sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Sada Law

Rouse Avenue Court Ahlmad Withdraws Anticipatory Bail Plea in Bribery Case Before Delhi High Court

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Rouse Avenue Court Ahlmad Withdraws Anticipatory Bail Plea in Bribery Case Before Delhi High Court High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PS LAW ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ULTRATECH CEMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT POOJA ENTERTAINMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IKIGAI LAW Rouse Avenue Court Ahlmad Withdraws Anticipatory Bail Plea in Bribery Case Before Delhi High Court PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 12 June 2025 The bribery-accused ahlmad from Rouse Avenue Court has withdrawn his anticipatory bail plea in the Delhi High Court. Learn about the latest updates, legal developments, and actions by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB). Bribery Accused Ahlmad Withdraws Anticipatory Bail Plea from Delhi High Court On June 11, 2025, the ahlmad (record keeper) of the Rouse Avenue Court, accused of bribery by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), withdrew his anticipatory bail plea in the Delhi High Court. Mukesh Kumar Withdraws Plea Amid Bribery Allegations The accused, identified as ahlmad Mukesh Kumar, faced charges under Section 7/13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Following his booking, a Special Judge under the PC Act was transferred from Rouse Avenue Court to Rohini, North-West Delhi. Hearing Scheduled But Bail Plea Withdrawn The High Court was scheduled to hear arguments regarding Kumar’s anticipatory bail. However, the plea was withdrawn during the proceedings and allowed by Justice Tejas Karia. Legal Counsel Urges Compliance with CrPC Guidelines During the withdrawal request, Advocate Ayush Jain stressed that the ACB must adhere to the procedures of Section 41 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), particularly notifying the accused before arrest. He also requested that Kumar’s statement be recorded in the presence of a lawyer. In response, Additional Standing Counsel Sanjeev Bhandari assured the Court that the ACB would follow the law. Permission Granted for Refiling Plea While the Court dismissed the current plea as withdrawn, it allowed Kumar the liberty to file a fresh application in the future. Bribery Charges and Pre-FIR Developments The ACB initiated action against Kumar on May 16 based on allegations that he demanded bribes from defendants to secure bail. Prior to the filing of the FIR, the ACB had sent a letter to the Law Secretary of the Delhi government, seeking approval to investigate a judge. The evidence involving both the judge and the ahlmad was submitted to the High Court for administrative review. Court’s Clarification on Judicial Investigation The High Court clarified that there is no current requirement for official permission to investigate the named Judicial Officer. However, the ACB is free to proceed with inquiries based on the complaints received. Ahlmad Claims Conspiracy, No Arrest Protection Yet Kumar has alleged that the bribery accusations are part of a conspiracy orchestrated by certain ACB officers aiming to frame the judge who ruled against the agency. Currently, he has not been granted any protection from arrest. Co-Accused Vishal Kumar Turns Approver In a twist, co-accused Vishal Kumar—previously granted regular bail—has submitted a petition to the Joint Commissioner of Police, ACB, seeking to become an approver in the case. Though the ACB initially opposed his bail, it acknowledged that he provided complete disclosures. The trial court eventually determined no further custody was needed and granted bail. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Rouse Avenue Court Ahlmad Withdraws Anticipatory Bail Plea in Bribery Case Before Delhi High Court Rouse Avenue Court Ahlmad Withdraws Anticipatory Bail Plea in Bribery Case Before Delhi High Court Sada Law • June 12, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case Sada Law • June 12, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy Sada Law • June 12, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Rouse Avenue Court Ahlmad Withdraws Anticipatory Bail Plea in Bribery Case Before Delhi High Court Read More »

High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PS LAW ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ULTRATECH CEMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT POOJA ENTERTAINMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IKIGAI LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMM LAW OFFICES High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 12 June 2025 The Karnataka High Court is set to decide on the CID’s custody request for RCB and DNA Entertainment executives involved in the tragic Bengaluru stadium stampede that claimed 11 lives. Stay updated on this critical case and legal developments. High Court to Rule on CID Custody in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case On June 11, 2025, the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) produced four accused individuals before the magistrate in connection with the deadly stampede outside M. Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru, which resulted in 11 tragic deaths and several injuries. Key Accused Include RCB and DNA Entertainment Executives The individuals presented were: – Nikhil Sosale – Head of Marketing for Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB)– Sunil Mathew – Director and Vice-President at DNA Entertainment Networks Pvt Ltd– Kiran Kumar – Event Manager at DNA– Shamanth SP – Ticketing Official They were presented before the 1st Additional Sessions Judge as the CID sought nine days of custody for thorough investigation. Defense Pushes Back Against Custody Plea The legal defense strongly opposed the CID’s request. Advocate Sandesh Chowta filed a plea in the Karnataka High Court, requesting a stay on the custody until the court delivers its verdict. “What is the urgency to take custody so immediately?” Chowta questioned during the hearing in the magistrate court. Magistrate Court Awaits High Court Verdict The magistrate chose to postpone the decision until the High Court delivers its ruling. The bench, headed by Justice Krishna Kumar, questioned the urgency of CID’s request, emphasizing the pending nature of the arrest challenge. ASP Jagadeesh Seeks Legal Advice When questioned about the urgency, Assistant Superintendent of Police Jagadeesh cited the need for custodial interrogation. He later consulted with the Advocate General (AG) and requested a short adjournment, which was granted. No Immediate Custody: Accused Sent Back to Prison Following the adjournment, ASP Jagadeesh confirmed that no custody request would be made until the High Court’s final verdict. As a result, the accused were returned to Parappana Agrahara Central Prison. Next Hearing to Determine CID Custody The High Court is now tasked with the final decision on the CID custody request. It will continue to hear petitions from the accused associated with RCB and DNA Entertainment Networks in the coming session. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case Sada Law • June 12, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy Sada Law • June 12, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

High Court to Decide on CID Custody of Accused in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede Case Read More »

Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PS LAW ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ULTRATECH CEMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT POOJA ENTERTAINMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IKIGAI LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMM LAW OFFICES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIS LEGIS LAW PRACTICE, ADVOCATES Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 12 June 2025 The Bombay High Court has permitted the abortion of a 14-year-old rape survivor from Raigad, Maharashtra, who was 24 weeks pregnant. The court acted under exceptional circumstances in compliance with the MTP Act, ensuring both the minor’s health and justice under the POCSO Act. Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks On June 11, 2025, the Bombay High Court granted permission for a 14-year-old girl from Raigad, Maharashtra, to terminate her 24-week pregnancy. The young girl had become pregnant following a sexual assault by someone she met through Instagram. How the Case Came to Light The case surfaced when the girl’s mother noticed her daughter had not menstruated for six months. Upon visiting a hospital, pregnancy was confirmed, and a First Information Report (FIR) was promptly filed against the accused. Legal Hurdles Due to Advanced Pregnancy Stage Under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, abortions up to 20 weeks can be performed without court approval. However, since the girl was already in her 24th week, legal intervention was necessary. Advocate and Medical Board Step In Advocate Manisha Jagtap, representing the minor, informed the court that the girl was neither mentally nor physically ready to carry the pregnancy to term. The High Court directed the Civil Surgeon of Alibaug‘s Civil Hospital to form a medical board to assess the girl’s condition and mental well-being. Health Evaluation and Final Decision The board’s report confirmed the girl was anemic and advised that the procedure could proceed only after correcting her hemoglobin levels. Once stabilized, doctors assured the court that no long-term reproductive harm would result from the abortion. With these assurances, the court gave its approval. POCSO Court to Expedite Compensation In addition to approving the abortion, the Bombay High Court instructed the trial court handling the case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act to expedite the interim compensation process for the victim. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy Sada Law • June 12, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Bombay High Court Approves Abortion for 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor at 24 Weeks of Pregnancy Read More »

CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PS LAW ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ULTRATECH CEMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT POOJA ENTERTAINMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IKIGAI LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMM LAW OFFICES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIS LEGIS LAW PRACTICE, ADVOCATES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV HUMERA NIYAZI CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 11 June 2025 A special Mumbai court granted one-day CBI custody to NCLT Deputy Registrar Charan Pratap Singh in a high-profile ₹3 lakh bribery case. Learn about the investigation, legal developments, and key players involved. One-Day Custody Granted for Deeper Investigation On June 10, a special court in Mumbai approved the *Central Bureau of Investigation*’s (CBI) request for one-day custody of Deputy Registrar National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) official Charan Pratap Singh in connection with a ₹3 lakh bribery case. Singh and his assistant, Karsan Ganesh Ahir, were earlier placed under judicial custody following Singh’s arrest by the CBI on May 29. Bail Plea and Legal Objections *Singh’s legal counsel*, Sak Saxena, filed a bail application, while the CBI pushed for five days of police custody citing the need for further investigation. Saxena objected, referencing the *Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)* and arguing that custody cannot be requested once an accused is in judicial custody—unless new and compelling evidence is presented. He further stated that the authorities could still confront witnesses using approved judicial methods without shifting Singh back into police custody. New Witness Testimonies Justify CBI Request After reviewing the arguments, the court found that new witness statements had surfaced post the initial refusal of police custody on May 29. These developments provided enough ground for the CBI’s one-day custody request. As a result, the special judge directed CBI Anti-Corruption Branch Police Inspector Shyamal Sawant to transfer Singh from Central Prison Mumbai on June 10 and present him back in court by 11:00 a.m. on June 11. Details of the Bribery Allegations Singh was initially arrested after allegedly demanding and receiving a ₹3 lakh bribe from a businessman, promising to resolve an ownership dispute related to a prominent Mumbai hotel. According to the CBI, on May 16, Singh also transferred ₹50,000 to Pradeep Kumar Nagarale, a court officer at NCLT Mumbai, as a bribe meant to influence an NCLT board member. The investigation further revealed that incriminating WhatsApp messages between Singh and Nagarale had been deleted from both devices. CBI officials are now working to retrieve this digital evidence as part of their broader investigation. Conclusion: Legal Battle Continues As the case unfolds, the CBI continues its probe into corruption within the judicial system. With new evidence emerging, this high-profile bribery case involving the NCLT may set important legal precedents for handling public sector corruption. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

CBI Gets One-Day Custody of NCLT Deputy Registrar in Rs 3 Lakh Bribery Case Read More »

Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PS LAW ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ULTRATECH CEMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT POOJA ENTERTAINMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IKIGAI LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMM LAW OFFICES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIS LEGIS LAW PRACTICE, ADVOCATES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV HUMERA NIYAZI Supreme Court Mandates “Support Persons” for Child Victims Under POCSO Act in Bachpan Bachao Case Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 11 June 2025 A Mumbai sessions court sentenced Jayendra Dattatray Moranjan to 10 years in prison for raping and defrauding a woman under the false promise of marriage in 2016. Read the full case details and legal outcome. Mumbai Sessions Court Delivers Justice in Matrimonial Fraud Case A Mumbai Sessions Court has sentenced 42-year-old Jayendra Dattatray Moranjan to 10 years in prison for raping and cheating a woman he met on a matrimonial website. The convict lured the woman under the false pretense of marriage, emotionally manipulated her, and financially exploited her. Multiple Identities and Deception Uncovered During the trial, it was revealed that Moranjan—unemployed at the time—used multiple fake identities including Rahul Ashitosh Patil, Sachin Misal, and Chetak Sudhir Bhavsar to trap women. The court, while noting he had no prior criminal record, emphasized the seriousness and repetitive nature of his offenses. Survivor Met Accused Through Matrimonial Site The survivor, a nurse and a divorcee since 2014, had registered on a popular marriage website at her family’s request. On June 18, 2016, she was contacted by someone identifying himself as Rahul Patil, who soon proposed marriage. He visited her home the next day and expressed mutual intent to marry. Trip to Shirdi Turns Into Nightmare Moranjan proposed a trip to Shirdi, citing a religious vow to visit the shrine of Sai Baba. The woman agreed, believing it was part of their courtship. However, during their stay at a hotel in Shirdi, he sexually assaulted her multiple times. False Engagement Promises and Financial Theft Moranjan convinced the woman’s family to begin engagement preparations, claiming his sister would arrive from the United States by July 28. On June 23, during a movie outing in Mumbai, he stole the woman’s ATM card and used the PIN she had written on the cover to withdraw funds. Repeated Assaults and Abandonment On July 2, Moranjan allegedly assaulted the woman again in Nashik. He then concocted a story about his grandmother being bitten by a snake in Mahabaleshwar and left the woman at her sister’s home. He had promised to send a vehicle for their engagement on July 5, but never followed through. Financial Loss and Threats Followed By this time, Moranjan had drained ₹1.5 lakh from her account. When the woman confronted him, he issued threats and warned her against contacting the police. He then cut off all communication with her and her family. Police Report and Legal Proceedings On July 17, 2016, the woman filed an FIR at the Vile Parle Police Station. Moranjan was soon arrested. A medical examination revealed the woman was pregnant, and she later underwent an abortion. Repeat Offender and Evidence Found Investigators discovered that Moranjan had similarly deceived and exploited at least four other women. Another ATM card belonging to a different woman was also recovered from his possession. The court acknowledged the survivor’s emotional and financial trauma and emphasized the repeated intent to defraud. Court’s Final Verdict Although Moranjan lacked a prior criminal record, the court ruled his actions demonstrated a persistent pattern of deception and exploitation. He was sentenced to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Mumbai Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Rape and Fraud Under False Promise of Marriage Read More »

Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PS LAW ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ULTRATECH CEMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT POOJA ENTERTAINMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IKIGAI LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMM LAW OFFICES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIS LEGIS LAW PRACTICE, ADVOCATES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV HUMERA NIYAZI Supreme Court Mandates “Support Persons” for Child Victims Under POCSO Act in Bachpan Bachao Case Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 11 June 2025 The Kerala High Court has directed the SIT to submit its report on the harassment allegations in the Malayalam film industry within 10 days, based on findings from the Hema Committee. Learn about the developments, film policy updates, and what the Hema Committee stands for. Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Report on Hema Committee Cases in 10 Days The Kerala High Court has granted a 10-day deadline to the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to present its findings on harassment cases flagged in the Hema Committee report. These cases concern serious allegations of sexual harassment and gender disparity in the Malayalam film industry. State Government to Finalize Malayalam Film Industry Policy During a hearing before a special bench of Justices A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and C.S. Sudha, the Kerala government announced the scheduling of a Cinema Conclave this August. The objective is to finalize a new film policy shaped by the input of over 600 organizations. Legislation Based on Film Policy to Follow in Two Months The government stated that within two months of the conclave, a comprehensive legislation based on the newly drafted film policy would be proposed. This legislation aims to address systemic issues in the Malayalam cinema sector, particularly those affecting women. Progress on Cases Listed in the Hema Committee Report The High Court also reviewed recent progress regarding the 40 cases brought to light by the Hema Committee. Of these, 26 cases were withdrawn from further legal action. A report detailing these developments was submitted to the court. According to the SIT, the cases were not initiated by direct victim complaints. Instead, they were registered based on observations made in the Hema Committee’s findings and testimonies. The court has set the next hearing for June 25, 2025. What is the Hema Committee? The Hema Committee was established in 2017 in response to a petition from the Women in Cinema Collective. Its objective was to investigate gender inequality and sexual harassment in the Malayalam film industry. The committee included retired High Court Justice K. Hema, acclaimed actor Sharada, and former IAS officer K.B. Valsala Kumari. Their comprehensive report revealed systemic exploitation, gender discrimination, and the lack of clear employment structures for women working in cinema. The committee’s recommendations have sparked significant policy reform discussions, leading to the current judicial and administrative actions. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief to Journalists in MP FIR Case, Directs Them to Seek High Court Protection Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief to Journalists in MP FIR Case, Directs Them to Seek High Court Protection Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Directs SIT to Submit Hema Committee Case Report Within 10 Days Read More »

Supreme Court Mandates “Support Persons” for Child Victims Under POCSO Act in Bachpan Bachao Case

Leave a Comment / 2023, Case law /

Trending Today Mumbai EOW Arrests IPS Officer’s Husband in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Fraud Case Over Redevelopment Scam Nestlé India’s Bonus Share Proposal Reflects Confidence, Strong Governance, and Shareholder Commitment China’s Rare-Earth Export Curbs Disrupt Indian Industries: Push for Self-Reliance Gains Momentum Bihar’s Biggest Crackdown: ₹Crores in Properties Seized from 52 Criminals Under PMLA Madras High Court Halts ED Proceedings Against Film Producer, Cites Lack of Jurisdiction and Orders Return of Seized Items CLAT PG Candidate Challenges ₹30,000 Counselling Fee in Delhi High Court, Cites Financial Hardship Bombay High Court Pushes for Swift Resolution in Sony vs Tata Play Licensing Dispute Operation Thunder: How Nagpur is Leading India’s War Against Drugs with Tech and Community Power INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LAWKARI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTION Supreme Court Mandates “Support Persons” for Child Victims Under POCSO Act in Bachpan Bachao Case REHA BHARGAV 11 June 2025 The Supreme Court of India’s 2023 judgment in Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India mandates the appointment of support persons for child victims under the POCSO Act, reinforcing the constitutional duty to protect children’s rights during legal proceedings. Introduction: Strengthening Child Protection Under the Law In a landmark judgment dated October 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of India in Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India took a significant step toward ensuring child-friendly legal proceedings under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The ruling emphasized the mandatory role of “support persons” to assist and protect child victims of sexual abuse throughout the legal process. By reinforcing the constitutional and statutory obligations of the State, the Court aimed to prevent further trauma to vulnerable child victims and ensure justice is accessible, empathetic, and child-centric. Case Background: Bachpan Bachao’s Fight for Children’s Rights The petitioner, Bachpan Bachao Andolan, a prominent child rights NGO, filed the petition to address serious gaps in the implementation of the POCSO Act—specifically the underuse of support persons as outlined in the POCSO Rules, 2020. A 2019 Supreme Court Registrar report revealed that support persons were appointed in only 4% of POCSO cases, highlighting a concerning lack of structured support for child victims. A particularly shocking case from Lalitpur, Uttar Pradesh, involving the alleged gang rape of a 13-year-old girl, prompted urgent judicial intervention. Key Legal Issue Is the Appointment of Support Persons a Legal Obligation? The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the State is constitutionally and statutorily obligated to provide a support person for child victims during the investigation and trial process under the POCSO Act, and what mechanisms must be put in place to ensure uniform enforcement. Arguments Presented Petitioner’s View (Bachpan Bachao Andolan) The petitioner argued that Section 39 of the POCSO Act requires the mandatory appointment of support persons for child victims. They emphasized that leaving the appointment to the discretion of parents or guardians undermines the purpose of the Act. Lack of uniform implementation leads to revictimization and emotional trauma for children navigating the legal system. Support persons play a critical role in offering psychological, emotional, and logistical support to the child. Respondent’s View (Union of India & State of Uttar Pradesh) The respondents agreed on the importance of support but claimed the appointment should be discretionary, based on guardian consent. They cited administrative challenges such as lack of trained personnel, remuneration issues, and infrastructure limitations. Concerns were also raised about potential privacy breaches and the risk of misuse of the support person’s role. Judgment Summary: A Mandate for Child Justice Supreme Court’s Verdict on October 18, 2023 The Supreme Court ruled that the appointment of support persons is not optional, but a constitutional duty of the State. The Court underscored that this duty stems from the need to ensure a fair trial, emotional support, and dignity for child victims. Key Directives Issued: The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) must draft model guidelines for the appointment, training, and remuneration of support persons. These guidelines must be implemented uniformly across all States and Union Territories. Authorities must inform parents or guardians about the availability and rights associated with support persons. Impact of the Judgment: Toward a Child-Centric Legal System This landmark ruling strengthens child rights under the POCSO Act, ensuring that support persons become a standard practice in cases involving minors. The judgment aims to: Prevent secondary trauma for victims during legal proceedings. Promote a child-friendly and sensitive judicial environment. Reinforce that child protection is a legal obligation, not a policy choice. Conclusion: A Milestone for Child Welfare in India The 2023 Supreme Court judgment in Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India marks a crucial step in making India’s criminal justice system more supportive and humane for child victims. By mandating the appointment of support persons under the POCSO Act, the Court has reaffirmed that protecting children’s dignity and rights is not just desirable—it’s constitutionally essential. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws K Umadevi vs Government of Tamil Nadu 2025: Supreme Court Recognizes Maternity Leave as Fundamental Reproductive Right Sada Law • June 20, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Affinity Test in Scheduled Tribe Verification: Affinity Test Not Mandatory for ST Claims Sada Law • June 20, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Bail Despite NDPS Act Section 37: Upholds Article 21 in Mohd. Muslim v. State (NCT of Delhi) Sada Law • June 20, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Mandates “Support Persons” for Child Victims Under POCSO Act in Bachpan Bachao Case Read More »

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ULTRATECH CEMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT POOJA ENTERTAINMENT LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT IKIGAI LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AMM LAW OFFICES LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIS LEGIS LAW PRACTICE, ADVOCATES JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ADV HUMERA NIYAZI Supreme Court Mandates “Support Persons” for Child Victims Under POCSO Act in Bachpan Bachao Case Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained Supreme Court Rules Section 6A Unconstitutional with Retrospective Effect in CBI v. R.R. Kishore Judgment Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 11 June 2025 Discover how the Supreme Court of India affirmed the constitutional right to business closure under Article 19(1)(g), highlighting the landmark case involving Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. and the interpretation of the Industrial Disputes Act. Supreme Court Upholds Right to Shut Down Business Under Article 19(1)(g) In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed that Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution grants individuals not only the right to operate a business but also the right to shut it down. This judgment was delivered by a two-judge bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra. However, this right remains subject to reasonable restrictions aimed at protecting employees and ensuring compliance with labor laws and statutory procedures. Background of the Case: Harinagar Sugar Mills vs. Bombay High Court Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. (HSML), which operated a biscuit division under exclusive Job Work Agreements (JWAs) with Britannia Industries Limited (BIL) for over 30 years, faced a critical change when BIL terminated the agreement in 2019. As a result, HSML applied for closure under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on August 28, 2019, by submitting Form XXIV-C as required under the Maharashtra Rules. However, the application was rejected by the Deputy Secretary of the Maharashtra Government as “incomplete,” leading to delays and further conflict. Government and Union Resistance Despite additional information provided by HSML, the Industrial Tribunal allowed the workers’ union to oppose the closure. HSML argued that the 60-day deemed approval period had lapsed in October 2019 and that the closure should be recognized as valid from the original submission date. They also contended that the Deputy Secretary lacked the authority to reject or alter the application—stating only the Minister had jurisdiction in such cases. Meanwhile, the government cited the incomplete nature of the application and emphasized the need to protect workers’ rights. Supreme Court’s Analysis and Ruling The Supreme Court confirmed that while businesses have a constitutional right to close under Article 19(1)(g), this right is regulated by Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court ruled: The closure application dated August 28, 2019, was complete and initiated the 60-day statutory window. The Deputy Secretary was not the “appropriate Government” as per Section 25-O. The Minister failed to independently evaluate the application, making the delegation of authority improper. All communications from the Deputy Secretary were legally invalid. The court referenced previous landmark cases like Excel Wear and Orissa Textile and Steel, reaffirming the interplay between business rights and labor regulations. Final Verdict and Compensation Award The Supreme Court set aside the Bombay High Court‘s decision and upheld the deemed closure as valid. It found procedural lapses in how the Maharashtra Government handled the case and concluded that HSML had no viable business options after the JWA termination. In a significant move, the Court directed that compensation awarded to employees during the dispute would not be recoverable. Additionally, it ordered HSML to pay an extra ₹5 crores in compensation to workers—payable within eight weeks. Conclusion: Balancing Business Freedom and Worker Protection This judgment reaffirms the delicate balance between the right to trade or business under Article 19(1)(g) and the legal safeguards designed to protect workers. While entrepreneurs have the liberty to close operations, such decisions must comply with applicable laws and respect due process. The Harinagar Sugar Mills case serves as a precedent on how constitutional freedoms and industrial regulations intersect in a rapidly evolving business environment. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief to Journalists in MP FIR Case, Directs Them to Seek High Court Protection Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief to Journalists in MP FIR Case, Directs Them to Seek High Court Protection Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Stays Madras HC Order Stopping NHAI Toll Collection on Madurai-Tuticorin Highway Supreme Court Stays Madras HC Order Stopping NHAI Toll Collection on Madurai-Tuticorin Highway Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Business Closure Under Article 19(1)(g): Harinagar Sugar Mills Case Explained Read More »

Supreme Court Rules Section 6A Unconstitutional with Retrospective Effect in CBI v. R.R. Kishore Judgment

Leave a Comment / 2023, Case law /

Trending Today Mumbai EOW Arrests IPS Officer’s Husband in ₹7.2 Crore BMC Fraud Case Over Redevelopment Scam Nestlé India’s Bonus Share Proposal Reflects Confidence, Strong Governance, and Shareholder Commitment China’s Rare-Earth Export Curbs Disrupt Indian Industries: Push for Self-Reliance Gains Momentum Bihar’s Biggest Crackdown: ₹Crores in Properties Seized from 52 Criminals Under PMLA Madras High Court Halts ED Proceedings Against Film Producer, Cites Lack of Jurisdiction and Orders Return of Seized Items CLAT PG Candidate Challenges ₹30,000 Counselling Fee in Delhi High Court, Cites Financial Hardship Bombay High Court Pushes for Swift Resolution in Sony vs Tata Play Licensing Dispute Operation Thunder: How Nagpur is Leading India’s War Against Drugs with Tech and Community Power INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT LAWKARI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JURIDICA SOLUTION Supreme Court Rules Section 6A Unconstitutional with Retrospective Effect in CBI v. R.R. Kishore Judgment NISHA KUMARI 11 June 2025 Discover how the Supreme Court of India’s 2023 judgment in CBI v. Dr. R.R. Kishore declared Section 6A of the DSPE Act unconstitutional and applied the ruling retrospectively, reshaping corruption investigations in India. Introduction: A Landmark Ruling in Anti-Corruption Law On 11th September 2023, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in the case of CBI v. Dr. R.R. Kishore, significantly impacting how corruption cases involving senior public officials are investigated. The Court held that Section 6A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946—which required prior approval from the Central Government to investigate senior officers—was unconstitutional and applied this ruling retrospectively. Background: What Was Section 6A of the DSPE Act? Section 6A mandated that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) obtain government approval before investigating officers of the rank of Joint Secretary and above for corruption. Introduced to safeguard senior officials, the provision was often criticized for hindering independent investigations. Case Origin and Legal Context Who Filed the Petitions? Two writ petitions were initially filed by: Dr. Subramanian Swamy Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) Both challenged the validity of Section 6A, arguing it violated Article 14 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees equality before the law. Previous Related Case: Subramanian Swamy v. CBI In this earlier case, a Constitution Bench had already declared Section 6A unconstitutional. However, the retrospective applicability of that judgment remained unclear—until now. Facts of the CBI v. R.R. Kishore Case In 2004, the CBI registered an FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and laid a trap to catch an accused accepting a bribe. The accused argued the investigation was invalid due to lack of government sanction under Section 6A. The CBI court rejected the discharge request, but the High Court allowed reinvestigation—only if approval was granted. The CBI challenged this order, and the matter remained pending until the 2023 Supreme Court verdict. Key Legal Issues Considered 1. Is prior sanction mandatory for prosecuting public servants under Section 197 of CrPC and Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act?   2. Was the High Court justified in quashing the criminal proceedings under Section 482 of CrPC?   3. Is there enough prima facie evidence to proceed under Sections 120B, 420, 468, 471 of the IPC and Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act?   Supreme Court Judgment: Section 6A Is Void from the Start Key Highlights of the Judgment The Court ruled that any law declared void under Article 13(2) is invalid from its inception. As Section 6A was added after the Constitution came into effect, it is considered null and void from the date of its creation (2003). Section 6A was a procedural provision, and its removal does not violate Article 20(1), which protects against retrospective criminal punishment. The judgment empowers the CBI to act without prior government approval in such cases. Implications for Corruption Investigations in India Impact on Public Servants The Court clarified that no one can claim protection under a law that has been declared unconstitutional. This decision removes artificial safeguards that previously shielded senior officials from anti-corruption probes. Reinforcing the Rule of Law By striking down Section 6A, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the principle of equal accountability under rule of law and empowered independent investigations. Conclusion: A Victory for Transparency and Accountability The Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in CBI v. R.R. Kishore marks a turning point in India’s anti-corruption framework. By holding Section 6A unconstitutional with retrospective effect, the Court enhanced the powers of investigative agencies, removed administrative barriers, and promoted equal justice under law. This ruling serves as a precedent for future corruption cases and highlights the Court’s commitment to transparency, accountability, and constitutional integrity. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws K Umadevi vs Government of Tamil Nadu 2025: Supreme Court Recognizes Maternity Leave as Fundamental Reproductive Right Sada Law • June 20, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Affinity Test in Scheduled Tribe Verification: Affinity Test Not Mandatory for ST Claims Sada Law • June 20, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Grants Bail Despite NDPS Act Section 37: Upholds Article 21 in Mohd. Muslim v. State (NCT of Delhi) Sada Law • June 20, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Rules Section 6A Unconstitutional with Retrospective Effect in CBI v. R.R. Kishore Judgment Read More »

Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023)

