sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Sada Law

CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Chennupati Kranthi Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Supreme Court Judgment (25 July 2023) MD. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. – Supreme Court Judgment (31 July 2023) Bail Granted in Boini Mahipal v. State of Telangana: Supreme Court on Prolonged Undertrial Detention and Article 21 Opportunity of Hearing Before Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC: Supreme Court’s Ruling in Yashodhan Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh Non-Compliance with Mandatory Safeguards Under the NDPS Act: Supreme Court Acquittal in Suresh Thipmppa Shetty v. State of Maharashtra Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Shivani Garg 26 September 2025 Introduction On September 25, 2025, a Delhi court directed the police to provide a copy of the FIR to Sakariya, the accused in the assault and attempted rape case against Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta. Despite the police labeling the case as “sensitive,” Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) Gaurav Goyal of the Tis Hazari Courts ruled that denying the accused access to the FIR would violate principles of natural justice and due process. Background The alleged incident took place on August 20, 2025, when 41-year-old autorickshaw driver Sakariya gained entry into CM Rekha Gupta’s residence in Delhi under the pretense of filing a grievance. He allegedly attacked the Chief Minister and was subdued by security personnel before being handed over to the police. He was arrested along with his companion, Tehseen Syed, on charges including attempted murder, assaulting a public servant, and obstructing duty. Earlier, on September 22, their judicial custody was extended until October 6, 2025. The attack raised serious concerns over security lapses at the Chief Minister’s residence. Key Developments The accused, Sakariya, requested a copy of the FIR. Delhi Police opposed, citing the case’s classification as “sensitive.” The court ruled that access to the FIR is a right of the accused, as established by the Supreme Court. Magistrate Gaurav Goyal directed that a copy of the FIR be provided within 24 hours. Safeguards were imposed: the accused is barred from sharing, distributing, or publishing the FIR’s contents without court permission. Issues Whether police can withhold an FIR from the accused by labeling a case as “sensitive.” Balancing investigative confidentiality with the rights of the accused. The adequacy of existing safeguards to prevent misuse of sensitive case information. Defense vs. Prosecution Arguments Defense: Argued that withholding the FIR violated natural justice and Supreme Court precedent. The accused cannot prepare a defense without access to the FIR. Prosecution: Claimed disclosure would compromise the investigation but conceded FIR could be shared under confidentiality conditions. Judicial Reasoning The court emphasized that providing the FIR is not a discretionary choice but a statutory and constitutional requirement of criminal jurisprudence. While upholding the accused’s right to access the document, the Magistrate also sought to protect confidentiality by restricting its wider circulation. Current Status The accused will receive a copy of the FIR within 24 hours. Judicial custody of Sakariya and Tehseen Syed continues until October 6, 2025. The case will move forward towards trial preparation. Conclusion The Delhi court’s order highlights the judiciary’s role in safeguarding due process even in highly sensitive cases. By ensuring FIR access with confidentiality restrictions, the court balanced the accused’s rights with investigative concerns. This ruling reaffirms that labeling a case “sensitive” does not override fundamental legal protections. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

CM Attack Case: Delhi Court Directs Police to Provide FIR Copy to Accused Despite ‘Sensitive Case’ Claim Read More »

Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Chennupati Kranthi Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Supreme Court Judgment (25 July 2023) MD. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. – Supreme Court Judgment (31 July 2023) Bail Granted in Boini Mahipal v. State of Telangana: Supreme Court on Prolonged Undertrial Detention and Article 21 Opportunity of Hearing Before Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC: Supreme Court’s Ruling in Yashodhan Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh Non-Compliance with Mandatory Safeguards Under the NDPS Act: Supreme Court Acquittal in Suresh Thipmppa Shetty v. State of Maharashtra Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Kashak Agarwala 26 September 2025 Introduction On September 26, 2025, the Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition seeking registration of an FIR against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, and former Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad in relation to the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), 2019. The Court termed the plea as baseless and frivolous, imposing a cost of ₹50,000 on the petitioner, Advocate Puran Chander Sen. Background The petition stemmed from allegations that the CAA had triggered violence, murders, and injuries across the country. In 2020, Advocate Sen had approached the Govindgarh police station in Alwar, demanding an FIR under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy). When no action was taken, he moved the magistrate’s court and sessions court, both of which dismissed the plea. He eventually petitioned the High Court. Key Developments Justice Sudesh Bansal’s bench heard the case. The Court held that the allegations were unsupported by evidence, details of victims, or causal links to CAA. The Court questioned the filing in Alwar district, where no incidents were reported. The petition was called “preposterous, effete, and concocted.” A ₹50,000 cost was imposed, payable to the Rajasthan High Court Litigants’ Welfare Fund. The Court gave liberty to the respondents (Modi, Shah, Prasad) and the State to pursue further civil or criminal action against the petitioner. Issues Whether allegations of violence linked to CAA, without evidence, can form the basis of an FIR against top government officials. Whether a practicing advocate can file politically motivated or frivolous criminal petitions without factual backing. The misuse of courts for political or publicity purposes and its impact on judicial integrity. Current Status The petition stands dismissed. Petitioner Advocate Puran Chander Sen is liable to pay ₹50,000 within four weeks. Respondents retain the option to pursue civil or criminal action against him. Conclusion The Rajasthan High Court’s order reinforces the judiciary’s strong stance against frivolous litigation and misuse of legal processes. By imposing costs and criticizing the petitioner, the Court emphasized that unfounded petitions, especially against senior constitutional figures, will not be entertained. The ruling also underlined the responsibility of advocates to uphold professional standards and avoid filing baseless claims that risk undermining public trust in the judicial system. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking FIR Against Modi, Shah Over CAA Read More »

Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Chennupati Kranthi Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Supreme Court Judgment (25 July 2023) MD. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. – Supreme Court Judgment (31 July 2023) Bail Granted in Boini Mahipal v. State of Telangana: Supreme Court on Prolonged Undertrial Detention and Article 21 Opportunity of Hearing Before Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC: Supreme Court’s Ruling in Yashodhan Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh Non-Compliance with Mandatory Safeguards Under the NDPS Act: Supreme Court Acquittal in Suresh Thipmppa Shetty v. State of Maharashtra Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Kashak Agarwala 26 September 2025 Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court on Thursday rejected the bail plea of former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor Tahir Hussain in the case concerning the murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) staffer Ankit Sharma during the February 2020 northeast Delhi riots.Justice Neena Bansal Krishna pronounced that “the bail application is denied.” A detailed order copy is awaited. Background of the Case Incident: On February 25, 2020, Ankit Sharma went missing during the riots. His body was discovered the next day in a drain in Chand Bagh near his residence, bearing 51 stab wounds. Police Allegations: Sharma was allegedly beaten and killed by a mob led by Hussain. Political Context: Hussain was suspended by the AAP following the riots and later joined AIMIM. Charges: In June 2020, Delhi Police filed a chargesheet against Hussain and others, accusing them of murder, rioting, criminal conspiracy, dacoity, promoting enmity, and offences under the Arms Act. Trial Status: A trial court framed charges in March 2023 against Hussain and 10 others. Defense Arguments Hussain’s counsel argued that: Several eyewitnesses did not implicate him. Eight co-accused had already been granted bail. He has spent nearly five years in custody, with witnesses already examined, reducing the chance of interference. Prosecution’s Case Represented by Special Public Prosecutor Rajat Nair and Advocate Dhruv Pande, the Delhi Police opposed bail, arguing that: Sharma’s killing was pre-planned and brutal, intended as a warning to law enforcement. Witnesses consistently identified Hussain as the leader of the mob, who incited violence and directed the attack. Hussain held significant local influence, and his release could lead to witness intimidation or evidence tampering. Court’s Rationale While the detailed judgment is awaited, the High Court’s denial of bail suggests concurrence with the trial court’s earlier reasoning: The gravity of the offence (murder with 51 stab wounds). The risk of influencing witnesses or obstructing justice. The impact on public confidence in the judiciary if bail were granted. Way Forward Hussain will remain in judicial custody until the completion of the trial. The case, a high-profile episode of the 2020 Delhi riots, continues to draw national attention as it embodies the communal violence and political tensions that gripped the capital. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Tahir Hussain in Ankit Sharma Murder Case Read More »

Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu Urges H-1B Holders to Return to India Amid U.S. Visa Fee Hike SC Grants Bail to Kerala Priest Edwin Figarez, Suspends Sentence Pending Appeal Delhi High Court on Hate Speech and Political Rallies – 19 September 2025 Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Shivani Garg 23 September 2025 Introduction The Delhi High Court issued a stern reprimand to a Delhi Police Sub-Inspector (SI) for misbehavior inside the courtroom, stressing that law enforcement officers must uphold, not undermine, the dignity of judicial proceedings. Background Case: Rameshwar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Date of Incident: September 22, 2025. Accused Officer: SI Narinder, Delhi Police. Allegations: The officer verbally abused and threatened both counsels (for complainant and convict) and misbehaved with a senior advocate who intervened. Key Developments Court’s Remarks: Justice Arun Monga observed that the officer was “supposed to be a protector of law and not a predator.” Possible FIR: The High Court considered directing registration of an FIR against the SI for his misconduct. Apology Accepted: The SI tendered an unconditional apology, leading the court to withhold immediate punitive action. Written Affidavit: The court ordered the SI to file his apology in writing via an affidavit. Issues Misconduct by Law Enforcement – Erosion of public trust when officers intimidate lawyers in court. Sanctity of Judicial Premises – Ensuring decorum and respect within courtrooms. Balancing Accountability and Forgiveness – Whether an apology suffices in lieu of formal punitive action. Current Status The SI has been directed to submit a written affidavit of apology. No FIR has been registered yet, though the High Court has left the door open for stronger action if misconduct recurs. Conclusion The Delhi High Court’s reprimand sends a clear message that courtroom integrity is non-negotiable. By emphasizing that police officers must act as guardians of the law, not intimidators, the ruling reinforces judicial authority while offering an opportunity for correction through the SI’s written apology. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Read More »

Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Non-Compliance with Mandatory Safeguards Under the NDPS Act: Supreme Court Acquittal in Suresh Thipmppa Shetty v. State of Maharashtra Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu Urges H-1B Holders to Return to India Amid U.S. Visa Fee Hike SC Grants Bail to Kerala Priest Edwin Figarez, Suspends Sentence Pending Appeal Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 Shivani Garg 23 September 2025 Introduction The Punjab and Haryana High Court has clarified the legal scope of Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), ruling that merely attempting to initiate a conversation with a woman—even if unwelcome—does not amount to an offence unless accompanied by criminal force with intent to outrage modesty. Background IPC Section 354: Penalizes assault or use of criminal force against a woman with intent to outrage her modesty. Case Details: An FIR was lodged in July 2020 at PGIMS Rohtak after a man approached a woman in a library, greeted her, and tried to engage in conversation despite her refusals. Judicial Concern: The court was tasked with determining whether such behavior qualified as an offence under Section 354. Key Developments Judgment by Justice Kirti Singh: Found that no physical contact or force was alleged in the complaint. The complainant herself testified that she had no grievance against the accused. Court’s Observation: Annoying or socially inappropriate conduct does not, by itself, satisfy the requirements of Section 354. For an act to fall under the section, there must be criminal force plus intent to outrage modesty. Issues Overbroad Use of IPC Section 354 – Risk of misuse if mere unwanted conversation is criminalized. Balance Between Social Conduct and Legal Offence – Distinguishing between socially inappropriate behavior and legally punishable acts. Judicial Process Abuse – Continuing such cases without the legal ingredients would waste judicial resources. Current Status The FIR was quashed by the High Court. The ruling reinforces judicial caution in extending criminal provisions beyond their intended scope. It highlights the need to protect the integrity of legal processes while ensuring women’s safety through appropriate application of law. Conclusion The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s judgment sets an important precedent by drawing a clear line between unwelcome social interactions and criminal conduct under IPC Section 354. While stressing the seriousness of offences that genuinely outrage a woman’s modesty, the court emphasized that the law must not be stretched to cover conduct lacking the essential elements of force or intent. This ensures both fairness to the accused and credibility of the judicial system. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Delhi High Court Reprimands Police SI for Threatening Lawyers in Court Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules Attempt to Initiate Conversation with Woman Not Offence Under IPC Section 354 Read More »

SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu Urges H-1B Holders to Return to India Amid U.S. Visa Fee Hike SC Grants Bail to Kerala Priest Edwin Figarez, Suspends Sentence Pending Appeal Delhi High Court on Hate Speech and Political Rallies – 19 September 2025 CJI Gavai Reaffirms Faith in All Religions, Stresses True Spirit of Secularism Justice Karia Highlights Arbitration Cooperation; CJI Gavai Ends Vishnu Idol Remark Row SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Shivani Garg 23 September 2025 Introduction Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta has voiced serious concerns about the fairness and credibility of India’s arbitration system. He highlighted that the current practice of litigants choosing their own arbitrators compromises neutrality and erodes trust in arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism. Background Arbitration in India: Arbitration was promoted to reduce court backlogs and provide quicker dispute resolution. Current Practice: Parties involved in disputes often appoint their own arbitrators, a system intended to ensure balance but increasingly criticized for fostering bias. Context of Concerns: Legal experts have long debated the issue of transparency and impartiality in arbitration, with growing pressure for reforms. Key Developments Conference Platform: On September 21, 2025, at a two-day arbitration law conference organized by the Gujarat High Court in Ahmedabad, Mehta publicly flagged these issues. Observation: He noted that arbitrators can often be linked to specific clients or law firms, undermining the perception of fairness. Proposal: Mehta suggested a mandatory system for publishing all arbitral awards on a single public platform, allowing stakeholders to track patterns such as repeat arbitrator-client-law firm linkages. Issues Lack of Neutrality – Party-appointed arbitrators create an impression of favoritism. Opacity – Most arbitral awards remain confidential, preventing scrutiny of potential bias. Trust Deficit – The credibility of arbitration is weakening, discouraging parties from using it over traditional litigation. Current Status Call for Legislative Action: Mehta urged Parliament to step in with reforms to ensure impartiality and transparency. Legal Community Reaction: His remarks resonate with ongoing debates within the legal fraternity about the urgent need for systemic reforms in arbitration. Policy Direction: If implemented, reforms like a centralized database of arbitral awards could transform arbitration into a more accountable and transparent process. Conclusion Tushar Mehta’s strong call for parliamentary intervention signals a turning point in India’s arbitration discourse. By advocating transparency through publication of awards and reducing party influence over arbitrator selection, he emphasizes the need to safeguard arbitration’s role as a credible and impartial dispute resolution mechanism. Reforms in this area would not only restore faith among litigants but also strengthen India’s standing as a global hub for arbitration. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

SG Tushar Mehta Flags Integrity Crisis in Arbitration, Calls for Parliamentary Intervention Read More »

Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu Urges H-1B Holders to Return to India Amid U.S. Visa Fee Hike SC Grants Bail to Kerala Priest Edwin Figarez, Suspends Sentence Pending Appeal Delhi High Court on Hate Speech and Political Rallies – 19 September 2025 CJI Gavai Reaffirms Faith in All Religions, Stresses True Spirit of Secularism Justice Karia Highlights Arbitration Cooperation; CJI Gavai Ends Vishnu Idol Remark Row Bill Proposes Removal of J&K CM, Ministers After 30 Days in Jail, Reappointment Allowed Post-Release Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma Palak Singla 23 September 2025 Introduction Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla has taken a major step toward initiating impeachment proceedings against Allahabad High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma. This follows the discovery of a large amount of unaccounted cash—some of it burnt—at Varma’s official residence in Delhi after a fire in March 2025. The incident triggered suspicions of misconduct, leading 146 Members of Parliament (MPs), including Ravi Shankar Prasad and Rahul Gandhi, to support a motion to investigate the matter. Background The Fire Incident: In March 2025, a fire broke out at Justice Varma’s Delhi residence, revealing stashes of cash, raising serious questions about corruption. Investigation So Far: A judicial probe team questioned 55 witnesses and reportedly found evidence linking Varma to the seized cash. Supreme Court’s Role: The Supreme Court supported the inquiry, while a former Chief Justice advised Varma to resign or face impeachment. Legal Process of Impeachment Constitutional Framework: Under Articles 124(4) and 124(5) of the Constitution, judges of the High Court and Supreme Court can be removed only through impeachment for proven misbehavior or incapacity. Committee Formation: A special inquiry committee comprising a Supreme Court judge, a High Court Chief Justice, and a senior lawyer was set up to assess the charges. Recent Development – Hiring of Lawyers On 19 September 2025, Speaker Om Birla appointed Rohan Singh and Sameeksha Dua as legal advisors to assist the inquiry committee. Their role will be to ensure the proceedings strictly follow constitutional procedure and maintain judicial fairness. Why This Matters Rare Event: Judicial impeachment is extremely rare in India, making this case highly significant. Bipartisan Concern: Both ruling and opposition MPs are united in demanding accountability, reflecting the seriousness of the allegations. Judicial Integrity: The outcome will have lasting implications for public trust in the judiciary. Constitutional Test: This case will test the robustness of India’s constitutional mechanisms for checks and balances. Conclusion The engagement of legal experts by the Lok Sabha Speaker signals Parliament’s commitment to a thorough and constitutionally sound investigation into Justice Yashwant Varma. The case has already drawn national attention, not only because of the dramatic discovery of cash but also because it underscores the rare and solemn process of impeachment. The final decision will play a critical role in shaping the perception of judicial accountability and integrity in India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Lok Sabha Speaker Engages Two Lawyers for Advice on Impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma Read More »

Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu Urges H-1B Holders to Return to India Amid U.S. Visa Fee Hike SC Grants Bail to Kerala Priest Edwin Figarez, Suspends Sentence Pending Appeal Delhi High Court on Hate Speech and Political Rallies – 19 September 2025 CJI Gavai Reaffirms Faith in All Religions, Stresses True Spirit of Secularism Justice Karia Highlights Arbitration Cooperation; CJI Gavai Ends Vishnu Idol Remark Row Bill Proposes Removal of J&K CM, Ministers After 30 Days in Jail, Reappointment Allowed Post-Release Farmers’ Protest Resurfaces Over MSP Guarantee Bill – 19 September 2025 Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Shivani Garg 23 September 2025 Introduction At the Dispute Avoidance and Welfare (DAW) 2025 conference, Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal stressed the urgent need to reform Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The provision, which governs the setting aside of arbitral awards, has long been criticized for causing delays and excessive litigation, undermining arbitration’s efficiency in India. Background Arbitration in India: Over the past decade, India has promoted arbitration as a credible alternative to traditional litigation, with the goal of becoming a global arbitration hub. Problem with Section 34: Parties often exploit the provision to challenge arbitral awards, leading to prolonged legal battles and undermining the finality of arbitration. Context of DAW 2025: The conference focused on reforms aimed at strengthening dispute resolution frameworks and ensuring faster delivery of justice. Key Developments Meghwal highlighted that judicial intervention under Section 34 often defeats the purpose of arbitration as a speedy, final, and cost-effective mechanism. He stressed the importance of balancing judicial scrutiny with tribunal autonomy, ensuring that arbitral awards are respected and enforced. The Minister proposed integrating technology, digitization, and standardized practices to streamline procedures. Emphasis was also placed on international arbitration standards, ensuring that reforms align India with global best practices. Issues Raised Excessive delays due to frequent challenges under Section 34. Judicial inconsistencies in applying the provision. Investor confidence undermined by unpredictability in enforcement. Need for synergy between legal reforms, technology, and institutional support. Current Status Section 34 continues to be one of the most litigated provisions in arbitration law. While previous amendments aimed to limit misuse, practical challenges persist. Meghwal’s call at DAW 2025 signals renewed government intent to bring focused reforms, with consultations expected among lawmakers, arbitration bodies, and legal experts. Conclusion By advocating reforms to Section 34, Arjun Ram Meghwal reaffirmed the government’s commitment to strengthening arbitration as a reliable dispute resolution mechanism. A reformed framework, supported by technology and institutional backing, could reduce litigation, enhance investor trust, and cement India’s status as a global arbitration hub. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Arjun Ram Meghwal Advocates Reform of Section 34 at DAW 2025 Read More »

Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu Urges H-1B Holders to Return to India Amid U.S. Visa Fee Hike SC Grants Bail to Kerala Priest Edwin Figarez, Suspends Sentence Pending Appeal Delhi High Court on Hate Speech and Political Rallies – 19 September 2025 CJI Gavai Reaffirms Faith in All Religions, Stresses True Spirit of Secularism Justice Karia Highlights Arbitration Cooperation; CJI Gavai Ends Vishnu Idol Remark Row Bill Proposes Removal of J&K CM, Ministers After 30 Days in Jail, Reappointment Allowed Post-Release Farmers’ Protest Resurfaces Over MSP Guarantee Bill – 19 September 2025 Parliament Debate on Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Intensifies – 19 September 2025 Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives Shivani Garg 23 September 2025 Introduction The Orissa High Court has delivered a landmark judgment reinforcing the duty of fathers to provide financial support to their unmarried daughters. The ruling dismisses stereotypical notions that an educated wife or daughter can independently manage expenses, clarifying that a father’s obligation to maintain his children is absolute and non-transferable. Background The case arose when a father contested his liability to pay maintenance for his unmarried daughter. His argument was that since his wife was educated, she could take care of the child’s financial needs. The plea raised broader questions about parental duties, gender stereotypes, and the legal interpretation of maintenance rights under Indian law. Key Developments The High Court rejected the father’s contention, ruling that education or employment of the wife does not absolve him of his responsibilities. It emphasized that maintenance is a legal right, not a discretionary favor. The bench drew upon provisions of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, highlighting that the duty to maintain an unmarried daughter rests squarely on the father. The court also referenced earlier precedents that reaffirm the obligation of parents to secure the welfare and dignity of their children. Issues Addressed Whether the education or earning potential of a wife can shift financial responsibility from the father. Court’s answer: No. Maintenance is a statutory duty of the father. Whether an unmarried daughter has an independent right to maintenance. Court’s answer: Yes. Maintenance ensures dignity, not mere survival, and cannot be denied based on assumptions about financial capability. Whether stereotypes about educated women being self-sufficient can influence maintenance disputes. Court’s answer: No. The judiciary must reject such assumptions. Current Status The Orissa High Court has ordered the father to continue providing maintenance for his unmarried daughter. The judgment now stands as binding precedent in similar disputes within the jurisdiction, further strengthening protections for unmarried daughters under family law. Conclusion By rejecting outdated stereotypes and reaffirming the non-transferable responsibility of fathers, the Orissa High Court has taken a progressive step in protecting women’s financial rights. The ruling underscores that maintenance is a fundamental entitlement aimed at ensuring dignity and well-being, not a negotiable benefit subject to assumptions about earning capacity. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu Urges H-1B Holders to Return to India Amid U.S. Visa Fee Hike Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Orissa HC Upholds Father’s Duty to Support Unmarried Daughter, Rejects Stereotypes About Educated Wives Read More »

GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu Urges H-1B Holders to Return to India Amid U.S. Visa Fee Hike SC Grants Bail to Kerala Priest Edwin Figarez, Suspends Sentence Pending Appeal Delhi High Court on Hate Speech and Political Rallies – 19 September 2025 CJI Gavai Reaffirms Faith in All Religions, Stresses True Spirit of Secularism Justice Karia Highlights Arbitration Cooperation; CJI Gavai Ends Vishnu Idol Remark Row Bill Proposes Removal of J&K CM, Ministers After 30 Days in Jail, Reappointment Allowed Post-Release Farmers’ Protest Resurfaces Over MSP Guarantee Bill – 19 September 2025 Parliament Debate on Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Intensifies – 19 September 2025 Supreme Court Directs Centre on Electoral Bonds Transparency (19 September 2025) GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Shivani Garg 23 September 2025 Introduction From 22 September 2025, India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) system undergoes one of its biggest overhauls since its introduction. The four-tier structure of 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28% has been simplified into two main slabs — 5% and 18% — with a new 40% slab introduced for “sin goods” and luxury items. The change is expected to make essentials and daily-use items cheaper, while luxury and high-end goods become costlier. Bengaluru, home to major dairy and consumer markets, will see some immediate changes in pricing. What Gets Cheaper Dairy Products: Ghee, butter, cheese → cut from 12% to 5%. Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF) confirms reduced prices for Nandini ghee, butter, and cheese. Packaged & Preserved Foods: Chocolates, bakery products, sauces, muffins, cakes, cookies, and ice cream → down from 18% to 5%. Personal Care & Home Consumables: Shampoos, soaps, toothpaste, detergents → moved to 5% from 12–18%. Electronics & Appliances: LED/LCD TVs, washing machines, refrigerators, air conditioners → down from 28% to 18%. Construction Materials: Cement and related items → lower slab benefits, expected to make housing slightly cheaper. What Gets Costlier Sin Goods & Luxury Items (40% Slab): Cigarettes, pan masala, gutkha, sugary aerated drinks. Automobiles: Two-wheelers above 350cc (big bikes) → now at 40%. Luxury SUVs and cars (larger engine capacities, premium models) → higher taxation. Imported Gadgets & Premium Smartphones: Less favorable slab adjustments; may see price hikes. Bengaluru-Specific Impacts KMF (Nandini Brand): Confirmed price cuts on ghee, butter, processed cheese. Bakery & Confectionery: Lower costs at local bakeries and supermarket shelves for cakes, chocolates, cookies. Milk & Curd: No major change — milk remains zero GST, curd stays at 5%. Why Checking MRPs Matters Old stock with pre-reform MRPs may still be on shelves. Retailers may correct MRPs via stickers or bills, but some may charge older, higher rates. The government has allowed old packaging until 31 March 2026, or until existing stock clears. Tip for consumers: Always check your bill and MRP to ensure new GST benefits are passed on. Conclusion The GST overhaul simplifies taxation, making daily essentials, dairy, and household goods cheaper, while pushing luxury and sin goods into higher brackets. For Bengaluru, immediate relief is visible in Nandini dairy products and bakery items. However, consumers must remain vigilant about MRPs during the transition. The reform balances affordability for the common man with stricter taxation on luxury and discretionary spending. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu Urges H-1B Holders to Return to India Amid U.S. Visa Fee Hike Sada Law • September 23, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments SC Grants Bail to Kerala Priest Edwin Figarez, Suspends Sentence Pending Appeal Sada Law • September 21, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

GST Overhaul from Sept 22: What’s Cheaper, What’s Costlier in Bengaluru Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote