sadalawpublications.com

Aishwarya Bhati

Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review

Trending Today Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KKR INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LEGAL SAVVY FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME BY UNITED UNIVERSITY Apple Shifts iPhone Production to India as Exports to US Surge 76% in April 2025 India’s Victory in Operation Sindoor Undermined by Diplomatic Delay: Brahma Chellaney LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT INDUSLAW JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRIVEDI & PARASHAR JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LITIGATION WING OF THE INDIAN ARMY Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 30 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India has declined to reconsider the ₹229-crore Gateway of India jetty project, leaving the matter to the Bombay High Court. The project, facing opposition from local residents, continues amid debate over heritage preservation and urban infrastructure development. Supreme Court Declines to Reconsider ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project On May 28, 2025, the Supreme Court of India refused to entertain a plea challenging the construction of a ₹229-crore passenger jetty near Gateway of India, Mumbai. The bench, comprising Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice AG Masih, noted that the matter is already being addressed by the Bombay High Court and urged a swift resolution before the monsoon season ends. Opposition Cites Heritage and Public Consultation Concerns The petition was filed by the Clean and Heritage Colaba Residents Association, alongside individual petitioners, who expressed concerns about the potential damage to Mumbai’s iconic heritage seafront. They argued that the project was implemented without public consultation and accused authorities of prioritizing elite interests by including VIP lounges and parking for 150 vehicles. It was also alleged that the jetty would be used for private ferries and celebrity yachts. “Not In My Backyard” Syndrome Cited by the Court The Supreme Court referenced the “Not in My Backyard” (NIMBY) syndrome—a common reaction where individuals oppose infrastructure projects that affect them personally, despite broader public benefit. CJI BR Gavai highlighted similar cases of resistance to civic development, including urban transit and sewage treatment facilities, and underscored the necessity of developing coastal infrastructure. Arguments For and Against the Jetty Project Representing the petitioners, Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde argued that the jetty primarily serves a privileged segment of society and lacks transparency. He claimed that the project offers private docking access for those wishing to travel to Alibaug for leisure. Countering these claims, Aishwarya Bhati, the Additional Solicitor General representing the Maharashtra Government, emphasized that the jetty is a public infrastructure project aimed at improving daily commute options for citizens. She categorically dismissed allegations of exclusivity. Bombay High Court to Decide Before Monsoon Ends Although the Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of the case, it acknowledged the pending hearing in the Bombay High Court scheduled for June 16. The High Court had earlier declined to halt the piling work for the jetty and is now expected to deliver a verdict before the monsoon concludes. Conclusion: Balancing Urban Growth with Heritage Preservation The ₹229-crore Gateway of India jetty project highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing urban infrastructure development with the preservation of historic and cultural landmarks. While the project promises to improve connectivity and benefit daily commuters, it has sparked concern among local residents and heritage advocates. As the legal proceedings continue in the Bombay High Court, the case serves as a critical example of how civic planning must consider both public utility and community impact. The outcome may shape future approaches to coastal development projects across Mumbai and beyond. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest Supreme Court Stops Karnataka Government from Removing Sri Anjaneya Temple Head Priest Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Apple Shifts iPhone Production to India as Exports to US Surge 76% in April 2025 Apple Shifts iPhone Production to India as Exports to US Surge 76% in April 2025 Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against ₹229-Crore Gateway of India Jetty Project, Cites Ongoing Bombay HC Review Read More »

Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute

Trending Today Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment Supreme Court Verdict on Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India: Challenge to EC Appointment Process & Section 7(1) of 2023 Act Supreme Court Verdict on Article 370: Constitutionality of Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Upheld Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 24 May 2025 The Supreme Court has paused the discharge of a woman Indian Air Force officer who served in Operations Sindoor and Balakot after she was denied a Permanent Commission. This case highlights gender parity, comparative merit, and structural challenges in India’s Armed Forces. Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot A high-profile case involving a female officer of the Indian Air Force (IAF) has come under judicial scrutiny. The officer, who played a vital role in Operation Balakot and Operation Sindoor, has approached the Supreme Court of India challenging the denial of a Permanent Commission (PC). Judicial Bench Holds Up Release Pending Further Review The bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh temporarily withheld the officer’s release, clarifying that the stay would not offer undue advantage or set a precedent. Legal Representation by Renowned Advocate Representing the petitioner, Senior Advocate Dr. Menaka Guruswamy emphasized the officer’s critical expertise as a fighter controller in the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) during the operations. The officer, identified as Wing Commander Nikita Pandey, has served over 13.5 years and ranked second in the air fighter controller merit list. However, due to a 2019 policy, she is now facing forced discharge. Government’s Stand on Comparative Merit Union Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati defended the government’s decision, stating that the officer was found “incompetent” by a review board. However, she acknowledged a second board would reassess her case. When questioned, Justice Kant responded, “Let her continue for some time.” The ASG pointed to the military’s “steep pyramidal structure,” which necessitates the exit of some officers after 14 years to maintain a youthful force. Supreme Court Questions Inter-Se Merit Criteria Justice Kant expressed concerns about the reliance on “inter-se merit” to determine Permanent Commission eligibility. He suggested revising the Short Service Commission (SSC) recruitment strategy, recommending alignment with the number of PC openings to avoid unfair disqualification. “If you can accommodate 100 SSC officers for PC, you should allow that. Disqualification should not be based on comparative merit but genuine unsuitability,” he stated. Armed Forces Need Policy Reforms, Says Court The court also addressed the psychological and professional uncertainty faced by officers. Justice Kant praised the IAF, remarking, “They are the country. Their synchronization is unmatched, and we salute them for that.” He argued for transparency and fairness, suggesting that the promise of a PC after ten years should act as motivation rather than stress-inducing competition. ASG Bhati Shares Personal Insight into Military Challenges ASG Bhati, with personal ties to both the Air Force and the Army, compared the progression of military officers to the elevation of High Court judges to the Supreme Court. She emphasized that “functional youthfulness” remains a crucial criterion in military structures. Despite the rigid structure, she noted that many female officers are indeed receiving Permanent Commissions, and their performance has been commendable. Wider Impact of Supreme Court’s Temporary Relief The Supreme Court’s stay on the discharge of Wing Commander Pandey will also benefit other female officers currently contesting their PC denials. This order extends to cases pending in the Armed Forces Tribunals, High Courts, and the Supreme Court. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s intervention in Wing Commander Nikita Pandey’s case marks a critical step toward addressing gender bias and merit transparency in the Indian Armed Forces. The outcome could set a precedent for fairer Permanent Commission policies, ensuring deserving officers—regardless of gender—receive equal opportunities to serve long-term. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Read More »