sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Live cases

PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections Shristi Singh 30 September 2025 Introduction Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the National Urban Housing Mission 2.0 (NUHM 2.0) on Sunday, aiming to provide affordable housing solutions for India’s growing urban population. With a target of 30 million homes by 2030, the initiative is positioned as both a welfare policy and an economic booster ahead of the 2026 general elections. Background The mission builds on the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY-Urban), which began in 2015 with the goal of “Housing for All” by 2022. While it sanctioned nearly 12 million homes, execution challenges persisted, including funding gaps, delays, and land constraints. With urbanization projected to reach 40% by 2030, NUHM 2.0 represents a strategic expansion, integrating sustainability, technology, and private sector participation into the housing framework. Key Developments Target of 30 million homes by 2030 across metros, tier-2, and tier-3 towns. Expanded Credit-Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS): Cheaper home loans for middle-income groups. Green Housing: Energy-efficient designs, solar integration, and rainwater harvesting. PPP Model: Incentives for private developers to deliver low-cost urban housing. Digital Land Records: Nationwide digitization to streamline approvals and reduce disputes. Budget: Initial allocation of ₹1.5 lakh crore for the first five years, with special infrastructure funds for states. At the Vigyan Bhawan launch, PM Modi emphasized that housing provides not just shelter but “dignity, security, and empowerment.” Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman underlined the scheme’s role in stimulating economic growth while supporting social inclusion. Issues Land acquisition challenges in high-cost urban centers. Funding requirements: Analysts estimate total costs may exceed ₹10 lakh crore. Implementation bottlenecks: Past delays under PMAY fuel skepticism. Opposition criticism: Congress and others argue NUHM 2.0 risks becoming a political showcase without strong execution. Current Status The scheme has been officially launched, with immediate focus on state-level collaboration and private developer participation. Market reactions were positive, with housing sector stocks and cement companies gaining. Opposition parties, however, have demanded accountability on pending PMAY projects before new commitments are made. Conclusion NUHM 2.0 is more than just a housing program—it is a political, social, and economic statement ahead of 2026. If implemented effectively, it could address urban housing shortages, create jobs, stimulate multiple industries, and contribute to India’s climate commitments. However, success will depend on overcoming land, funding, and coordination hurdles. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections Read More »

MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teesta Setalvad: A Reaffirmation of Bail Jurisprudence MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Shivani Garg 30 September 2025 Introduction The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has firmly rejected remarks by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently pressed Russian President Vladimir Putin for clarity on the Ukraine conflict following steep U.S. tariffs on Indian goods. Claim by NATO Chief Rutte alleged that Modi reached out to Putin amid growing U.S. economic pressure, including a 50% tariff on Indian exports, suggesting that Washington’s measures were indirectly shaping Moscow’s calculations in Ukraine. He argued that such developments highlighted the effectiveness of economic sanctions and tariffs in altering geopolitical dynamics. India’s Rebuttal The MEA dismissed the NATO chief’s assertions as “factually incorrect and entirely baseless.” It clarified that no such demand was made by Modi in the manner described. The ministry further urged NATO’s leadership to act with “restraint and responsibility”, cau tioning against speculative comments that misrepresent India’s foreign policy engagements. Background & Context Modi and Putin last spoke on September 17, 2025, on the Prime Minister’s 75th birthday, with India reiterating its position that the conflict in Ukraine should be resolved peacefully through dialogue. India has consistently defended its independent foreign policy, balancing ties with Russia while maintaining strong partnerships with the United States and Europe. The U.S. recently imposed 50% tariffs on Indian exports, citing India’s sustained oil trade with Russia — a move seen as an attempt to exert indirect pressure on New Delhi’s strategic choices. Issues & Implications The episode underscores the growing use of trade and tariffs as tools of foreign policy. NATO’s claim risks straining perceptions of India’s diplomatic neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. India’s strong rebuttal signals its intent to safeguard strategic autonomy and avoid being drawn into competing Western or Russian narratives. Current Status India has not announced any new diplomatic engagement with Russia or NATO following the controversy. The MEA’s statement suggests that New Delhi remains committed to its balancing act — advocating peace in Ukraine, protecting its energy security, and resisting external pressures on its foreign policy decisions. Conclusion The MEA’s rebuttal highlights India’s sensitivity to suggestions that its diplomacy is driven by U.S. trade pressure. At a time when economic measures are increasingly deployed as instruments of global politics, New Delhi appears determined to assert its independence while managing complex ties with both Washington and Moscow. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Read More »

Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teesta Setalvad: A Reaffirmation of Bail Jurisprudence LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MANDLA AND SINGH LAW CHAMBERS Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Shristi Singh 30 September 2025 Introduction In a major development for India’s financial sector, the Government of India has appointed senior bureaucrat and economist Shirish Chandra Murmu as the new Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). His appointment, effective from October 9, 2025, comes just days before the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting, where crucial decisions on inflation and economic growth are expected. Background The Deputy Governor’s role at the RBI is of high strategic importance, overseeing areas such as monetary policy, banking supervision, and financial regulation. Murmu, a 1979-batch IAS officer from the Gujarat cadre, brings decades of administrative experience. He previously served as the first Lieutenant Governor of Jammu & Kashmir after Article 370’s abrogation, and as Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, where his financial oversight role was widely commended. Key Developments The Ministry of Finance vannounced Murmu’s appointment on September 29, 2025. He will replace Rajeshwar Rao, who retires on October 8 after guiding the RBI during the pandemic. Murmu’s portfolios within the RBI are yet to be finalized, but he is expected to handle financial supervision and internal regulation. His appointment precedes the MPC meeting scheduled from October 1–3, 2025, where interest rate decisions will be taken amid high inflation. Market reactions were positive, with the Sensex rising by 200 points, reflecting investor confidence in policy continuity. Issues Economic pressures: Inflation stood at 6.4% in August 2025, above RBI’s target range. Growth forecasts have dipped from 6.7% to 6.2%. Global volatility: Rising crude oil prices, a weakening rupee, and global financial uncertainty continue to weigh on India’s economy. RBI–government dynamics: Historically, tensions over autonomy have surfaced; Murmu’s administrative and political experience may help balance this relationship. Current Status Murmu officially assumes office on October 9, 2025 for a three-year term. His immediate challenge will be contributing to RBI’s inflation–growth balancing act in the upcoming MPC meeting. Experts suggest RBI may keep the repo rate unchanged at 6.5% while signaling caution in future moves. Conclusion Shirish Chandra Murmu’s appointment as Deputy Governor of the RBI signals the government’s intent to strengthen central bank leadership with experienced administrators. His mix of governance, fiscal oversight, and political sensitivity equips him to navigate India’s pressing economic challenges. As the RBI faces tough policy choices, Murmu’s role will be pivotal in shaping India’s financial stability and economic trajectory ahead of the 2026 general elections. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Read More »

Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teesta Setalvad: A Reaffirmation of Bail Jurisprudence LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MANDLA AND SINGH LAW CHAMBERS High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Shivani Garg 30 September 2025 Introduction The arrest of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk in September 2025 followed a violent turn in the ongoing Ladakh statehood movement. Long-standing demands for statehood and constitutional safeguards under the Sixth Schedule escalated into unrest in Leh, leaving casualties, property damage, and a deepening rift between the administration and local communities. The episode highlights the intersection of environmental activism, regional aspirations, and governance challenges in India’s newest Union Territory. Background Ladakh was carved out as a Union Territory in 2019 after the abrogation of Article 370. Local communities have since sought full statehood and inclusion under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides tribal regions with autonomy and protection of land, culture, and resources. Sonam Wangchuk, an internationally recognized climate activist and education reformer, became the prominent voice of this movement. On September 10, 2025, he launched a hunger strike to press for these demands, intensifying the agitation. Key Developments The protests had remained peaceful until September 24, 2025. Tensions escalated when two hunger strikers — an elderly man and a woman — were hospitalized. This inflamed anger among youth participants. Demonstrations in Leh turned violent: protesters clashed with security forces, torched a BJP office, damaged government property, and set fire to a paramilitary vehicle. Authorities resorted to tear gas and live firing to control the mob. Issues Whether Ladakh should be granted statehood and Sixth Schedule protections to address demands for autonomy, employment, and resource rights. The role of civil society leaders like Sonam Wangchuk in mobilizing protests versus allegations of incitement. Balancing regional aspirations with national security concerns in a strategically sensitive border territory. Current Status Four people were killed, and dozens (including civilians and police personnel) were injured. Authorities imposed curfews and tightened security in Leh and surrounding regions. On September 26, Wangchuk was arrested by Ladakh Police, accused of making provocative remarks that allegedly fueled the violence. The Union Government also cancelled the FCRA licence of Wangchuk’s NGO, SECMOL, blocking foreign funding. Wangchuk has rejected the allegations, calling his arrest a political move and warning that suppressing democratic voices may deepen unrest. Conclusion The unrest in Ladakh underscores unresolved questions about democratic representation, ecological sustainability, and development in the Union Territory. While the government frames the violence as law-and-order breakdown incited by Wangchuk, local voices see it as the culmination of broken promises and marginalization. The arrest has polarized opinion, raising concerns about the space for peaceful activism and the path ahead for Ladakh’s governance framework. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Read More »

High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Karnataka High Court Allows Caste Survey to Continue with Voluntary Participation and Data Confidentiality Supreme Court Highlights Lingering Colonial-Era Land Disputes in India CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Shristi Singh 26 September 2025 Introduction Recent rulings from the Delhi, Rajasthan, and Karnataka High Courts highlight the judiciary’s role in balancing individual rights, public safety, and state authority. These cases reflect the courts’ efforts to uphold justice while preventing misuse of legal processes. Background Delhi HC: Communal violence in Northeast Delhi (2020 riots) and subsequent murder charges. Rajasthan HC: Petitions seeking FIRs against PM Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah over the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Karnataka HC: State-led caste survey to collect socio-economic data amid privacy concerns. Key Developments Delhi HC: Denied bail to accused rioters citing severity of crime and risk to witnesses. Rajasthan HC: Dismissed petition for FIR against political leaders, emphasizing separation of powers. Karnataka HC: Allowed caste survey to continue with safeguards for voluntary participation and confidentiality. Issues Balancing public safety against personal liberty (Delhi HC). Preventing criminalization of governance decisions (Rajasthan HC). Ensuring privacy and preventing misuse of sensitive socio-economic data (Karnataka HC). Current Status Delhi HC: Accused remain in judicial custody pending trial. Rajasthan HC: Petition dismissed; FIR not registered. Karnataka HC: Survey ongoing under court-mandated privacy and consent safeguards. Conclusion These rulings collectively demonstrate the judiciary’s careful calibration of law, politics, and social equity. While contexts differ—communal violence, political accountability, and caste surveys—the courts consistently aim to prevent misuse of law and protect constitutional principles. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Read More »

Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Karnataka High Court Allows Caste Survey to Continue with Voluntary Participation and Data Confidentiality Supreme Court Highlights Lingering Colonial-Era Land Disputes in India CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA Shristi Singh 26 September 2025 Background The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) triggered nationwide protests, with critics alleging it discriminated against Muslims by fast-tracking citizenship for non-Muslim minorities from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh. Amid this political unrest, a petition was filed in the Rajasthan High Court seeking registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah for introducing and implementing the CAA. Court’s Findings The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the petition, labeling it “absurd and frivolous.” The bench emphasized that law-making and governance are constitutional functions, and introducing legislation in Parliament, debating it, and implementing it after enactment cannot be equated with criminal acts. The Court further noted that allowing an FIR in such circumstances would amount to misuse of criminal law for political purposes. It clarified that disagreements with laws should be addressed through constitutional remedies—including protests, petitions, or legal challenges—not through criminal complaints against political leaders. Decision The plea was dismissed outright, with the bench criticizing the petitioner for attempting to use the judicial process for political ends. Legal Significance Separation of powers reinforced: Parliament enacts laws; executive implements them; criminal law does not extend to legislative or governance acts. Prevention of judicial misuse: Ensures that FIRs are not weaponized for political vendettas. Guidance for citizens: Challenges to laws must follow constitutional avenues rather than criminalizing governance decisions. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA Read More »

India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Karnataka High Court Allows Caste Survey to Continue with Voluntary Participation and Data Confidentiality Supreme Court Highlights Lingering Colonial-Era Land Disputes in India CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Chennupati Kranthi Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Supreme Court Judgment (25 July 2023) India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Kashak Agarwala 26 September 2025 Introduction Senior international arbitrator Jimmy Yim has emphasized that India must adopt a unified and integrated strategy if it seeks to emerge as a leading global hub for arbitration. Speaking at a legal conference, Yim noted that while India has made significant progress in arbitration reforms, much more is required to reach international standards. Request for a Coordinated Arbitration Approach Yim highlighted that arbitration in India has grown phenomenally but remains fragmented. He urged for a coordinated framework that combines legislative reform, institutional development, judicial uniformity, and international collaboration to elevate India’s arbitration ecosystem. Significance of Legal and Institutional Systems While acknowledging reforms in India’s arbitration law, Yim pointed out that leading arbitration hubs such as Singapore, London, and Paris succeeded not merely through legislation but also via strong institutional support. He stressed that India must strengthen its arbitral institutions, ensure efficiency in procedures, and maintain transparency to enhance credibility. Judicial and Governmental Role Yim underscored the importance of judicial predictability and limited government interference in arbitration matters. A pro-arbitration judicial environment coupled with government support in infrastructure and policy facilitation, he said, would inspire confidence among global businesses to choose India as a seat of arbitration. Arbitrator Training and Development A major area of focus, according to Yim, is capacity building. He recommended specialized training for arbitrators, lawyers, and professionals, along with international exposure through exchange programs and dedicated arbitration schools. This, he argued, would equip India’s large legal talent pool to handle complex cross-border disputes. Requirement for Investor Confidence Yim stressed that investor trust is inseparable from dispute resolution efficiency. Businesses will only turn to India if arbitration here is prompt, impartial, and enforceable. He highlighted that the enforceability of arbitral awards and procedural consistency are key to boosting investor confidence. Relational Global Lessons Drawing parallels with Singapore and Hong Kong, Yim noted that their rise as arbitration centres was the result of strategic, integrated efforts involving reforms, government support, institutional credibility, and international promotion. India, with its cost advantages and deep legal talent base, could replicate such a model. A Roadmap for the Future Concluding his remarks, Yim called for a common roadmap that involves lawmakers, judiciary, arbitral institutions, government agencies, and practitioners. Only through collective efforts, he stressed, can India transform itself into a major international arbitration hub. Conclusion Jimmy Yim’s observations underline both India’s progress and its untapped potential in arbitration. By combining reforms with institutional support, capacity building, and investor-oriented measures, India could position itself as a competitive global arbitration destination. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Read More »

Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Karnataka High Court Allows Caste Survey to Continue with Voluntary Participation and Data Confidentiality Supreme Court Highlights Lingering Colonial-Era Land Disputes in India CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Chennupati Kranthi Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Supreme Court Judgment (25 July 2023) MD. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. – Supreme Court Judgment (31 July 2023) Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Kashak Agarwala 26 September 2025 Introduction The Delhi High Court has ordered the removal of allegedly defamatory social media posts and videos related to BJP leader Gaurav Bhatia’s television appearance on a News18 debate. Justice Amit Bansal ruled that if original uploaders fail to delete the content, intermediary platforms such as Google and X (formerly Twitter) must step in and ensure removal. Background of the Case The controversy began when a video clip of Gaurav Bhatia appearing on a News18 debate show hosted by Amish Devgan circulated online. In the clip, Bhatia appeared to be wearing a kurta without pyjamas or pants. Bhatia later clarified that he was wearing shorts, but argued that the content was deceptively presented and circulated without his consent. Bhatia’s Stand Represented by advocate Raghav Awasthi, Bhatia claimed the posts were not satire but outright defamation. He stressed that the material was offensive, vulgar, and ridiculed his physical appearance. Bhatia personally addressed the court, remarking that reputation takes decades to build and should not be destroyed under the pretext of humour. Court’s Observation Justice Bansal held that the posts prima facie caused reputational harm and could not be justified as free speech. The Court emphasized that freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a) is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2), including defamation. The Court directed that defamatory content must be removed promptly. The Defamation Suit Bhatia’s defamation suit names 22 defendants, including: Samajwadi Party’s social media unit Congress leader Ragini Nayak AAP leader Saurabh Bhardwaj Journalist Abhisar Sharma Digital outlets like Newslaundry and News18 Content creators like Rofl Gandhi and Ranting GolaAdditionally, intermediaries Google and X were made parties to ensure compliance with takedown orders. Free Speech vs. Defamation The case revives the debate between safeguarding free expression and protecting individual reputation. While satire and criticism are part of political discourse, the Court stressed that vulgarity and personal attacks cannot be shielded as humour. Political Context The controversy has taken a political turn. BJP leaders allege a coordinated smear campaign by opposition parties, while rivals argue that politicians must tolerate higher levels of criticism. However, Bhatia insists the posts crossed permissible limits, amounting to vulgar defamation rather than satire. What Lies Ahead The High Court’s directions mark a significant precedent in online defamation disputes involving political figures. While Bhatia may secure relief through takedowns, broader questions remain about intermediary liability and the limits of political satire in the digital age. Conclusion The Delhi High Court’s intervention underscores its commitment to protecting reputation in the face of online ridicule. By balancing free speech with restrictions against defamation, the ruling signals that humour cannot be used as a defence for vulgar and defamatory attacks on public figures. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Read More »

Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Karnataka High Court Allows Caste Survey to Continue with Voluntary Participation and Data Confidentiality Supreme Court Highlights Lingering Colonial-Era Land Disputes in India CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Chennupati Kranthi Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Supreme Court Judgment (25 July 2023) MD. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. – Supreme Court Judgment (31 July 2023) Bail Granted in Boini Mahipal v. State of Telangana: Supreme Court on Prolonged Undertrial Detention and Article 21 Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Kashak Agarwala 26 September 2025 Introduction The Delhi High Court has called upon the Bar Council of India (BCI) and the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) to create a structured policy for providing financial assistance to the families of deceased advocates. The observation arose from a case filed by the mother of a lawyer who died, seeking compensation under the Chief Minister Advocate Welfare Scheme (CMAWS). Background of the Case The petitioner, mother of the deceased advocate, sought the release of ₹10 lakh under CMAWS. The Delhi government denied her claim, stating that the insurance coverage had not been activated before the lawyer’s death. A single judge upheld the rejection, prompting the petitioner to appeal before a Division Bench. Court’s Observations on Welfare Schemes The Bench agreed that CMAWS benefits could not be applied retrospectively. However, it recognized deeper flaws in the existing welfare framework, stressing that many lawyers’ families face severe financial distress after an advocate’s untimely death. The Court referred to the Advocates Welfare Fund Act, 2021, which provides benefits during a lawyer’s lifetime but leaves dependents inadequately protected after death. Interim Assistance from BCD During proceedings, it was revealed that the BCD had been extending monthly financial support to the petitioner’s family for nearly two years. The Court praised this move as proactive and benevolent but highlighted the lack of a formal policy to ensure continuity. Request for Comprehensive Policy The Bench urged BCI and BCD to frame a formal, structured welfare scheme to prevent advocates’ families from slipping into poverty. It emphasized that bar councils hold not just regulatory responsibilities but also ethical duties to safeguard the profession’s credibility through robust welfare measures. Freedom Granted to Petitioner Disposing of the appeal, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to approach BCI and BCD for further assistance. It directed the councils to consider her case sympathetically under existing or forthcoming schemes. Greater Implications The ruling underscores judicial concern over the economic vulnerabilities of many lawyers, particularly those at early stages of practice. The Court’s call for reform may pave the way for welfare models similar to those in states like Tamil Nadu and Kerala, which already run stronger schemes for advocates’ welfare. Legal Representation For the Petitioner: BS Bagga and Jitender Khurana For BCI: T. Singhdev, Tanishq Srivastava, Sourabh Kumar, Vedant Sood Conclusion The Delhi High Court’s appeal to BCI and BCD reflects a push towards institutionalizing welfare for lawyers’ families. By urging structural reforms, the Court has highlighted the humanitarian and ethical responsibilities of bar councils, paving the way for stronger social security mechanisms in the legal profession. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Karnataka High Court Allows Caste Survey to Continue with Voluntary Participation and Data Confidentiality Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Urges BCI and BCD to Frame Policy for Financial Aid to Families of Deceased Lawyers Read More »

Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs”

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Karnataka High Court Allows Caste Survey to Continue with Voluntary Participation and Data Confidentiality Supreme Court Highlights Lingering Colonial-Era Land Disputes in India CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Chennupati Kranthi Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Supreme Court Judgment (25 July 2023) MD. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. – Supreme Court Judgment (31 July 2023) Bail Granted in Boini Mahipal v. State of Telangana: Supreme Court on Prolonged Undertrial Detention and Article 21 Opportunity of Hearing Before Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC: Supreme Court’s Ruling in Yashodhan Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Kashak Agarwala 26 September 2025 Introduction The Delhi High Court has partially modified its earlier injunction on Patanjali Ayurved’s advertising campaign for its Special Chyawanprash. While the Court permitted the company to use the phrase “Why settle for ordinary Chyawanprash?”, it prohibited references to Dabur’s “40 herbs”, ruling that such targeted claims crossed into disparagement. Background Dabur, which holds over 60% of the Chyawanprash market share, filed a case against Patanjali alleging that its advertisements demeaned Dabur’s products. In July 2025, Justice Mini Pushkarna partly upheld Dabur’s complaint, instructing Patanjali to drop references like “40 herbs” and remove certain graphics, while allowing the campaign in a trimmed form. Key Developments Division Bench Ruling: Justices C. Hari Shankar and Om Prakash Shukla upheld the ban on “40 herbs” but allowed Patanjali to retain the larger expression “ordinary Chyawanprash”. Doctrine of Puffery: The Court reaffirmed that exaggeration in comparative advertising is permissible, provided it does not directly disparage a competitor. Consumer Perception: The Bench observed that Indian consumers are discerning and unlikely to abandon trusted brands like Dabur solely due to the term “ordinary”. Issues Comparative Advertising vs. Disparagement: The key question was whether Patanjali’s campaign was puffery or crossed the line into unfairly targeting Dabur. Commercial Free Speech: Patanjali argued that the injunction violated its right to commercial speech and limited permissible exaggeration in marketing. Market Impact: Dabur contended that Patanjali’s campaign misled consumers by suggesting Dabur’s formulations were ordinary or inauthentic. Current Status The Division Bench struck a balance—allowing Patanjali to use “Why settle for ordinary Chyawanprash?” but restricting any reference to “40 herbs”, which was directly linked to Dabur’s product. The larger dispute, including regulatory aspects and further disparagement claims, remains pending before the trial court. Conclusion The ruling reflects the judiciary’s attempt to strike equilibrium between protecting commercial free speech and preventing misleading or disparaging claims in advertising. While Patanjali secured partial relief, Dabur succeeded in blocking direct references to its product, setting a precedent for future comparative advertising disputes. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Karnataka High Court Allows Caste Survey to Continue with Voluntary Participation and Data Confidentiality Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Highlights Lingering Colonial-Era Land Disputes in India Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Allows Patanjali to Use ‘Why Settle for Ordinary Chyawanprash,’ Restrains Reference to Dabur’s “40 Herbs” Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote