sadalawpublications.com

Supreme Court bail

Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case

Trending Today Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case PRABHAT KUMAR BITLORIA 25 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India declined urgent listing of Hany Babu’s plea in the Bhima Koregaon case, asking for clarification on bail rights after withdrawal from apex court. Explore the legal timeline and implications. Supreme Court Declines Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea On June 23, 2025, the Supreme Court of India refused to urgently list a bail clarification plea filed by Hany Babu, a former professor at Delhi University and an accused in the high-profile Bhima Koregaon case. Request for Clarification on Bail Rights The application sought clarification from the apex court on whether Babu could approach the Bombay High Court for bail, following the withdrawal of his petition from the Supreme Court. However, the bench comprising Justice KV Viswanathan and Justice NK Singh denied scheduling the matter during the court’s vacation session, stating it would be taken up after reopening. Counsel Cites Precedents and Delays Babu’s counsel highlighted that several co-accused in the case had been granted bail either on merit or due to prolonged custody. The defense argued that the urgency stemmed from the legal ambiguity following the withdrawal of the Special Leave Petition (SLP) earlier in May 2024. The Bombay High Court had, on May 2, 2025, directed Babu to seek clarification from the Supreme Court regarding his right to approach the High Court for bail, prompting the submission of this plea. Supreme Court Questions Delay in Filing Justice Viswanathan questioned why the plea had not been filed during regular working days between May 2 and May 23. “You needed to demonstrate a sense of urgency and submit your filing punctually,” he noted. The court emphasized that urgent listings are typically granted when filings reflect genuine immediacy. In response, Babu’s counsel attributed the delay to time taken in acquiring certified copies. Justice Viswanathan remarked that in urgent cases, listings have been allowed even without certified copies—a common practice known among legal professionals. Background: Arrest, Custody, and Legal Battle Hany Babu was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in July 2020 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), for his alleged links to Maoist groups. The Bombay High Court denied him bail in September 2022. In May 2024, Babu withdrew his SLP from the Supreme Court, citing changed circumstances and expressing his intent to seek bail through the High Court instead. High Court Demands Supreme Court Clarification Despite the withdrawal, the Bombay High Court ruled that the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw the plea did not inherently preserve his right to seek bail again. Consequently, Babu was required to obtain formal clarification from the Supreme Court to proceed. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Read More »

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case

Trending Today Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case Akshay Kumar Sues Paresh Rawal for ₹25 Crore Over Hera Pheri 3 Exit Enforceability of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Supreme Court’s Landmark 2023 Ruling Explained Banke Bihari Temple Devotee Petitions Supreme Court Against UP Govt’s Corridor Redevelopment Plan Supreme Court Rules Juvenile Justice Board Cannot Review Its Own Decisions Under JJ Act Supreme Court Declares Kuldeep Kumar Rightful Chandigarh Mayor After Electoral Malpractice Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Over Withheld Rs 2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Linked to NEP Non-Implementation Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation Supreme Court Ruling on Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Cases: Shajan Skaria vs State of Kerala (2024) Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 21 May 2025 The Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail to former IAS probationer Puja Khedkar in the UPSC cheating case involving allegations of OBC and disability quota misuse. Read the detailed timeline and court observations here. Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India on Wednesday granted anticipatory bail to former IAS probationer Puja Khedkar in connection with the high-profile UPSC cheating case. The allegations include misusing OBC reservation and disability quota benefits during the 2022 civil services examination. Supreme Court Defends Bail: “She Is Not a Terrorist or Drug Lord” During the hearing, a bench comprising Justices B. V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma highlighted that Khedkar is not accused of any violent crimes such as murder (Section 302 IPC) or offenses under the NDPS Act. The court emphasized, “She has lost everything and will not get a job anywhere,” suggesting that the punishment has, in many ways, already been delivered. Delhi Police Opposes Bail, Citing Non-Cooperation Despite the bail grant, the Delhi Police opposed the move, arguing that Khedkar was not cooperating with the investigation and that the charges were of a serious nature. However, the Supreme Court concluded that the Delhi High Court should have granted her bail earlier, considering the facts of the case. Allegations Against Puja Khedkar: Forgery and Quota Fraud Khedkar allegedly submitted false documents to avail herself of reservation benefits in the 2022 UPSC exam. A written complaint by the Union Public Service Commission in July 2024 led to formal charges of cheating, forgery, and violations under the IT Act and the Disability Act. Khedkar has denied all allegations made against her. Supreme Court’s Conditions and Crime Branch Interrogation On April 21, the Supreme Court directed Khedkar to appear before the Crime Branch on May 2 for questioning. The bench also instructed law enforcement to refrain from any coercive action. During her appearance at the Kamla Market office, she was interrogated for over eight hours, during which she answered several rounds of questioning and was asked to produce specific documents. Investigation Focus: Fake Disability Certificates According to Additional Solicitor General S. V. Raju, the investigation aims to uncover the network of individuals who may have assisted Khedkar in acquiring fake disability certificates. Authorities believe that custodial interrogation could help reveal further leads in the quota misuse scam. Conclusion: A Case That Raises Questions About Reservation Misuse The anticipatory bail granted to Puja Khedkar marks a critical moment in the ongoing investigation into alleged misuse of the reservation system in India. While the courts have offered her interim relief, the case continues to spotlight the need for stricter verification and systemic checks in competitive examinations like the UPSC Civil Services Exam. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case Sada Law • May 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Akshay Kumar Sues Paresh Rawal for ₹25 Crore Over Hera Pheri 3 Exit Akshay Kumar Sues Paresh Rawal for ₹25 Crore Over Hera Pheri 3 Exit Sada Law • May 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case Read More »

Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation

Trending Today Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Over Withheld Rs 2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Linked to NEP Non-Implementation Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation Supreme Court Ruling on Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Cases: Shajan Skaria vs State of Kerala (2024) Supreme Court Mandates Three Years of Legal Practice for Judicial Service Eligibility Kerala High Court Questions Withholding of 10th Grade Results in Shahabas Murder Case Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Sanitation Worker, Shifts Burden of Proof to Employer After Testimony Punjab and Haryana High Court rejects PIL Seeking ‘Martyr’ Status for Pahalgam Terror Attack Victims Supreme Court on Modification of Arbitral Awards Under Sections 34 and 37: Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Explained Supreme Court Rules Only Vaishnav Sampradaya Members Can Be Receivers of Mathura Temples Rajasthan High Court Flags Lack of Law for Coaching Centers Amid Surge in Student Suicides in Kota Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 21 May 2025 The Supreme Court grants interim bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad in connection with his controversial social media posts on Operation Sindoor. A Special Investigation Team is also established to probe the case. Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad in Operation Sindoor Case The Supreme Court of India has granted temporary bail to Ali Khan Mahmudabad, a professor at Ashoka University, in a case involving controversial social media posts about Operation Sindoor. Mahmudabad had been in police custody since his arrest on May 18, 2025, following an FIR lodged by the Haryana Police. Special Investigation Team (SIT) Ordered by Supreme Court While granting bail, the Court refused to stop the investigation. Instead, it directed the Haryana Director General of Police to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) within 24 hours. The SIT must consist of senior Indian Police Service officers from outside Haryana and Delhi, with one female officer included. The team will be led by an Inspector General (IG) rank officer, supported by two Superintendent of Police (SP) rank officers. Restrictions Imposed as Part of Interim Bail As a condition of interim bail, Mahmudabad is prohibited from posting or publishing any content related to the case or commenting on terrorist attacks or India’s counter-terror operations. He is also required to cooperate fully with the SIT during the investigation. The bench, comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice NK Singh, emphasized that the interim bail is intended to facilitate further inquiry. Kapil Sibal Advocates for Mahmudabad, FIRs and Free Speech Debated Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Mahmudabad, urged the court to prevent any further FIRs on the same issue. Justice Kant orally advised the State of Haryana to avoid duplicating cases but permitted the state to investigate new findings if any. Sibal presented Mahmudabad’s posts from Instagram and Facebook, calling them “patriotic.” However, Justice Kant questioned the timing and tone of the remarks, especially references to right-wing commentators, mob lynching, and the praise of Colonel Sofiya Qureshi. Justice Kant on Language, Intent, and Responsibility Justice Kant pointed out that while freedom of speech is protected, Mahmudabad’s wording suggested “dog-whistling”—a term used to describe coded language that signals controversial views to a specific audience. He advised the professor to use neutral and respectful language that doesn’t provoke or offend. Justice Kant added, “A learned professor cannot be without words from the dictionary. He should express ideas clearly and respectfully, without causing harm to others’ sentiments.” Sibal maintained that the comments lacked criminal intent and concluded with the patriotic phrase “Jai Hind.” He also shared that Mahmudabad’s wife is nine months pregnant and due to deliver soon, as a reason for humanitarian consideration. State’s Position and Ongoing Judicial Process Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, representing the State, argued that the remarks were not as benign as suggested and may have offended female army officers. Justice Kant acknowledged that some terms used could carry dual meanings and warranted investigation. Mahmudabad was earlier placed in judicial custody by a Sonepat municipal court. The police’s request for a seven-day remand was denied, and he was instead held for two days starting May 18. Charges Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Mahmudabad faces charges under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including: Section 196: Acts undermining communal harmony Section 152: Statements that incite public discord Other sections: Actions that threaten national sovereignty and insult a woman’s modesty The Haryana State Commission for Women, chaired by Renu Bhatia, has also issued a notice to the professor. Conclusion: A Case at the Crossroads of Free Speech and National Security The temporary bail of Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad by the Supreme Court highlights the delicate balance between protecting freedom of expression and safeguarding national security. While the Court has upheld Mahmudabad’s right to due process, it has also emphasized responsible communication, especially in sensitive times following events like Operation Sindoor. As the newly formed Special Investigation Team (SIT) undertakes a thorough examination, the case will likely serve as a precedent in discussions surrounding digital speech, academic responsibility, and patriotic expression in India. The coming weeks will be critical in determining the legal and social ramifications of this high-profile case. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Over Withheld Rs 2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Linked to NEP Non-Implementation Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Over Withheld Rs 2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Linked to NEP Non-Implementation Sada Law • May 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation Sada Law • May 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Mandates

Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation Read More »