sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Sada Law

SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LIS PARTNERS SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 01 June 2025 The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) bans Bollywood actor Arshad Warsi, his wife Maria Goretti, and others from the securities market for their role in a pump-and-dump scheme involving Sadhna Broadcast Limited. Discover the full details of SEBI’s findings, penalties, and the fraudulent trading practices involved. SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi and Others in Major Pump-and-Dump Scam On May 30, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a major order prohibiting actor Arshad Warsi, his wife Maria Goretti, and 57 others from participating in the securities market. The ban stems from their alleged involvement in manipulating the stock of Sadhna Broadcast Limited (SBL) through a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme. SEBI’s Findings on Market Manipulation According to the order issued by SEBI Whole Time Member Ashwani Bhatia, Arshad Warsi, his brother Iqbal Hussain Warsi, and Maria Goretti Warsi traded in SBL shares under the explicit direction of scheme mastermind Manish Mishra. WhatsApp chat records from July 13, 2022, revealed coordinated trades from the accounts of the three individuals — 3,29,050 shares by Arshad Warsi, 3,29,755 shares by Maria Goretti, and 82,625 shares by Iqbal Warsi — all at ₹12.08 per share, acting on Mishra’s instructions. The Role of Misleading YouTube Promotions SEBI’s investigation uncovered that the manipulation scheme operated in two stages. First, related parties carried out pre-arranged trades to artificially inflate the stock’s price and volume. Then, fake promotional videos were uploaded on YouTube claiming false acquisitions by the Adani Group, ownership of 5G licenses, and unrealistic share price projections ranging from ₹76 to ₹340. These videos, posted via five YouTube channels managed by Manish Mishra, were heavily promoted using Google Ads to attract public investors. Interim Orders and Scope of SEBI’s Investigation In March 2023, SEBI issued an interim order restricting the Warsis and others from trading in the securities market. The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) later limited the ban to SBL shares alone. The investigation covered the period from March 8 to November 30, 2022, triggered by investor complaints received between July and September 2022. Notably, during this timeframe, SBL’s public shareholding skyrocketed from 885 to 72,509, while promoter holdings fell from 40.95% to 25.58%. Regulatory Violations and Financial Penalties SEBI concluded that the Warsis’ trading activity violated multiple provisions of the SEBI Act, 1992 and the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003. Arshad Warsi’s unlawful profits totaled ₹41.70 lakh, Maria Goretti’s reached ₹50.35 lakh, and Iqbal Warsi earned ₹12.61 lakh. Mishra was held jointly liable, and Arshad Warsi was additionally accountable for the gains in his wife’s account. Disgorgement and Further Actions SEBI ordered the Warsis to repay the illicit earnings with 12% annual interest from November 30, 2022, and imposed a ₹5 lakh penalty on each individual. These amounts are to be deposited into the Investor Protection and Education Fund within 45 days. Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale for Investors and Market Participants The SEBI crackdown on Arshad Warsi, Maria Goretti, and others involved in the Sadhna Broadcast pump-and-dump scheme serves as a powerful reminder of the consequences of market manipulation. This case highlights the importance of regulatory oversight and transparency in protecting retail investors from fraudulent schemes fueled by misinformation and digital media. As financial markets become increasingly influenced by online content and social media, investors must remain vigilant and rely on verified sources before making investment decisions. SEBI’s decisive action reaffirms its commitment to maintaining market integrity and punishing those who misuse their influence for personal gain. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

SEBI Bans Arshad Warsi, Wife for One Year Over Sadhna Broadcast Pump-and-Dump Scam Read More »

Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LIS PARTNERS MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION BY MAIMS, DELHI Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 1 June 2025 The Supreme Court upholds a ₹1 lakh penalty on the Odisha Public Service Commission for failing to evaluate a judicial service exam answer. Learn what this means for exam integrity and future accountability in public recruitment processes. Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Penalty on Odisha PSC Over Exam Evaluation Lapse In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India upheld a ₹1 lakh fine imposed on the Odisha Public Service Commission (Odisha PSC) by the Odisha High Court for negligence in evaluating a judicial services exam paper. The case stemmed from the Odisha Judicial Service Examination 2022, where a candidate’s response to a 12.5-mark question went unchecked. Background of the Judicial Services Exam Dispute The controversy began when a young law graduate, aspiring to become a judicial officer, discovered that one of the answers in their exam script had not been evaluated. Despite this glaring error, the Odisha PSC submitted the answer sheet as complete. The candidate then petitioned the Odisha High Court, which ruled in their favor and imposed a ₹1 lakh penalty on the Commission. Supreme Court Bench Supports High Court’s Decision A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and Vijay Bishnoi reviewed the Commission’s appeal. The Court decided not to interfere with the High Court’s ruling, noting that the decision was made in light of the specific facts of the case and should not be treated as a binding precedent for similar situations in the future. PSC’s Appeal Dismissed Amid Accountability Concerns The Odisha PSC contended that the answer sheet had been properly assessed and requested the removal of adverse comments made by the High Court. However, Justice Surya Kant firmly questioned the Commission’s unwillingness to accept responsibility, asking, “How will the younger generation believe and trust you?” He criticized their defensive stance and stressed the importance of candidly admitting mistakes when they occur. Commission’s Responsibility Stressed by the Supreme Court Justice Dipankar Datta highlighted that even if examiners are outsourced, the ultimate responsibility lies with the Commission. He emphasized that three colleges unanimously confirmed the question (5a) was not evaluated. According to the Court, the ₹1 lakh fine was a minimal cost that should serve as a deterrent and promote vigilance in the Commission’s future assessment procedures. High Court’s Fine Seen as a Wake-Up Call The Supreme Court noted that if similar errors recur, the Commission could consider recovering penalties from the individual examiners involved. However, it stood by the High Court’s ruling, viewing the judgment as a necessary alert to improve diligence and prevent administrative negligence in public service examinations. Conclusion: A Message of Accountability for Public Commissions This ruling sends a clear message to all public service commissions in India: rigorous standards and transparency in evaluations are non-negotiable. In highly competitive and consequential exams like the judicial services examination, even minor mistakes can have lasting impacts on candidates’ futures. The Supreme Court’s verdict upholding the ₹1 lakh penalty reflects its commitment to justice and institutional accountability. It affirms the rights of candidates to fair and error-free assessments while reinforcing the obligation of bodies like the Odisha Public Service Commission to maintain the highest levels of integrity and transparency in public recruitment. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Read More »

NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LIS PARTNERS MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION BY MAIMS, DELHI NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 01 June 2025 Join the NPAC conference in Chennai on June 7, 2025, as top legal minds, policymakers, and insolvency professionals gather to reflect on a decade of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and chart its future roadmap. NPAC to Host High-Impact Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in Chennai The Nani Palkhivala Arbitration Centre (NPAC) is set to organize a prestigious one-day conference on June 7, 2025 (Saturday) in Chennai. Titled “Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: A Retrospective and Roadmap for the Future”, this event aims to foster insightful discussions among legal professionals, scholars, and policymakers on the decade-long impact of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in India. The IBC: A Decade of Economic Reform Introduced in 2016, the IBC marked a transformative phase in India’s economic reform agenda. As it approaches its tenth anniversary, the code’s implementation, evolution, and contribution to India’s commercial and financial ecosystem take center stage. The conference will examine its judicial interpretations, operational challenges, and future prospects. Key Topics and Discussions This international event will feature in-depth sessions led by eminent experts from the judiciary, regulatory authorities, legal academia, and the insolvency sector. Attendees can expect insightful discussions on: The evolution of the IBC ecosystem since 2016 Landmark rulings by courts impacting insolvency jurisprudence Comparative insights from global insolvency frameworks Synergies between arbitration, mediation, and insolvency Group insolvency and enterprise resolution mechanisms Trends in resolution strategies and value maximization Conference Highlights Distinguished Speakers: Judges from the Supreme Court and High Courts of India, Members of the NCLT, senior advocates, and noted insolvency professionals International Perspective: Comparative analyses on cross-border insolvency frameworks Networking Opportunities: Build connections with industry experts across the insolvency and legal ecosystem Why Attend? This is a must-attend event for insolvency professionals, lawyers, academics, and business leaders seeking to understand the strategic direction of insolvency law in India and globally. Whether you’re a practitioner or policy enthusiast, the conference offers a platform to engage with the latest trends, reforms, and best practices shaping the IBC landscape. Register and Stay Informed Don’t miss this opportunity to be part of a crucial dialogue on the future of India’s insolvency regime. For more details on registration, agenda, and speakers, visit the official NPAC website. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Supreme Court Upholds ₹1 Lakh Fine on Odisha PSC Over Judicial Exam Evaluation Error Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Sada Law • June 1, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

NPAC to Host Conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Reflecting on a Decade and Planning the Future Read More »

Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LIS PARTNERS MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION BY MAIMS, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU DELHI PROJECT 39A Justices Anjaria, Bishnoi, and Chandurkar Sworn In as Supreme Court Judges of India Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 1 june 2025 Delhi High Court orders Mohak Mangal to remove defamatory parts of his YouTube video targeting ANI over copyright strikes, citing reputational damage. Background: Defamation Case Filed by ANI Against Mohak Mangal On May 29, 2025, the Delhi High Court directed popular YouTuber Mohak Mangal to delete specific portions of his video titled “Dear ANI”, which criticized the news agency ANI for its handling of copyright strikes against content creators. The court responded to a defamation lawsuit filed by ANI, alleging that the video used inflammatory and defamatory language, including terms like “hafta wasooli” (extortion), “gunda raj” (rule of thugs), and “kidnap.” Court Observations and Verdict Judge Criticizes Use of Harsh Language Presiding over the case, Justice Amit Bansal noted that the video content was disparaging on its face and emphasized that such statements should have been phrased more appropriately. “Assuming ANI’s demands were unjust—how does that qualify as extortion?” the judge asked. He further questioned Mangal’s justification for using such serious accusations while choosing not to obtain proper licensing for ANI’s copyrighted content. Language Like “Mafia” and “Thugs” Under Fire The court also criticized the tone and terminology used by others named in the lawsuit. In particular, it addressed stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra, who used terms like “mafia” and “thugs” in social media posts. Justice Bansal stated: “I support free speech, but calling someone ‘thugs’ or ‘mafia’ is unacceptable.” Other Defendants: Mohammed Zubair and Kunal Kamra Alt News’ Zubair Agrees to Delete Post Mohammed Zubair, co-founder of fact-checking site Alt News, who was also named in the suit for promoting the video, agreed to remove one of his posts related to the incident from X (formerly Twitter). Kunal Kamra Removes One Post, Defends Satire Kunal Kamra, known for his satirical content, agreed to take down only one of several posts. His lawyer defended Kamra’s actions, highlighting his role as a free speech advocate and satirist. ANI’s Claims: Damaged Reputation and Harassment ANI stated in its petition that the video has caused measurable harm to its goodwill, public image, and business. The agency alleged the video incited widespread online harassment and backlash. The news agency emphasized that Mohak Mangal had used ANI’s copyrighted material in monetized videos without permission, calling it a calculated attack on their brand reputation and trademarks. Key Takeaways Delhi High Court instructed Mohak Mangal to delete defamatory parts of his video targeting ANI. The video allegedly used terms like “extortion”, “thugs”, and “kidnap” to describe ANI’s actions. Other figures like Mohammed Zubair and Kunal Kamra were also asked to remove related posts. ANI claims the video caused public backlash and harmed its reputation and credibility. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 • Case law • No Comments State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Orders Mohak Mangal to Remove Defamatory Content Targeting ANI Read More »

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Arunachal Pradesh: Exploring Its Rich Tribal Heritage, Natural Beauty, and Development Challenges JOB OPPORTUNITY AT DSA LEGAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT TRENTAR PRIVATE LIMITED JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UGRO CAPITAL LTD JOB OPPORTUNITY AT LIS PARTNERS MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION BY MAIMS, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NLU DELHI PROJECT 39A Justices Anjaria, Bishnoi, and Chandurkar Sworn In as Supreme Court Judges of India Allahabad High Court Rejects Rahul Gandhi’s Plea Challenging Summons Over Indian Army Remarks Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Prabhat Kumar biltoria 1 june 2025 The Supreme Court has issued a notice on appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran against the NCLAT’s decision on Byju’s insolvency case. Learn about the legal developments, key arguments, and what’s next in the Think & Learn Pvt Ltd saga. Supreme Court Reviews Appeals in Byju’s Insolvency Case On May 30, 2025, the Supreme Court of India issued a notice in response to appeals filed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Riju Raveendran. These appeals challenge a ruling by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which denied BCCI’s attempt to withdraw its insolvency application against Think & Learn Pvt Ltd, the parent company of Byju’s, without prior approval from the Committee of Creditors (CoC). Background of Byju’s Insolvency Case BCCI’s Initial Insolvency Petition The matter dates back to July 16, 2024, when the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted BCCI’s insolvency application due to unpaid dues amounting to ₹158.90 crore. A subsequent settlement between BCCI and Byju’s was initially approved by NCLAT. However, Glas Trust, a financial creditor, appealed the approval. On October 23, 2024, the Supreme Court nullified the NCLAT’s approval and instructed BCCI to file a fresh application with the NCLT. CoC Formation and Withdrawal Application On August 16, 2024, BCCI submitted a Form FA withdrawal application to the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). However, it was directed that the request could only be submitted to the NCLT after Glas Trust’s appeal was resolved. Meanwhile, the Committee of Creditors (CoC) was constituted on August 21, 2024. The Form FA was eventually submitted to the NCLT on November 14, 2024. The NCLT ruled that the settlement proposal must first be approved by 90% of the CoC under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 before allowing withdrawal. NCLAT Upholds NCLT Decision On April 17, 2025, the NCLAT upheld the NCLT ruling, stating that: The relevant date is when the withdrawal application is filed with the NCLT, not when submitted to the IRP. Since the CoC was already constituted, its approval was mandatory. The 90% CoC voting threshold under Section 12A applied in full. The NCLAT also rejected BCCI’s argument that the IRP delayed the application process, stating the delay was caused by BCCI itself. Riju Raveendran’s Plea Dismissed Entrepreneur Riju Raveendran also filed an appeal, claiming that his impleadment application was not properly heard. However, NCLAT dismissed his claim, confirming that he had participated in hearings and presented his arguments. Dissatisfied, Raveendran has now moved the Supreme Court seeking relief. What’s Next in Byju’s Insolvency Case? A Supreme Court bench led by Justices Vikram Nath and Sanjay Kumar has requested responses from Byju’s creditors and its insolvency resolution professional. The court will hear the request for interim relief on July 21, 2025. This ongoing legal battle highlights the complexities of insolvency resolution under the IBC and the critical role of the Committee of Creditors in approving settlements once a company enters the insolvency process. Key Takeaways: Supreme Court notice issued in response to appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran. NCLAT upheld that CoC approval is mandatory for withdrawal under Section 12A of the IBC. Next Supreme Court hearing is scheduled for July 21, 2025.     Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 • Case law • No Comments State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Byju’s Insolvency Case Appeals by BCCI and Riju Raveendran Read More »

Justices Anjaria, Bishnoi, and Chandurkar Sworn In as Supreme Court Judges of India

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Justices Anjaria, Bishnoi, and Chandurkar Sworn In as Supreme Court Judges of India Allahabad High Court Rejects Rahul Gandhi’s Plea Challenging Summons Over Indian Army Remarks CBI Arrests NCLT Mumbai Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Scandal INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BJP LEGAL CELL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT OFFICE OF MRS. SANGEETA YADAV INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT AERHE DEVELOPMENT FEDERATION Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders on Verandah Construction and Green Parking, Citing No UNESCO Violation Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Justices Anjaria, Bishnoi, and Chandurkar Sworn In as Supreme Court Judges of India Prabhat Kumar biltoria 31 May 2025 Justices NV Anjaria, Vijay Bishnoi, and Atul S Chandurkar have been sworn in as Supreme Court judges, bringing the bench to full strength of 34 judges. Learn about their careers and the oath ceremony led by CJI BR Gavai. Supreme Court Oath Ceremony Administered by CJI BR Gavai The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai. This appointment follows the recent announcement by the Central Government confirming the elevation of the three judges to the Supreme Court. Notably, Justice Vijay Bishnoi took his oath in Hindi, while Justices Anjaria and Chandurkar took theirs in English. With these appointments, the Supreme Court of India now operates at its full sanctioned strength of 34 judges, enhancing its capacity to manage the nation’s growing judicial workload. Collegium Recommendation and Background of the Judges On May 26, 2025, the Supreme Court Collegium, led by CJI BR Gavai, recommended the elevation of these three distinguished judges. At the time: Justice NV Anjaria was serving as Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, with Gujarat as his parent High Court. Justice Vijay Bishnoi, originally from Rajasthan High Court, was Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court. Justice Atul S Chandurkar was a judge at the Bombay High Court. Justice NV Anjaria’s Legal Career and Judicial Journey Justice Anjaria began his legal career in August 1988 at the Gujarat High Court under Senior Advocate SN Shelat. He specialized in constitutional, civil, labor, and service law, serving as standing counsel for several state entities. His judicial appointments include: Additional Judge, Gujarat High Court – November 21, 2011 Permanent Judge, Gujarat High Court – September 6, 2013 Chief Justice, Karnataka High Court – February 25, 2024 Justice Vijay Bishnoi’s Experience and Contributions Registered as an advocate on July 8, 1989, Justice Bishnoi practiced at the Rajasthan High Court and the Central Administrative Tribunal in Jodhpur. He handled civil, criminal, constitutional, service, and election cases and served as Additional Central Government Standing Counsel (2000-2004). His judicial milestones include: Additional Judge, Rajasthan High Court – January 8, 2013 Permanent Judge, Rajasthan High Court – January 7, 2015 Chief Justice, Gauhati High Court – February 5, 2024 Justice Atul S Chandurkar’s Career Highlights Justice Chandurkar began his legal practice in Mumbai in 1988, working with Senior Advocate BN Naik, later moving to Nagpur in 1992 to broaden his legal practice. He was appointed: Additional Judge, Bombay High Court – June 21, 2013 Importance of the New Supreme Court Judges’ Appointment The induction of Justices NV Anjaria, Vijay Bishnoi, and Atul S Chandurkar reinforces the Supreme Court’s strength, enabling it to better serve justice efficiently across India. Their vast experience from various High Courts brings valuable perspectives to the nation’s highest judicial forum. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 • Case law • No Comments State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Justices Anjaria, Bishnoi, and Chandurkar Sworn In as Supreme Court Judges of India Read More »

Allahabad High Court Rejects Rahul Gandhi’s Plea Challenging Summons Over Indian Army Remarks

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Allahabad High Court Rejects Rahul Gandhi’s Plea Challenging Summons Over Indian Army Remarks CBI Arrests NCLT Mumbai Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Scandal INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BJP LEGAL CELL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT OFFICE OF MRS. SANGEETA YADAV INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT AERHE DEVELOPMENT FEDERATION Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders on Verandah Construction and Green Parking, Citing No UNESCO Violation Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA Allahabad High Court Rejects Rahul Gandhi’s Plea Challenging Summons Over Indian Army Remarks Prabhat Kumar biltoria 31 May 2025 The Allahabad High Court has dismissed Rahul Gandhi’s plea against a defamation summons related to his controversial remarks about the Indian Army. Learn the key details of the case, the political backdrop, and its legal implications. Allahabad High Court Dismisses Rahul Gandhi’s Plea Over Indian Army Remarks Rahul Gandhi Faces Legal Setback Over Defamation Case In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court has rejected a petition filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, challenging a summons issued by a Lucknow court in a defamation case. The case pertains to Gandhi’s alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra. Details of the Court’s Decision Justice Subhash Vidyarthi dismissed the plea on its merits, affirming that the legal process must continue. The original summoning order was issued by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Alok Verma, requiring Rahul Gandhi to appear in court on March 24. What Sparked the Legal Action? Defamatory Comments About Indian Army The complaint stems from a statement made by Rahul Gandhi on December 16, 2022, referring to a clash between Indian and Chinese troops in Arunachal Pradesh on December 9, 2022. Gandhi had remarked that: “Chinese soldiers are beating up Indian Army personnel in Arunachal Pradesh.” This comment, interpreted as a criticism of the Government of India’s response to Chinese aggression, was deemed insulting to the armed forces. Who Filed the Complaint? Lawyer Vivek Tiwari filed the defamation complaint on behalf of Uday Shankar Srivastava, a former director of the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) with a rank equivalent to that of an Army Colonel. Tiwari alleged that Gandhi’s comments were defamatory and harmed the dignity of the Indian Army. Broader Legal Context and Political Fallout Other Defamation Cases Against Rahul Gandhi Rahul Gandhi has been facing a series of legal battles over alleged defamatory statements: In January 2025, the Supreme Court of India stayed criminal defamation proceedings against him related to comments about Amit Shah, the Union Home Minister. In a 2018 speech, Gandhi referred to Shah as a “murder accused,” drawing backlash and legal action from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Navin Jha. The Supreme Court also admonished Gandhi for calling Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, a key figure in Hindutva ideology, a “British collaborator.” The bench warned of suo motu contempt proceedings if similar remarks were repeated. Key Takeaways The Allahabad High Court has upheld the defamation summons against Rahul Gandhi. The case relates to his 2022 statement on Chinese troops confronting Indian soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh. Legal experts see this as part of a broader pattern of litigation involving political speech. The Supreme Court of India remains involved in several other related matters. Conclusion The dismissal of Rahul Gandhi’s plea by the Allahabad High Court marks another chapter in his ongoing legal and political battles. As the 2024–2025 political landscape heats up, such cases underscore the tension between freedom of expression and accountability for public statements, especially when they involve sensitive national issues like the Indian Army. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 • Case law • No Comments State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Allahabad High Court Rejects Rahul Gandhi’s Plea Challenging Summons Over Indian Army Remarks Read More »

CBI Arrests NCLT Mumbai Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Scandal

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today CBI Arrests NCLT Mumbai Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Scandal INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT BJP LEGAL CELL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT OFFICE OF MRS. SANGEETA YADAV INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT AERHE DEVELOPMENT FEDERATION Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders on Verandah Construction and Green Parking, Citing No UNESCO Violation Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach CBI Arrests NCLT Mumbai Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Scandal Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 31 May 2025 The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has arrested the Deputy Registrar of NCLT Mumbai for allegedly accepting a ₹3 lakh bribe to influence a legal case. Get full details on the bribery case, sting operation, and ongoing investigation. CBI Cracks Down on Corruption in NCLT Mumbai On May 29, 2025, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) apprehended Charan Pratap Singh (Deputy Registrar of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench), along with an associate, in a significant bribery and corruption case. The arrest followed allegations that the two demanded and accepted a ₹3 lakh bribe to influence a pending legal case. Background: Long-Running Legal Dispute Sparks Corruption Charges The bribery investigation was triggered by a complaint from a hotel owner involved in a property dispute with his brothers. The complainant had submitted a petition to NCLT Mumbai‘s Court No. IV on November 2, 2020. The case remained unresolved for years. According to a CBI press release, on May 11, 2025, the Deputy Registrar contacted the complainant and allegedly demanded ₹3.5 lakh to use his influence within the Tribunal to sway the ruling. After negotiation, the final amount was settled at ₹3 lakh. CBI Sting Operation Leads to Arrest To verify the complaint, the CBI organized a sting operation. On May 29, one of the accused was caught accepting the bribe—₹1 lakh in actual currency and ₹2 lakh in dummy notes—on behalf of the Deputy Registrar. Later that day, Charan Pratap Singh was also arrested for his role in the bribery scheme. Ongoing Investigation: Raids in Mumbai and Lucknow Following the arrests, the CBI launched search operations at various locations associated with the accused in Mumbai and Lucknow. The goal is to uncover more evidence and determine whether additional individuals were involved in the corruption network. Legal and Public Implications This case highlights growing concerns over corruption in India’s judicial system, especially in quasi-judicial bodies like the NCLT. Public trust and the integrity of legal institutions are at stake as the investigation progresses. Conclusion The CBI’s arrest of the Deputy Registrar of NCLT Mumbai represents a major step toward cleaning up corruption in India’s legal and tribunal systems. As the probe unfolds, further developments may expose the wider scope of bribery and misconduct within key judicial forums. Stay tuned for more updates on this high-profile CBI investigation and NCLT bribery case. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach Sadalaw • May 30, 2025 • Case law • No Comments State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act State of West Bengal vs Union of India 2024: Supreme Court Judgment on CBI Jurisdiction and Consent Withdrawal under DSPE Act Sada Law • May 27, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Supreme Court Rules Cheque Dishonour Is Not a Continuing Cause for Arbitration Under Section 138 NI Act Sada Law • May 25, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

CBI Arrests NCLT Mumbai Deputy Registrar in ₹3 Lakh Bribery Scandal Read More »

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders on Verandah Construction and Green Parking, Citing No UNESCO Violation

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders on Verandah Construction and Green Parking, Citing No UNESCO Violation Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders on Verandah Construction and Green Parking, Citing No UNESCO Violation PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 31 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court orders to construct a verandah and install green pavers, stating there’s no violation of UNESCO heritage site regulations. A key ruling impacting the Capitol Complex and sustainable development in Chandigarh. Supreme Court Upholds High Court Orders on Verandah and Green Parking in Chandigarh The Supreme Court of India has affirmed the directives issued by the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding infrastructure upgrades at the court premises. These include the construction of a new verandah in front of Courtroom No. 1 and the installation of green paver blocks in the existing kutcha parking area. High Court’s Infrastructure Orders Backed by Top Court A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta rejected objections raised by the Chandigarh Administration. The Court ruled that the verandah construction aligned with UNESCO guidelines for global heritage sites, including the iconic Capitol Complex. Preserving Heritage While Promoting Utility The High Court’s plan to replicate existing verandahs in front of Courtrooms 2–9 was deemed logical and harmonious with the heritage structure. The apex court emphasized that while there’s no UNESCO violation, the Chandigarh Administration may seek ex post facto approval as a precautionary step. Green Paver Blocks to Address Parking Woes The Supreme Court also validated the High Court’s February 7 and 21, 2025, orders to install green paver blocks in the open kutcha parking area. The aim is to maximize vehicle capacity, provide shade, and expand greenery, ensuring sustainability without compromising heritage status. Expert Guidance Encouraged for Landscaping The High Court was directed to consult landscaping professionals to ensure strategic tree planting and optimal parking. Oversight will be managed by the Court’s internal Concerned Committee. Temporary Relief in Contempt Proceedings To facilitate compliance, the Supreme Court has put contempt proceedings—initiated on December 13, 2024—on hold for 12 weeks. This includes temporary relief for Chief Engineer CB Ojha, who had been named in the notice. Timeline of Events and Legal Journey The issue originated in 2023 when the High Court Secretary filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to enhance infrastructure. A writ of mandamus was issued on November 29, 2024, instructing the Chandigarh Administration to complete the verandah within six weeks. The Administration, citing the World Heritage Committee and design principles by Le Corbusier, challenged the directive. Architectural and Environmental Balance Emphasized Despite pending consultations with Fondation Le Corbusier and the Archaeological Survey of India, the High Court moved forward, citing urgent public utility concerns. The Supreme Court stayed these orders temporarily in January 2025 but has now reversed that decision. Parking Crisis and Sustainable Growth The High Court justified green pavers due to the daily influx of 3,000–4,000 vehicles and the limited capacity of the underground three-tier parking (600 cars). It also ordered planting 100–200 trees to restore green space. Final Verdict: All Orders Upheld All four orders issued by the High Court—including verandah construction and green parking upgrades—stand upheld by the Supreme Court. This landmark decision sets a precedent for balancing heritage preservation with modern infrastructure and environmental sustainability. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders on Verandah Construction and Green Parking, Citing No UNESCO Violation Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders on Verandah Construction and Green Parking, Citing No UNESCO Violation Sada Law • May 31, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders on Verandah Construction and Green Parking, Citing No UNESCO Violation Read More »

Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Supreme Court: No Blanket Ban on Witness Statement Disclosure Without Individual Threat Assessment Under UAPA WazirX Hack Explained: Legal Analysis and Cryptocurrency Security Lessons from India’s Biggest Crypto Breach LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTIO LLP, DELHI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUNIOR ADVOCATE AT SAHALNA ASSOCIATE JOB OPPORTUNITY AT EVARA LEGAL LLP JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADITYA BHARAT MANUBARWALA JOB OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF MS. SUPRIYA JUNEJA AND MR. ADITYA SINGLA Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi PRABAHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 31 May 2025 The Supreme Court of India will hear a plea next week challenging demolition orders in Jamia Nagar, Delhi. The petition questions the legality of notices issued without due process, raising concerns about arbitrary evictions. Background: Supreme Court Agrees to Review Demolition Plea On Thursday, May 29, the Supreme Court of India agreed to hear a petition next week regarding demolition notices issued in Jamia Nagar, Delhi. The notices pertain to alleged unauthorized constructions in the area. The plea was presented before Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, who initially advised the counsel to approach the High Court. However, the counsel argued that the notices were issued in violation of previous Supreme Court directives and insisted that the matter needed urgent attention. Allegations of Arbitrary Demolition The petitioners claim that structures were “arbitrarily picked” for demolition, and that they were not part of the area mentioned in the court’s earlier contempt ruling. The counsel asserted that this was originally a private dispute which escalated to a court-ordered demolition without a fair hearing. They stated that although the Supreme Court allowed a 15-day notice period, residents received notices affixed outside their homes on May 26, demanding immediate eviction without due process. Legal Concerns Over Due Process The counsel emphasized that since the Supreme Court’s previous order affected the parties directly, the High Court could not be approached. They requested a recall of the order on the grounds that the affected individuals were not heard during the original proceedings. In response, CJI Gavai remarked that the demolition was being executed based on a valid Supreme Court directive after a thorough document review. “We cannot sit in appeal over this Court’s directions,” he stated, though he maintained that the High Court remained an available forum. Listing Confirmed for Next Week Despite repeated suggestions to take the matter to the High Court, the counsel pressed for an urgent hearing in the Supreme Court. Eventually, the CJI agreed to list the matter for the upcoming week. Earlier on May 8, the Supreme Court had instructed the Delhi Development Authority and the Delhi government to proceed with the legal demolition of unauthorized constructions over more than four bighas of public land in Khasra No. 279, Okhla Village, within a period of three months. Conclusion: A Critical Legal Test for Property Rights and Due Process The upcoming hearing in the Supreme Court of India will be pivotal in determining whether demolition actions in Jamia Nagar were carried out in compliance with legal procedures and constitutional rights. With allegations of arbitrary notices and lack of proper hearing, the case raises important questions about the balance between urban development and the protection of individual rights. As Delhi continues to grapple with unauthorized constructions, the outcome of this plea could set a crucial precedent for similar disputes across the country. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Supreme Court Upholds Arrest Stay of BJP Minister Vijay Shah in Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Case, Ends MP High Court Proceedings Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Filmmaker Akhil Marar Over Alleged Seditious Remarks Sada Law • May 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week on Jamia Nagar Demolitions in Delhi Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote