sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Live cases

Supreme Court Petition Seeks Immediate Suspension of Air India’s Boeing Fleet Over Safety Concerns

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Petition Seeks Immediate Suspension of Air India’s Boeing Fleet Over Safety Concerns Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case Supreme Court Petition Seeks Immediate Suspension of Air India’s Boeing Fleet Over Safety Concerns PRABHAT KUMAR BITLORIA 25 June 2025 A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in the Supreme Court urges the immediate suspension of Air India’s Boeing fleet following a tragic crash and multiple safety concerns. The case highlights maintenance lapses, fake audits, and ongoing service issues despite Tata Group ownership. Supreme Court PIL Seeks Suspension of Air India Boeing Fleet After Fatal Crash On June 24, 2025, the Supreme Court of India received a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) demanding the immediate suspension of all Boeing aircraft operated by Air India. The plea follows a devastating Air India crash en route from Ahmedabad to London that killed 241 passengers and crew members, along with 29 people on the ground. Crash Triggers Public Outcry and Legal Action The petition was filed by advocate Ajay Bansal, who emphasized the urgent need for compliance with safety regulations and protection of passenger rights. The June 12 disaster has raised widespread concerns over the airworthiness of Air India’s Boeing fleet and the airline’s maintenance protocols. Personal Flight Experience Sparks Legal Initiative Ajay Bansal detailed his own unsatisfactory flight experience aboard Air India flight AI 127 from Delhi to Chicago on May 20, 2025. Despite booking Business Class, he and his spouse encountered malfunctioning air conditioning, broken in-flight entertainment, and defective seating until the aircraft reached cruising altitude. Even after filing a formal complaint, the airline provided only partial acknowledgment and offered ₹10,000 as compensation. The incident is cited as one of many recurring service failures plaguing the airline. Air India’s Ongoing Operational Issues Revealed The petition highlights that such service failures are not isolated incidents. Viral videos and social media posts consistently show evidence of poor maintenance and frequent malfunctions aboard Air India aircraft. The PIL argues that systemic issues persist despite the airline’s acquisition by the Tata Group in 2022. DGCA Report Exposes Falsified Safety Inspections A critical piece of evidence in the PIL is a report from the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), which found that Air India fabricated data from internal safety audits. Thirteen reported inspections at key airports were proven false—lacking documentation, authorized signatures, or evidence of authority delegation. Shockingly, individuals listed as auditors were actually passengers on those flights. Call for Enforcement of Aircraft Safety Laws The petition urges strict enforcement of the Aircraft Act of 1934 and the Aircraft Rules of 1937. Bansal calls for immediate grounding of unfit aircraft, mandatory public disclosure of safety audits, and penalties for non-compliance. Additionally, the petition advocates for robust and frequent inspections of engines, airframes, and cabin systems to ensure regulatory compliance and passenger safety. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Petition Seeks Immediate Suspension of Air India’s Boeing Fleet Over Safety Concerns Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Petition Seeks Immediate Suspension of Air India’s Boeing Fleet Over Safety Concerns Read More »

Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case PRABHAT KUMAR BITLORIA 25 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India declined urgent listing of Hany Babu’s plea in the Bhima Koregaon case, asking for clarification on bail rights after withdrawal from apex court. Explore the legal timeline and implications. Supreme Court Declines Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea On June 23, 2025, the Supreme Court of India refused to urgently list a bail clarification plea filed by Hany Babu, a former professor at Delhi University and an accused in the high-profile Bhima Koregaon case. Request for Clarification on Bail Rights The application sought clarification from the apex court on whether Babu could approach the Bombay High Court for bail, following the withdrawal of his petition from the Supreme Court. However, the bench comprising Justice KV Viswanathan and Justice NK Singh denied scheduling the matter during the court’s vacation session, stating it would be taken up after reopening. Counsel Cites Precedents and Delays Babu’s counsel highlighted that several co-accused in the case had been granted bail either on merit or due to prolonged custody. The defense argued that the urgency stemmed from the legal ambiguity following the withdrawal of the Special Leave Petition (SLP) earlier in May 2024. The Bombay High Court had, on May 2, 2025, directed Babu to seek clarification from the Supreme Court regarding his right to approach the High Court for bail, prompting the submission of this plea. Supreme Court Questions Delay in Filing Justice Viswanathan questioned why the plea had not been filed during regular working days between May 2 and May 23. “You needed to demonstrate a sense of urgency and submit your filing punctually,” he noted. The court emphasized that urgent listings are typically granted when filings reflect genuine immediacy. In response, Babu’s counsel attributed the delay to time taken in acquiring certified copies. Justice Viswanathan remarked that in urgent cases, listings have been allowed even without certified copies—a common practice known among legal professionals. Background: Arrest, Custody, and Legal Battle Hany Babu was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in July 2020 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), for his alleged links to Maoist groups. The Bombay High Court denied him bail in September 2022. In May 2024, Babu withdrew his SLP from the Supreme Court, citing changed circumstances and expressing his intent to seek bail through the High Court instead. High Court Demands Supreme Court Clarification Despite the withdrawal, the Bombay High Court ruled that the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw the plea did not inherently preserve his right to seek bail again. Consequently, Babu was required to obtain formal clarification from the Supreme Court to proceed. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Hany Babu’s Bail Clarification Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case Read More »

Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARVAANK ASSOCIATES, BENGALURU Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties PRABHAT KUMAR BITLORIA 25 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India clarifies that its stay order in the copyright dispute between Azure Hospitality and Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) does not apply to third parties, reinforcing that licensing obligations remain unchanged beyond the case. Supreme Court Clarifies Copyright Stay in Azure–PPL Dispute: No Relief for Third Parties On June 19, 2025, the Supreme Court of India clarified that its April 21 stay order in the ongoing copyright dispute between Azure Hospitality and Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) applies strictly to the commercial suit pending before the Delhi High Court and has no bearing on unrelated third parties. Clarification Issued in Response to PPL’s Interlocutory Application The clarification came in response to an interlocutory application filed by PPL. A bench comprising Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan stated that the stay order is only binding between the parties involved in CS(COMM) 714 of 2022, which is under consideration by a single judge at the Delhi High Court. Background: Copyright Dispute Between Azure and PPL In 2022, PPL accused Azure, which operates popular restaurants like Mamagoto, Dhaba, and Sly Granny, of playing copyrighted songs from its catalog without proper licensing. PPL claimed these performances infringed its rights as the assignee of public performance licenses from various music labels. Azure countered that PPL lacked the legal authority to issue licenses or pursue litigation as it is not a registered copyright society under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957. High Court’s Split Verdicts on PPL’s Licensing Authority On March 3, 2025, a single judge ruled in favor of PPL, affirming its rights to license music as an assignee. However, Azure appealed to a Division Bench, which reversed this ruling on April 15. The Bench held that PPL, without being a registered copyright society, cannot issue licenses on behalf of others—even if it owns rights through assignments. While asserting that creators may license their own work, the court emphasized that collective licensing is reserved for officially registered societies. Despite this ruling, the court ordered Azure to pay an amount equal to what Recorded Music Performance Ltd charges for similar public performances if they continued to use PPL-claimed tracks. Supreme Court Stay and Request for Clarification PPL challenged the Division Bench’s order before the Supreme Court. On April 21, 2025, the apex court stayed the direction requiring Azure to make payments to PPL. However, Azure celebrated the decision, interpreting it as temporary relief from payment obligations. The Supreme Court later clarified that the March 3 decision from the single judge remains valid. It also made it clear that the stay order should not be construed as a blanket exemption by unrelated businesses. Clarification Aimed at Preventing Misuse by Third Parties Due to misinterpretations of the stay order, several third-party entities reportedly refused to pay licensing fees to PPL. PPL petitioned the Supreme Court for clarification, citing disruption to its operations. The court responded by stating that the April 21 stay order applies exclusively to the parties in the ongoing case and does not alter the general legal obligation to obtain licenses. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Clarifies Azure–PPL Copyright Stay: No Impact on Third Parties Read More »

Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARVAANK ASSOCIATES, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SULLAR LAW CHAMBERS, CHANDIGARH Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation KASHISH JAHAN 25 June 2025 The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR under Section 306 IPC in a loan-related suicide case, reinforcing the high evidentiary bar for abetment of suicide and protecting against the misuse of criminal law in civil disputes. Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 306 IPC in Loan-Linked Suicide Case In a landmark ruling, the Bombay High Court has quashed an FIR filed under Sections 306, 506(2), and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The FIR accused a businessman of abetment in a suicide case stemming from alleged harassment over a loan. However, the division bench concluded that the behavior cited did not amount to the legal threshold of instigation required under Section 306 IPC. Understanding Section 306 IPC: What Constitutes Abetment of Suicide? Section 306 IPC criminalizes the abetment of suicide, requiring proof of deliberate instigation or encouragement that leads the victim to take their own life. The Court emphasized that mere harassment or pressure related to financial obligations does not satisfy the standard for prosecution under this provision. Case Background: Loan Dispute and Alleged Harassment The case involved a financial dispute where the deceased had borrowed money from the accused. Allegations surfaced that the victim endured prolonged harassment related to repayment. A suicide note named multiple individuals, including the petitioner, accusing them of mistreatment. However, the Court found no immediate or proximate cause linking the alleged harassment to the suicide event. Key Figures in the Case The Petitioner: Accused of causing suicide through alleged loan-related harassment. The Victim: A borrower who left a suicide note citing pressure and distress. The Court: A division bench of the Bombay High Court led by Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Neela Gokhale. Legal Reasoning: Lack of Mens Rea and Direct Instigation The Court held that the accused’s conduct did not demonstrate mens rea or direct incitement. The alleged harassment stemmed from older disputes and lacked any recent provocation closely tied to the suicide. The Court concluded that harassment alone—even if substantiated—does not justify prosecution under Section 306 IPC without clear incitement. Implications: Setting Legal Standards in Abetment Cases This judgment reinforces that Section 306 requires a direct causative link between the accused’s conduct and the suicide. It serves as a crucial safeguard against the misuse of criminal charges in commercial disagreements or personal fallouts. Constitutional Significance and Safeguards Against Misuse By invoking Section 482 of the CrPC, the High Court protected the petitioner’s fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to personal liberty. The ruling underscores the judiciary’s role in preventing vexatious or baseless criminal proceedings and preserving the integrity of legal safeguards in civil disputes. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Quashes 306 IPC FIR in Loan-Linked Suicide Case, Cites Lack of Instigation Read More »

Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARVAANK ASSOCIATES, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SULLAR LAW CHAMBERS, CHANDIGARH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLE PRIORITY HR PARTNERS, DELHI Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law KASHISH JAHAN 25 June 2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a PIL against online betting ads, emphasizing the need to follow statutory remedies like the Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act, 2025, and avoiding judicial overreach through misuse of PILs. High Court Upholds Statutory Path Over PIL in Gambling Ad Case A division bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, led by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel, has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that aimed to ban online betting and opinion-trading advertisements under Indian gambling laws. The court emphasized that the recently enacted Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act, 2025 and other statutory remedies provide adequate legal avenues—making a PIL unnecessary and improper in this context. Statutory Remedy vs Extraordinary Jurisdiction The court reinforced a crucial constitutional principle: when effective statutory remedies exist, constitutional courts should not entertain PILs. Bypassing these legal mechanisms through PIL leads to judicial overreach and adds unnecessary burden to the court system. This decision promotes the importance of legislative procedures in addressing legal grievances. Misleading Online Betting Ads Under Scrutiny The PIL alleged that platforms such as YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), and other social media networks were running deceptive advertisements for online betting and opinion-trading platforms. The petitioners argued these ads violated gambling regulations by making false promises and operating without proper regulation. Key Parties and Stakeholders in the Case – Anuj Malik and others served as petitioners, raising concerns about misleading betting advertisements. – The bench included Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel, presiding over the matter. – The State Government of Haryana underscored the relevance of the newly introduced Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act, 2025 as an effective statutory remedy. Court Decision and Legal Direction The court dismissed the PIL and advised the petitioners to file their grievances through proper statutory channels under the existing Act. The judgment highlighted the need for judicial restraint and reinforced that PILs should be reserved for scenarios lacking adequate legislative solutions. Broader Legal Impact and Public Importance This decision reiterates that PILs should not substitute structured legislative frameworks, especially when laws like the Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act exist to regulate the issue. The ruling protects the principle of separation of powers and discourages misuse of PILs that could divert valuable judicial resources. Constitutional Significance and Article 14 The High Court’s judgment supports Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which ensures equality before the law. It underscores that all litigants must follow the same statutory processes and that constitutional jurisdiction should be reserved for matters of true constitutional importance—not routine legal complaints. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Punjab–Haryana High Court Rejects PIL Against Online Betting Ads, Citing Statutory Remedies Under Gambling Law Read More »

Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARVAANK ASSOCIATES, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SULLAR LAW CHAMBERS, CHANDIGARH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLE PRIORITY HR PARTNERS, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GODREJ INDUSTRIES GROUP, MUMBAI Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights KASHISH JAHAN 25 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India has reserved its interim order on the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, after hearing key constitutional challenges. Explore the legal framework, major parties involved, and implications for religious and minority rights. Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 On May 22, 2025, a bench of the Supreme Court of India, comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih, reserved its interim order in the case In Re: Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The court conducted three days of hearings on petitions challenging critical provisions of the Waqf Amendment, including rules around denotification, waqf-by-user, and Waqf Board composition. Legal Framework: Presumption of Constitutionality The Court reiterated the principle that all legislative statutes carry a strong presumption of constitutionality. Interim relief, such as a stay, demands a “very strong, glaring case.” Petitioners, represented by senior advocates, argued the amended Act is vague and infringes on constitutional guarantees like religious freedom and property rights. The government, defended by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, emphasized the legal continuity of historical regulatory practices concerning waqf properties. Allegations: Executive Overreach into Waqf Assets The core allegation from the petitioners is that the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, enables undue executive control over religious endowments. Specifically, the petitioners claimed the amendments authorize excessive government interference in denotification procedures and Waqf Board appointments. This could disproportionately affect the rights of the Muslim community, compromise minority religious autonomy, and endanger valuable heritage waqf properties. Key Individuals and Political Entities Involved Chief Justice B.R. Gavai & Justice A.G. Masih: Presided over the hearings Tushar Mehta: Argued in favor of the government Petitioners included: AIMIM Communist Party of India (CPI) Prominent Parliamentarian Asaduddin Owaisi Union of India: Argued for a limited review focused on only a few contentious clauses Case Developments: What Happened in Court After intensive arguments, the Supreme Court reserved its interim order. While the bench initially aimed to limit its assessment to three specific areas, petitioners insisted on a comprehensive constitutional review, citing wider concerns over secularism and religious rights. Broader Implications for Religious and Minority Rights This case has far-reaching significance, especially concerning religious freedom under Articles 25 and 26 of the Indian Constitution. The outcome will likely influence how waqf properties are managed and could reshape the relationship between religious institutions and the state. The issue has also sparked nationwide debate and public protests, raising questions about the balance between faith-based governance and state oversight. Legal and Constitutional Relevance The Supreme Court’s ruling will set a precedent on how far executive power can reach into religious and charitable trusts. It will also test whether laws like the Waqf (Amendment) Act can be frozen pending full judicial review, thereby defining the limits of parliamentary authority in matters of religious trust governance and property rights. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Reserves Interim Order on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Key Legal and Constitutional Highlights Read More »

HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARVAANK ASSOCIATES, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SULLAR LAW CHAMBERS, CHANDIGARH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLE PRIORITY HR PARTNERS, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GODREJ INDUSTRIES GROUP, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT YASH TECHNOLOGIES, INDORE HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust KASHISH JAHAN 25 June 2025 HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan moves the Bombay High Court to quash an FIR filed by Lilavati Trust in a ₹2 crore bribery case. The case raises key legal issues under Sections 420 and 409 of the IPC and the misuse of criminal law in corporate disputes. HDFC Bank CEO Seeks Quashing of ₹2 Crore Bribery FIR In a major legal development, HDFC Bank Managing Director and CEO, Sashidhar Jagdishan, has filed a petition in the Bombay High Court to quash a First Information Report (FIR) filed against him. The complaint was initiated by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust in connection with an alleged ₹2.05 crore bribery scandal involving accusations of cheating and criminal breach of trust. Legal Charges Framed Under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) The FIR names Jagdishan and others under the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC): Section 420 IPC – Cheating Section 409 IPC – Criminal Breach of Trust Jagdishan’s legal team has argued that the charges are entirely unfounded and are part of an effort to criminalize a civil or commercial disagreement. Nature of the Allegations by Lilavati Trust The FIR alleges that senior officials from HDFC Bank, including Jagdishan, were involved in facilitating bribes intended to sway a legal matter in favor of the trust. These accusations are at the heart of a larger corporate dispute involving high-profile entities. Key Individuals and Entities Involved Sashidhar Jagdishan – HDFC CEO, who has denied all allegations and is seeking to quash the FIR. Lilavati Trust – The complainant in the case, alleging misconduct by HDFC officials. Bombay High Court – Two judges have recused themselves due to potential conflicts, and a new bench is to be formed. Recent Developments in the Court Proceedings The legal proceedings have been temporarily delayed as two judges assigned to the case recused themselves. This was reportedly due to potential conflicts of interest. A fresh bench will soon be appointed to hear the matter. Broader Implications for Corporate Legal Disputes This case underscores significant concerns regarding the misuse of criminal law in corporate disputes. Legal experts argue that it sets a dangerous precedent when civil disagreements are escalated into criminal matters without substantial evidence. Constitutional and Legal Relevance Under Article 21 The ongoing case also touches on fundamental constitutional protections, particularly the right to a fair trial and protection from arbitrary prosecution under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Legal commentators stress the importance of upholding due process and ensuring that criminal law is not weaponized in civil disputes. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan Moves Bombay HC to Quash FIR in ₹2 Crore Bribery Case Filed by Lilavati Trust Read More »

IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARVAANK ASSOCIATES, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SULLAR LAW CHAMBERS, CHANDIGARH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLE PRIORITY HR PARTNERS, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GODREJ INDUSTRIES GROUP, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT YASH TECHNOLOGIES, INDORE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JOHNSON & JOHNSON, MUMBAI IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate KASHISH JAHAN 25 June 2025 Mumbai EOW arrests IPS officer Rashmi Karandikar’s husband, Purushottam Chavan, in a ₹7.2 crore BMC redevelopment scam. The case exposes deep flaws in urban governance and influence peddling within public systems. Mumbai EOW Arrests IPS Officer Rashmi Karandikar’s Husband in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Mumbai has arrested Purushottam Chavan, husband of senior IPS officer Rashmi Karandikar, for allegedly defrauding a developer of ₹7.2 crore under the guise of facilitating approvals from the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC). The case reveals deep concerns over influence peddling and systemic corruption in Mumbai’s urban redevelopment process. Scam Overview: ₹7.2 Crore Fraud for BMC Clearance At the center of this high-profile case is an alleged promise by Chavan to a reputable Mumbai-based developer, claiming he could secure BMC redevelopment clearances by leveraging his influential connections. Over time, he reportedly collected ₹7.2 crore in multiple tranches, stating the money was essential for navigating bureaucratic channels. However, no approvals materialized, leaving the complainant in financial and reputational distress. Legal Charges: IPC Sections for Cheating and Trust Breach An FIR has been lodged under the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC): Section 420 – Cheating Section 406 – Criminal breach of trust Officials are also investigating the possibility of a larger criminal conspiracy, indicating that more individuals may be involved in the fraudulent scheme. Key Individuals and Institutions Involved Purushottam Chavan: The main accused, now in police custody. Rashmi Karandikar: A senior IPS officer; not named in the FIR but under public and media scrutiny due to her relation to the accused. The Complainant: A respected Mumbai developer, who now faces both financial losses and project delays. BMC: Its clearance process is under investigation for potential manipulation and corruption. Current Status: Custody and Financial Trail As of June 24, 2025, Chavan remains in police custody. Investigators are following the money trail to assess whether the funds were siphoned, laundered, or used to bribe officials. There is an ongoing probe into the possible involvement of BMC insiders. Why This Scam Is a Major Red Flag for Urban Governance This incident underscores systemic weaknesses in Mumbai’s redevelopment protocols. Influence peddling and exploitation of bureaucratic loopholes compromise the integrity of public institutions. Given the city’s already burdened redevelopment landscape, this case brings urgency to implementing transparent and tamper-proof clearance systems. Constitutional Angle: Upholding Equality Before the Law This case echoes the principle enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India, which affirms equality before the law. The action taken by the EOW sends a powerful message: no individual, regardless of status or affiliation, is above the law. A senior EOW officer remarked:“Our message is clear — no individual is above the law, no matter their rank or relationships.” Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

IPS Officer’s Husband Arrested in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Redevelopment Scam: Mumbai EOW Crackdown Sparks Integrity Debate Read More »

Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARVAANK ASSOCIATES, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SULLAR LAW CHAMBERS, CHANDIGARH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLE PRIORITY HR PARTNERS, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GODREJ INDUSTRIES GROUP, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT YASH TECHNOLOGIES, INDORE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JOHNSON & JOHNSON, MUMBAI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LEGAL SYNC Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 25 June 2025 The Bombay High Court has issued a strong directive against illegal residents occupying MHADA transit homes in Maharashtra. Learn how this impacts housing policy and legal enforcement across Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, and Thane. Bombay High Court Cracks Down on Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes The Bombay High Court has taken a firm stance against the unlawful occupation of transit accommodations provided by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA). In a significant ruling dated 22 June 2025, the court emphasized that no form of extra-legal interference will be tolerated regarding the misuse of these temporary shelters. Legal Action Ordered Against Interference in MHADA Operations The bench comprising Justices GS Kulkarni and Arif Doctor ruled that anyone attempting to obstruct MHADA’s official functioning—regardless of their rank—must face strict legal consequences. This order comes amid growing concerns over illegal residents occupying transit homes designated for individuals whose buildings are undergoing reconstruction. Widespread Encroachment in Mumbai’s Transit Housing Transit accommodations, designed to serve displaced residents during redevelopment, have been increasingly misused. In regions like Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, and Thane, illegal occupancy has led to a severe backlog in housing allocation, leaving deserving citizens without shelter. Accountability Measures for MHADA Officials and Leadership The High Court directed all MHADA officials to report any undue influence or interference to the Vice President of MHADA. If interference continues, the Vice Chairman has the authority to escalate the issue to the Chief Secretary or even the High Court, ensuring transparency and judicial oversight. Dissemination of the Court’s Order Across Planning Authorities The court has mandated the Vice Chairman of MHADA to distribute this ruling to all field-level officials and leadership in allied planning bodies such as the Municipal Corporations, MMRDA, and CIDCO. Judiciary’s Stand Against Dormancy in Public Administration The bench underscored that illegal occupancy thrives when officials fail to fulfill their duties. Such negligence compromises public trust and directly harms individuals in genuine need of housing. Political Interference Hindering Legal Action According to Advocate Manisha Jagtap, representing MHADA, legal and political interference often prevents officers from evicting unauthorized residents. This compromises the agency’s ability to provide fair housing. Upholding the Rule of Law in Maharashtra Housing The High Court concluded by reinforcing that MHADA and other authorities must not allow illegal occupation. Officials are expected to strictly follow the law and act against any unlawful interference that obstructs the delivery of public services. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments India Withdraws from Indus Waters Treaty Citing Security Concerns, Triggers Global Legal Dispute Sada Law • June 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Orders Strict Action Against Illegal Occupants in MHADA Transit Homes Read More »

Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CODITAS, PUNE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARVAANK ASSOCIATES, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SULLAR LAW CHAMBERS, CHANDIGARH LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLE PRIORITY HR PARTNERS, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GODREJ INDUSTRIES GROUP, MUMBAI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT YASH TECHNOLOGIES, INDORE LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JOHNSON & JOHNSON, MUMBAI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LEGAL SYNC JOB OPPORTUNITY AT FACTUM LEGAL, DELHI Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 25 June 2025 Former Lilavati Hospital trustee Chetan Mehta has approached the Bombay High Court seeking to quash an FIR linked to a ₹1,243 crore fraud. Learn about the ongoing legal battle, counter-allegations, and its implications for Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust. Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Seeks High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case Former Lilavati Hospital trustee Chetan Mehta has filed a petition in the Bombay High Court seeking dismissal of a First Information Report (FIR) filed against him for alleged misappropriation of ₹1,243 crore. The FIR was registered by Mumbai Police at the Bandra Police Station following a forensic audit. Forensic Audit Uncovers Alleged Misconduct The forensic audit, conducted by current trustee Prashant Mehta, reportedly identified financial irregularities within the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust. Based on the findings, the Magistrate Court directed the Bandra Police to register the FIR after initial inaction. Chetan Mehta’s Legal Stand Represented by lawyers Lakshmi Raman and Dhiren Shah, Mehta has challenged the FIR in court, arguing that the Magistrate’s order came prematurely—just 10 days after the complaint was filed—without waiting for a police inquiry report. Mehta, a Belgium citizen with an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card, was a trustee from 2007 to December 2023. He was removed following an order by the Charity Commissioner of Maharashtra. Case Now Under Economic Offences Wing The investigation has been transferred to the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Mumbai Police. According to the plea, four additional FIRs have also been lodged against Mehta, all of which are being contested in court. Counter-Allegations Against Prashant Mehta In his petition, Mehta alleges that Prashant Mehta and his family, in collaboration with former Mumbai Police Commissioner Param Bir Singh, have orchestrated multiple FIRs to target him. Mehta maintains that under his leadership, Lilavati Hospital thrived—fixed deposits reportedly rose from ₹200 crore to ₹500 crore, and substantial charitable initiatives were implemented. The Legacy and Family Dispute The Lilavati Hospital is managed by a trust established in 1978 by Kirtilal Mehta. His descendants, including Vijay Mehta, Prabodh Mehta, Kishore Mehta, Rashmi Mehta, and Rekha Sheth, were involved in its development. Today, the dispute centers around the sons of Prabodh Mehta (Chetan) and Kishore Mehta (Prashant), resulting in a high-profile legal and family conflict over control of the trust. Financial Stability and Damage to Reputation Chetan Mehta’s petition asserts that Lilavati Hospital is financially stable with a consistent surplus, supported by audited financial records. He claims that the ongoing legal proceedings have tarnished his professional reputation and inflicted irreparable harm. Current Status of the Case A division bench led by Justice Sarang Kotwal briefly mentioned the plea before recusing himself. As of now, the case has not been scheduled for a hearing. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case Sada Law • June 25, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments India Withdraws from Indus Waters Treaty Citing Security Concerns, Triggers Global Legal Dispute Sada Law • June 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments ED Summons Top Lawyers: Legal Privilege vs. Corporate Accountability Debate Erupts Sada Law • June 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Ex-Lilavati Hospital Trustee Chetan Mehta Seeks Bombay High Court Relief in ₹1,243 Crore Fraud Case Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote