sadalawpublications.com

Nitish Kumar

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam: Political Fallout and Fight Against Corruption

Trending Today Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam: Political Fallout and Fight Against Corruption INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT INTERVENOR LEGAL SOLUTIONS, NEW DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HEMVATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL UNIVERSITY, UTTARAKHAND LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HEAD DIGITAL WORKS, DELHI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VOYAGER CAPITAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU DELHI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DR. RAM MANOHAR LOHIYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, LUCKNOW INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE & POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, BHOPAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LEGALNEST PROFESSIONAL ADVISORY LLP, MUMBAI Supreme Court Rules Weapon Recovery Alone Insufficient for Murder Conviction Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam: Political Fallout and Fight Against Corruption KASHISH JAHAN 30 June 2025 The Supreme Court has ordered a CBI investigation into a ₹3,200 crore foodgrain scam in Bihar, exposing massive corruption in the PDS system. This landmark move could reshape welfare delivery and political accountability in India. Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam In a landmark decision on 26 June 2025, the Supreme Court of India ordered a court-monitored probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into a multi-crore foodgrain distribution scam in Bihar. Estimated at over ₹3,200 crore, the scam has exposed deep-rooted corruption within the Public Distribution System (PDS), which is intended to supply subsidized food to millions of families below the poverty line. Bench Slams Bihar Government Over Systemic Corruption A bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Manoj Misra criticized the Bihar government’s failure to prevent massive leakages. The court was responding to a batch of PILs submitted by whistleblowers and social activists, who revealed how foodgrains meant for poor households were allegedly siphoned off by a nexus of corrupt officials, middlemen, and politicians. Scam Mechanics: Fake Ration Cards and Ghost Beneficiaries Petitioners presented shocking details: widespread use of fake ration cards, registration of ghost beneficiaries, and deliberate underreporting of foodgrain stocks. Independent investigations confirmed that many ration shops functioned only on paper, forcing poor families to either pay market rates or go hungry. Right to Food as a Constitutional Guarantee In a powerful statement, the court emphasized, “The right to food is an integral facet of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.” The bench noted the complete breakdown of Bihar’s internal vigilance mechanisms and stressed that only an independent, court-supervised probe could bring real accountability. Political Fallout: Nitish Kumar Government Under Fire The revelations have embarrassed the ruling coalition, led by Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, who has long touted success in welfare delivery. While his office has assured full cooperation with the CBI, the opposition has seized the moment, accusing the government of providing political cover for years of unchecked corruption. What Happens Next: Supreme Court’s Directive to the CBI The Supreme Court has directed the CBI to file an FIR within seven days and submit its first progress report within three months. The investigation will include officials from the Food and Civil Supplies Department, local supply officers, and any political figures involved. Notably, the CBI has been authorized to arrest and question suspects without prior state government approval. Call for Reform: Fixing the Welfare Delivery System This case has sparked nationwide discussions on the need for reform in welfare distribution. Experts argue that technology-driven solutions—such as Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT) and biometric authentication—are crucial to eliminate fraud and ensure benefits reach the intended recipients. Conclusion: A Turning Point for Accountability and Governance The Bihar foodgrain scam is more than a regional issue—it’s a test case for India’s commitment to transparency and good governance. The Supreme Court’s order offers a beacon of hope to the thousands of affected families, affirming that the justice system can still safeguard their rights when state mechanisms falter. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam: Political Fallout and Fight Against Corruption Sada Law • June 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Weapon Recovery Alone Insufficient for Murder Conviction Sada Law • June 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Karnataka High Court Dismisses Hate Speech Case Against Former CM Basavaraj Bommai Sada Law • June 28, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into ₹3,200 Crore Bihar Foodgrain Scam: Political Fallout and Fight Against Corruption Read More »

Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate

Trending Today Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case Akshay Kumar Sues Paresh Rawal for ₹25 Crore Over Hera Pheri 3 Exit Enforceability of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Supreme Court’s Landmark 2023 Ruling Explained Banke Bihari Temple Devotee Petitions Supreme Court Against UP Govt’s Corridor Redevelopment Plan Supreme Court Rules Juvenile Justice Board Cannot Review Its Own Decisions Under JJ Act Supreme Court Declares Kuldeep Kumar Rightful Chandigarh Mayor After Electoral Malpractice Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Over Withheld Rs 2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Linked to NEP Non-Implementation Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 22 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India has stayed criminal defamation proceedings against India Today Chairman Aroon Purie, citing violations of journalistic freedom during a televised debate on political developments in Bihar. Supreme Court Halts Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate In a major legal development, the Supreme Court of India has stayed criminal defamation proceedings initiated against Aroon Purie, Chairman of the India Today Group. The case stemmed from a televised news debate focused on political shifts in Bihar, aired in 2024. Purie Defends Journalistic Freedom Purie argued that the criminal defamation case was a direct violation of journalistic freedom, as guaranteed by the Constitution of India. He emphasized that the complaint lacked specific allegations or defamatory imputations against him. Supreme Court Bench Grants Stay on May 19 The stay order was granted by a bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan. The decision came after an appeal challenged the Patna High Court‘s March 24 ruling, which had upheld the summoning order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patna. Legal Representation and Arguments Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra, assisted by Hrishikesh Baruah, represented Purie. They contended that the legal action lacked merit, asserting that Purie was unfairly implicated without direct involvement or jurisdictional basis. Defamation Linked to Janata Dal (United) Debate The defamation case was triggered by a 2024 televised debate discussing internal developments within the Janata Dal (United) party. The broadcast included speculation on leadership changes involving Nitish Kumar, Tejashwi Yadav, Lalu Prasad Yadav, and Lallan Singh. The conversation revolved around whether the unfolding events were a political revolt or strategic repositioning. Concerns About Selective Targeting of Media Criticism arose as the defamation complaint was filed only against India Today and its editorial leadership, while other media outlets like ABP News and The Hindu aired similar content. This raised concerns about selective targeting and unequal treatment of media platforms. Procedural Irregularities and Legal Errors The petitioner’s legal team highlighted significant procedural lapses: No investigation under Section 202 CrPC despite jurisdictional limitations. Examination conducted primarily by the complainant’s lawyer, not the magistrate, violating Section 200 CrPC. Purie was charged under conflicting accused numbers and a nonexistent provision, Section 500A IPC, showcasing judicial oversight. Supreme Court Recognizes Flaws and Grants Relief Acknowledging the procedural violations and legal irregularities, the Supreme Court granted a stay on all further proceedings against Aroon Purie. This decision is seen as a strong reaffirmation of press freedom and due process. India Today’s Legal Representation Nasser Kabir, Group General Counsel for India Today, also appeared in the case, further emphasizing the media house’s stance against the selective and flawed legal targeting. Conclusion: A Landmark Moment for Press Freedom in India The Supreme Court’s intervention in staying the criminal defamation case against Aroon Purie marks a pivotal moment in safeguarding journalistic freedom in India. The case highlights the growing concerns over the misuse of defamation laws to silence media voices and reinforces the judiciary’s role in upholding constitutional rights. As debates around political developments and press accountability continue, this decision serves as a strong reminder that a free press is vital to a functioning democracy. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Read More »