June 1, 2025

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Four in 2021 West Bengal Poll Violence Case, Calls It a “Grave Attack on Democracy”

Trending Today Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Four in 2021 West Bengal Poll Violence Case, Calls It a “Grave Attack on Democracy” Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Four in 2021 West Bengal Poll Violence Case, Calls It a “Grave Attack on Democracy” PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 01 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India has cancelled the bail of four accused in the 2021 West Bengal post-poll violence case, calling the incident a “grave attack on democracy.” Learn more about this landmark judgment and its implications on political violence and justice in India. Supreme Court’s Firm Stance Against Political Violence In a decisive move, the Supreme Court of India has cancelled the bail of four individuals accused in the 2021 West Bengal Assembly Elections post-poll violence case. The Court referred to the incident as a “grave attack on democracy,” sending a clear message about the seriousness of politically motivated crimes. Details of the 2021 Post-Poll Violence Case The case involves a violent attack on a worker from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and his family. According to reports, the victim’s house was set ablaze, and his family members were physically assaulted following the Assembly election results. Though the four accused were initially granted bail, the decision was later challenged and scrutinized. Supreme Court’s Critical Observations A bench comprising Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Sandeep Mehta reviewed a plea filed by the victim’s wife. The Court remarked that granting bail in such a politically sensitive and violent case was “shocking,” citing a lack of proper legal assessment by the lower court. Democracy and the Rule of Law Must Prevail The Supreme Court highlighted that political violence undermines the foundations of a democratic society. It ordered the accused to surrender within a week and instructed the state to ensure their custody. The ruling reinforces that justice must be upheld beyond party lines and electoral outcomes. A Landmark Judgment with Nationwide Implications This verdict is not just a step toward justice for the victim’s family but also a strong warning against violence in politics. It underlines that the Indian judiciary remains committed to upholding the rule of law and safeguarding democracy in India. Conclusion: Upholding Justice in the Face of Political Violence The Supreme Court’s decision to revoke bail in the 2021 West Bengal post-poll violence case serves as a powerful reminder that acts of political aggression will not go unchecked. By prioritizing justice and reinforcing the importance of due process, the Court has taken a crucial step in protecting democratic values and restoring public faith in the legal system. As India continues to evolve as the world’s largest democracy, such rulings play a vital role in deterring future violence and ensuring that the rule of law remains supreme. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Four in 2021 West Bengal Poll Violence Case, Calls It a “Grave Attack on Democracy” Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Four in 2021 West Bengal Poll Violence Case, Calls It a “Grave Attack on Democracy” Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Four in 2021 West Bengal Poll Violence Case, Calls It a “Grave Attack on Democracy” Read More »

Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 01 June 2025 The Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition seeking the removal of Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s husband, Sandeep Chandra, from his role as UP Standing Counsel, stating no evidence of misconduct. Learn the full judgment details and implications. Background of the Petition The Allahabad High Court recently dismissed a writ petition seeking the removal of Sandeep Chandra, husband of sitting judge Justice Sangeeta Chandra, from his position as Standing Counsel for the Government of Uttar Pradesh. The case titled Anupam Mehrotra v. State of UP alleged a potential conflict of interest and violation of professional conduct norms. However, the Bench comprising Justices Rajan Roy and Om Prakash Shukla found no evidence of misconduct. No Proof of Misconduct or Influence The Bench clearly stated that no material was presented to suggest that advocate Chandra leveraged his marital relationship with Justice Chandra for professional gain. “There have been no references to any events where he might have exploited his position,” the Bench observed. “Justice Chandra has served as a judge since 2016, yet the petition lacks any instance suggesting her involvement in benefiting her spouse.” Petitioner’s Allegations Against Sandeep Chandra The petitioner urged the Court to prohibit advocate Chandra from practicing at the Lucknow Bench of the High Court while his wife serves there. He also demanded that Chandra be temporarily suspended from the advocate roll and filed a complaint with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. To support his claim, the petitioner submitted a photo of the gate of the residence shared by the couple, showing both their nameplates. He argued that this violated the Bar Council of India (BCI) Rules and appeared to promote advocate Chandra’s connection with Justice Chandra. Delhi High Court Precedent Cited The Court referred to a judgment by the Delhi High Court, emphasizing that BCI Rules only prohibit advocates from appearing before a relative who is the presiding judge in the same matter—not the entire Court. “We found no justification for interpreting the provisions differently. The explanation added to the BCI Rules balances legal practice rights with judicial integrity,” the Bench ruled. Allegations Deemed Unsubstantiated The claim that advocate Chandra was operating his office from their residence was dismissed. The Court noted the nameplate was small and not promotional. Additionally, the petitioner failed to confirm the ownership of the house or provide details about the date the photograph was taken. The Court ruled that the photograph and associated claims did not qualify as grounds for issuing a writ of quo warranto against a state law officer. Court Rebukes Petitioner for Baseless Allegations The Court called out the petitioner for using “scandalising” language and urged introspection, especially since the petitioner is an experienced lawyer representing himself. “A petition drafted by a self-representing lawyer with 30 years of experience should avoid intemperate language,” the Court remarked. “The petitioner must consider whether such unverified claims are a responsible use of legal knowledge.” Conclusion This ruling by the Allahabad High Court reinforces the principles of legal ethics, fairness, and judicial integrity. It affirms that allegations without evidence—no matter how sensitive the relationship dynamics—will not hold in a court of law. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role Read More »

Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 01 June 2025 India’s Supreme Court continues to highlight gaps in outdated cryptocurrency laws through high-profile Bitcoin extortion cases. Learn about the legal grey areas, court proceedings, and regulatory concerns in this evolving crypto landscape. Supreme Court Case Sheds Light on Legal Loopholes in Cryptocurrency Regulation The ongoing case of Shailesh Babulal Bhatt, accused of cryptocurrency fraud in multiple Indian states, underscores the growing urgency for a modern legal framework around digital assets. The case was heard by a Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Surya Kant, Justice Dipankar Datta, and Justice Vijay Bishnoi. Advocates Highlight Lack of Crypto Regulation Senior Advocates Siddharth Dave and Mukul Rohatgi argued that India’s existing cryptocurrency laws are outdated and inadequate to handle cases involving Bitcoin extortion or fraud. During the hearing, Justice Kant criticized the government’s vague stance on crypto regulation, stating that relying solely on “watching international economic conditions” is not enough. ASG Bhati Defends Current Legal Proceedings Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati asserted that the real issue lies with the petitioner’s actions, not the lack of a framework. She emphasized that the petitioner falsely presented himself as an investor without providing proof and claimed the case was a “pure extortion matter.” Bitcoin Wallets and KYC Compliance Concerns ASG Bhati pointed out a key enforcement challenge: wallets that do not follow KYC (Know Your Customer) norms. While agencies can freeze KYC-compliant wallets, non-compliant wallets remain a legal loophole in cryptocurrency enforcement. Court Observes the Need for a Regulatory Framework The Court stressed the need for proper cryptocurrency regulation rather than complete prohibition, equating unregulated crypto activity to hawala transactions. Justice Kant made it clear that the regulatory vacuum increases opportunities for misuse. Details of the Petitioner’s Legal Situation Rohatgi revealed that Bhatt had been incarcerated since August 2024 and appeared before investigative agencies 15 times. He argued for temporary bail, stating that the petitioner had filed FIRs against police for extortion and was later named in counter FIRs, though he wasn’t charged in any predicate offense. Supreme Court Postpones Final Decision Due to the ongoing investigation, the Court deferred its decision until July, allowing authorities more time to complete inquiries. The bench maintained neutrality in its remarks, stating it would not comment on the petitioner’s guilt or innocence for now. India’s Judiciary Continues to Push for Crypto Legislation This is not the first instance where the Supreme Court of India emphasized the need for crypto legislation. In November 2023, a Public Interest Litigation seeking guidelines for cryptocurrency mining and trading was dismissed by a bench including Justice JB Pardiwala, Justice Manoj Misra, and former Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, stating that the matter lies within Parliament’s domain. Government Promises Discussions on Crypto Policy In September 2023, Attorney General R. Venkataramani informed the Court that a comprehensive review of domestic and international cryptocurrency regulation was underway. Despite multiple hearings since January 2024, no concrete legal framework has been introduced. Final Remarks: Need for Policy, Not Judicial Intervention In April 2025, a bench led by Justice BR Gavai (now Chief Justice of India) and AG Masih dismissed a plea under Article 142 of the Constitution seeking court-imposed crypto fraud regulations. The bench reiterated that such policy decisions must be addressed by the appropriate legislative authorities. Conclusion: Bridging the Gap Between Technology and Law The ongoing Bitcoin extortion case has spotlighted the legal grey areas in India’s cryptocurrency regulation. As the judiciary repeatedly underscores the urgent need for a clear and updated legal framework, it becomes evident that relying on outdated laws in the age of digital finance is no longer sustainable. With rising incidents of crypto-related fraud, extortion, and misuse, both courts and enforcement agencies are constrained without concrete legislative backing. India stands at a crucial juncture—balancing innovation and investor protection with robust, modern laws. Until Parliament enacts a comprehensive cryptocurrency regulatory framework, the legal ambiguity will continue to hinder justice and compromise financial integrity. The case of Shailesh Bhatt is not just a courtroom drama; it’s a wake-up call for policymakers to act swiftly and decisively. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws Read More »

SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LIS PARTNERS SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 01 June 2025 The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) bans Bollywood actor Arshad Warsi, his wife Maria Goretti, and others from the securities market for their role in a pump-and-dump scheme involving Sadhna Broadcast Limited. Discover the full details of SEBI’s findings, penalties, and the fraudulent trading practices involved. SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi and Others in Major Pump-and-Dump Scam On May 30, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a major order prohibiting actor Arshad Warsi, his wife Maria Goretti, and 57 others from participating in the securities market. The ban stems from their alleged involvement in manipulating the stock of Sadhna Broadcast Limited (SBL) through a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme. SEBI’s Findings on Market Manipulation According to the order issued by SEBI Whole Time Member Ashwani Bhatia, Arshad Warsi, his brother Iqbal Hussain Warsi, and Maria Goretti Warsi traded in SBL shares under the explicit direction of scheme mastermind Manish Mishra. WhatsApp chat records from July 13, 2022, revealed coordinated trades from the accounts of the three individuals — 3,29,050 shares by Arshad Warsi, 3,29,755 shares by Maria Goretti, and 82,625 shares by Iqbal Warsi — all at ₹12.08 per share, acting on Mishra’s instructions. The Role of Misleading YouTube Promotions SEBI’s investigation uncovered that the manipulation scheme operated in two stages. First, related parties carried out pre-arranged trades to artificially inflate the stock’s price and volume. Then, fake promotional videos were uploaded on YouTube claiming false acquisitions by the Adani Group, ownership of 5G licenses, and unrealistic share price projections ranging from ₹76 to ₹340. These videos, posted via five YouTube channels managed by Manish Mishra, were heavily promoted using Google Ads to attract public investors. Interim Orders and Scope of SEBI’s Investigation In March 2023, SEBI issued an interim order restricting the Warsis and others from trading in the securities market. The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) later limited the ban to SBL shares alone. The investigation covered the period from March 8 to November 30, 2022, triggered by investor complaints received between July and September 2022. Notably, during this timeframe, SBL’s public shareholding skyrocketed from 885 to 72,509, while promoter holdings fell from 40.95% to 25.58%. Regulatory Violations and Financial Penalties SEBI concluded that the Warsis’ trading activity violated multiple provisions of the SEBI Act, 1992 and the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003. Arshad Warsi’s unlawful profits totaled ₹41.70 lakh, Maria Goretti’s reached ₹50.35 lakh, and Iqbal Warsi earned ₹12.61 lakh. Mishra was held jointly liable, and Arshad Warsi was additionally accountable for the gains in his wife’s account. Disgorgement and Further Actions SEBI ordered the Warsis to repay the illicit earnings with 12% annual interest from November 30, 2022, and imposed a ₹5 lakh penalty on each individual. These amounts are to be deposited into the Investor Protection and Education Fund within 45 days. Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale for Investors and Market Participants The SEBI crackdown on Arshad Warsi, Maria Goretti, and others involved in the Sadhna Broadcast pump-and-dump scheme serves as a powerful reminder of the consequences of market manipulation. This case highlights the importance of regulatory oversight and transparency in protecting retail investors from fraudulent schemes fueled by misinformation and digital media. As financial markets become increasingly influenced by online content and social media, investors must remain vigilant and rely on verified sources before making investment decisions. SEBI’s decisive action reaffirms its commitment to maintaining market integrity and punishing those who misuse their influence for personal gain. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Read More »

Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LIS PARTNERS MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION BY MAIMS, DELHI Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 1 June 2025 The Supreme Court upholds a ₹1 lakh penalty on the Odisha Public Service Commission for failing to evaluate a judicial service exam answer. Learn what this means for exam integrity and future accountability in public recruitment processes. Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Penalty on Odisha PSC Over Exam Evaluation Lapse In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India upheld a ₹1 lakh fine imposed on the Odisha Public Service Commission (Odisha PSC) by the Odisha High Court for negligence in evaluating a judicial services exam paper. The case stemmed from the Odisha Judicial Service Examination 2022, where a candidate’s response to a 12.5-mark question went unchecked. Background of the Judicial Services Exam Dispute The controversy began when a young law graduate, aspiring to become a judicial officer, discovered that one of the answers in their exam script had not been evaluated. Despite this glaring error, the Odisha PSC submitted the answer sheet as complete. The candidate then petitioned the Odisha High Court, which ruled in their favor and imposed a ₹1 lakh penalty on the Commission. Supreme Court Bench Supports High Court’s Decision A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and Vijay Bishnoi reviewed the Commission’s appeal. The Court decided not to interfere with the High Court’s ruling, noting that the decision was made in light of the specific facts of the case and should not be treated as a binding precedent for similar situations in the future. PSC’s Appeal Dismissed Amid Accountability Concerns The Odisha PSC contended that the answer sheet had been properly assessed and requested the removal of adverse comments made by the High Court. However, Justice Surya Kant firmly questioned the Commission’s unwillingness to accept responsibility, asking, “How will the younger generation believe and trust you?” He criticized their defensive stance and stressed the importance of candidly admitting mistakes when they occur. Commission’s Responsibility Stressed by the Supreme Court Justice Dipankar Datta highlighted that even if examiners are outsourced, the ultimate responsibility lies with the Commission. He emphasized that three colleges unanimously confirmed the question (5a) was not evaluated. According to the Court, the ₹1 lakh fine was a minimal cost that should serve as a deterrent and promote vigilance in the Commission’s future assessment procedures. High Court’s Fine Seen as a Wake-Up Call The Supreme Court noted that if similar errors recur, the Commission could consider recovering penalties from the individual examiners involved. However, it stood by the High Court’s ruling, viewing the judgment as a necessary alert to improve diligence and prevent administrative negligence in public service examinations. Conclusion: A Message of Accountability for Public Commissions This ruling sends a clear message to all public service commissions in India: rigorous standards and transparency in evaluations are non-negotiable. In highly competitive and consequential exams like the judicial services examination, even minor mistakes can have lasting impacts on candidates’ futures. The Supreme Court’s verdict upholding the ₹1 lakh penalty reflects its commitment to justice and institutional accountability. It affirms the rights of candidates to fair and error-free assessments while reinforcing the obligation of bodies like the Odisha Public Service Commission to maintain the highest levels of integrity and transparency in public recruitment. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Read More »

NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LIS PARTNERS MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION BY MAIMS, DELHI NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 01 June 2025 Join the NPAC conference in Chennai on June 7, 2025, as top legal minds, policymakers, and insolvency professionals gather to reflect on a decade of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and chart its future roadmap. NPAC to Host High-Impact Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in Chennai The Nani Palkhivala Arbitration Centre (NPAC) is set to organize a prestigious one-day conference on June 7, 2025 (Saturday) in Chennai. Titled “Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: A Retrospective and Roadmap for the Future”, this event aims to foster insightful discussions among legal professionals, scholars, and policymakers on the decade-long impact of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in India. The IBC: A Decade of Economic Reform Introduced in 2016, the IBC marked a transformative phase in India’s economic reform agenda. As it approaches its tenth anniversary, the code’s implementation, evolution, and contribution to India’s commercial and financial ecosystem take center stage. The conference will examine its judicial interpretations, operational challenges, and future prospects. Key Topics and Discussions This international event will feature in-depth sessions led by eminent experts from the judiciary, regulatory authorities, legal academia, and the insolvency sector. Attendees can expect insightful discussions on: The evolution of the IBC ecosystem since 2016 Landmark rulings by courts impacting insolvency jurisprudence Comparative insights from global insolvency frameworks Synergies between arbitration, mediation, and insolvency Group insolvency and enterprise resolution mechanisms Trends in resolution strategies and value maximization Conference Highlights Distinguished Speakers: Judges from the Supreme Court and High Courts of India, Members of the NCLT, senior advocates, and noted insolvency professionals International Perspective: Comparative analyses on cross-border insolvency frameworks Networking Opportunities: Build connections with industry experts across the insolvency and legal ecosystem Why Attend? This is a must-attend event for insolvency professionals, lawyers, academics, and business leaders seeking to understand the strategic direction of insolvency law in India and globally. Whether you’re a practitioner or policy enthusiast, the conference offers a platform to engage with the latest trends, reforms, and best practices shaping the IBC landscape. Register and Stay Informed Don’t miss this opportunity to be part of a crucial dialogue on the future of India’s insolvency regime. For more details on registration, agenda, and speakers, visit the official NPAC website. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Read More »

Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LIS PARTNERS MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION BY MAIMS, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU DELHI PROJECT 39A Justices Anjaria, Bishnoi, and Chandurkar Sworn In as Supreme Court Judges of India Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 1 june 2025 Delhi High Court orders Mohak Mangal to remove defamatory parts of his YouTube video targeting ANI over copyright strikes, citing reputational damage. Background: Defamation Case Filed by ANI Against Mohak Mangal On May 29, 2025, the Delhi High Court directed popular YouTuber Mohak Mangal to delete specific portions of his video titled “Dear ANI”, which criticized the news agency ANI for its handling of copyright strikes against content creators. The court responded to a defamation lawsuit filed by ANI, alleging that the video used inflammatory and defamatory language, including terms like “hafta wasooli” (extortion), “gunda raj” (rule of thugs), and “kidnap.” Court Observations and Verdict Judge Criticizes Use of Harsh Language Presiding over the case, Justice Amit Bansal noted that the video content was disparaging on its face and emphasized that such statements should have been phrased more appropriately. “Assuming ANI’s demands were unjust—how does that qualify as extortion?” the judge asked. He further questioned Mangal’s justification for using such serious accusations while choosing not to obtain proper licensing for ANI’s copyrighted content. Language Like “Mafia” and “Thugs” Under Fire The court also criticized the tone and terminology used by others named in the lawsuit. In particular, it addressed stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra, who used terms like “mafia” and “thugs” in social media posts. Justice Bansal stated: “I support free speech, but calling someone ‘thugs’ or ‘mafia’ is unacceptable.” Other Defendants: Mohammed Zubair and Kunal Kamra Alt News’ Zubair Agrees to Delete Post Mohammed Zubair, co-founder of fact-checking site Alt News, who was also named in the suit for promoting the video, agreed to remove one of his posts related to the incident from X (formerly Twitter). Kunal Kamra Removes One Post, Defends Satire Kunal Kamra, known for his satirical content, agreed to take down only one of several posts. His lawyer defended Kamra’s actions, highlighting his role as a free speech advocate and satirist. ANI’s Claims: Damaged Reputation and Harassment ANI stated in its petition that the video has caused measurable harm to its goodwill, public image, and business. The agency alleged the video incited widespread online harassment and backlash. The news agency emphasized that Mohak Mangal had used ANI’s copyrighted material in monetized videos without permission, calling it a calculated attack on their brand reputation and trademarks. Key Takeaways Delhi High Court instructed Mohak Mangal to delete defamatory parts of his video targeting ANI. The video allegedly used terms like “extortion”, “thugs”, and “kidnap” to describe ANI’s actions. Other figures like Mohammed Zubair and Kunal Kamra were also asked to remove related posts. ANI claims the video caused public backlash and harmed its reputation and credibility. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 • Case law • No Comments State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Read More »

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT RGNUL

INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VINOD KOTHARI & CO.

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SAMVĀD: PARTNERS

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Four in 2021 West Bengal Poll Violence Case, Calls It a “Grave Attack on Democracy”

Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Remove Justice Sangeeta Chandra’s Husband from UP Counsel Role

Supreme Court Highlights Legal Gaps in Ongoing Bitcoin Extortion Case Amid Outdated Cryptocurrency Laws

SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam

Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error

NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future

Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI

Editorial message

Quick links

Contact info