sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

May 30, 2025

Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 31 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India will hear a plea next week challenging demolition orders in Jamia Nagar, Delhi. The petition questions the legality of notices issued without due process, raising concerns about arbitrary evictions. Background: Supreme Court Agrees to Review Demolition Plea On Thursday, May 29, the Supreme Court of India agreed to hear a petition next week regarding demolition notices issued in Jamia Nagar, Delhi. The notices pertain to alleged unauthorized constructions in the area. The plea was presented before Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, who initially advised the counsel to approach the High Court. However, the counsel argued that the notices were issued in violation of previous Supreme Court directives and insisted that the matter needed urgent attention. Allegations of Arbitrary Demolition The petitioners claim that structures were “arbitrarily picked” for demolition, and that they were not part of the area mentioned in the court’s earlier contempt ruling. The counsel asserted that this was originally a private dispute which escalated to a court-ordered demolition without a fair hearing. They stated that although the Supreme Court allowed a 15-day notice period, residents received notices affixed outside their homes on May 26, demanding immediate eviction without due process. Legal Concerns Over Due Process The counsel emphasized that since the Supreme Court’s previous order affected the parties directly, the High Court could not be approached. They requested a recall of the order on the grounds that the affected individuals were not heard during the original proceedings. In response, CJI Gavai remarked that the demolition was being executed based on a valid Supreme Court directive after a thorough document review. “We cannot sit in appeal over this Court’s directions,” he stated, though he maintained that the High Court remained an available forum. Listing Confirmed for Next Week Despite repeated suggestions to take the matter to the High Court, the counsel pressed for an urgent hearing in the Supreme Court. Eventually, the CJI agreed to list the matter for the upcoming week. Earlier on May 8, the Supreme Court had instructed the Delhi Development Authority and the Delhi government to proceed with the legal demolition of unauthorized constructions over more than four bighas of public land in Khasra No. 279, Okhla Village, within a period of three months. Conclusion: A Critical Legal Test for Property Rights and Due Process The upcoming hearing in the Supreme Court of India will be pivotal in determining whether demolition actions in Jamia Nagar were carried out in compliance with legal procedures and constitutional rights. With allegations of arbitrary notices and lack of proper hearing, the case raises important questions about the balance between urban development and the protection of individual rights. As Delhi continues to grapple with unauthorized constructions, the outcome of this plea could set a crucial precedent for similar disputes across the country. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Read More »

Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 30 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India has upheld the arrest stay of BJP Minister Kunwar Vijay Shah in the controversy involving his derogatory remarks against Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, ending MP High Court proceedings and instructing an SIT-led investigation to continue. Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India maintained its temporary stay on the arrest of BJP Minister Kunwar Vijay Shah. The case relates to derogatory comments made by Shah, where he allegedly called Colonel Sofiya Qureshi a “sister of terrorists.” MP High Court Proceedings Halted The Supreme Court directed the Madhya Pradesh High Court to cease ongoing proceedings, noting that the apex court had already taken cognizance of the matter. This move effectively ends dual proceedings and centralizes the legal action at the national level. Special Investigation Team Formed to Probe Case During the hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the court that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising three senior officers had been formed as per the earlier directives. The SIT has begun its inquiry and filed a status report citing an on-site investigation conducted on May 21. Investigation in Progress: SIT Seizes Devices and Records Statements The SIT has already collected substantial evidence, including the seizure of mobile phones and electronic devices. Statements from key witnesses were also recorded. Given that the investigation is still in its initial stages, the court granted more time for further progress. Bench Reviews Petitions Filed by Vijay Shah Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta reviewed two petitions filed by Vijay Shah. One challenged the suo motu order of the MP High Court directing an FIR against him, while the other contested the High Court’s intent to monitor the investigation directly. Supreme Court Rejects Shah’s Public Apology The Court issued a strong condemnation of Shah’s comments, calling them “filthy, crass, and shameful.” The bench also dismissed Shah’s public apology as insincere, pointing out that the apology video lacked genuine remorse or acknowledgment of public outrage. Justice Surya Kant urged Shah to reflect on his actions and seek meaningful redemption. Cooperation Mandated for Arrest Stay to Continue The court made it clear that the arrest stay is conditional upon full cooperation by Shah with the ongoing investigation. While the bench refrained from monitoring the case, it asked for periodic updates from the SIT to ensure procedural integrity. Conclusion: Legal Scrutiny Continues Amid Political Turmoil This case underscores the growing scrutiny of public figures and the consequences of inflammatory speech in India’s political landscape. With the Supreme Court stepping in to ensure a fair and impartial investigation, the focus now shifts to the integrity and findings of the SIT probe. As the legal process unfolds, the case remains a crucial marker in the conversation about political accountability and responsible discourse. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Read More »

Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 30 May 2025 The Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail to filmmaker Akhil Marar over alleged seditious remarks regarding the Pahalgam incident and India-Pakistan border truce. Read more on the legal developments and constitutional insights. Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Updated by Prabhat Kumar Biltoria on 29 May 2025 In a high-profile legal development, the Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail to filmmaker Akhil Marar, following a case filed against him for alleged seditious remarks related to the Pahalgam incident and the India-Pakistan border truce. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas Presides Over the Bail Hearing The case was heard by Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, who ordered Akhil Marar to surrender his mobile phone and appear before the investigating officer on June 10 at 10 a.m. In the event of an arrest, the court directed that Marar should be released on bond. Facebook Video at the Center of Controversy The complaint stems from a Facebook video allegedly uploaded by Marar, which was considered a threat to India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The Kottarakkara police registered the case under Section 152 of the BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). Marar stated that the video was taken down within an hour of uploading after realizing it might be misinterpreted. He denied all allegations, asserting that they were politically motivated and baseless. Prosecution Seeks Gadget Seizure and Custodial Interrogation Despite Marar’s defense, the prosecution argued that confiscating the device and conducting an in-custody interrogation were necessary for proper investigation. They opposed the anticipatory bail plea, citing the seriousness of the charges. Freedom of Speech Upheld by the Court After thoroughly reviewing the case, the court highlighted that freedom of speech and expression is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The court further emphasized that Article 19(2) allows for only reasonable restrictions. Since Marar’s post did not include any explicit call for violence or secession, the court found no basis for the charges under sedition. This ruling reflects a careful balance between national security concerns and civil liberties. Conclusion This case brings renewed focus on the legal interpretation of seditious content in the digital era and the constitutional safeguards of free expression in India. As the investigation continues, Akhil Marar’s legal battle is likely to remain under public and media scrutiny. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Read More »

Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KKR Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 30 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India has ruled against a blanket ban on disclosing witness statements under the UAPA, emphasizing the need for individualized threat assessments to uphold the accused’s right to a fair trial. Supreme Court Rejects Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Under UAPA In a landmark judgment dated 29 May 2024, the Supreme Court of India ruled that courts cannot impose a blanket prohibition on the disclosure of witness statements in cases under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) without a personalized assessment of threat to each witness. Personalized Judicial Evaluation Is Mandatory The Court clarified that any restriction on the defence’s access to prosecution witness statements must be supported by a well-reasoned judicial order. Such an order should demonstrate careful analysis of whether a specific witness’s life or safety is at risk, ensuring that protective measures are individualized and justified. High Court and Special Court’s Blanket Ban Overturned Initially, a Special Court barred disclosure of witness statements based on concerns raised by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), citing Sections 44 of UAPA and 17 of the NIA Act, 2008. This blanket ban was later upheld by the High Court, even after the examination-in-chief of the witnesses. However, the Supreme Court bench—comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan—allowed the appeal, stressing that a universal restriction is unconstitutional without a case-by-case evaluation. Appellant’s Argument: No Threat Assessment, No Justification The Appellant, facing charges under UAPA for alleged involvement in terrorist activities, argued that while the law permits protective measures, these must be grounded in concrete threat perceptions per individual. Without any specific evidence of threat or protective steps for each of the 15 witnesses examined under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), the blanket gag order violated the accused’s right to a fair trial. Right to Fair Trial and Cross-Examination Must Be Preserved Justice Oka emphasized that the right to cross-examine witnesses is fundamental to a fair trial. Courts cannot withhold statements mechanically—even when a threat is recorded—without providing a brief but reasoned justification for each case. Omnibus Applications by Prosecutors Not Acceptable The Supreme Court further warned that prosecutors must not file omnibus applications seeking protection for all witnesses under Section 44(2) of UAPA or Section 17(2) of the NIA Act. Applications must include specific averments for each witness, ensuring strict adherence to procedural fairness and transparency. Final Judgment and Directive to NIA The Supreme Court annulled the previous orders by the Special Court and the High Court. It directed the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to submit a fresh application within eight weeks, ensuring that individual threat assessments are presented for proper judicial scrutiny. This judgment reinforces the balance between national security and constitutional rights, affirming that witness protection must not override the right to a fair and transparent trial. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA Read More »

WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach

Leave a Comment / 2025, Case law /

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach NITU KUMARI 30 May 2025 Explore the WazirX hack of July 2024 that shook India’s crypto market. Understand how the breach happened, its legal implications, and key lessons on cryptocurrency security and digital asset protection. The WazirX Hack: A Wake-Up Call for India’s Crypto Ecosystem On July 18, 2024, a major security breach hit WazirX, India’s leading cryptocurrency exchange. Despite implementing robust protocols, over $230 million (INR 1900 crores) was stolen from one of its main trading wallets. This hack, one of the most significant in Indian crypto history, has sparked widespread concern about digital asset security and legal accountability. What Is Cryptocurrency? Cryptocurrency is a digital form of money used for online transactions. Unlike traditional currency, it is decentralized and operates without a central authority. Cryptocurrencies rely on blockchain technology to record transactions and create new units. Common Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin (BTC): The most popular decentralized digital currency, launched in 2009. Ethereum (ETH): Known for its smart contracts and native token, Ether. Litecoin (LTC): Similar to Bitcoin, with faster transaction times. Stablecoins: Pegged to real-world assets like the US Dollar. Solana (SOL): Focuses on high-speed and low-cost transactions. Background: The Breach That Shook WazirX WazirX faced a $230 million crypto theft, prompting a petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The hackers gained access to an Ethereum Safe Multisig wallet, raising concerns about the effectiveness of existing security measures. How Did the Hack Happen? Modus Operandi of the Hackers The attackers exploited WazirX’s multi-signature wallet system, which required three WazirX and one Liminal signature for transaction approval. They: Created a fake WazirX account and deposited tokens. Emptied the hot wallet and accessed the cold wallet. Manipulated the smart contract controlling the multisig wallet. Gained full control and withdrew all assets. WazirX had declared roughly $500 million in digital reserves just a month prior, indicating a massive blow to investor confidence. Who Is WazirX? Founded in 2018 by Nischal Shetty, Siddharth Menon, and Sameer Mhatre, WazirX quickly became a top Indian crypto exchange. Known for its compliance-first approach and transparency reports, WazirX had built a reputation for being secure—until this breach. Timeline of the WazirX Hack Date of Breach: July 18, 2024 Assets Lost: ~$230 million Suspected Perpetrators: Lazarus Group, a North Korean hacking organization Affected Users: Over 240,000 wallets WazirX’s Response & Customer Backlash WazirX immediately froze all trading and withdrawals. However, the lack of clear updates and blame game between WazirX and Liminal led to user frustration. Many customers turned to X (formerly Twitter) to demand answers, express outrage, or seek legal help. Legal Pressure Builds CoinSwitch, another Indian exchange, revealed it had funds trapped on WazirX and is now pursuing legal action. Users demanded compensation, but WazirX CEO Nischal Shetty clarified he no longer owns the platform, having sold it in 2019. Who Was Behind the Attack? While there is no concrete proof, cybersecurity experts suspect the involvement of APT-28, also known as the Lazarus Group—a cybercrime ring linked to North Korea and known for large-scale crypto thefts. Forensic Investigation: What Went Wrong? Cybersecurity firm Mandiant conducted a forensic audit of the laptops used for signing transactions. Their report found no evidence of compromise. Still, questions remain about how the attacker bypassed the three WazirX signatures needed to approve transactions. What Could Have Prevented the Hack? Although the technical vulnerabilities aren’t fully known, experts suggest: Tighter access control to smart contracts Enhanced multi-factor authentication Regular third-party security audits Improved cold wallet management protocols Key Takeaways: Lessons from the WazirX Hack Crypto security needs continuous improvement, especially in developing markets like India. Transparency and timely communication are essential for maintaining user trust. There’s a growing need for regulatory oversight to protect digital assets and prevent future attacks. Final Thoughts The WazirX security breach is a critical moment for India’s crypto industry. It reveals the vulnerabilities of even well-regarded exchanges and emphasizes the urgent need for legal restructuring, secure infrastructure, and better industry collaboration. Cryptocurrency platforms must evolve to ensure the safety of user funds and regain investor confidence in a volatile digital asset environment. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 • Case law • No Comments State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach Read More »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI

Leave a Comment / JOB /

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI Sweta Kumari About Juridica Solutio LLP Juridica Solutio Law Associates (‘JSLA’) is a full-service law firm with a professional, experienced and dedicated team that strives to deliver effective legal advice and compliance services to its clients while keeping time and cost efficiencies in mind. The firm’s goal is to preserve its clients’ interests and get the best possible solution in any legal matter or dispute. It is a one-stop shop that offers a wide range of legal services to its clients. The firm is well-equipped to handle lawsuits throughout India. About the Opportunity Our firm is looking for a dynamic, detail-oriented, and motivated individual to join our growing team. This role offers hands-on experience in diverse matters involving litigation, arbitration, and corporate advisory. The ideal candidate should have strong research and drafting skills, and a genuine interest in courtroom practice and strategic legal consultation. If you’re ready to work in a fast-paced, collaborative environment and eager to learn, we’d love to hear from you Number of Vacancies 2 Practice Areas Civil, Commercial, Consumer, Corporate Advisory, Arbitration, Criminal. Eligibility Criteria Experience: 2 – 3 years Good drafting skills and a sound understanding of procedural laws Go-getter attitude with a willingness to take initiative and ownership Excellent communication (oral & written), interpersonal skills, and punctuality Court craft, presentation skills, and familiarity with legal research platforms (SCC Online, Manupatra, Indian Kanoon, etc.,) Must be willing to learn and capable of handling matters independently over time Salary Remuneration shall remain negotiable and commensurate with the qualifications, experience, and overall suitability of the selected candidate. Location Delhi. How to Apply? To apply, share your updated CV with juridicasolutio@gmail.com. Contact Information For any queries, please contact at +91 9711919980. Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI Read More »

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE

Leave a Comment / JOB /

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE Sweta Kumari About the Job Sahal & Associates is looking for a Junior Advocate to join our dynamic legal team. The ideal candidate should be capable of independently handling matters before the Gauhati High Court and NCLT. Eligibility Law degree from a recognized university Enrolled with the Bar Council 1–3 years of litigation experience preferred Strong drafting, research, and court presentation skills Passionate about litigation and long-term career growth Location Guwahati | Accommodation Provided for Outstation Candidates How to Apply? Interested candidates may send their CVs to sahalnassociates@gmail.com Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE Read More »

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP

Leave a Comment / JOB /

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP Eshika Sahay About the Job Evara Legal is looking for a talented and motivated Litigation Associate to join their growing team. Position: Litigation Associate Eligibility Excellent research, drafting, and communication skills. Ability to work efficiently in a fast-paced environment. A proactive attitude and willingness to learn. Experience: 0-4 years Qualification: LL.B. Location Full-time, On-Site (New Delhi) How to Apply? Send your resume and a brief cover letter to agrata@evaralegal.in Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP Read More »

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA

Leave a Comment / JOB /

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA Sweta Kumari About the Chamber The Chamber is headed by Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala, LL.M, University of Cambridge, Counsel, Union of India and State of Madhya Pradesh at Supreme Court. Mrs. Akriti Aditya Manubarwala and Ms. Tanishka Grover co-head the research and strategy division of the Chamber. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala is an advocate practicing at the Supreme Court of India, Delhi, and Bombay High Court, National Company Appellate Law Tribunal, and other commercial tribunals. About the Job Call for Junior Litigation Associate. They are accepting applications for the position of an Associate. Joining Date: 1st August 2025 Salary Shall be offered based upon the short listed candidates profile and prior work experience. Location Defence Colony, New Delhi How to Apply? 2 page CV accompanied with 1 writing sample not exceeding 1,000 words along with 1 Draft sample to emailed with a 1 page covering letter to – chambersofadityamanubarwala@gmail.com Never miss an opportunity! Click to join our whatsapp channel More Oppurtunities JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KKR LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KKR Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 1 2 3 Next »

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA Read More »

Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KKR INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LEGAL SAVVY FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME BY UNITED UNIVERSITY Apple Shifts iPhone Production to India as Exports to US Surge 76% in April 2025 India’s Victory in Operation Sindoor Undermined by Diplomatic Delay: Brahma Chellaney LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT INDUSLAW JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRIVEDI & PARASHAR JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LITIGATION WING OF THE INDIAN ARMY Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 30 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India has declined to reconsider the ₹229-crore Gateway of India jetty project, leaving the matter to the Bombay High Court. The project, facing opposition from local residents, continues amid debate over heritage preservation and urban infrastructure development. Supreme Court Declines to Reconsider ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project On May 28, 2025, the Supreme Court of India refused to entertain a plea challenging the construction of a ₹229-crore passenger jetty near Gateway of India, Mumbai. The bench, comprising Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice AG Masih, noted that the matter is already being addressed by the Bombay High Court and urged a swift resolution before the monsoon season ends. Opposition Cites Heritage and Public Consultation Concerns The petition was filed by the Clean and Heritage Colaba Residents Association, alongside individual petitioners, who expressed concerns about the potential damage to Mumbai’s iconic heritage seafront. They argued that the project was implemented without public consultation and accused authorities of prioritizing elite interests by including VIP lounges and parking for 150 vehicles. It was also alleged that the jetty would be used for private ferries and celebrity yachts. “Not In My Backyard” Syndrome Cited by the Court The Supreme Court referenced the “Not in My Backyard” (NIMBY) syndrome—a common reaction where individuals oppose infrastructure projects that affect them personally, despite broader public benefit. CJI BR Gavai highlighted similar cases of resistance to civic development, including urban transit and sewage treatment facilities, and underscored the necessity of developing coastal infrastructure. Arguments For and Against the Jetty Project Representing the petitioners, Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde argued that the jetty primarily serves a privileged segment of society and lacks transparency. He claimed that the project offers private docking access for those wishing to travel to Alibaug for leisure. Countering these claims, Aishwarya Bhati, the Additional Solicitor General representing the Maharashtra Government, emphasized that the jetty is a public infrastructure project aimed at improving daily commute options for citizens. She categorically dismissed allegations of exclusivity. Bombay High Court to Decide Before Monsoon Ends Although the Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of the case, it acknowledged the pending hearing in the Bombay High Court scheduled for June 16. The High Court had earlier declined to halt the piling work for the jetty and is now expected to deliver a verdict before the monsoon concludes. Conclusion: Balancing Urban Growth with Heritage Preservation The ₹229-crore Gateway of India jetty project highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing urban infrastructure development with the preservation of historic and cultural landmarks. While the project promises to improve connectivity and benefit daily commuters, it has sparked concern among local residents and heritage advocates. As the legal proceedings continue in the Bombay High Court, the case serves as a critical example of how civic planning must consider both public utility and community impact. The outcome may shape future approaches to coastal development projects across Mumbai and beyond. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Apple Shifts iPhone Production to India as Exports to US Surge 76% in April 2025 Apple Shifts iPhone Production to India as Exports to US Surge 76% in April 2025 Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote