Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law
Trending Today Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case Akshay Kumar Sues Paresh Rawal for ₹25 Crore Over Hera Pheri 3 Exit Enforceability of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Supreme Court’s Landmark 2023 Ruling Explained Banke Bihari Temple Devotee Petitions Supreme Court Against UP Govt’s Corridor Redevelopment Plan Supreme Court Rules Juvenile Justice Board Cannot Review Its Own Decisions Under JJ Act Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 22 May 2025 The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 377 case against a husband, reaffirming that Indian law does not currently recognize the concept of marital rape. Read more on this significant legal development and its implications. Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case Against Husband In a major legal development, the Delhi High Court recently quashed a trial court’s decision to prosecute a man under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), citing that Indian law does not recognize the concept of marital rape. Case Background: Allegations of Unnatural Offence in Marriage The case involved a plea filed by the husband challenging the framing of charges under Section 377, which penalizes “unnatural offences.” The trial court had directed prosecution for allegedly engaging in oral sex with his wife. The matter was presided over by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma. Court’s Observation on Consent and Marital Rights The court clarified that the wife had not explicitly stated whether the act occurred without her consent. Citing Section 375 of IPC (as amended), which presumes implied consent for sexual activity in a marital relationship, the court emphasized that there is no legal basis for criminalizing such acts within marriage under Section 377. Impact of the Navtej Singh Johar Judgment Referring to the landmark Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case, which decriminalized consensual same-sex relations, the court stated that a key element of proving an offence under Section 377 is the absence of consent. Since consent was neither denied nor explicitly withdrawn in this case, the court ruled that no prima facie case existed. Interpretation of Section 377 in Marital Context The judge highlighted that Section 377 cannot be invoked to criminalize non-penile-vaginal intercourse, such as oral or anal sex, within a legally recognized marriage. This interpretation aligns with the reasoning laid out in the Navtej Singh Johar verdict. Contradictory Claims and Legal Arguments The wife had accused the husband of being “impotent” while simultaneously alleging that he engaged in oral sex, presenting a contradiction in her claims. The husband argued that their marriage was valid under Indian law and that consent was inherently presumed, protecting him from prosecution under Section 377. Legal Conclusion and Dismissal of Charges Ultimately, the High Court found no solid grounds to proceed with charges under Section 377. The judgment reaffirmed that legal protection is granted to husbands under the exception to rape laws in India, and that consensual acts within marriage cannot be criminalized under this section. Conclusion: Legal Protection Gaps Reflect India’s Backwardness on Marital Rape While the dismissal of the Section 377 case by the Delhi High Court was consistent with current legal standards, it highlights a deeper issue: the lack of legal recognition for marital rape in India. Unlike many progressive legal systems around the world, India continues to shield husbands from prosecution under outdated exceptions in its rape laws, particularly Section 375 of the IPC. This case reinforces the urgent need for legislative reform. Without acknowledging marital rape as a criminal offense, India remains behind in protecting the fundamental rights and bodily autonomy of married women. As legal and social discourse around consent continues to evolve globally, it is imperative for India to modernize its laws to ensure equal protection for all individuals—regardless of marital status. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »