Congress leader Rahul Gandhi faces legal action in a UP court over his controversial remarks calling Lord Rama a “mythological figure” during a US visit. Read about the charges, political reactions, and legal context.

Background of the Controversy

A criminal complaint has been filed against Rahul Gandhi, Congress leader and Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, for referring to Lord Rama as a “mythological figure” during an interactive session in the United States. The remark, made last month, has sparked outrage and legal action.

Complaint Filed in Varanasi Court

The case was filed by Advocate Hari Shankar Pandey before the ACJM (MP/MLA) Court in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. Pandey labeled Gandhi’s comment as “hateful” and “controversial,” accusing him of spreading misinformation and disrespect toward religious beliefs.

Allegations of Hate Speech and Insult to Sanatan Dharma

The complaint claims that Rahul Gandhi has repeatedly engaged in hate speech, particularly targeting followers of Sanatan Dharma. It alleges that he has made derogatory remarks about sacred symbols and avatars revered by Hindus.

Supreme Court’s Displeasure Over Savarkar Remarks

The lawsuit also cites recent observations made by the Supreme Court of India, expressing disapproval of Gandhi’s past comments on Veer Savarkar, a revered freedom fighter and ideologue. The court had previously criticized Gandhi and the Congress party for their repeated attacks on Hindu sentiments.

Ongoing Pattern of Controversial Statements

According to the complaint, this is not an isolated incident. Gandhi and the Indian National Congress have been accused of making inflammatory remarks about Hindu traditions and figures on multiple occasions, contributing to communal disharmony.

Legal Charges Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Advocate Pandey has urged the court to take strict action against Rahul Gandhi under Sections 356, 351, 353, and 196 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). These sections pertain to promoting enmity, assault, and public mischief, among others.

Conclusion

This legal battle adds to the series of controversies involving Rahul Gandhi’s remarks on religious and national icons. As the matter proceeds in court, it remains to be seen how it will impact the political landscape ahead of the upcoming elections.