Armaan Malik, YouTuber, and former Bigg Boss OTT contestant, along with his two wives, have been summoned by the Patiala court in a domestic violence case alleging polygamy and violation of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Emergence of Legal Scrutiny

Armaan Malik and his wives, Payal Malik and Kritika Malik, have been officially summoned by the District Court of Patiala. The summons, issued on 13th August 2025, relates to alleged violations of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and claims of domestic violence.

The complaint was filed by Davinder Raj Rajput, brother of Payal Malik, alleging that Armaan Malik married multiple times and practiced domestic cruelty. All three parties are required to appear in court in response to these charges.

Lawsuit and Hindu Marriage Act Complications

The petition highlights alleged breaches of the Hindu Marriage Act, which prohibits polygamy. Armaan Malik is reported to have married four times, which could render subsequent marriages legally invalid.

Additionally, the petition mentions that Armaan Malik’s public content, portraying himself and Payal as Hindu deities, may have offended religious sentiments, potentially invoking sections of the Indian Penal Code related to hurting religious feelings.

Legal Implications of Marital History

Public reports outline Armaan Malik’s marital timeline:

• First marriage: At age 17, to Sumitra.

• Second marriage: To Payal Malik in 2011 (son named Chirayu).

• Third marriage: To Kritika Malik in 2018, reported to be Payal’s best friend and co-parent in the household.

Under the Hindu Marriage Act, the first marriage is considered legal, while subsequent marriages may be invalid. Additional legal complications may include voidable or unauthorized unions.

Social and Legal Consequences

The case has sparked widespread debate, particularly regarding the personal life of influencers showcased publicly on platforms like YouTube. Critics argue that such portrayals can mislead audiences about the legality of polygamous relationships in India.

This controversy also emphasizes the intersection of modern digital lifestyles with traditional Indian marriage laws and societal norms.

Future Legal Proceedings

Armaan Malik and his wives must appear in the Patiala court on 2nd September 2025. Potential legal consequences include:

• Invalid marriages under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

• Punishment for bigamy, as per Sections 17 HMA, 494, and 495 IPC, including imprisonment or fines.

• Charges for insulting religious feelings, under applicable IPC provisions.

Relevance in Modern Legal and Social Life

This case highlights the tension between personal lifestyle choices shared publicly and India’s personal laws. The outcome may set a precedent for how social media influencers navigate legal frameworks regarding marriage, family, and societal morals.