lawyer-client privilege

Trending Today ED Summons Top Lawyers: Legal Privilege vs. Corporate Accountability Debate Erupts Punjab & Haryana High Court Warns Against Misusing PILs to Bypass Legal Remedies DGCA Issues Warning to Air India Over Pilot Fatigue Violations on International Flights Nagpur Police Launch Legally-Backed ‘Operation Thunder’ to Seize Drug Mafia Assets Supreme Court Halts Madras HC Order to Demolish Temple in Madurai Apartment Complex ED Bans Summons to Advocates Under New Law; Director’s Nod Needed for Exceptions Amid CHIL ESOP Probe CALL FOR MEMBERS BY DELHI JUDICIAL REFORMS COUNCIL LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT EKLAVYA INDIA FOUNDATION LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SK SAPRA & CO., NOIDA LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LEGAL SAVVY ED Summons Top Lawyers: Legal Privilege vs. Corporate Accountability Debate Erupts KASHISH JAHAN 23 June 2025 The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has issued summons to prominent Indian legal figures, including Arvind Datar and former Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, in relation to ongoing investigations into high-value corporate transactions. This move has ignited a heated debate across India’s legal community, raising concerns over potential breaches of professional legal privilege. Bar Associations Condemn Summons Over Client Confidentiality Leading legal bodies such as the Supreme Court Bar Association have strongly criticized the ED’s action. They argue that forcing advocates to disclose sensitive communications with clients undermines the principle of legal confidentiality— a right protected under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. The legal fraternity emphasizes that such privileges form the backbone of a trustworthy legal system, allowing clients to seek counsel without fear of exposure. ED Defends Action: Accountability Over Absolute Privilege Defending the summons, a senior ED official stated:“Legal advice cannot become a shield for decisions that might violate the spirit of the law. There is a duty to uphold corporate integrity.” This statement signals the ED’s intent to ensure that the sanctity of corporate law is not misused under the guise of legal counsel. It raises a critical question: how can regulatory bodies hold corporations accountable while still respecting the sanctity of lawyer-client privilege? Constitutional Angle: Article 19(1)(g) and Public Interest Under Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution, every citizen has the right to practice any profession. However, this right is not absolute. It is subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest of the general public, especially when national financial systems and corporate transparency are at stake. The ED’s bold move marks a potential shift in how legal and corporate sectors intersect. The focus now lies in navigating the fine balance between upholding legal privilege and enforcing lawful corporate accountability. Conclusion: A Defining Moment for India’s Legal System This development represents more than a legal clash—it’s a constitutional crossroad. As scrutiny over corporate conduct intensifies, it will be crucial for India’s legal system to evolve safeguards that protect both public interest and professional confidentiality. The coming months may well determine how India redefines the limits of legal privilege in the age of increasing regulatory oversight. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases ED Summons Top Lawyers: Legal Privilege vs. Corporate Accountability Debate Erupts Sada Law • June 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Punjab & Haryana High Court Warns Against Misusing PILs to Bypass Legal Remedies Sada Law • June 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments DGCA Issues Warning to Air India Over Pilot Fatigue Violations on International Flights Sada Law • June 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »