negotiate, and conquer contracts like a pro? If you’re someone who thrives under pressure, loves leading teams, and can tame the wild world of contracts, we want to meet YOU! Joining: ASAP to 15 days Eligibility Criteria 6+ years of legal experience (SaaS/IT/Media? Even better!) Master of SLAs, TATs, and legal acronyms. Strong in Indian legal frameworks (bonus points for LLM!). Leadership skills that can rally a team even on a Monday morning. Communication skills that make even complex clauses sound cool. Location Remote How to Apply? Send your resume at hr@mindmerchants.co.in   Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS Sadalaw • June 3, 2025 INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Sadalaw • June 3, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SHYAMBAZAR LAW COLLEGE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SHYAMBAZAR LAW COLLEGE Sadalaw • June 2, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MIND MERCHANTS Read More »

INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS

Leave a Comment / Internship /

INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Sweta Kumari About Hammurabi & Solomon Partners Hammurabi & Solomon Partners was founded in early 2001 and is ranked among India’s top 15 law firms. Their journey has been marked by stellar growth and recognition over the past 2 decades, with over 16 partners handpicked from the top of their fields. Paving their way into the Indian legal landscape, they believe in providing complete client satisfaction with a result-driven approach.  About the Internship Call for Applications for the post of Assessment Intern at Hammurabi & Solomon Partners – Hyderabad Office Eligibility Criteria For Assessment Intern- Graduate from the 2024 batch Location Hyderabad Office Important Date 6 June 2025 How to Apply? Interested candidates may apply by 6th June 2025 by sending their resume at Hrcom1@hammurabisolomon.com.   Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Sadalaw • June 3, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SHYAMBAZAR LAW COLLEGE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SHYAMBAZAR LAW COLLEGE Sadalaw • June 2, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHILANA & CHILANA LAW OFFICES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHILANA & CHILANA LAW OFFICES Sadalaw • June 2, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Read More »

Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Supreme Court Quashes False Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage: A Landmark Judgment on Misuse of Law Anna University Sexual Assault Case: Convict Gets 30 Years Rigorous Imprisonment in Landmark Verdict Supreme Court Directs Gauhati High Court to Hear Assam Deportation Petition First CALL FOR PAPERS BY IPVARNA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SHYAMBAZAR LAW COLLEGE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHILANA & CHILANA LAW OFFICES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ANM GLOBAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NYATI GROUP Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate KASHISH JAHAN 03 June 2025 Discover how the Kerala High Court made history by affirming transgender parents’ rights to update their child’s birth certificate with gender-neutral terms, marking a pivotal step forward for transgender rights in India. Kerala High Court Upholds Transgender Parents’ Rights in Landmark Ruling In a historic and progressive judgment, the Kerala High Court has affirmed the rights of a transgender couple to update their child’s birth certificate. The court ruled that the traditional gendered terms “mother” and “father” can be replaced with the inclusive term “parents,” recognizing the realities of modern family structures. Transgender Couple Ziya and Zahhad Seek Legal Recognition The couple, Ziya and Zahhad, both identify as transgender individuals. They approached the Kerala High Court to seek legal validation of their gender identity and to have official documents reflect their family truth. Their petition challenged outdated norms, asking the court to uphold their right to dignity and equality. Gender Identity and Article 21 of the Indian Constitution The court grounded its judgment in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. It emphasized that gender identity is a core aspect of personal dignity and privacy, and must be respected by the state. A Shift Towards Inclusive Legal Documentation Recognizing the importance of evolving societal norms, the judgment stated that official documents must reflect the diversity of contemporary families. Using the term “parents” not only respects individual self-identification but also upholds the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in Indian law. Advancing Transgender Rights in India This ruling marks a significant advancement for transgender rights in India. It not only legitimizes diverse family identities but also serves as a legal precedent for future cases. The decision challenges rigid gender roles and affirms the right to identity and recognition for transgender individuals. Support from LGBTQ+ Community and Human Rights Advocates The case has been widely celebrated by LGBTQ+ rights activists and human rights organizations. It is seen as a powerful step toward a more inclusive and equitable society, demonstrating the judiciary’s willingness to uphold the rights of marginalized communities. Conclusion: A Milestone for Legal and Social Inclusion in India The Kerala High Court‘s ruling in favor of transgender parents marks a transformative moment in India’s journey toward equality. By recognizing the legitimacy of non-traditional family structures and allowing gender-neutral identification on official documents, the court has reinforced the rights to dignity, identity, and freedom of expression. This landmark judgment is more than a legal win—it is a message of hope and validation for the transgender community and all who advocate for human rights in India. As society continues to evolve, this decision sets a powerful precedent for embracing diversity, promoting social justice, and creating a more inclusive future for all families. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes False Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage: A Landmark Judgment on Misuse of Law Supreme Court Quashes False Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage: A Landmark Judgment on Misuse of Law Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Affirms Transgender Parents’ Right to Gender-Neutral Birth Certificate Read More »

Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Supreme Court Quashes False Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage: A Landmark Judgment on Misuse of Law Anna University Sexual Assault Case: Convict Gets 30 Years Rigorous Imprisonment in Landmark Verdict Supreme Court Directs Gauhati High Court to Hear Assam Deportation Petition First CALL FOR PAPERS BY IPVARNA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SHYAMBAZAR LAW COLLEGE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHILANA & CHILANA LAW OFFICES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ANM GLOBAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NYATI GROUP LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT MW ASSOCIATES Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay KASHISH JAHAN 03 June 2025 The Delhi High Court has ordered an immediate medical abortion for a 17-year-old rape survivor after AIIMS Delhi delayed care over ID issues, highlighting the need for urgent and compassionate healthcare access for survivors. Delhi High Court Orders Urgent Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor In a powerful move to uphold justice and compassionate care, the Delhi High Court has ordered the immediate termination of pregnancy for a 17-year-old minor rape survivor. The girl had initially approached AIIMS Delhi seeking a medical abortion, but was denied timely care due to the absence of valid identification documents. Delay in Care Due to Bureaucracy The delay caused by procedural formalities placed immense emotional and physical distress on the minor. Denial of urgent medical intervention based on document verification raised serious questions about the responsiveness of the healthcare system in cases of sexual violence. High Court Steps In With Swift Action Distressed by the delay, the minor sought legal recourse. The Delhi High Court responded without hesitation, issuing a directive for immediate medical abortion. The court emphasized that no bureaucratic process should obstruct the timely treatment of sexual assault survivors, particularly minors. Focus on Survivor-Centric Healthcare The judgment highlighted the urgent need to adopt a survivor-centric approach in medical and legal systems. It stated that compassion, speed, and dignity must define the treatment of rape survivors. Formalities like identity checks should never delay emergency medical services in such sensitive situations. Clear Guidelines Issued for Hospitals The court also laid down new guidelines for public and private hospitals to prevent similar incidents. These directives aim to ensure that survivors of sexual violence receive timely, respectful, and barrier-free medical assistance without delays rooted in paperwork. A Landmark for Women’s Health Rights This ruling marks a significant victory for women’s health rights and strengthens legal protection for sexual assault survivors. Advocates and human rights organizations have praised the decision, calling it a step forward in ensuring access to safe and prompt medical abortion services. Conclusion: Urgent Care Must Override Bureaucracy The Delhi High Court’s intervention not only brought relief to a young girl in distress but also exposed a crucial gap in healthcare accessibility. The ruling reinforces that in cases involving rape and abortion, bureaucracy must never take precedence over a survivor’s well-being and rights. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes False Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage: A Landmark Judgment on Misuse of Law Supreme Court Quashes False Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage: A Landmark Judgment on Misuse of Law Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Anna University Sexual Assault Case: Convict Gets 30 Years Rigorous Imprisonment in Landmark Verdict Anna University Sexual Assault Case: Convict Gets 30 Years Rigorous Imprisonment in Landmark Verdict Sada Law • June 3, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Orders Immediate Abortion for Minor Rape Survivor After AIIMS Delay Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote