Sada Law

YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI

Trending Today YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment Supreme Court Verdict on Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India: Challenge to EC Appointment Process & Section 7(1) of 2023 Act Supreme Court Verdict on Article 370: Constitutionality of Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Upheld Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 24 May 2025 YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, arrested in a shocking espionage case, allegedly leaked classified information to Pakistan’s ISI during Operation Sindoor. Discover how a travel vlogger became the center of a high-level spy investigation in India. Jyoti Malhotra: YouTuber at the Center of an Espionage Scandal In a sensational case that has rocked Indian intelligence circles, 33-year-old Jyoti Malhotra, the creator of the travel YouTube channel Travel with JO, has been arrested for allegedly sharing sensitive information with operatives of Pakistan’s ISI during Operation Sindoor. She is among 11 individuals arrested across Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh for being part of a suspected spy network believed to be active in North India. Arrest and Interrogation Under Official Secrets Act According to reports, Malhotra, who resides in Haryana, confessed to communicating with at least three Pakistani intelligence handlers. She was arrested for allegedly leaking classified information in violation of the Official Secrets Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). In a startling statement made during interrogation, Malhotra remained calm and unrepentant, reportedly telling investigators: “I don’t regret anything.” Unapologetic Stance During Investigation Investigators revealed that Malhotra, despite being aware of the severity of the charges, felt her actions were justified. “Jyoti feels she did not commit any mistake,” an officer involved in the case shared. Her unwavering demeanor has raised concerns among officials about the potential depth of the espionage network. Secret Communication During Blackouts Security agencies stated that Malhotra maintained communication with Pakistani intelligence handlers during critical communication blackouts in India. These blackouts typically occur during high-security alerts when internet and mobile networks are suspended. “She was actively communicating even when others couldn’t,” said a senior intelligence source. Authorities are now investigating whether this was part of a deliberate plan to bypass surveillance and stay in contact with foreign agents. Connection with Pakistani Diplomat Danish Malhotra’s connection to Pakistani High Commission official Ehsan-ur-Rahim, alias Danish, has further fueled suspicions. She reportedly met him in 2023 while applying for a visa, which allegedly led to her introduction to other ISI handlers. Danish was later accused of espionage and expelled from India on May 13. Just days later, Malhotra was apprehended in Hisar‘s New Aggarsain Extension. Multi-Agency Probe Underway A joint investigation involving the National Investigation Agency (NIA), Intelligence Bureau (IB), and Haryana Police is currently ongoing. Malhotra is on a five-day police remand as authorities comb through her financial records, travel logs, and digital devices to uncover the full scope of her activities. Conclusion: A Shocking Collision of Social Media and Espionage The case of Jyoti Malhotra serves as a stark reminder of how digital platforms like YouTube can be misused for purposes far beyond their original intent. What started as a travel content channel with over 400,000 subscribers has now become the focal point of a major national security investigation involving Pakistan’s ISI. As the multi-agency probe unfolds, it raises critical questions about digital vetting, cyber surveillance, and the vulnerabilities in our information ecosystem. With rising concerns over online radicalization and foreign interference, this case underscores the need for vigilance—not just from authorities, but from the online community at large. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI Read More »

Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment Supreme Court Verdict on Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India: Challenge to EC Appointment Process & Section 7(1) of 2023 Act Supreme Court Verdict on Article 370: Constitutionality of Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Upheld Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 24 May 2025 The Supreme Court has paused the discharge of a woman Indian Air Force officer who served in Operations Sindoor and Balakot after she was denied a Permanent Commission. This case highlights gender parity, comparative merit, and structural challenges in India’s Armed Forces. Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot A high-profile case involving a female officer of the Indian Air Force (IAF) has come under judicial scrutiny. The officer, who played a vital role in Operation Balakot and Operation Sindoor, has approached the Supreme Court of India challenging the denial of a Permanent Commission (PC). Judicial Bench Holds Up Release Pending Further Review The bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh temporarily withheld the officer’s release, clarifying that the stay would not offer undue advantage or set a precedent. Legal Representation by Renowned Advocate Representing the petitioner, Senior Advocate Dr. Menaka Guruswamy emphasized the officer’s critical expertise as a fighter controller in the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) during the operations. The officer, identified as Wing Commander Nikita Pandey, has served over 13.5 years and ranked second in the air fighter controller merit list. However, due to a 2019 policy, she is now facing forced discharge. Government’s Stand on Comparative Merit Union Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati defended the government’s decision, stating that the officer was found “incompetent” by a review board. However, she acknowledged a second board would reassess her case. When questioned, Justice Kant responded, “Let her continue for some time.” The ASG pointed to the military’s “steep pyramidal structure,” which necessitates the exit of some officers after 14 years to maintain a youthful force. Supreme Court Questions Inter-Se Merit Criteria Justice Kant expressed concerns about the reliance on “inter-se merit” to determine Permanent Commission eligibility. He suggested revising the Short Service Commission (SSC) recruitment strategy, recommending alignment with the number of PC openings to avoid unfair disqualification. “If you can accommodate 100 SSC officers for PC, you should allow that. Disqualification should not be based on comparative merit but genuine unsuitability,” he stated. Armed Forces Need Policy Reforms, Says Court The court also addressed the psychological and professional uncertainty faced by officers. Justice Kant praised the IAF, remarking, “They are the country. Their synchronization is unmatched, and we salute them for that.” He argued for transparency and fairness, suggesting that the promise of a PC after ten years should act as motivation rather than stress-inducing competition. ASG Bhati Shares Personal Insight into Military Challenges ASG Bhati, with personal ties to both the Air Force and the Army, compared the progression of military officers to the elevation of High Court judges to the Supreme Court. She emphasized that “functional youthfulness” remains a crucial criterion in military structures. Despite the rigid structure, she noted that many female officers are indeed receiving Permanent Commissions, and their performance has been commendable. Wider Impact of Supreme Court’s Temporary Relief The Supreme Court’s stay on the discharge of Wing Commander Pandey will also benefit other female officers currently contesting their PC denials. This order extends to cases pending in the Armed Forces Tribunals, High Courts, and the Supreme Court. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s intervention in Wing Commander Nikita Pandey’s case marks a critical step toward addressing gender bias and merit transparency in the Indian Armed Forces. The outcome could set a precedent for fairer Permanent Commission policies, ensuring deserving officers—regardless of gender—receive equal opportunities to serve long-term. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Read More »

Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment Supreme Court Verdict on Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India: Challenge to EC Appointment Process & Section 7(1) of 2023 Act Supreme Court Verdict on Article 370: Constitutionality of Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Upheld Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 24 May 2025 The Supreme Court has quashed FIRs under the UP Gangsters Act against SHUATS Vice-Chancellor Vinod Bihari Lal, calling them an “abuse of process.” Learn how this legal battle unfolded and why the verdict matters. Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against SHUATS VC Under UP Gangsters Act On May 23, 2025, the Supreme Court of India dismissed two FIRs filed under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 against Vice-Chancellor Vinod Bihari Lal of SHUATS, located in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. The apex court declared the FIRs as a clear “abuse of process of law.” High Court’s Refusal Overturned by Supreme Court A bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan also reversed the Allahabad High Court‘s decision to allow criminal proceedings, which included non-bailable warrants issued under Sections 2 and 3 of the 1986 Act. The Supreme Court noted,“We are convinced that the continuation of the Special Sessions trial no. 54/2019 arising out of FIR no. 850/2018 registered at Naini Police Station, district Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh is nothing but the abuse of the process of law.” Charges of Organized Economic Crimes The FIR alleged that Lal was the leader of a two-member “organized gang” involved in committing economic crimes through fraud, deception, and document forgery. These offenses fall under Chapters XVI, XVII, and XXII of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The authorities claimed the accused engaged in these acts for financial, material, and personal gain by manipulating official documents. However, the Supreme Court found no substantial evidence to support such claims and emphasized the lack of witness testimonies due to fear and intimidation. Interpretation of ‘Gang’ Under the Law Justice J.J. Munir of the High Court had previously clarified that violence is not a necessary condition to classify a group as a “gang” under Section 2(b) of the 1986 Act. He stated that non-violent antisocial activities, if committed systematically by a group or individually within a group, can also meet the criteria, especially when they result in financial or temporal gain. Conclusion: A Significant Judicial Stand on Legal Misuse This landmark ruling not only brings relief to SHUATS VC Vinod Bihari Lal but also sets a precedent against the misuse of stringent legal provisions like the UP Gangsters Act. The case underscores the Supreme Court’s commitment to ensuring that justice prevails over procedural exploitation. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Read More »

Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment Supreme Court Verdict on Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India: Challenge to EC Appointment Process & Section 7(1) of 2023 Act Supreme Court Verdict on Article 370: Constitutionality of Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Upheld Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 24 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India criticizes the Indian Navy for denying a Permanent Commission (PC) to a female SSC officer in the JAG Branch, calling for accountability and gender equality in the armed forces. “Shed Your Egos”: Supreme Court Criticizes Indian Navy Over Denial of PC to Female JAG Officer The Supreme Court of India has once again emphasized the need for gender equality in the armed forces, criticizing the Indian Navy for denying a Permanent Commission (PC) to a female officer in the Judge Advocate General (JAG) Branch. The petitioner, Seema Chaudhary, is a Short Service Commission (SSC) officer from the 2007 batch who has faced multiple legal hurdles in her pursuit of justice. Supreme Court Urges Navy to “Shed Ego” and Comply with 2024 Ruling Despite past directions, the Supreme Court noted that Seema Chaudhary had not been granted PC even after five rounds of litigation. During the hearing, Senior Advocate Dr. R Balasubramanian requested time to consult with the authorities. Meanwhile, Rekha Palli, representing the petitioner, pointed out systemic discrimination: women can only join the Navy through short commissions, unlike men who can enter via permanent commissions. No Female JAG Officers Have Been Granted Permanent Commission Palli emphasized that no female JAG officer in the Indian Navy has ever been granted a Permanent Commission. The bench, led by Justice Surya Kant and Justice N Kotiswar Singh, questioned the Navy’s rationale, especially as the petitioner was found suitable in all evaluation metrics. Negative ACRs and Gender Bias: The Court’s Rebuttal Dr. Bala argued that three Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) had negative remarks. However, the bench countered that these ACRs—covering 2016 to 2019—had been overruled by the reviewing authority. Justice Kant noted: “Enough is enough… Bring her in for Permanent Commission. This is not about ego.” He further criticized the bias of the male officers who authored the ACRs, highlighting a broader issue of gender discrimination in the Navy. 2024 Ruling and Violation of Article 142 In 2024, a bench led by former Chief Justice Dr. DY Chandrachud had already directed the Navy to re-evaluate Chaudhary’s PC eligibility. The judgment, delivered under Article 142 of the Constitution, mandated a special Selection Board review. Justice Kant reaffirmed that the ruling was final and binding, stating the Navy must comply without letting personal biases or ego interfere. Background: Seema Chaudhary’s Service History Commissioned in 2007, Seema Chaudhary progressed to Lieutenant Commander by 2012 and received two extensions during her service. In 2020, she was informed of her termination by August 2021. The case has roots in the Union of India v. Lieutenant Commander Annie Nagaraja judgment from 2020. That ruling stated that SSC officers in legal, education, and logistics branches should be considered for PC. Despite being included in that batch, Chaudhary was initially overlooked due to a 2008 policy letter that was later quashed. Claim of Workplace Harassment and Retaliation In her latest appeal, Chaudhary alleged that she was denied PC due to retaliation after filing a workplace harassment complaint against a male officer. A Board of Inquiry validated her claim, yet she was reassigned the next day—while the accused officer remained in place. Conclusion: A Call for Institutional Accountability This case is not just about one officer but reflects the broader struggle of women in the Indian armed forces. The Supreme Court’s stern remarks highlight the need for transparent, merit-based decision-making and an end to gender discrimination. The Indian Navy now stands at a critical juncture—will it uphold the constitutional principles of equality and justice, or allow systemic bias to persist? Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Read More »

Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment Supreme Court Verdict on Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India: Challenge to EC Appointment Process & Section 7(1) of 2023 Act Supreme Court Verdict on Article 370: Constitutionality of Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Upheld Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 24 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India declined to sentence a POCSO convict, citing the victim’s opposition to punishment and her current marital relationship with the accused. Learn about the landmark ruling under Article 142 and its implications on the legal system. Landmark Supreme Court Ruling Under Article 142 On Friday, May 23, the Supreme Court of India ruled against sentencing a man convicted under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). The bench, invoking its authority under Article 142 of the Constitution, noted that the victim—now an adult and married to the convict—did not view the incident as a crime. Victim Faced More Harm from Legal and Social Fallout The Court emphasized that although the act was legally an offense, the victim did not perceive it as such. According to the official report, the victim endured greater trauma from the legal and societal consequences rather than the act itself. Her struggle involved navigating police procedures, enduring court trials, and fighting to protect her husband from conviction. Emotional Bond and Current Family Life Influenced Decision The accused married the victim following the incident, and they now live together with their child. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, recognized the deep emotional connection the victim had developed with the convict. She had become, as noted, “very possessive about her small family.” Court Highlights Systemic Failures in Justice Delivery This judgment also spotlighted the failures of the legal system, society, and the victim’s own family. The Court remarked that “her own family abandoned her, the legal system failed her, and society judged her,” thereby denying her the opportunity to make informed decisions earlier. Instructions to State and Ministry of Women and Child Development Alongside the ruling, the Court issued preliminary instructions to the State Government and sent a notice to the Ministry of Women and Child Development. These directives aim to address the recommendations provided by the Amicus Curiae, with more detailed orders to follow upon release of the final judgment. Conclusion: A Controversial Yet Eye-Opening Judicial Precedent The Supreme Court’s decision to forgo sentencing in this POCSO Act case has ignited important conversations around justice, victim agency, and the limitations of the current legal framework. By exercising its powers under Article 142, the Court prioritized context, emotional well-being, and the wishes of the now-adult victim over rigid legal formalism. This ruling not only exposes the challenges victims face in the aftermath of such cases but also calls for urgent reform and sensitivity within the judicial system. As the nation reflects on this precedent, it remains critical to balance the rule of law with compassion, autonomy, and societal accountability. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw Publications. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process Sada Law • May 24, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment Read More »

Supreme Court Verdict on Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India: Challenge to EC Appointment Process & Section 7(1) of 2023 Act

Supreme Court Verdict on Article 370: Constitutionality of Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Upheld

Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case Akshay Kumar Sues Paresh Rawal for ₹25 Crore Over Hera Pheri 3 Exit Enforceability of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Supreme Court’s Landmark 2023 Ruling Explained Banke Bihari Temple Devotee Petitions Supreme Court Against UP Govt’s Corridor Redevelopment Plan Supreme Court Rules Juvenile Justice Board Cannot Review Its Own Decisions Under JJ Act Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 22 May 2025 The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 377 case against a husband, reaffirming that Indian law does not currently recognize the concept of marital rape. Read more on this significant legal development and its implications. Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case Against Husband In a major legal development, the Delhi High Court recently quashed a trial court’s decision to prosecute a man under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), citing that Indian law does not recognize the concept of marital rape. Case Background: Allegations of Unnatural Offence in Marriage The case involved a plea filed by the husband challenging the framing of charges under Section 377, which penalizes “unnatural offences.” The trial court had directed prosecution for allegedly engaging in oral sex with his wife. The matter was presided over by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma. Court’s Observation on Consent and Marital Rights The court clarified that the wife had not explicitly stated whether the act occurred without her consent. Citing Section 375 of IPC (as amended), which presumes implied consent for sexual activity in a marital relationship, the court emphasized that there is no legal basis for criminalizing such acts within marriage under Section 377. Impact of the Navtej Singh Johar Judgment Referring to the landmark Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case, which decriminalized consensual same-sex relations, the court stated that a key element of proving an offence under Section 377 is the absence of consent. Since consent was neither denied nor explicitly withdrawn in this case, the court ruled that no prima facie case existed. Interpretation of Section 377 in Marital Context The judge highlighted that Section 377 cannot be invoked to criminalize non-penile-vaginal intercourse, such as oral or anal sex, within a legally recognized marriage. This interpretation aligns with the reasoning laid out in the Navtej Singh Johar verdict. Contradictory Claims and Legal Arguments The wife had accused the husband of being “impotent” while simultaneously alleging that he engaged in oral sex, presenting a contradiction in her claims. The husband argued that their marriage was valid under Indian law and that consent was inherently presumed, protecting him from prosecution under Section 377. Legal Conclusion and Dismissal of Charges Ultimately, the High Court found no solid grounds to proceed with charges under Section 377. The judgment reaffirmed that legal protection is granted to husbands under the exception to rape laws in India, and that consensual acts within marriage cannot be criminalized under this section. Conclusion: Legal Protection Gaps Reflect India’s Backwardness on Marital Rape While the dismissal of the Section 377 case by the Delhi High Court was consistent with current legal standards, it highlights a deeper issue: the lack of legal recognition for marital rape in India. Unlike many progressive legal systems around the world, India continues to shield husbands from prosecution under outdated exceptions in its rape laws, particularly Section 375 of the IPC. This case reinforces the urgent need for legislative reform. Without acknowledging marital rape as a criminal offense, India remains behind in protecting the fundamental rights and bodily autonomy of married women. As legal and social discourse around consent continues to evolve globally, it is imperative for India to modernize its laws to ensure equal protection for all individuals—regardless of marital status. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 377 Case, Cites Lack of Marital Rape Recognition Under Indian Law Read More »

Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case Akshay Kumar Sues Paresh Rawal for ₹25 Crore Over Hera Pheri 3 Exit Enforceability of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Supreme Court’s Landmark 2023 Ruling Explained Banke Bihari Temple Devotee Petitions Supreme Court Against UP Govt’s Corridor Redevelopment Plan Supreme Court Rules Juvenile Justice Board Cannot Review Its Own Decisions Under JJ Act Supreme Court Declares Kuldeep Kumar Rightful Chandigarh Mayor After Electoral Malpractice Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 22 May 2025 The Bombay High Court has revoked a non-bailable warrant against Bollywood actor Arjun Rampal in a 2019 tax evasion case under Section 276C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Read on to learn the details of the court’s ruling and its implications. Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Arjun Rampal In a significant legal update, the Bombay High Court has overturned a non-bailable warrant issued against Arjun Rampal, a prominent Bollywood actor known for his roles in movies such as Om Shanti Om and Don. The case pertains to alleged tax evasion dating back to 2019. Background: Tax Evasion Charges Under Section 276C(2) Rampal is being prosecuted under Section 276C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which deals with the willful attempt to evade tax payment. The provision carries a maximum penalty of up to three years of imprisonment for offenders. Court Ruling: Warrant Deemed Unjustified On May 16, 2025, Justice Advait M. Sethna, presiding as vacation judge, set aside the warrant issued by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate of the 38th Court at Ballard Pier, Mumbai. According to the High Court, the April 9, 2025, order was issued in a case involving a bailable offense and lacked a proper application of judicial discretion. Justice Sethna labeled the order as “cryptic,” “contrary to law,” and an example of a mechanical approach in judicial decision-making. Legal Proceedings and Observations Despite Rampal’s attorney filing a vakalatnama and an exemption plea from personal appearance, the Magistrate still issued a non-bailable warrant. The High Court criticized this action, stating that no justification was provided in the original order. The judgment emphasized that such an approach could unfairly prejudice the accused, especially when the alleged offense is bailable in nature. The Court highlighted the lack of mental application and described the decision as a “mysterious order.” Outcome and Future Course While the Income Tax Department initially sought time to respond, it ultimately did not object to the limited relief sought by Rampal. As a result, the Bombay High Court quashed the April 9 order. However, it clarified that the proceedings on merit will continue as per due process of law, ensuring that the judicial process remains intact and unbiased. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case Read More »

Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton

Leave a Comment / Live cases / Sada Law

Trending Today Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Ex-IAS Probationer Puja Khedkar in UPSC Cheating Case Akshay Kumar Sues Paresh Rawal for ₹25 Crore Over Hera Pheri 3 Exit Enforceability of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Supreme Court’s Landmark 2023 Ruling Explained Banke Bihari Temple Devotee Petitions Supreme Court Against UP Govt’s Corridor Redevelopment Plan Supreme Court Rules Juvenile Justice Board Cannot Review Its Own Decisions Under JJ Act Supreme Court Declares Kuldeep Kumar Rightful Chandigarh Mayor After Electoral Malpractice Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Over Withheld Rs 2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Linked to NEP Non-Implementation Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 22 May 2025 Former US NSA John Bolton challenges Donald Trump’s claim of brokering peace between India and Pakistan, calling it a typical attempt to steal credit. Here’s what happened after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and the launch of Operation Sindoor. Trump Under Fire for India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Former US National Security Advisor John Bolton has publicly criticized former US President Donald Trump for falsely taking credit for mediating peace between nuclear rivals India and Pakistan. Bolton described Trump’s claims as part of a broader pattern of “rushing to the spotlight, facts notwithstanding.” “Trump Takes Credit for Everything” – Bolton Speaking in an interview with news agency ANI, Bolton remarked, “This is Donald Trump, who takes credit for everything.” He noted that while Trump may have had a conversation with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as well as Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the ceasefire claim has little merit. Bolton clarified that multiple nations might have been in contact during escalating tensions, but Trump’s immediate rush to claim credit fits a known behavior pattern. “It’s just Trump being Trump,” he added. The Pahalgam Attack and Operation Sindoor Trump’s comments came after a devastating terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir, on April 22, which claimed the lives of 26 civilians. In response, India launched a powerful military counteroffensive, **Operation Sindoor**, targeting nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Bolton dismissed the idea that the US played a central role in securing a ceasefire. “The notion that American mediation ended the conflict is unfounded,” he stated. Trump’s Trade-Based Peace Theory During a joint press briefing with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, Trump claimed, “We settled that whole thing… I believe I used trade to resolve it.” He emphasized the importance of US-India and US-Pakistan trade relations in supposedly defusing the situation. He further commented, “We had a conversation with them, and I believe we resolved the matter.” Trump Declares His Own Ceasefire on Truth Social Trump reiterated his claim on Truth Social, writing: “I am happy to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by the United States.” He praised both countries for their “excellent intelligence and use of common sense,” crediting US diplomacy with preventing a potential nuclear escalation. India Denies US Mediation Role Despite Trump’s assertions, Indian officials have repeatedly denied that the US played any part in brokering peace. They also rejected the notion that trade deals were linked to any de-escalation efforts between India and Pakistan. According to sources, India views Trump’s comments as misleading and diplomatically inappropriate, emphasizing that New Delhi’s military and diplomatic decisions are guided by internal strategy—not external pressure. Conclusion: A Pattern of Credit or Credibility? The recent remarks by John Bolton have reignited the debate around Donald Trump’s pattern of claiming credit in international affairs—this time, involving the sensitive dynamics between India and Pakistan. While Trump’s narrative of preventing a nuclear conflict may appeal to his base, official responses from India challenge the legitimacy of those claims. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Supreme Court Directs Center to Fully Implement Cashless Treatment Scheme for Road Accident Victims Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Supreme Court Stays Defamation Case Against Aroon Purie Over Bihar Political Debate Sada Law • May 22, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Trump’s India-Pakistan Ceasefire Claim Mocked by Ex-NSA John Bolton Read More »

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Espionage: No Regrets Over Leaking Info to Pakistan ISI

Supreme Court Halts Discharge of Woman IAF Officer Involved in Operations Sindoor and Balakot Amid PC Denial Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes Gangster Act FIR Against SHUATS VC, Cites Abuse of Legal Process

Supreme Court Slams Indian Navy for Denying Permanent Commission to Female JAG Officer

Supreme Court Declines Sentence in POCSO Case as Victim Now Married to Convict and Opposes Punishment

Supreme Court Verdict on Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India: Challenge to EC Appointment Process & Section 7(1) of 2023 Act

Supreme Court Verdict on Article 370: Constitutionality of Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Upheld

Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant Against Actor Arjun Rampal in Tax Evasion Case

Editorial message

Quick links

Contact info