M Chinnaswamy Stadium tragedy

Trending Today High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PS LAW ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ULTRATECH CEMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT POOJA ENTERTAINMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IKIGAI LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMM LAW OFFICES High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 12 June 2025 The Karnataka High Court is set to decide on the CID’s custody request for RCB and DNA Entertainment executives involved in the tragic Bengaluru stadium stampede that claimed 11 lives. Stay updated on this critical case and legal developments. High Court to Rule on CID Custody in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case On June 11, 2025, the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) produced four accused individuals before the magistrate in connection with the deadly stampede outside M. Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru, which resulted in 11 tragic deaths and several injuries. Key Accused Include RCB and DNA Entertainment Executives The individuals presented were: – Nikhil Sosale – Head of Marketing for Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB)– Sunil Mathew – Director and Vice-President at DNA Entertainment Networks Pvt Ltd– Kiran Kumar – Event Manager at DNA– Shamanth SP – Ticketing Official They were presented before the 1st Additional Sessions Judge as the CID sought nine days of custody for thorough investigation. Defense Pushes Back Against Custody Plea The legal defense strongly opposed the CID’s request. Advocate Sandesh Chowta filed a plea in the Karnataka High Court, requesting a stay on the custody until the court delivers its verdict. “What is the urgency to take custody so immediately?” Chowta questioned during the hearing in the magistrate court. Magistrate Court Awaits High Court Verdict The magistrate chose to postpone the decision until the High Court delivers its ruling. The bench, headed by Justice Krishna Kumar, questioned the urgency of CID’s request, emphasizing the pending nature of the arrest challenge. ASP Jagadeesh Seeks Legal Advice When questioned about the urgency, Assistant Superintendent of Police Jagadeesh cited the need for custodial interrogation. He later consulted with the Advocate General (AG) and requested a short adjournment, which was granted. No Immediate Custody: Accused Sent Back to Prison Following the adjournment, ASP Jagadeesh confirmed that no custody request would be made until the High Court’s final verdict. As a result, the accused were returned to Parappana Agrahara Central Prison. Next Hearing to Determine CID Custody The High Court is now tasked with the final decision on the CID custody request. It will continue to hear petitions from the accused associated with RCB and DNA Entertainment Networks in the coming session. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case Sada Law • June 12, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy Sada Law • June 12, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »