AP High Court Grants Parole to Lifer for Son’s Wedding in Exceptional Case Citing Rule 27
Trending Today AP High Court Grants Parole to Lifer for Son’s Wedding in Exceptional Case Citing Rule 27 ED Arrests Gujarat Samachar Owner Bahubali Shah: Political Uproar as Congress, AAP Accuse BJP of Silencing Media Rajnath Singh Urges IMF to Reconsider $1 Billion Pakistan Loan Over Terror Funding Allegations Electricity Reaches 17 Remote Naxal-Affected Villages in Chhattisgarh for the First Time Supreme Court Slams Telangana Over Kancha Gachibowli Deforestation, Threatens Contempt Action Supreme Court Legal Aid Campaign Empowers 3,800 Inmates in Landmark Justice Initiative Madhya Pradesh High Court Slams Police Over Flawed FIR in Minister Vijay Shah–Col. Sofiya Qureshi Hate Speech Case IAEA Confirms No Radiation Leak at Pakistan’s Kirana Hills Amid India-Pakistan Tensions Precedential Value of Judgments: Does Bench Size or Majority Matter? A Case Study of Trimurthi Fragrances vs. Govt. of NCT Delhi Dhaka University Student Leader Fatally Stabbed After Concert Near Campus Entrance AP High Court Grants Parole to Lifer for Son’s Wedding in Exceptional Case Citing Rule 27 MAHI SINHA 16 May 2025 The Andhra Pradesh High Court allowed a lifer to attend his son’s wedding under exceptional circumstances, citing Rule 27 of the Suspension of Sentence on Parole Rules 2024. Learn about the unique legal reasoning and case details here. AP High Court Permits Lifer to Attend Son’s Wedding in Exceptional Circumstances In a noteworthy judgment, the Andhra Pradesh High Court granted parole to a life-term convict to attend his son’s wedding. This rare allowance was made despite the presence of a co-convict already on parole, which typically restricts such permissions under standard procedure. Background: Vennapusa Raghunath Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh The petitioner, Vennapusa Raghunath Reddy, son of lifer Vennapusa Gangadhar Reddy, approached the court seeking temporary parole for his father. The father was convicted and serving a life sentence. Although parole had already been granted, it was conditional upon the return of another parolee involved in the same case. The respondents cited concerns under Rule 27 of the Parole Rules (G.O. Ms. No.04, Home (Paroles & HRC) Department, dated 06.01.2025), which emphasize the prevention of law and order issues when multiple co-convicts are out on parole simultaneously. Parole Denial Due to Co-Convict Already on Parole On March 26, 2025, another co-convict, Vemireddy Bala Chinnareddy, was granted a 30-day parole, which was later extended by 15 days, expiring on May 14, 2025. Authorities argued that until his return, granting parole to another convict involved in the same offense could potentially disrupt peace and security. Court’s Interpretation of Rule 27 and Final Ruling A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice R. Raghunandan Rao evaluated the case under Rule 27 of the Suspension of Sentence on Parole Rules 2024. The bench observed that although the Rule requires the jail superintendent to ensure public safety, this case stood out due to its “exceptional” nature. Since the convict’s son was getting married on May 11, 2025, the court ruled that denying the parole would be unjust. It ordered the release of the lifer with proper police escort to attend the wedding on May 10 and May 11, 2025. Logistics and Final Orders by the Court The Kadapa Central Prison Superintendent was instructed to facilitate the convict’s travel with a police escort to the village where the wedding was scheduled. He was to be returned to prison by 5:00 PM on May 12, 2025. As a result, the writ appeal was officially dismissed, marking this as a significant case in the application of parole law in India. Conclusion: A Humanitarian Interpretation of Parole Law The ruling by the Andhra Pradesh High Court underscores the importance of judicial discretion and humanitarian considerations in the implementation of parole laws in India. While maintaining law and order is crucial, this exceptional case demonstrated how courts can balance security concerns with personal liberty and family values. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases AP High Court Grants Parole to Lifer for Son’s Wedding in Exceptional Case Citing Rule 27 AP High Court Grants Parole to Lifer for Son’s Wedding in Exceptional Case Citing Rule 27 Sada Law • May 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments ED Arrests Gujarat Samachar Owner Bahubali Shah: Political Uproar as Congress, AAP Accuse BJP of Silencing Media ED Arrests Gujarat Samachar Owner Bahubali Shah: Political Uproar as Congress, AAP Accuse BJP of Silencing Media Sada Law • May 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Rajnath Singh Urges IMF to Reconsider $1 Billion Pakistan Loan Over Terror Funding Allegations Rajnath Singh Urges IMF to Reconsider $1 Billion Pakistan Loan Over Terror Funding Allegations Sada Law • May 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »
