sadalawpublications.com

Sada Law

Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation

Trending Today Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARIN PARTNERS JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIDHI CENTRE FOR LEGAL POLICY Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 07 June 2025 A Pakistani national residing in Goa since 2016 on a long-term visa has moved the Supreme Court of India after India revoked visas for Pakistani citizens post-Pahalgam attack. Learn more about the case, legal response, and visa policy changes. Background – Pakistani Citizen Residing in Goa on Long-Term Visa A Pakistani national, who claims to have been living in Goa since 2016 on a valid long-term visa, has approached the Supreme Court of India to challenge the recent Government of India decision to revoke visas for Pakistani nationals. The individual asserts he was born in India and has maintained legal residency in Goa for nearly a decade. His appeal follows a government notification issued after the Pahalgam terror attack, which led to the cancellation of most visas granted to Pakistani citizens. Supreme Court Hearing and Legal Arguments The petition came before a bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma. During the hearing, the petitioner’s legal counsel referenced the Union government’s notification stating that all visas granted to Pakistani nationals were revoked as of April 27, except for categories like medical, diplomatic, official, and long-term visas. When Justice Karol remarked, “Then go back,” the lawyer responded that the petitioner is not unwilling to leave but requested the court to consider specific conditions outlined in the long-term visa regulations. Bench Queries and Petitioner’s Legal Route The court questioned why the petitioner did not approach the Bombay High Court, which has jurisdiction over Goa, before coming to the Supreme Court. The counsel explained that local police visits created concerns for the petitioner, prompting a direct approach to the apex court. The bench eventually agreed to list the matter for a detailed hearing, taking note of the petitioner’s claim of Indian birth and long-standing residence. Government Order – Visa Revocation for Pakistani Nationals In its official statement, the Government of India clarified that all currently valid visas for Pakistani nationals—with the exception of medical (valid until April 29), long-term, diplomatic, and official visas—were revoked effective April 27. This directive was issued following heightened security concerns after the Pahalgam attack, which triggered a reassessment of India’s visa policy for Pakistani citizens. Implications of Visa Policy Changes on Pakistani Residents in India This case brings attention to the uncertainty faced by Pakistani nationals in India, particularly those residing on long-term or humanitarian grounds. The government’s directive has raised legal and humanitarian questions, especially for those who claim deep ties to India through birth or long-term residence. Conclusion – Awaiting Supreme Court’s Decision As the Supreme Court of India prepares to examine the matter further, this case could set a precedent for how India treats visa-holding Pakistani nationals in light of evolving national security policies. The outcome may affect similar long-term residents seeking legal clarity and protection under Indian law. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Read More »

Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty

Trending Today AIMPLB to File Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Launch of Waqf Umeed Portal Amid Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 Supreme Court Forms Committee to Manage Overcrowding and Ban Illegal Mining in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve Kerala High Court Orders Disclosure of Cargo and Oil Spill Data from MSC Elsa Sinking on Environment Day Pakistani National Living in Goa Since 2016 Appeals to Supreme Court After Visa Revocation Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty PRABHAT BILTORIA 07 June 2025 Madras High Court affirms that same-sex couples can be recognized as families, highlighting LGBTQIA+ rights and personal liberty. Read how this landmark ruling strengthens legal protection for same-sex partners in India. Landmark Ruling by Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family In a significant move for LGBTQIA+ rights in India, the Madras High Court has ruled that while same-sex marriage is not yet legal under Indian law, same-sex couples can still be considered a family unit. This decision strengthens the legal recognition of chosen families and reinforces the right to personal liberty as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Case Overview – Lesbian Woman Freed from Illegal Detention The judgment came after a habeas corpus petition was filed by a 25-year-old woman from Tirupattur district. Her partner had approached the court seeking help after the woman was allegedly held against her will by her family in Gudiyatham, Vellore district. A division bench comprising Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan directed that the woman has full legal rights to leave with her partner, as per her own will. The court emphasized that no one, including her family, has the right to interfere with her personal decisions. Recognition of Chosen Families in LGBTQIA+ Law The court made a powerful statement: “Family can be established in ways other than marriage.” It highlighted that the concept of chosen family is now well-established in LGBTQIA+ legal frameworks, citing the NALSA v. Union of India and Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India cases, where the Supreme Court of India ruled that sexual orientation is a protected aspect of personal liberty. Police Inaction Criticized by the Court The bench also criticized the police departments in Gudiyatham (Tamil Nadu), Reddiyarpalayam (Puducherry), and Jeevan Beema Nagar (Karnataka) for failing to act on emergency complaints. The court stated that authorities became responsive only after the habeas corpus petition was filed. To ensure ongoing safety, a writ of continuing mandamus was issued, instructing the jurisdictional police to provide protection to the couple whenever necessary. Societal Resistance vs. Legal Clarity The woman’s mother alleged that her daughter had been “led astray” and turned into a “drug addict” by the petitioner. However, the court firmly rejected this narrative, noting that the woman appeared healthy and mentally sound. Although the petitioner referred to herself only as a “close friend,” the bench acknowledged the reluctance to disclose the true nature of their relationship due to the conservative societal climate—despite progressive legal rulings like NALSA and Navtej Johar. Reflections on Leila Seth and LGBTQIA+ Legal Journey The bench also recalled Leila Seth‘s heartfelt letter expressing her disappointment over the reversal of the Delhi High Court‘s ruling in the Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi case, which initially decriminalized same-sex relationships. While Seth did not live to see the Supreme Court’s final decision in the Navtej Singh Johar case, her advocacy still resonates in the ongoing struggle for LGBTQIA+ equality. Final Verdict – Law Supports Adult Autonomy and Chosen Love The court concluded that the law leaves no room for ambiguity:Adults have the right to make life choices, and interference by family or society is not justified under the Constitution. The ruling reinforces the principle that personal liberty and sexual orientation are constitutionally protected. Conclusion: A Step Forward for LGBTQIA+ Rights in India This Madras High Court judgment marks a crucial step forward in the recognition of same-sex relationships and chosen families in India. While same-sex marriage remains unrecognized, this ruling sets a strong precedent that reaffirms legal protections, individual freedom, and the dignity of LGBTQIA+ individuals. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Madras High Court Recognizes Same-Sex Couples as Family, Upholds LGBTQIA+ Rights and Personal Liberty Read More »

Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership

Trending Today Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARIN PARTNERS JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIDHI CENTRE FOR LEGAL POLICY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UNITEDLEX Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership KASHISH JAHAN 06 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India ends a 50-year legal dispute over the Shahdara Gurdwara, affirming Sikh ownership and setting a vital precedent for future religious property cases. A Landmark Ruling on Religious Property Rights In a historic judgment, the Supreme Court of India has officially concluded a five-decade legal battle concerning a prominent Gurdwara in Shahdara, Delhi. The Court dismissed the claim by the Delhi Wakf Board that the site qualified as waqf land, instead recognizing the Sikh community’s longstanding religious and historical ties to the site. Legal Dispute and Historical Background The conflict arose from the Delhi Wakf Board’s assertion that the Gurdwara was a “waqf by user” property, suggesting that consistent usage over time had converted it into waqf land. However, the Supreme Court ruled that the Gurdwara has existed since 1947, thus invalidating the claim of implied conversion based on historical use. The judgment was grounded in historical evidence and long-standing community association. Impact and Broader Legal Significance This verdict not only resolves a long-pending religious property case but also establishes a judicial precedent for similar disputes. The ruling reinforces the significance of verifiable historical documentation in religious land ownership conflicts and highlights the crucial role of the Indian judiciary in preserving cultural heritage and ensuring religious freedom. Conclusion: Strengthening Religious and Legal Integrity By siding with factual history and religious continuity, the Supreme Court’s decision safeguards the rights of religious communities and contributes to a stronger legal foundation for addressing disputes involving sacred sites. The ruling is seen as a victory for truth, faith, and the rule of law. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Ends 50-Year Shahdara Gurdwara Dispute, Affirms Sikh Ownership Read More »

Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders

Trending Today Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARIN PARTNERS JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIDHI CENTRE FOR LEGAL POLICY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UNITEDLEX JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NMIMS KIRIT P. MEHTA SCHOOL OF LAW Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders KASHISH JAHAN 06 June 2025 Teachers in Chhattisgarh have filed a legal petition challenging the state’s school rationalization orders, citing violations of service rules and constitutional rights. Learn how this case could reshape educational policy and teacher employment. Teachers Raise Concerns Over Education Reform in Chhattisgarh A group of educators in Chhattisgarh has filed a writ petition challenging the state government’s recent school rationalization orders. According to the petitioners, these directives infringe upon their constitutional rights and jeopardize their employment and professional roles within the education system. Legal Challenge Led by Teachers’ Union The Chhattisgarh Vidyalayin Shikshak Karmachari Sangh, in collaboration with 34 affected teachers, submitted a formal writ petition against two controversial state orders. These orders call for the merger of schools and the reassignment of headmasters to general teaching positions, a move that the educators argue violates the Chhattisgarh School Shiksha Sewa Bharti Tatha Padonnati Niyam, 2019. The union claims the decision undermines long-established service rules and fails to consider its impact on educational quality and staff morale. Impact on Educational Infrastructure and Policy The petition has spotlighted growing concerns about how government policies affect school administration and teacher placement. Education experts emphasize that restructuring without proper stakeholder input can weaken educational infrastructure and compromise the effectiveness of the system. If successful, this legal challenge may lead to significant changes in how educational policy is crafted and implemented in the state. Future of Teacher Employment in Chhattisgarh The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how teacher employment rights and administrative decisions are handled across India. With the teaching community voicing their concerns, this case has become a focal point in the ongoing debate around school rationalization and employment protections in the education sector. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Chhattisgarh Teachers File Petition Against School Rationalization Orders Read More »

Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival

Trending Today Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARIN PARTNERS JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIDHI CENTRE FOR LEGAL POLICY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UNITEDLEX JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NMIMS KIRIT P. MEHTA SCHOOL OF LAW Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival KASHISH JAHAN 06 June 2025 The Telangana High Court reviews enforcement of cow protection laws ahead of Bakrid 2025, following a petition by the World Hindu Federation. Learn how the case balances religious freedom and animal welfare. Legal Spotlight on Religious Practices and Animal Welfare As the Muslim festival of Bakrid approaches, the Telangana High Court is actively reviewing the enforcement of the state’s cow protection regulations. This case emphasizes the sensitive intersection between religious freedom and animal welfare laws in India. Petition Filed by World Hindu Federation On June 4, 2025, the World Hindu Federation submitted a petition to the Telangana High Court, claiming that the Telangana Cow Protection Act is not being adequately enforced. The organization raised concerns over possible incidents of cow slaughter and illegal beef smuggling during the Bakrid celebrations. In response, the High Court issued formal notices to the state government of Telangana, demanding a comprehensive explanation of current enforcement efforts and preventive measures. Religious Rights vs. Animal Protection Laws in India This legal development highlights a continuing national debate on how to harmonize religious practices with existing animal protection regulations. The case has sparked discussions among both civil society and legal experts regarding how states should handle sensitive issues during religious festivals. What’s Next: Future Legal Proceedings The matter is set for further review on June 18, 2025, when the Telangana High Court will assess the state’s implementation of cow protection laws during the festival. The outcome may influence future policy decisions across India, especially in states with large religious and cultural diversity. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Telangana High Court Reviews Cow Protection Law Enforcement Ahead of Bakrid Festival Read More »

Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests

Trending Today Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARIN PARTNERS JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIDHI CENTRE FOR LEGAL POLICY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UNITEDLEX JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NMIMS KIRIT P. MEHTA SCHOOL OF LAW Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests KASHISH JAHAN 06 June 2025 The Bombay High Court has permitted animal sacrifice during the Urs festival at Vishalgad Fort, Maharashtra, amid right-wing protests. Discover the court’s ruling, public response, and broader impact on religious freedom and heritage conservation. Judicial Intervention in Religious Practices The Bombay High Court has approved animal sacrifice in connection with the Urs festival at the Hazrat Peer Malik Rehan Dargah, situated within Vishalgad Fort in Maharashtra, India. The court’s decision has triggered criticism from various right-wing groups, reopening discussions around religious freedom and historical site preservation. Conditions Set by the Court The ruling allows the sacrifice to occur on private land located 1.4 kilometers from the fort. Importantly, the court stated that all sacrificial practices must take place within closed premises to prevent public display and ensure adherence to safety and hygiene regulations. Public Reaction and Rising Tensions In response, the Hindu Ekata Andolan organized protests demanding a ban on the Urs celebrations and any form of animal slaughter in or around the fort. The group has urged the Maharashtra State Government to file an appeal in the Supreme Court of India, arguing that the decision could set a concerning precedent for religious activities in historically significant locations. Balancing Religious Rights and Cultural Heritage This development underscores the delicate balance India must maintain between respecting religious practices and protecting cultural landmarks. The judiciary’s role is pivotal in mediating such complex conflicts where legal, emotional, and historical values intersect. Conclusion: A Landmark Ruling with Far-Reaching Impact The Bombay High Court’s decision reflects the ongoing challenge of safeguarding constitutional rights while preserving India’s heritage. As the case potentially moves toward the Supreme Court, it may shape future interpretations of religious freedom and public interest. For now, the ruling serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s role in bridging tradition and modern governance in a diverse society. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Allows Animal Sacrifice at Vishalgad Fort During Urs Festival Amid Protests Read More »

Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy

Trending Today Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PEOPLESCIENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT SARIN PARTNERS JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIDHI CENTRE FOR LEGAL POLICY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT UNITEDLEX JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NMIMS KIRIT P. MEHTA SCHOOL OF LAW Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy KASHISH JAHAN 06 June 2025 A tragic stampede at the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium during the RCB victory parade in Bengaluru claimed 11 lives. Discover how legal action, public outcry, and calls for safer event management are reshaping public safety norms in India. Stampede During RCB Victory Parade Turns Deadly in Bengaluru A celebration turned tragic on June 4, 2025, when a devastating stampede occurred outside the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru, claiming at least 11 lives and injuring over 50 others. The stampede happened during the victory parade of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), who were celebrating their maiden title win in the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025 season. Karnataka High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance In immediate response to the tragedy, the Karnataka High Court initiated suo motu proceedings. The court aims to investigate the underlying causes of the crowd crush and hold the responsible parties accountable. Legal experts and citizens have sharply criticized the lack of proper crowd control measures and have called out possible negligence by both the event organizers and local authorities. Legal Scrutiny Over Public Safety Failures The court’s involvement signifies the urgency to enforce stronger safety protocols for large-scale events. Authorities including the Bengaluru City Police, municipal bodies, and event planners are under scrutiny. Based on the court’s findings, legal and administrative action may be taken against those found guilty of oversight or neglect. Cricket’s Cultural Importance and Its Impact on Public Gatherings In India, cricket is more than just a sport—it’s a national obsession that unites millions. Public events like IPL victory parades naturally attract massive crowds. However, this incident brings into focus the urgent need for strategic planning, proper infrastructure, and crowd management to ensure such events remain safe and celebratory. Lessons in Responsible Event Management The Bengaluru stampede serves as a powerful reminder of the immense responsibility involved in organizing public celebrations. This tragedy has sparked widespread calls for enforcing stricter safety regulations and fostering better coordination between stakeholders. As legal proceedings continue, there’s hope that India will adopt more robust event management frameworks to prevent similar incidents in the future. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Supreme Court Limits Probe in ‘Operation Sindoor’, Upholds Fair Investigation Principles Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Ruling in Methodist Church Leadership Dispute Over Retirement Age Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bengaluru RCB Victory Parade Stampede: 11 Dead, Legal Action and Public Outcry Follow IPL Celebration Tragedy Read More »

Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A

Trending Today Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Directs Mandatory Self-Declarations in Ads: Influencers and Brands Liable for Misleading Endorsements JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT THE OFFICE OF VAIBHAV CHOUDHARY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SDG’S AND PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT FOX MANDAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KAPIL GUPTA AND ASSOCIATES INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT IVY LAW OFFICES LLP Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A REHA BHARGAV 06 June 2025 Explore the landmark Supreme Court of India ruling on Kolkata Municipal Corporation’s land acquisition case, emphasizing the protection of property rights under Article 300A and the importance of procedural safeguards in municipal acquisitions. Introduction: Supreme Court on Municipal Land Acquisition and Property Rights The Supreme Court of India delivered a crucial judgment on May 16, 2024, concerning the Kolkata Municipal Corporation’s (KMC) attempt to acquire private land owned by Bimal Kumar Shah. The case highlights the constitutional limits on municipal powers in compulsory land acquisition and reinforces the right to property protections under Article 300A of the Indian Constitution. Background of the Case KMC sought to acquire Shah’s land for public use—to create a park—relying on Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 (link to Indian government legal code). Shah challenged the acquisition, arguing that Section 352 only authorizes identifying land for public purposes, not compulsory acquisition. He contended that proper legal procedures under Section 537 and constitutional safeguards were bypassed, violating his fundamental property rights. Key Issues in the Case Does Section 352 Empower Compulsory Acquisition? KMC argued that Section 352 granted authority to compulsorily acquire land for public benefit without following Section 537’s detailed procedures. Are Constitutional Protections Under Article 300A Being Upheld? The respondent maintained that compulsory acquisition must comply with Article 300A, which protects citizens from unlawful deprivation of property. Arguments from Both Sides Petitioner’s Viewpoint (KMC) Section 352 empowers the Municipal Commissioner for acquisition for public purposes. Acquisition aims to benefit the public by creating green spaces. No need to follow the elaborate procedures in Section 537. Actions were lawful and within municipal powers. Respondent’s Counterarguments (Bimal Kumar Shah) Section 352 does not authorize compulsory acquisition, only land identification. Section 537’s procedures, including notice and fair compensation, are mandatory. Violation of constitutional rights under Article 300A. Lack of due process and transparency in the acquisition process. Supreme Court’s Verdict The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of Bimal Kumar Shah, holding that: Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act only allows identifying land but does not authorize compulsory acquisition. Compulsory acquisition must strictly follow Section 537 procedures, ensuring procedural fairness and protection of property rights. Acquisition without adherence to these safeguards violates Article 300A of the Constitution. The KMC’s acquisition was unlawful and invalid, with the Court ordering costs payable to the respondent. Conclusion: Upholding Property Rights and Legal Procedures This landmark judgment reaffirms the constitutional protection of property rights in India and the necessity for municipal authorities to comply with established legal frameworks when acquiring land. It emphasizes that deprivation of property cannot be arbitrary or without due process, reinforcing the rule of law and safeguarding citizens’ fundamental rights. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Judgment on Kolkata Municipal Corporation Land Acquisition: Protecting Right to Property Under Article 300A Read More »

Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024)

Trending Today Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Directs Mandatory Self-Declarations in Ads: Influencers and Brands Liable for Misleading Endorsements JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT THE OFFICE OF VAIBHAV CHOUDHARY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SDG’S AND PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT FOX MANDAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KAPIL GUPTA AND ASSOCIATES INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT IVY LAW OFFICES LLP INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADVOCATE SANJAY TANGRI Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) REHA BHARGAV 06 June 2025 Discover the Supreme Court of India’s landmark judgment on the portrayal of persons with disabilities in cinema. Learn how the court balanced freedom of expression with dignity and respect for PwDs in the case of Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures Films India Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The Supreme Court of India delivered a significant ruling on July 8, 2024, in the case of Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures Films India Pvt. Ltd., addressing the portrayal of persons with disabilities (PwDs) in Indian cinema. This judgment highlights the delicate balance between artistic freedom and the rights of marginalized communities under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act). Background of the Case Facts In October 2023, Sony Pictures released the trailer for Aankh Micholi, a film depicting a family concealing various disabilities. Disability rights activist Nipun Malhotra challenged the film, arguing that it perpetuated harmful stereotypes about PwDs and violated the RPwD Act by using derogatory language and misrepresenting disabilities. Legal Issues The primary issues revolved around whether the film’s portrayal infringed on the constitutional rights of persons with disabilities, including dignity and equality under Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Indian Constitution. Another key question was whether the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) properly fulfilled its duty under the Cinematograph Act, 1952 in certifying the film. Arguments Presented Petitioner’s Claims Misrepresentation and Stereotyping: The film allegedly reinforced negative stereotypes, promoting prejudice against PwDs. Violation of RPwD Act, 2016: The portrayal was claimed to disrespect the dignity and equality guaranteed by the Act. Constitutional Rights: The film was argued to violate fundamental rights related to equality and non-discrimination. CBFC’s Failure: The Board was accused of neglecting its duty by certifying a film that could harm marginalized communities. Demand for Punitive Measures: Malhotra sought damages and a public apology from Sony Pictures. Respondent’s Defense Freedom of Expression: Sony Pictures cited Article 19(1)(a) protecting creative freedom and artistic expression. Intent and Context: The film intended to use humor empathetically, raising awareness rather than mocking disabilities. CBFC Compliance: The certification process followed statutory guidelines and proper scrutiny. Promoting Inclusion: The film aimed to highlight resilience and inclusion, aligning with the RPwD Act’s objectives. No Malicious Intent: Humor was defended as a legitimate tool against stigma. Supreme Court Judgment The Supreme Court of India dismissed Nipun Malhotra’s petition, upholding the film’s certification and release. The Court emphasized: The fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression protects creative works, including satire and humor. The portrayal did not amount to unlawful discrimination or defamation under the RPwD Act. The film’s message was considered inclusive, promoting resilience and dignity for PwDs. The CBFC acted within its statutory powers, considering content and social sensitivities. Filmmakers are encouraged to exercise responsible creativity without curbing artistic freedom. Conclusion The Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures case sets a crucial precedent in balancing freedom of expression with the protection of the dignity and rights of persons with disabilities in Indian media. While upholding artistic freedom, the Supreme Court underlined the importance of sensitive and respectful portrayals of disabilities in cinema. This ruling encourages filmmakers to promote inclusivity and responsible representation while safeguarding their creative liberties. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Directs Mandatory Self-Declarations in Ads: Influencers and Brands Liable for Misleading Endorsements Supreme Court Directs Mandatory Self-Declarations in Ads: Influencers and Brands Liable for Misleading Endorsements Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Guidelines on Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Indian Cinema | Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures (2024) Read More »

Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment

Trending Today Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Directs Mandatory Self-Declarations in Ads: Influencers and Brands Liable for Misleading Endorsements JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT THE OFFICE OF VAIBHAV CHOUDHARY INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SDG’S AND PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT FOX MANDAL LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT KAPIL GUPTA AND ASSOCIATES INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT IVY LAW OFFICES LLP INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF ADVOCATE SANJAY TANGRI INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT GGC LEGAL Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment NITU KUMARI 06 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India in Abhimeet Sinha vs. Patna High Court upheld the requirement of minimum viva voce marks in judicial service recruitment. Learn how this decision impacts merit, fairness, and recruitment transparency in Bihar and Gujarat. Introduction In a significant ruling affecting judicial service recruitment across India, the Supreme Court of India upheld the legality of minimum qualifying marks in viva voce (interview) for the appointment of judicial officers in Bihar and Gujarat. This judgment reinforces the principle that high written exam scores alone are not sufficient to determine merit, highlighting the critical role of interviews in evaluating candidates holistically. Background of the Case This case consolidated multiple petitions challenging the recruitment process for District Judge posts in Bihar and Gujarat: Bihar Judicial Services (2015): Required a 20% minimum in viva voce. Gujarat Judicial Services: Mandated 40% minimum in interview. Petitioners argued these requirements were arbitrary, violated the principles of equality under Articles 14 and 16 of the Indian Constitution, and conflicted with the Shetty Commission‘s recommendations and the All India Judges Association case. Key Legal Issues Raised Are minimum viva voce marks consistent with Shetty Commission and All India Judges’ case (2002)? Do these rules violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution? Was the mark moderation process in Bihar fair? Were Gujarat’s amended rules invalid due to non-consultation with the Public Service Commission under Article 234? Supreme Court’s Judgment The Supreme Court upheld the minimum viva voce thresholds, stating that the recruitment criteria were constitutional, rational, and non-discriminatory. Viva Voce Cut-Offs Are Constitutionally Valid The Bench found no violation of Articles 14 or 16, affirming that interviews are essential for assessing the communication skills, temperament, and suitability of candidates for judicial roles. “While written exams assess knowledge, interviews reveal a candidate’s character and judicial temperament,” the court stated. Moderation in Bihar Was Legitimate The Bihar High Court’s moderation and aggregation methods were ruled to be objective and within legal boundaries. Gujarat Rules Hold Even Without PSC Consultation Despite the absence of consultation with the Public Service Commission, the High Court of Gujarat was found to have the constitutional authority under Article 234 to independently design judicial recruitment rules. Ratio Decidendi (Binding Legal Principles) Merit Beyond Marks: Judicial merit must encompass both intellectual and personal attributes. Interview Cut-Offs Are Fair: Reasonable thresholds are valid tools to ensure competency in judiciary. High Court Autonomy Upheld: The decision reinforces the autonomy of High Courts in setting judicial recruitment standards.  Obiter Dicta (Judicial Observations) Codification Needed: Moderation processes should be clearly codified to avoid ambiguity and ensure transparency. Improving Interview Transparency: High Courts must work toward enhancing transparency in the viva voce stage to eliminate perceptions of bias. Court Directions Recruitment rules should explicitly define mark moderation mechanisms. Viva voce processes must be transparent and standardized across jurisdictions. Conclusion This ruling in Abhimeet Sinha & Ors. vs. High Court of Patna strengthens the principle that judicial recruitment must evaluate a candidate holistically—not just by academic excellence, but by interpersonal and analytical skills essential for judicial office. Upholding viva voce cut-offs ensures merit-based, fair, and constitutionally sound recruitment while preserving judicial independence. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Directs Mandatory Self-Declarations in Ads: Influencers and Brands Liable for Misleading Endorsements Supreme Court Directs Mandatory Self-Declarations in Ads: Influencers and Brands Liable for Misleading Endorsements Sada Law • June 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Clarifies Section 102(3) CrPC: Delay in Reporting Seizure Does Not Invalidate It – Shento Varghese v. Julfikar Husen (2024) Supreme Court Clarifies Section 102(3) CrPC: Delay in Reporting Seizure Does Not Invalidate It – Shento Varghese v. Julfikar Husen (2024) Sada Law • June 5, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Upholds Viva Voce Cut-Off for Judicial Services: Key Judgment on Merit Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat Recruitment Read More »