student examination rights

Trending Today Kerala High Court Questions Withholding of 10th Grade Results in Shahabas Murder Case Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Sanitation Worker, Shifts Burden of Proof to Employer After Testimony Punjab and Haryana High Court rejects PIL Seeking ‘Martyr’ Status for Pahalgam Terror Attack Victims Supreme Court on Modification of Arbitral Awards Under Sections 34 and 37: Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Explained Supreme Court Rules Only Vaishnav Sampradaya Members Can Be Receivers of Mathura Temples Rajasthan High Court Flags Lack of Law for Coaching Centers Amid Surge in Student Suicides in Kota Punjab & Haryana High Court Warns Litigant Over Contemptuous Remarks Against Judges in Maya Devi Will Case Allahabad High Court Upholds Survey Order in Sambhal Masjid Case, Says Hindu Plaintiffs’ Suit Is Maintainable Karnataka High Court Declares Power Subsidy Denial to Farmer Societies Unconstitutional, Upholds Cooperative Farming Rights India Imposes Import Restrictions on Bangladeshi Goods Through Northeast Checkpoints Kerala High Court Questions Withholding of 10th Grade Results in Shahabas Murder Case MAHI SINHA 20 May 2025 The Kerala High Court raises strong concerns over the delayed 10th-grade results of students accused in the Shahabas murder case. Explore the legal and ethical issues surrounding child rights, education access, and criminal law reform. Kerala High Court Demands Clarity on Withholding 10th Grade Results in Shahabas Murder Case On May 20, 2025, the Kerala High Court questioned the State on why the 10th-grade exam results of students allegedly involved in the murder of 15-year-old Shahabas had not been released. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas raised critical concerns over the delay, emphasizing that academic results should not be withheld due to criminal allegations. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas: “If They Wrote the Exam, the Results Must Be Published” During the hearing of the case, XX v State of Kerala, Justice Thomas orally stated, “The results must be published if they have written the examination.” The Court drew a clear line between the criminal investigation and the students’ right to education, a fundamental child right protected by the Child Rights Commission. Details of the Shahabas Murder Case The incident involves five students accused of planning and executing an assault on fellow student Shahabas, allegedly resulting in his death from a skull fracture. The group reportedly used WhatsApp and Instagram to coordinate the attack. Child Rights Commission’s Role and Government’s Response Despite a directive from the Child Rights Commission, the students’ academic results were withheld. Advocate K. M. Firoz, representing one of the minors, informed the court that the government dismissed the directive as a mere suggestion. Impact on Plus-One Admission Process The urgency of releasing the results was underscored by the fact that the single-window portal for Plus-One admissions was closing the same day. The delay in publishing the results could jeopardize the students’ future academic prospects. Criminal Law Reform and Juvenile Rights in Focus The Kerala High Court reminded the State that reformation is the cornerstone of criminal jurisprudence. Preventing a minor who has taken an exam from receiving results contradicts this principle. The Court emphasized that administrative authorities could face consequences for any intentional delay. Bail Hearings and Further Legal Action The current proceedings are linked to an application challenging the denial of bail for the accused minors. The Court advised that the appropriate legal path would be to challenge the government’s noncompliance with the Commission’s orders directly in the High Court. A decision on the bail request is expected in the next session. Conclusion: Balancing Justice and Education in Juvenile Cases The ongoing Shahabas murder case raises significant concerns at the intersection of criminal law, child rights, and educational access. As the Kerala High Court emphasized, the right to education must not be overshadowed by ongoing legal proceedings—especially in the case of minors. With critical deadlines like Plus-One admissions at stake, ensuring timely publication of exam results is not just a procedural necessity but a constitutional obligation. This case may well set a precedent for how India’s legal system handles similar instances involving juvenile offenders and their fundamental rights. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Questions Withholding of 10th Grade Results in Shahabas Murder Case Kerala High Court Questions Withholding of 10th Grade Results in Shahabas Murder Case Sada Law • May 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Sanitation Worker, Shifts Burden of Proof to Employer After Testimony Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Sanitation Worker, Shifts Burden of Proof to Employer After Testimony Sada Law • May 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Punjab and Haryana High Court rejects PIL Seeking ‘Martyr’ Status for Pahalgam Terror Attack Victims Punjab and Haryana High Court rejects PIL Seeking ‘Martyr’ Status for Pahalgam Terror Attack Victims Sada Law • May 20, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »