sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Sada Law

Nepal Sets March Elections After Appointing First Woman Interim Prime Minister

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Nepal Sets March Elections After Appointing First Woman Interim Prime Minister India’s Electoral Drama: Rahul Gandhi Allegations Spark “Vote Theft” Storm Degrees on Protest, Justice on Hold: The Silent Crisis of Overnight Approved Law Colleges Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT SIDDHARTH & CO, ADVOCATES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SCHOOL OF LAW, GUJARAT UNIVERSITY LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ADVOCATE SHRUTI BIST Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court Nepal Sets March Elections After Appointing First Woman Interim Prime Minister Shristi Singh 14 September 2025 Introduction Nepal entered a new political chapter on Saturday as President Ramchandra Paudel dissolved Parliament and announced fresh elections for 5 March 2026. The move came after weeks of youth-led protests that shook the Himalayan republic. The appointment of Sushila Karki, Nepal’s former Chief Justice, as the nation’s first woman interim Prime Minister marks both a historic milestone and a test of stability amid deepening political and social unrest. Background of the Crisis For weeks, Nepal was engulfed in protests led largely by Generation Z activists. Initially triggered by a controversial social media ban and fueled by grievances over corruption, unemployment, and governance failures, demonstrations escalated into violent clashes with security forces. At least 51 people died and more than 1,300 were injured, making it one of the most violent uprisings since Nepal’s 2008 republican transition. Mounting unrest forced Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli to resign earlier this week, creating a political vacuum. Appointment of Sushila Karki In response, the ruling coalition nominated Sushila Karki, former Chief Justice of Nepal’s Supreme Court, as interim Prime Minister. She is recognized for her integrity and anti-corruption stance. Karki had already made history in 2016 as Nepal’s first female Chief Justice. Now, she repeats history as the first woman Prime Minister, tasked with restoring public trust and calming protests. Dissolution of Parliament & Election Announcement President Ramchandra Paudel dissolved the federal Parliament under constitutional provisions. General elections scheduled: 5 March 2026. The decision is being positioned as democratic renewal, offering citizens the chance to elect new leadership. Analysts note that the interim period allows time for electoral preparations while addressing law and order. Scenes on the Ground Following the announcement: Shops reopened and traffic resumed in Kathmandu. Roads cleared after days of barricades and burning tires. A heavy security presence remained in many districts. Yet, tensions lingered as families of those killed demanded recognition as martyrs and financial compensation. One grieving father said: “My son died for justice. We will not leave until this government honors him as a martyr.” India’s Response India welcomed Nepal’s election announcement, stressing hopes for “peace, stability, and democratic renewal.” As Nepal’s largest trading partner and influential neighbor, India’s support is viewed as crucial. Observers also noted India’s concerns about China’s growing presence in the region. Public Reaction Supporters: Hailed Karki as a symbol of honesty and change, especially youth and women’s groups. Skeptics: Questioned her ability to withstand pressure from entrenched political elites without a political base. Social media: Hashtags like #FirstWomanPM trended alongside demands for deeper reforms. Challenges Ahead Restoring Order – Preventing further violence and calming unrest. Ensuring Fair Elections – Transparent polls in under six months require resources and trust in institutions. Meeting Protester Demands – Beyond elections, youth want anti-corruption reforms, jobs, and digital freedoms. Geopolitical Balance – Navigating relations with India and China while focusing on domestic stability. International Significance Nepal’s turmoil has regional and global implications: As a fragile democracy between India and China, instability could affect regional politics. Western governments (US, EU) urged accountability for protest deaths and a peaceful electoral process. Analysis Karki’s appointment is symbolic yet uncertain. While her clean image provides credibility, her lack of political machinery poses challenges. Dissolving Parliament and calling elections may reset the political system, but youth-driven unrest may persist unless systemic reforms are implemented. The protests revealed a widening generational divide in Nepal. Young citizens are increasingly impatient with corruption and traditional leadership, demanding transformative change rather than temporary fixes. Conclusion Nepal has entered uncharted political territory. The appointment of Sushila Karki, the nation’s first woman Prime Minister, and the scheduling of elections for March 2026 present both hope and uncertainty. While her leadership symbolizes renewal, the cost of this transition—lost lives, eroded trust, and strained institutions—remains high. The coming months will determine whether Nepal transforms its turmoil into democratic renewal or whether unrest resurfaces in a fragile republic watched closely by the world Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Nepal Sets March Elections After Appointing First Woman Interim Prime Minister Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments India’s Electoral Drama: Rahul Gandhi Allegations Spark “Vote Theft” Storm Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Degrees on Protest, Justice on Hold: The Silent Crisis of Overnight Approved Law Colleges Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Nepal Sets March Elections After Appointing First Woman Interim Prime Minister Read More »

India’s Electoral Drama: Rahul Gandhi Allegations Spark “Vote Theft” Storm

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today India’s Electoral Drama: Rahul Gandhi Allegations Spark “Vote Theft” Storm Degrees on Protest, Justice on Hold: The Silent Crisis of Overnight Approved Law Colleges Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT SIDDHARTH & CO, ADVOCATES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SCHOOL OF LAW, GUJARAT UNIVERSITY LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ADVOCATE SHRUTI BIST Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT S&A LAW OFFICES India’s Electoral Drama: Rahul Gandhi Allegations Spark “Vote Theft” Storm   Shristi Singh 14 September 2025 Headline: Rahul Gandhi lashes out at “vote theft” in latest election controversy, sparking nationwide protests over Indian electoral integrity Lead: On 28 August 2025, Rahul Gandhi, leader of India’s largest opposition party, accused the Election Commission and ruling BJP of “vote chori” (vote theft) in state assembly contests including Mahadevapura, Karnataka. Rallying protesters nationwide, Gandhi alleged manipulated electoral rolls favoured incumbents—a claim the Election Commission promptly dismissed as baseless, challenging Gandhi to formalize his concerns under statutory oath or apologize. The controversy has reignited debate over democratic safeguards and institutional impartiality amidst growing polarization. Background: In early August, Gandhi began leveling allegations of irregularities during the 2024 general election. He highlighted errors in voter registration rolls for Mahadevapura and called on ECI to investigate systemic manipulation. The Commission rejected unverified claims, citing procedural norms requiring signed affidavits and contestation deadlines. This latest flare-up has led to protests and social media campaigns organized by the Congress and aligned organizations, asserting that democratic norms are under threat. Developments and Significance: Political Polarization: The case hardened fault lines: BJP defended ECI’s conduct, while Gandhi accused it of institutional betrayal. Institutional Pressure: Questions about ECI autonomy and competence have been thrust back into the spotlight, particularly as electoral systems undergo digital transformations. Democratic Resilience: The debates come amid global concerns about democratic erosion; India’s handling may set examples regionally. Reactions: Election Commission: Declared allegations invalid unless substantiated with signed affidavits—warning Gandhi of legal consequences for defamation or slander. BJP Leadership: Accused Gandhi of conspiracy to erode trust in democracy; echoed ECI’s technical stance. Civil Society and Media: Pressed for transparency through independent audits, especially where digital systems may be vulnerable to manipulation. Analysis: Muddying the Playing Field: Accusations—even if unsubstantiated—breed mistrust and undermine voter faith. ECI’s Communication Failure: The Commission’s procedural response may alienate public sentiment—more explanation and openness might be needed. Long-Term Trust Deficit: Without reforms and responsive institutions, credibility gaps may widen—fueling populist narratives. Conclusion: India’s “vote chori” row underscores fragile trust in institutions at a moment when the world is watching. How ECI and political leaders choose to respond will deeply influence democratic resilience—not just for the upcoming vice-presidential election but for public faith across India’s vast electoral landscape. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases India’s Electoral Drama: Rahul Gandhi Allegations Spark “Vote Theft” Storm Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Degrees on Protest, Justice on Hold: The Silent Crisis of Overnight Approved Law Colleges Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

India’s Electoral Drama: Rahul Gandhi Allegations Spark “Vote Theft” Storm Read More »

Degrees on Protest, Justice on Hold: The Silent Crisis of Overnight Approved Law Colleges

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Degrees on Protest, Justice on Hold: The Silent Crisis of Overnight Approved Law Colleges Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT SIDDHARTH & CO, ADVOCATES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SCHOOL OF LAW, GUJARAT UNIVERSITY LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ADVOCATE SHRUTI BIST Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT S&A LAW OFFICES Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore? Degrees on Protest, Justice on Hold: The Silent Crisis of Overnight Approved Law Colleges   Kashak Agarwala 14 September 2025 Introduction Fred Rodell, one of the fiercest critics of legal academia, once wrote that law schools merely grant diplomas of empty value. His words ring prophetic in light of the Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University (SRMU), Barabanki episode, where decades of regulatory apathy and days of student protests culminated in a sudden midnight recognition by the Bar Council of India (BCI). Background The crisis began when SRMU students discovered that their law courses lacked BCI recognition. On August 18, 2025, students raised concerns. By September 1, they were on the streets, demanding answers. Protests intensified the following day, leading to clashes with police, reports of students being roughed up, expelled, or detained, and fears that their degrees were worthless. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath swiftly suspended a Circle Officer, ordered inquiries into both police excesses and the university’s law programs, and promised accountability. On September 3, in a dramatic twist, the BCI granted provisional one-year approval, retroactively regularising admissions for 2023-24 and 2024-25 batches. Hours later, an FIR was filed against SRMU by the state government. Legal Framework and Precedents The timing and manner of BCI’s approval raised questions of transparency. Under Section 7(1)(h) of the Advocates Act, 1961, the BCI must recognise universities whose law degrees qualify graduates for enrolment. Rule 3 of the BCI Rules of Legal Education, 2008, mandates annual notifications of approved colleges. Section 22 of the UGC Act, 1956 restricts valid degree issuance to recognised universities. Judicial precedents reinforce this framework: BCI v. Bonnie Foi Law College (2012) upheld BCI’s pre-enrolment powers; in Gunderson v. Committee of Management Anuragi Devi Degree College (2016), the UP Court condemned unapproved admissions; and in Arulmigu Kalasalingam College of Education, the Supreme Court held degrees during withdrawn recognition periods void. False Representation and Misleading Claims SRMU worsened the crisis by misrepresenting its status. Its website falsely listed BCI approval under “Institutional Approvals,” misleading students into believing their courses were compliant. This amounted to fraud on the public, undermining trust and exposing students to irreparable harm. Students as Petitioners Before Advocates Ironically, SRMU law students’ first legal battle was not moot court but fighting for their own legitimacy. Instead of studying jurisprudence, they drafted petitions, complaints, and protest slogans—litigating their right to a recognised education in real time. Larger Implications India has over 1,700 BCI-approved law colleges producing nearly 90,000 graduates annually. Delays or lapses in recognition, as in SRMU, risk devaluing the legal profession and reducing compliance to symbolic gestures. Such failures erode confidence in regulatory systems and jeopardise careers. A Question of Priorities While the BCI strictly enforces standards for practising lawyers through Certificates of Practice and the All India Bar Examination, enforcement for institutions is sluggish and reactive. The SRMU case highlights this imbalance—students pay the price for regulatory delay while practitioners face immediate discipline. Behind Recognition: Politics and Protests The overnight approval of SRMU law courses was clearly accelerated by student agitation, political embarrassment, and administrative pressure. This raises a deeper concern: what happens to students in less prominent institutions who lack political backing or visibility? Without systemic reform, their futures remain uncertain. Current Situation As of September 3, SRMU law students have temporary relief with a one-year provisional approval, but their long-term fate depends on compliance and further regulatory review. Investigations against the university are ongoing, and questions about accountability remain unanswered. Conclusion The SRMU episode exposes structural fractures in India’s legal education system. A reactive regulator and opaque processes risk producing generations of law graduates uncertain about the validity of their degrees. Unless regulatory responsibility, transparency, and timeliness are enforced, India’s legal profession faces a slow erosion of credibility and trust.   Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Degrees on Protest, Justice on Hold: The Silent Crisis of Overnight Approved Law Colleges Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Degrees on Protest, Justice on Hold: The Silent Crisis of Overnight Approved Law Colleges Read More »

Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Title: Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT SIDDHARTH & CO, ADVOCATES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SCHOOL OF LAW, GUJARAT UNIVERSITY LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ADVOCATE SHRUTI BIST Title: Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT S&A LAW OFFICES Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore? LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ALL IP CARE Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing   Kashak Agarwala 14 September 2025 Introduction The Supreme Court, in Anna Waman Bhalerao v. State of Maharashtra, directed that all High Courts and trial courts must dispose of regular and anticipatory bail applications within two months of filing. The Bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan emphasized that prolonged pendency of bail matters infringes upon constitutional guarantees of liberty under Articles 14 and 21. Court’s Observations The Court reiterated that bail applications must be decided on their merits without leaving parties in indefinite uncertainty. Long delays in disposal not only undermine the object of the Code of Criminal Procedure but also amount to a denial of justice, running contrary to constitutional ethos. Key Directions Issued The Supreme Court laid down the following guidelines:a) High Courts must ensure speedy disposal of bail/anticipatory bail pleas within two months, barring deliberate delays by parties.b) Administrative directions should be issued to subordinate courts to prioritize personal liberty cases and curb endless adjournments.c) Investigating agencies must prevent investigations from dragging unnecessarily, ensuring fair treatment to both complainants and accused.d) High Courts should ensure that no bail application remains pending indefinitely, as prolonged pendency itself is an assault on fundamental rights. Additionally, the Registrar (Judicial) of the Supreme Court was instructed to circulate the judgment to all High Courts for immediate compliance. Case Background The ruling arose from appeals by two retired revenue officers whose anticipatory bail applications had remained pending before the Bombay High Court since 2019. Despite interim protection being granted during the pendency, the High Court dismissed the pleas in July 2025, more than six years later. Freedom and Freedom of Docket The Bench acknowledged the chronic issue of docket explosion but underscored that cases involving personal liberty must always receive priority. Bail decisions should be straightforward, based on factual considerations, and not left hanging over applicants like a “sword of Damocles.” Outcome of the Present Case The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court’s refusal of anticipatory bail, noting that custodial interrogation was necessary to trace transactions, establish complicity, and prevent suppression of evidence. The Court also highlighted the appellants’ lack of cooperation despite six years of interim protection, affirming that no interference was warranted in the High Court’s judgment. Conclusion The ruling strengthens the constitutional protection of personal liberty by mandating time-bound disposal of bail pleas. While upholding the Bombay High Court’s refusal of relief in this particular case, the Supreme Court has set a binding precedent to prevent undue delays and ensure that bail applications are treated with urgency across all courts in India.   Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Title: Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Title: Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Asks Courts to Decide Bail Pleas Within 2 Months of Filing Read More »

Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT HAMMURABI & SOLOMON PARTNERS Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SCHOOL OF LAW, GUJARAT UNIVERSITY LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ADVOCATE SHRUTI BIST Title: Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT S&A LAW OFFICES Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore? LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ALL IP CARE SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo   Kashak Agarwala 14 September 2025 Introduction Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court has become the subject of intense controversy following a December 2024 speech containing derogatory remarks against Muslims. Despite calls for his removal, procedural delays and institutional hesitancy have left impeachment proceedings stalled, with the judge now just eight months away from retirement. Background Controversial Speech: In December 2024, at a Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) event, Justice Yadav claimed that India would be governed by the will of the majority and used language widely criticized as anti-minority. Backlash: The comments triggered outrage, with critics arguing that such statements undermine the impartiality expected of a sitting judge. Impeachment Motion Stalled Announcement: On 10 December 2024, Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal declared that he would move an impeachment motion against Justice Yadav, supported by Lok Sabha MP Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi. Support: Within three days, 55 Rajya Sabha MPs signed the motion. The Judges Inquiry Act, 1968, requires at least 50 Rajya Sabha or 100 Lok Sabha MPs’ signatures for admission. Verification Delays: By June 2025, after verification, only 44 MPs had reconfirmed their support. The process was further stalled due to the absence of a Rajya Sabha Chairman following Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s retirement. The Internal Investigation That Never Occurred Supreme Court Interest: On 15 December 2024, the Supreme Court noted Justice Yadav’s speech and requested a report from the Allahabad High Court. Senior Advocates’ Letter: In January 2025, 13 senior lawyers, including Indira Jaising and Anand Grover, urged then CJI Sanjiv Khanna to act, even suggesting a CBI probe. Collegium’s Attempt: Justice Hrishikesh Roy indicated that Justice Yadav was asked to apologize. Though initially agreeable, he later refused. The Collegium began but then abandoned an inquiry in June 2025, deferring to Parliament’s jurisdiction. A Stark Contrast The sluggish response in Yadav’s case contrasts sharply with that of Justice Yashwant Varma, who was swiftly indicted after unaccounted cash was found in his home. Within four months, Parliament admitted a motion signed by 146 MPs, and an investigative panel was formed. Symbolic Roster Removal Limited Assignment: In December 2024, the Allahabad High Court restricted Justice Yadav to first-appeal cases. Reversal: By February 2025, bail matters were reassigned to him, suggesting the roster reshuffle was more symbolic than real. Conclusion: Time as the Ultimate Shield Justice Yadav’s case highlights systemic weaknesses in India’s judicial accountability. The impeachment motion is stuck in procedural limbo, the Supreme Court dropped its inquiry, and High Court measures proved temporary. With his retirement due in April 2026, time itself appears to be his strongest shield, raising serious questions about whether accountability mechanisms can ever overcome bureaucratic inertia and institutional reluctance. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Title: Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore? Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav: Impeachment in Limbo Read More »

Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ADVOCATE SHRUTI BIST Title: Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT S&A LAW OFFICES Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore? LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ALL IP CARE SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit Sushila Karki to Be Sworn in as Interim PM Amid Nepal’s Political Turmoil Trump Hails Charlie Kirk as ‘Martyr for Truth,’ Blames Radical Left for Violence Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court   Kashak Agarwala 14 September 2025 Introduction The Supreme Court of India has ruled that real estate insolvencies under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) must, as a general rule, be pursued on a project-by-project basis rather than against the entire corporate debtor, except in exceptional circumstances. The ruling, delivered by a Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, aims to protect solvent projects and genuine homebuyers from collateral damage. Background of the Case The Court was hearing four appeals arising from orders of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning Gayatri Infra Planner Pvt. Ltd. and Antriksh Infratech Pvt. Ltd. Mansi Brar Fernandes signed an MoU (April 6, 2016) for four flats, paying ₹35 lakh, with a buyback option worth ₹1 crore in 12 months. Sunita Agarwal invested ₹25 lakh (July 2015) with assured 25% returns in 24 months and a mandatory buyback clause.Both moved Section 7 IBC applications after defaults. The NCLT admitted the cases, but NCLAT reversed them, treating the applicants as speculative investors. Supreme Court’s Observations The SC upheld the NCLAT’s findings: Fernandes’ MoU was a buyback agreement, not a genuine flat purchase. Agarwal’s transaction with guaranteed returns and exit options lacked intent to hold property. Both applicants were speculative investors, not homebuyers, and thus ineligible to trigger CIRP. The Court reiterated that IBC cannot be misused by speculative investors as a debt-recovery mechanism. Referring to Pioneer Urban, the Bench noted that speculative CIRPs would destabilize projects and harm real homebuyers. Indicators of Speculative Investments The Court listed six non-exhaustive red flags: Agreements replacing possession with buyback/refund options. Refunds with high interest rates. Refusal to take possession. Acquisition of multiple units (often >10). Special rights/superior treatment. Assured unreasonable returns (20–25% in short term).➡️ True homebuyer intent is shown by ownership and possession of a unit. Housing as a Basic Right Invoking Article 21, the Court emphasized housing as a fundamental right: “A home is not just a roof but a statement of hopes, dreams, and security.” It reminded the State of its constitutional duty to protect homebuyers from exploitation by developers. Reform Directions by the Court To strengthen the IBC and protect homebuyers, the Court issued several systemic directions: NCLT/NCLAT Strengthening: Vacancies to be filled urgently; special IBC benches to be created; Union Govt. to submit compliance within 3 months. Expert Committee Formation: To be headed by a retired High Court judge with members from law/housing ministries, NIUA, HUDCO-HSMI, IIM, NLU, and NITI Aayog. Report due within 6 months. Empowering RERA: States must include at least one legal expert/consumer advocate in each RERA authority. Financial Safeguards: Periodic CAG audits of the SWAMIH Fund. Funds to be used for last-mile financing. Buyer proceeds for new projects to go into escrow accounts, released in tranches as per RERA. Applicability of the 2019 IBC Amendment The Court clarified that the 2019 IBC Amendment Ordinance (minimum 100 allottees or 10% of total allottees to trigger insolvency) applied since the petitions were pending when the ordinance came into effect, even though orders had already been reserved. Representation For Appellants: Vineet Kumar, Harshita Gulati, Anindita Mitra, Akhil Anand, Awanish Sinha, Nupur Kumar. For Respondents: Sr. Adv. Sunil Fernandes, Kaustubh Shukla, Saurabh Mishra, Diksha Dadu, Mantika Haryani, Astha Sharma, among others. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s judgment is a landmark in real estate insolvency, prioritizing project-level resolution, protecting genuine homebuyers, and discouraging speculative misuse of the IBC. With directives for stronger institutional capacity, RERA empowerment, and financial accountability, the ruling strengthens consumer protection and aims to stabilize India’s real estate sector. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Title: Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore? Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Real estate insolvency resolution should be project specific, not against entire corporate debtor: Supreme Court Read More »

Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore?

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore? LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ALL IP CARE SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit Sushila Karki to Be Sworn in as Interim PM Amid Nepal’s Political Turmoil Trump Hails Charlie Kirk as ‘Martyr for Truth,’ Blames Radical Left for Violence Larry Ellison Briefly Tops Elon Musk as World’s Richest After Oracle Stock Surge ITR Filing Deadline for FY 2024-25 Extended to September 15 — What You Need to Know HAL Inks SSLV Tech Transfer Deal with ISRO, Boosting India’s Private Space Push Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore?   Kashak Agarwala 14 September 2025 Introduction India has long aspired to become a global arbitration hub. On 7 September 2025, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu announced plans to set up a world-class international arbitration centre in Visakhapatnam, explicitly aiming to compete with Singapore, one of the world’s leading arbitration destinations. The declaration came during the International Mediation Conference in Visakhapatnam, with Naidu stressing arbitration’s role in bolstering investor confidence and economic growth. Why Visakhapatnam? Although arbitration in India is usually associated with Delhi and Mumbai, Visakhapatnam offers unique advantages: A strategic maritime metropolis with growing international trade links. Emerging as an IT and fintech hub. Strong institutional and political support. The Andhra Pradesh High Court has already trained 1,400 mediators, with another 800 in the pipeline, laying a foundation for a robust ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) ecosystem. Learning from Singapore Singapore’s success as a global arbitration centre rests on three pillars: Institutional autonomy via the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC). Judicial backing with minimal interference. International trust in neutrality and enforceability. For Visakhapatnam to succeed, it must not only provide infrastructure but also replicate these principles of consistency, neutrality, and credibility. Sea and Sustainability Potentials Visakhapatnam’s maritime identity offers a niche opportunity: It could specialize in maritime arbitration, a field historically dominated by London and Singapore. With the rise of ESG-linked disputes in green energy, climate compliance, and infrastructure, Vizag could position itself as India’s hub for sustainability-related arbitration. Challenges Ahead Several hurdles could impede progress: Governance and independence – political interference could undermine credibility. Talent pool – building arbitrators, counsel, and experts requires long-term investment. Enforcement and recognition – cross-border confidence in enforceability under Indian law is crucial. Global competition – Singapore, London, and Paris remain dominant, so Vizag must differentiate rather than imitate. The Bigger Picture: Arbitration in India India has taken steps toward strengthening arbitration: Establishment of the Mumbai Centre of International Arbitration (MCIA). Reforms via the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Acts. Yet, systemic delays and the absence of a national arbitration strategy remain obstacles. If Andhra Pradesh ensures seriousness and independence, it could advance India’s ambition to become a world arbitration leader. Conclusion Visakhapatnam’s proposed arbitration centre is both symbolic and ambitious, signaling India’s determination to reassert itself in international dispute resolution. But ambition must be matched by: Institutional autonomy Sector specialization Judicial consistency Only then can Visakhapatnam evolve into a credible competitor to Singapore instead of becoming another underutilized facility. Andhra Pradesh has taken the first decisive step—now the world will watch whether India can finally transform aspiration into reality. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore? Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay Sada Law • September 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Visakhapatnam’s Upcoming Arbitration Centre: Can Andhra Pradesh Match Up to Singapore? Read More »

SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit Sushila Karki to Be Sworn in as Interim PM Amid Nepal’s Political Turmoil Trump Hails Charlie Kirk as ‘Martyr for Truth,’ Blames Radical Left for Violence Larry Ellison Briefly Tops Elon Musk as World’s Richest After Oracle Stock Surge ITR Filing Deadline for FY 2024-25 Extended to September 15 — What You Need to Know HAL Inks SSLV Tech Transfer Deal with ISRO, Boosting India’s Private Space Push Kerala Karunya Plus KN-589 Lottery: ₹1 Crore First Prize Winner Announced for September 11, 2025 Draw Mahindra XUV700 Price Slashed by Up to ₹1.43 Lakh After New GST Cut SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced Shivani Garg 14 September 2025 Introduction On September 12, 2025, the SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) Tier 1 examination faced disruptions at multiple centres in Delhi, Gurgaon, and Jammu due to administrative and technical failures. The cancellations have forced the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) to reschedule exams, affecting thousands of aspirants. Background The SSC CGL exam is one of India’s most competitive recruitment processes, attracting lakhs of aspirants nationwide. Any disruption in its conduct significantly impacts candidates’ preparation, travel, and psychological readiness. What Happened & Centres Affected Delhi: Bharti Vidya Niketan Public School. Gurgaon: M.M. Public School (where over 1,400 candidates across three shifts were affected). Jammu: Digital Computer Education centre (first shift disrupted). Cause: Server crashes, outdated infrastructure, and mismanagement. Rescheduling & Candidate Instructions Delhi & Gurgaon candidates: Re-exam on September 24, 25, or 26, 2025. Jammu candidates: Re-exam on September 26, 2025. New centres in NCR will be allotted within ~10 days to avoid repeat issues. Candidate Concerns & Responses Many candidates travelled long distances, only to learn of last-minute cancellations. In Gurgaon, chaos erupted outside M.M. Public School as frustrated candidates protested over poor communication and infrastructure lapses. Aspirants cited logistical issues (travel, accommodation) and stress due to sudden changes. Official Response SSC Chairman S. Gopalakrishnan admitted that while ~215 centres functioned smoothly, around a dozen centres suffered major disruptions. He attributed the failures to outdated servers, weak networks, and poor centre management. Assurance given: affected candidates will be accommodated in new centres with improved facilities. Current Situation Exams at most centres remain unaffected. Affected candidates must prepare for re-exams later in September. SSC faces criticism for poor planning, inadequate infrastructure checks, and lack of timely updates. Conclusion The cancellation of SSC CGL Tier 1 exams at key centres has highlighted persistent problems in exam infrastructure management. While SSC has promised corrective measures and rescheduling, the incident underscores the urgent need for better oversight and technical preparedness to safeguard candidates’ time, effort, and morale.   Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced Sada Law • September 14, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay Sada Law • September 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit Sada Law • September 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

SSC CGL 2025 Exams Cancelled at Multiple Centres in Delhi, Gurgaon; Rescheduled Dates Announced Read More »

Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit Sushila Karki to Be Sworn in as Interim PM Amid Nepal’s Political Turmoil Trump Hails Charlie Kirk as ‘Martyr for Truth,’ Blames Radical Left for Violence Larry Ellison Briefly Tops Elon Musk as World’s Richest After Oracle Stock Surge ITR Filing Deadline for FY 2024-25 Extended to September 15 — What You Need to Know HAL Inks SSLV Tech Transfer Deal with ISRO, Boosting India’s Private Space Push Kerala Karunya Plus KN-589 Lottery: ₹1 Crore First Prize Winner Announced for September 11, 2025 Draw Mahindra XUV700 Price Slashed by Up to ₹1.43 Lakh After New GST Cut IIT Bombay Distances Itself After Controversial ‘Pyramid of Capitalist India’ Poster Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay Shivani Garg 13 September 2025 Introduction The Kremlin has announced that peace talks between Russia and Ukraine are on pause, with communication channels technically open but no active negotiations underway. Moscow has blamed European countries for obstructing progress, warning against unrealistic expectations of a breakthrough. Background Earlier this year, three rounds of direct talks were held in Istanbul. These led to limited agreements, mainly on prisoner and body exchanges, but failed to resolve core disputes such as territorial control, ceasefire terms, and long-term security guarantees. Russia insists that any settlement must reflect “realities on the ground,” while Ukraine demands recognition of its territorial integrity and rejects concessions of occupied land. Key Developments Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed the suspension of negotiations and criticized European influence as obstructive. He cautioned that expectations should be tempered: there can be no “rose-tinted glasses” approach to peace talks. Ukraine continues to push for a leaders’ summit between President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and President Vladimir Putin, but Russia has set preconditions, making such a meeting uncertain. Issues Security Guarantees: Ukraine, backed by European allies, demands strong post-war guarantees, potentially involving European or foreign forces. Russia sees this as a security threat and rejects the idea. Territorial Disputes: Russia seeks recognition of current frontlines and retained control over captured regions, while Ukraine refuses to concede land. Mediation Role: European states’ involvement is a key flashpoint, with Russia accusing them of hindering progress, while Ukraine views them as essential partners in ensuring guarantees. Current Status Peace negotiations are suspended, with both sides entrenched in their positions. Russia claims willingness to resume dialogue but continues to escalate militarily, launching intensified aerial assaults. Diplomatic interventions by the U.S. and European nations continue, but prospects of direct breakthroughs remain dim. Conclusion The suspension of peace talks underscores the widening gap between Russia and Ukraine’s negotiating positions. While dialogue is not completely off the table, territorial and security disputes remain major obstacles. Without direct engagement between the two presidents, a breakthrough looks unlikely, leaving the conflict to intensify militarily while diplomatic channels stall.   Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay Sada Law • September 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit Sada Law • September 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Sushila Karki to Be Sworn in as Interim PM Amid Nepal’s Political Turmoil Sada Law • September 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Russia Says Ukraine Peace Talks Suspended; Blames Europe for Delay Read More »

PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit Sushila Karki to Be Sworn in as Interim PM Amid Nepal’s Political Turmoil Trump Hails Charlie Kirk as ‘Martyr for Truth,’ Blames Radical Left for Violence Larry Ellison Briefly Tops Elon Musk as World’s Richest After Oracle Stock Surge ITR Filing Deadline for FY 2024-25 Extended to September 15 — What You Need to Know HAL Inks SSLV Tech Transfer Deal with ISRO, Boosting India’s Private Space Push Kerala Karunya Plus KN-589 Lottery: ₹1 Crore First Prize Winner Announced for September 11, 2025 Draw Mahindra XUV700 Price Slashed by Up to ₹1.43 Lakh After New GST Cut IIT Bombay Distances Itself After Controversial ‘Pyramid of Capitalist India’ Poster Apple Unveils iPhone Air, Announces iOS 26 Rollout on September 15 PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit   Shivani Garg 13 September 2025 Introduction Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to visit Manipur on 13 September 2025 for the first time since the outbreak of ethnic conflict in May 2023. The visit is expected to focus on direct engagement with internally displaced persons (IDPs), along with the launch of significant development projects. Background & Context Since May 2023, Manipur has witnessed ethnic clashes primarily between the Meitei community (valley) and Kuki-Zo groups (hills). The violence has caused widespread displacement, infrastructural damage, and a breakdown in law and order. Over 280 relief camps currently shelter around 57,000 displaced persons, many of whom have remained in camps for over two years. Key Developments – Modi’s Visit Date & Route: 13 September 2025, covering Churachandpur (hills) followed by Imphal (valley). Engagements: The PM will meet IDPs in both regions to hear their grievances. Development Announcements: Churachandpur: Foundation stones for projects worth about ₹7,300 crore. Imphal: Inauguration of projects worth ₹1,200 crore. Issues & Expectations Resettlement Roadmap: Displaced communities seek assurance of safety, peace, and return to homes. Political Demand: Kuki-Zo groups have reiterated calls for a separate Union Territory administration, citing safety and representation concerns. Other Priorities: Restoration of free movement between hills and valleys, currently restricted by “buffer zones.” Phasing out relief camps. Strengthening law and order. Rebuilding infrastructure and restoring essential services. Significance & Challenges The visit is a crucial signal of the Centre’s involvement in peace and development in Manipur after two years of unrest. Challenges ahead: Translating announcements into tangible action. Reconciling divergent community expectations (hills vs. valley). Maintaining security during the visit. Addressing deep-rooted political grievances beyond infrastructure, including representation, administration, and identity issues. Conclusion PM Modi’s visit to Manipur marks a pivotal moment in efforts to address a prolonged humanitarian and political crisis. While development projects may provide immediate relief, long-term stability will depend on reconciling competing demands, ensuring safe resettlement, and building trust between communities.   Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit Sada Law • September 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Sushila Karki to Be Sworn in as Interim PM Amid Nepal’s Political Turmoil Sada Law • September 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Trump Hails Charlie Kirk as ‘Martyr for Truth,’ Blames Radical Left for Violence Sada Law • September 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

PM Modi to Engage with Internally Displaced Persons in Churachandpur & Imphal During Manipur Visit Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote