sadalawpublications.com

Haryana Police FIR

Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles

Trending Today Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age Delhi High Court Rejects PIL Over Illegal Construction Near Mehrauli Gurdwara, Cites Lack of Locus Standi Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Regularize Court Managers as Permanent Staff Delhi High Court Urges Swift COVID-19 Testing Guidelines to Tackle Infection Surge Supreme Court Clarifies Section 102(3) CrPC: Delay in Reporting Seizure Does Not Invalidate It – Shento Varghese v. Julfikar Husen (2024) Supreme Court Rules Bail Cancellation Requires Just Cause, Protects Personal Liberty Supreme Court Issues Notice on Son’s Plea Against Assam Police for Illegal Detention and Deportation to Bangladesh Woman Faces Criminal Charges for Concealing ₹10 Lakh in Divorce Settlement in Delhi NEET-PG 2025 Postponed: Supreme Court Directs Single-Shift Exam for Transparency and Fairness Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles KASHISH JAHAN 05 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India restricts the scope of the probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, safeguarding due process and reaffirming constitutional protections in criminal investigations. Supreme Court Restricts Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’: Safeguards Fair Investigation In a landmark move reinforcing judicial integrity, the Supreme Court of India has stepped in to protect the legal rights of Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, a renowned academic associated with Ashoka University. The decision comes amidst rising concerns over an expanding police investigation in Haryana under the controversial ‘Operation Sindoor’. Background: FIRs Against Professor Ali Spark Concerns The case began when the Haryana Police lodged two First Information Reports (FIRs) against Professor Ali, leading to the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT). However, legal experts and civil rights advocates raised alarm bells about the possibility of investigative overreach. Supreme Court’s Order: Probe Must Stay Within Legal Limits Recognizing the potential for misuse of authority, the Supreme Court directed that the SIT’s inquiry must remain strictly confined to the allegations detailed in the original FIRs. The Court explicitly warned against “fishing expeditions” or any broad, unauthorized investigations—emphasizing the protection of individual rights and due process. Legal Principle Reaffirmed: Limited Scope of Investigation This judicial intervention underscores a fundamental principle in Indian criminal law: the limited scope of investigation. The Court’s decision serves as a reminder that investigative agencies must adhere to the precise boundaries set by registered allegations and cannot exploit their power for open-ended pursuits. Why This Matters: Protecting Constitutional Rights The verdict carries significant weight in preserving constitutional safeguards. It ensures that law enforcement operates within the rule of law, and that accused individuals like Professor Ali are not subjected to arbitrary or politically motivated probes. Upholding fairness in investigation is not just a legal necessity—it is a cornerstone of a just democracy. Conclusion: A Victory for Rule of Law and Judicial Accountability By drawing clear boundaries for the SIT in ‘Operation Sindoor’, the Supreme Court has sent a strong message: criminal investigations must be legally justified, not politically driven. The ruling is a reaffirmation of India’s commitment to justice, transparency, and the protection of civil liberties—even in the face of high-profile controversies. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Rejects PIL Over Illegal Construction Near Mehrauli Gurdwara, Cites Lack of Locus Standi Delhi High Court Rejects PIL Over Illegal Construction Near Mehrauli Gurdwara, Cites Lack of Locus Standi Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Read More »

Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation

Trending Today Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Over Withheld Rs 2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Linked to NEP Non-Implementation Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation Supreme Court Ruling on Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Cases: Shajan Skaria vs State of Kerala (2024) Supreme Court Mandates Three Years of Legal Practice for Judicial Service Eligibility Kerala High Court Questions Withholding of 10th Grade Results in Shahabas Murder Case Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Sanitation Worker, Shifts Burden of Proof to Employer After Testimony Punjab and Haryana High Court rejects PIL Seeking ‘Martyr’ Status for Pahalgam Terror Attack Victims Supreme Court on Modification of Arbitral Awards Under Sections 34 and 37: Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Explained Supreme Court Rules Only Vaishnav Sampradaya Members Can Be Receivers of Mathura Temples Rajasthan High Court Flags Lack of Law for Coaching Centers Amid Surge in Student Suicides in Kota Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 21 May 2025 The Supreme Court grants interim bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad in connection with his controversial social media posts on Operation Sindoor. A Special Investigation Team is also established to probe the case. Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad in Operation Sindoor Case The Supreme Court of India has granted temporary bail to Ali Khan Mahmudabad, a professor at Ashoka University, in a case involving controversial social media posts about Operation Sindoor. Mahmudabad had been in police custody since his arrest on May 18, 2025, following an FIR lodged by the Haryana Police. Special Investigation Team (SIT) Ordered by Supreme Court While granting bail, the Court refused to stop the investigation. Instead, it directed the Haryana Director General of Police to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) within 24 hours. The SIT must consist of senior Indian Police Service officers from outside Haryana and Delhi, with one female officer included. The team will be led by an Inspector General (IG) rank officer, supported by two Superintendent of Police (SP) rank officers. Restrictions Imposed as Part of Interim Bail As a condition of interim bail, Mahmudabad is prohibited from posting or publishing any content related to the case or commenting on terrorist attacks or India’s counter-terror operations. He is also required to cooperate fully with the SIT during the investigation. The bench, comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice NK Singh, emphasized that the interim bail is intended to facilitate further inquiry. Kapil Sibal Advocates for Mahmudabad, FIRs and Free Speech Debated Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Mahmudabad, urged the court to prevent any further FIRs on the same issue. Justice Kant orally advised the State of Haryana to avoid duplicating cases but permitted the state to investigate new findings if any. Sibal presented Mahmudabad’s posts from Instagram and Facebook, calling them “patriotic.” However, Justice Kant questioned the timing and tone of the remarks, especially references to right-wing commentators, mob lynching, and the praise of Colonel Sofiya Qureshi. Justice Kant on Language, Intent, and Responsibility Justice Kant pointed out that while freedom of speech is protected, Mahmudabad’s wording suggested “dog-whistling”—a term used to describe coded language that signals controversial views to a specific audience. He advised the professor to use neutral and respectful language that doesn’t provoke or offend. Justice Kant added, “A learned professor cannot be without words from the dictionary. He should express ideas clearly and respectfully, without causing harm to others’ sentiments.” Sibal maintained that the comments lacked criminal intent and concluded with the patriotic phrase “Jai Hind.” He also shared that Mahmudabad’s wife is nine months pregnant and due to deliver soon, as a reason for humanitarian consideration. State’s Position and Ongoing Judicial Process Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, representing the State, argued that the remarks were not as benign as suggested and may have offended female army officers. Justice Kant acknowledged that some terms used could carry dual meanings and warranted investigation. Mahmudabad was earlier placed in judicial custody by a Sonepat municipal court. The police’s request for a seven-day remand was denied, and he was instead held for two days starting May 18. Charges Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Mahmudabad faces charges under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including: Section 196: Acts undermining communal harmony Section 152: Statements that incite public discord Other sections: Actions that threaten national sovereignty and insult a woman’s modesty The Haryana State Commission for Women, chaired by Renu Bhatia, has also issued a notice to the professor. Conclusion: A Case at the Crossroads of Free Speech and National Security The temporary bail of Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad by the Supreme Court highlights the delicate balance between protecting freedom of expression and safeguarding national security. While the Court has upheld Mahmudabad’s right to due process, it has also emphasized responsible communication, especially in sensitive times following events like Operation Sindoor. As the newly formed Special Investigation Team (SIT) undertakes a thorough examination, the case will likely serve as a precedent in discussions surrounding digital speech, academic responsibility, and patriotic expression in India. The coming weeks will be critical in determining the legal and social ramifications of this high-profile case. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Over Withheld Rs 2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Linked to NEP Non-Implementation Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Over Withheld Rs 2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Linked to NEP Non-Implementation Sada Law • May 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation Sada Law • May 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Mandates

Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad Amid Operation Sindoor Post Controversy; SIT Formed for Investigation Read More »