Leave a Comment / 2023, Case law /

Trending Today Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) Supreme Court Upholds Abolition of Orissa Administrative Tribunal: Union Government’s Power Affirmed Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Post-Charge-Sheet in Mahdoom Bava v. CBI (2023) Can High Courts Review CAT Orders from Outside Their Jurisdiction? Supreme Court Seeks Clarity in Sanjiv Chaturvedi Case Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief to Journalists in MP FIR Case, Directs Them to Seek High Court Protection Supreme Court Stays Madras HC Order Stopping NHAI Toll Collection on Madurai-Tuticorin Highway Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Hearing of Tamil Nadu’s Lawsuit Against Centre Over Rs 2291 Crore Education Funds Dispute Kerala High Court Upholds Widow’s Right to Marital Home Under Domestic Violence Act Bombay High Court Judge Cites Long Work Hours and Backlog for Delayed Judgment Upload in Landmark Property Dispute Case Supreme Court Landmark Ruling: Permanent Alimony and Home Ownership Rights for Divorced Women Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) REHA BHARGAV 11 June 2025 The Supreme Court ruled in CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) that default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is not absolute and can be cancelled after filing a chargesheet in serious non-bailable offences. Learn about this landmark decision balancing bail rights and justice. Introduction: Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Default Bail In a significant judgment on January 16, 2023, the Supreme Court of India ruled in the case of State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy @ Yerra Gangi Reddy that default bail under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) is not an unassailable right. The Court clarified that such bail can be cancelled on merits after the filing of a chargesheet, especially in cases involving serious non-bailable offences like murder. This decision arose from the high-profile murder case of Y. S. Vivekananda Reddy, shedding light on the legal balance between individual liberty and the interests of justice. Case Background: Facts and Timeline The Crime and Initial Investigation Victim: Y. S. Vivekananda Reddy, former legislator and Member of Parliament Incident Date: March 2019 Initially registered under Section 174 CrPC (unnatural death), the case was later upgraded to Sections 302 and 120B IPC (murder and criminal conspiracy). Arrest and Default Bail Accused: T. Gangi Reddy Arrest Date: March 28, 2019 Due to delay in investigation, the accused was granted default bail on June 27, 2019, under Section 167(2) CrPC, which mandates bail if a chargesheet is not filed within 60 days. CBI Takes Over and Files Chargesheet The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took over the case and filed a detailed chargesheet on October 26, 2021, implicating Gangi Reddy. CBI then moved to cancel the default bail, citing seriousness of the offence and strong prima facie evidence. Legal Issue: Can Default Bail Be Cancelled After Chargesheet? The central legal question before the Supreme Court was: Can an accused who has secured default bail due to delay in investigation lose that bail once a chargesheet is filed in serious, non-bailable cases? Arguments Before the Court CBI’s Arguments (Petitioner) Default bail is conditional, not absolute—it’s granted only because of a procedural delay. Once a chargesheet is filed, especially in heinous crimes like murder, the court has discretion to cancel bail based on the merits of the case. Continued bail poses a risk to the investigation, including potential tampering with evidence or witnesses. Respondent’s Arguments Default bail under Section 167(2) is a statutory right and should not be revoked merely because the investigation later concluded. Cancelling default bail would undermine the intent of Section 167(2), which aims to prevent indefinite pre-trial detention due to investigative delays. Supreme Court Judgment: Bail is Not Absolute Key Observations by the Court Presiding Judges: Justice M. R. Shah and Justice C. T. Ravikumar Date of Judgment: January 16, 2023 The Court held that default bail is not an absolute or indefeasible right. Once a chargesheet is filed with strong evidence in a serious offence, courts can cancel such bail. The ruling emphasized the gravity of the crime, likelihood of tampering with evidence, and the interests of justice. Impact of the Judgment This judgment reinforces that procedural safeguards like default bail are not meant to protect offenders indefinitely, especially when strong evidence emerges post-investigation. Conclusion: Balancing Liberty and Justice The Supreme Court’s ruling in CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy sets a critical precedent in Indian criminal law. It affirms that while the right to default bail safeguards against undue detention, it does not override the need for justice in serious criminal cases. Courts retain the discretion to cancel bail once substantial evidence surfaces, ensuring the integrity of the judicial process. Key Takeaways Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is not permanent. Courts can cancel bail after a chargesheet, especially in serious, non-bailable offences. The judgment upholds a balanced approach between personal liberty and public interest.   Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds Abolition of Orissa Administrative Tribunal: Union Government’s Power Affirmed Supreme Court Upholds Abolition of Orissa Administrative Tribunal: Union Government’s Power Affirmed Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Post-Charge-Sheet in Mahdoom Bava v. CBI (2023) Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Post-Charge-Sheet in Mahdoom Bava v. CBI (2023) Sada Law • June 11, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Judgment on Cancellation of Default Bail After Chargesheet Filing in Serious Offence Cases – State Through CBI v. T. Gangi Reddy (2023) Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote