sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Sada Law

K.T. Rama Rao Under Fresh Scrutiny in ₹55 Crore Formula E Probe: ACB Investigates Public-Private Deal Irregularities

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today K.T. Rama Rao Under Fresh Scrutiny in ₹55 Crore Formula E Probe: ACB Investigates Public-Private Deal Irregularities Legal Action in Kedarnath Helicopter Crash: Aviation Safety Under Scrutiny After Tragedy INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT JLS LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUSPAY, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GOODYEAR, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BATA, GURGAON RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band to Signal Liquidity Tightening and Inflation Focus Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8 Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Services Entry INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT TRUEBLUE LEGALS, KANDIVALI OFFICE, MUMBAI  K.T. Rama Rao Under Fresh Scrutiny in ₹55 Crore Formula E Probe: ACB Investigates Public-Private Deal Irregularities KASHISH JAHAN 17 June 2025 Senior BRS leader K.T. Rama Rao receives a fresh notice from the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) in Hyderabad over alleged financial irregularities in the ₹55 crore Formula E funding. The probe raises critical questions about transparency in public-private partnerships. K.T. Rama Rao Faces New Notice in Formula E Funding Investigation In a significant development, the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) in Hyderabad has issued a fresh notice to senior BRS leader K.T. Rama Rao. The notice is linked to alleged irregularities in the ₹55 crore funding for the high-profile Formula E race held in the city. This probe is part of a broader investigation into how public funds were allocated and used, raising serious questions about the transparency and accountability of government collaborations with private enterprises. Key Allegations: Misuse of Public Funds At the heart of the investigation are concerns that taxpayer money was misappropriated or distributed without proper oversight. The ACB is reviewing financial records, contractual agreements, and the involvement of key government officials in greenlighting and managing the project. While the Formula E event elevated Hyderabad’s international image, critics argue that it might have been funded at the expense of responsible fiscal management. Political Implications for K.T. Rama Rao and BRS This case carries significant political weight. Opposition parties claim it’s indicative of a broader pattern of misuse of authority and public resources during the previous administration. For K.T. Rama Rao, often seen as the architect of Telangana’s modernization, this investigation poses a major reputational challenge at a time when the public is increasingly demanding greater transparency from political leaders. Public Demands for Accountability in Mega Events Civic groups and transparency watchdogs are urging a fair and thorough probe. They emphasize that while mega events like Formula E can enhance a city’s prestige, they must be managed with strict ethical and financial standards. The broader concern is that such high-profile projects should not become avenues for corruption or unchecked spending. Broader Impact: Public-Private Partnerships Under Scrutiny The Formula E funding controversy is evolving into more than a localized issue—it’s becoming a national conversation about governance in public-private ventures. As the legal process unfolds, it will serve as a litmus test for the integrity of high-value government initiatives and whether they truly serve public interest. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases K.T. Rama Rao Under Fresh Scrutiny in ₹55 Crore Formula E Probe: ACB Investigates Public-Private Deal Irregularities Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Legal Action in Kedarnath Helicopter Crash: Aviation Safety Under Scrutiny After Tragedy Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band to Signal Liquidity Tightening and Inflation Focus Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

K.T. Rama Rao Under Fresh Scrutiny in ₹55 Crore Formula E Probe: ACB Investigates Public-Private Deal Irregularities Read More »

Legal Action in Kedarnath Helicopter Crash: Aviation Safety Under Scrutiny After Tragedy

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Legal Action in Kedarnath Helicopter Crash: Aviation Safety Under Scrutiny After Tragedy INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT JLS LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUSPAY, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GOODYEAR, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BATA, GURGAON RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band to Signal Liquidity Tightening and Inflation Focus Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8 Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Services Entry INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT TRUEBLUE LEGALS, KANDIVALI OFFICE, MUMBAI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ANOMA LEGAL Legal Action in Kedarnath Helicopter Crash: Aviation Safety Under Scrutiny After Tragedy KASHISH JAHAN 17 June 2025 Aviation safety in India is under the spotlight following the tragic Kedarnath helicopter crash. Legal action has been initiated against Aryan Aviation, sparking nationwide calls for stricter regulations in high-altitude flight operations. Legal Action Begins After Kedarnath Helicopter Tragedy: Spotlight on Aviation Safety In the tragic aftermath of the Kedarnath helicopter crash that claimed seven lives, the Uttarakhand Police have launched legal proceedings against officials from Aryan Aviation. This devastating incident has ignited a nationwide discussion about the current state of aviation safety, especially in pilgrimage areas and high-risk zones. An FIR has been registered under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Aircraft Act. In response, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has suspended the licenses of the officials named in the investigation. Growing Safety Concerns in High-Altitude Helicopter Operations The crash has brought renewed attention to the lack of stringent safety protocols among helicopter services operating in mountainous terrains, particularly those facilitating the Kedarnath Yatra. Each year, thousands of pilgrims fly to this remote shrine, often unaware of the risks associated with unpredictable weather, difficult terrain, and mechanical stress at high altitudes. Experts are questioning whether aviation companies are compromising on maintenance, pilot training, and flight planning in a bid to meet high seasonal demand. Government and DGCA Respond with Swift Action The immediate registration of the FIR and license suspensions reflect a strong intent by authorities to ensure accountability. The DGCA has confirmed that a thorough review of all safety clearances and operating permits issued to helicopter services in the region is underway. There is growing speculation that this case may lead to a wider audit of aviation operators across other popular pilgrimage and tourist circuits in India. Victims’ Families Demand Accountability and Justice The families of those who lost their lives are demanding a fair and transparent investigation. Many are calling for stringent legal consequences for anyone found guilty of negligence. Several civil society organizations have joined these calls, pushing for policy reforms that would tighten safety norms and enhance oversight over aviation operators in hazard-prone regions. Conclusion: A Call for Reforms in India’s Aviation Safety Framework The Kedarnath helicopter crash is more than just a tragic accident—it’s a critical wake-up call for aviation regulators and stakeholders across India. As the legal process unfolds, this case will serve as a test of India’s ability to enforce accountability and implement long-overdue reforms in high-altitude aviation safety. Pilgrimage and tourism routes must now become focal points for regulatory overhaul to ensure such a tragedy never repeats. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Legal Action in Kedarnath Helicopter Crash: Aviation Safety Under Scrutiny After Tragedy Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band to Signal Liquidity Tightening and Inflation Focus Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8 Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Legal Action in Kedarnath Helicopter Crash: Aviation Safety Under Scrutiny After Tragedy Read More »

RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band to Signal Liquidity Tightening and Inflation Focus

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Legal Action in Kedarnath Helicopter Crash: Aviation Safety Under Scrutiny After Tragedy INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT JLS LAW LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JUSPAY, BENGALURU LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT GOODYEAR, DELHI LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT BATA, GURGAON RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band to Signal Liquidity Tightening and Inflation Focus Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8 Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Services Entry INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT TRUEBLUE LEGALS, KANDIVALI OFFICE, MUMBAI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ANOMA LEGAL RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band to Signal Liquidity Tightening and Inflation Focus KASHISH JAHAN 17 June 2025 The Reserve Bank of India narrows the call money rate band, signaling a strategic shift in liquidity management and a focus on inflation control. Learn what this means for banks, borrowers, and the Indian economy. RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band, Signals Liquidity Tightening In a noteworthy policy shift, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has revised the operating band for the overnight call money rate, allowing it to fluctuate within a narrower range of 25 basis points around the repo rate, down from the previous 50 basis points. This strategic move underscores the RBI’s evolving approach to managing liquidity and stabilizing short-term interest rates in the Indian financial system. Market analysts interpret this as a subtle but firm signal that the central bank aims to rein in excess liquidity and maintain a firm grip on inflation risks. Impact on Banks and Borrowers The call money market plays a crucial role in India’s banking ecosystem, allowing banks to borrow short-term funds overnight to meet liquidity requirements. By tightening the band, the RBI is targeting reduced rate volatility, making the cost of interbank borrowing more stable and predictable. While this move won’t immediately affect consumer loan rates, it suggests a cautious tightening of monetary policy as part of a larger focus on price stability. Market Reactions and Expert Insights Initial reactions from financial markets have been mixed. Several economists believe this adjustment enhances the effectiveness of monetary policy transmission, improving alignment between market interest rates and the RBI’s policy stance. However, in the context of an already constrained liquidity environment, some experts caution that the move could increase borrowing costs for both banks and businesses, potentially impacting credit availability. Broader Economic Implications This recalibration of the call money rate band comes at a delicate time. The RBI is walking a fine line between sustaining economic growth and curbing inflation. With ongoing global uncertainties, the central bank is likely to rely on subtle liquidity management tools like this rather than aggressive interest rate hikes. Conclusion: A Strategic Shift Toward Stability The RBI’s move to tighten the call money rate band is more than a technical adjustment—it reflects a broader commitment to ensuring financial and price stability. Although the immediate impact on consumers may be minimal, the message to markets is clear: the RBI is prepared to act decisively in controlling inflation and aligning liquidity with its monetary goals. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Legal Action in Kedarnath Helicopter Crash: Aviation Safety Under Scrutiny After Tragedy Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band to Signal Liquidity Tightening and Inflation Focus Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8 Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

RBI Narrows Call Money Rate Band to Signal Liquidity Tightening and Inflation Focus Read More »

Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8 Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Services Entry INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT TRUEBLUE LEGALS, KANDIVALI OFFICE, MUMBAI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ANOMA LEGAL LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT PRANAY JOSHI ADVOCATE & ASSOCIATES LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VRG LEGAL Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Principle Applies to Various Phases of Identical Proceedings LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JADON LAW CHAMBERS Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Summons Against Patanjali and Baba Ramdev Over Misleading Ads Case LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PINK SAMURA Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8 PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 17 June 2025 Absconding after a crime doesn’t prove guilt on its own, but as per the Supreme Court of India, it is a relevant fact under Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act. Learn how behavioral evidence and last-seen theories influence murder convictions in Indian criminal law. Understanding the Role of Absconding in Criminal Cases The Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed that simply fleeing from the scene of a crime does not, by itself, establish guilt. However, such behavior is considered a relevant fact under Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act, especially when the accused fails to offer a reasonable explanation for their absence. Judicial Interpretation by Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh In a recent case, the bench of Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh upheld a murder conviction, noting that the accused was last seen with the deceased before going missing. His failure to account for his sudden disappearance added weight to the prosecution’s argument, especially when supported by forensic evidence and the recovery of the murder weapon. Absconding vs. Instinctive Fear: A Legal Distinction While the instinct for self-preservation might drive even innocent individuals to flee under suspicion, the court emphasized that absconding can reflect a guilty mind when examined alongside other circumstances. As clarified under the Indian Evidence Act of 1872, absconding is a piece of conduct evidence that must be evaluated in context. Citing Legal Precedents: Matru v. State of Uttar Pradesh The Court referenced the case of Matru @ Girish Chandra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (1971), where it was stated that such conduct “strengthens the needle of suspicion.” This precedent reinforces that while absconding alone does not prove guilt, it is a vital piece of the evidentiary puzzle. Case Details: Timeline and Behavioral Evidence In this case, the appellant was last seen with the deceased on 10 July 2006 and absconded from 11 July to 22 July 2006. During this period, he misled companions and gave false information to the deceased’s family. This deceptive behavior, when coupled with the discovery of the firearm and scientific proof connecting it to the murder, painted a compelling narrative of guilt. Why Absconding Matters When Supported by Other Evidence The Supreme Court concluded that the appellant’s failure to explain his escape, along with corroborating evidence—such as last-seen theory, motive, and weapon recovery—solidified the prosecution’s case. The appeal was dismissed, and the murder conviction was upheld. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8 Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Services Entry Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Principle Applies to Various Phases of Identical Proceedings Sada Law • June 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court: Absconding Alone Doesn’t Prove Guilt but Is Relevant Under Evidence Act Section 8 Read More »

Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Services Entry

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Services Entry INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT TRUEBLUE LEGALS, KANDIVALI OFFICE, MUMBAI JOB OPPORTUNITY AT ANOMA LEGAL LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT PRANAY JOSHI ADVOCATE & ASSOCIATES LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT VRG LEGAL Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Principle Applies to Various Phases of Identical Proceedings LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JADON LAW CHAMBERS Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Summons Against Patanjali and Baba Ramdev Over Misleading Ads Case LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PINK SAMURA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AGROSTAR Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Mandate for Judicial Service Eligibility PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 17 June 2025 A review petition has challenged the Supreme Court’s mandate requiring three years of legal practice before candidates can apply for judicial service. The petition argues this decision is unfair, lacks empirical backing, and disproportionately affects marginalized communities. Supreme Court Ruling Sparks Legal Backlash The Supreme Court of India recently introduced a rule requiring three years of advocacy experience before applicants can be considered for entry-level judicial positions such as Civil Judge (Junior Division). A review petition has now been filed, challenging the immediate implementation of this mandate. The petitioner requests that the rule be deferred to 2027 to avoid disadvantaging law graduates from 2023 to 2025 who prepared under the previous eligibility framework. Violation of Constitutional Principles: Article 14 and Legitimate Expectation The review petition argues that the enforcement violates Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law. The petitioner claims the sudden enforcement causes retroactive hardship, contradicting the principle of legitimate expectation. This petition directly challenges the judgment delivered on May 20 in the All India Judges Association case by a bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice A.G. Masih, and Justice K. Vinod Chandran. Ignoring the Shetty Commission Recommendations According to the petitioner Chandra Sen Yadav, a practicing counsel, the court disregarded key recommendations from the Shetty Commission, which had advised eliminating the practice requirement. The Commission emphasized that internships and court visits during a law degree already offer practical exposure. Moreover, judicial candidates undergo training before assuming office, which the petitioner argues makes the three-year bar experience unnecessary. Selective Evidence from State Governments and High Courts The Court relied heavily on affidavits from various State Governments and High Courts supporting the rule’s reinstatement. However, the petition points out that opposing views from the states of Nagaland, Tripura, Punjab and Haryana High Court, and Chhattisgarh were overlooked. Absence of Empirical Data Supporting the Rule The petitioner criticizes the Court for basing its decision on anecdotal opinions rather than empirical research. No data was presented to prove that recent law graduates make ineffective judges. Historical data on the performance of candidates without bar experience was also not assessed. The petitioner asserts that such oversight renders the ruling arbitrary and unsubstantiated. Marginalized Groups Disproportionately Affected The petition highlights that the rule disproportionately impacts candidates from socially and economically underprivileged backgrounds, including Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). Additionally, law graduates with relevant legal experience in PSUs, corporate law firms, or as legal advisors are excluded because their roles do not qualify as “litigation practice.” Judiciary Overstepping Legislative Boundaries? Another major contention is that the Supreme Court acted as a policy-maker by enforcing a blanket eligibility rule across all states without legislative or consultative processes. According to the petitioner, this violates Article 141, which does not permit judicial overreach into policymaking. The restriction also contravenes Article 19(1)(g), which guarantees the right to practice any profession. Conclusion: A Call for Reconsideration The petition urges the Court to reconsider the 3-year experience requirement and delay its enforcement to protect the interests of recent graduates. It challenges the logic, fairness, and legality of the decision and calls for data-driven judicial policymaking. As the review is under consideration, the legal community and aspiring judges await a balanced and evidence-based resolution. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Services Entry Sada Law • June 17, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Principle Applies to Various Phases of Identical Proceedings Sada Law • June 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Summons Against Patanjali and Baba Ramdev Over Misleading Ads Case Sada Law • June 16, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Review Petition Challenges Supreme Court’s 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Services Entry Read More »

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Principle Applies to Various Phases of Identical Proceedings

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Principle Applies to Various Phases of Identical Proceedings LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT JADON LAW CHAMBERS Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Summons Against Patanjali and Baba Ramdev Over Misleading Ads Case LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PINK SAMURA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AGROSTAR Madras High Court Seeks Centre’s Stand on Uniform Civil Code in Tamil Nadu INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT PEEPALCO Uttarakhand High Court Orders Urgent Action on Prison Remissions for Life-Term Convicts, Pushing Prison Reform Custodial Death of Somnath Suryawanshi: Bombay High Court Urged to Order Court-Monitored SIT Probe One Nation, One Election: A Constitutional Reform or Threat to India’s Federalism? Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Principle Applies to Various Phases of Identical Proceedings Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 16 June 2025 Supreme Court rules that the res judicata principle applies to various phases of identical proceedings, reinforcing finality in civil litigation and barring repeated objections to impleadment under CPC Order I Rule 10. Understanding the Res Judicata Principle in Indian Civil Law The Supreme Court of India recently clarified that the res judicata principle is applicable not only across different proceedings but also at various phases within the same legal proceeding. This landmark judgment reinforces the finality of judicial decisions and prevents repeated litigation on the same issues. Key Supreme Court Judgment on Res Judicata and Impleadment Background of the Case In a significant ruling, a bench comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan upheld the Kerala High Court’s decision that dismissed an application under Order I Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC). The application sought to object to the impleadment of a legal heir at a late stage, despite the opportunity to raise such objections earlier. Court’s Reasoning The Court emphasized that once the trial court issued an order to implead a legal heir after a proper inquiry under Order XII Rule 4 CPC, any subsequent objections were barred by the doctrine of constructive res judicata, as per Explanation IV, Section 11 CPC. This principle prohibits re-litigation of matters that have already been decided or could have been decided. The bench cited the precedent set in Bhanu Kumar Jain v. Archana Kumar (2005) 1 SCC 787, noting: “The principles of res judicata apply not only to two different proceedings but also to different stages of the same proceeding.” Finality of Impleadment Decision Since the appellant did not object or file a revision against the impleadment order earlier, the Court ruled that the matter had reached finality. Consequently, the later attempt to remove the appellant from the list of parties was rightly dismissed as barred by res judicata. What This Means for Civil Litigation in India Res Judicata Applies Within the Same Proceeding: This ruling confirms that objections or disputes cannot be raised repeatedly at different stages of the same case. Importance of Timely Objections: Parties must raise objections during the proper phase; failure to do so will bar them from raising the same issues later. Finality of Orders on Impleadment: Once a legal heir is impleaded following due inquiry, that decision is binding and cannot be contested repeatedly. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s decision strengthens the doctrine of res judicata, ensuring judicial efficiency by avoiding unnecessary delays and repetitive litigation. Litigants and legal practitioners should take note that timely objections and challenges are crucial to protect their rights during civil proceedings. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Principle Applies to Various Phases of Identical Proceedings Read More »

Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Summons Against Patanjali and Baba Ramdev Over Misleading Ads Case

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Summons Against Patanjali and Baba Ramdev Over Misleading Ads Case LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PINK SAMURA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AGROSTAR Madras High Court Seeks Centre’s Stand on Uniform Civil Code in Tamil Nadu INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT PEEPALCO Uttarakhand High Court Orders Urgent Action on Prison Remissions for Life-Term Convicts, Pushing Prison Reform Custodial Death of Somnath Suryawanshi: Bombay High Court Urged to Order Court-Monitored SIT Probe One Nation, One Election: A Constitutional Reform or Threat to India’s Federalism? Madras High Court Rules False Sexual Allegations as Mental Cruelty, Grants Divorce to Husband President Approves Inquiry Into Former CJI D Y Chandrachud Over Alleged Misuse of Power Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Summons Against Patanjali and Baba Ramdev Over Misleading Ads Case Prabhat Kumar Biltoria 16 June 2025 The Uttarakhand High Court annuls summons issued to Patanjali Ayurved, Baba Ramdev, and Divya Pharmacy in a high-profile case involving allegations of deceptive advertising related to Coronil. Learn the court’s rationale and key legal points. Overview of the Uttarakhand High Court Decision On June 3, 2025, the Uttarakhand High Court canceled the summons issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Haridwar against Patanjali Ayurved, Divya Pharmacy, and their founders Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna. This legal action was initiated following complaints of deceptive advertisements, particularly concerning the promotion of the controversial product Coronil. Why Were the Summons Canceled? Lack of Expert Evidence Against Patanjali’s Advertisements Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma, who presided over the case, emphasized that the State government failed to provide any expert report proving that Patanjali’s advertisements were false or misleading. The Court stated that merely sending a notice to remove the advertisement without confirming the claims as false does not justify prosecution. Absence of Specific Allegations Under the Drugs and Magical Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 The complaint did not include clear accusations of false drug claims required under the Drugs and Magical Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954. Without evidence proving an offense under Sections 3, 4, and 7 of this Act, the Court ruled that the trial court should not have taken cognizance or issued summons. Legal Issues Highlighted by the Court Delay in Filing the Complaint Violates Legal Deadlines Most alleged offenses occurred before April 15, 2023, but the case was acknowledged by the CJM on April 16, 2024. This delay violates Section 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code, India (CrPC), which sets strict timelines for filing cases. Insufficient Digital Evidence Without Proper Certification The digital evidence submitted lacked a Section 65B certificate, as mandated by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, to be admissible in court. This procedural flaw weakened the State’s case significantly. Multiple Offenses Over Two Years The complaint involved 20 offenses committed between 2022 and 2024, not constituting a single transaction. The Court found that a single cognizance order was inappropriate for multiple separate offenses. Background: The State’s Complaint Against Patanjali The Uttarakhand government filed the complaint in 2024, alleging legal violations related to advertising by Patanjali, Divya Pharmacy, Baba Ramdev, and Acharya Balkrishna. The summons followed the complaint, which was contested in the High Court leading to this landmark judgment. Conclusion: Impact of the Uttarakhand High Court Ruling The High Court’s decision to annul the summons against Patanjali and Baba Ramdev highlights the importance of concrete evidence and adherence to legal procedures in cases involving deceptive advertising claims. This ruling serves as a precedent emphasizing that allegations without expert verification and procedural compliance are insufficient for prosecution. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Summons Against Patanjali and Baba Ramdev Over Misleading Ads Case Read More »

Madras High Court Seeks Centre’s Stand on Uniform Civil Code in Tamil Nadu

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT PINK SAMURA LEGAL JOB OPPORTUNITY AT AGROSTAR Madras High Court Seeks Centre’s Stand on Uniform Civil Code in Tamil Nadu INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT PEEPALCO Uttarakhand High Court Orders Urgent Action on Prison Remissions for Life-Term Convicts, Pushing Prison Reform Custodial Death of Somnath Suryawanshi: Bombay High Court Urged to Order Court-Monitored SIT Probe One Nation, One Election: A Constitutional Reform or Threat to India’s Federalism? Madras High Court Rules False Sexual Allegations as Mental Cruelty, Grants Divorce to Husband President Approves Inquiry Into Former CJI D Y Chandrachud Over Alleged Misuse of Power Bokaro Launches Mobile Land Court to Deliver Justice in Rural Jharkhand Madras High Court Seeks Centre’s Stand on Uniform Civil Code in Tamil Nadu Kashish jahan 16 June 2025 The Madras High Court has asked the Central Government to clarify its stand on implementing the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in Tamil Nadu. Explore how this landmark case could influence personal law reform and constitutional rights in India. Introduction: A Legal Turning Point for Tamil Nadu In a significant move, the Madras High Court is reviewing a petition demanding the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in Tamil Nadu. The petitioner argues that the absence of a UCC violates Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, which encourages the state to secure a uniform civil code for all citizens. This case has now drawn national attention as the Court has requested the Central Government to clearly state its position, raising critical questions about religious freedom, personal laws in India, and constitutional equality. What Is the Uniform Civil Code (UCC)? The Uniform Civil Code refers to a common set of laws governing marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, and other civil matters regardless of religion. Although Article 44 promotes the idea of a UCC, India currently follows different personal laws for various communities, creating a complex legal landscape. High Court’s Focus on Constitutional Clarity Judicial Push for Personal Law Reform The Madras High Court’s intervention signals a possible shift from political debate to constitutional scrutiny. The Court has asked the Centre to clarify whether it plans to introduce a UCC in Tamil Nadu, a move that could shape the future of family law reform across India. Why Article 44 Matters Article 44 of the Constitution is part of the Directive Principles of State Policy, which, though not enforceable by courts, act as guiding principles for governance. The petition claims that the current legal system’s inconsistency with Article 44 leads to inequality in civil rights, especially in matters like inheritance and marriage. Religious Freedom vs. Legal Uniformity Balancing Individual Rights and Community Practices The UCC debate is deeply rooted in the tension between religious freedom and equal rights. Implementing a UCC could promote gender equality and legal uniformity, but critics argue it may infringe on minority rights and cultural practices. Potential Impact on India’s Legal Framework A Landmark Case for Civil Law in Tamil Nadu This petition could serve as a test case for the viability of implementing a Uniform Civil Code in a diverse and multi-religious society like India. If the Centre supports the move, it may trigger broader discussions on national civil law reform. Judiciary’s Role in Social Reform The Court’s cautious yet firm approach highlights the judiciary’s growing role in nudging political accountability on long-pending social reforms. This case could set a precedent, encouraging other states and courts to revisit the UCC debate with fresh legal insight. Conclusion: Will the UCC Debate Gain Momentum? As the Madras High Court awaits the Centre’s response, the outcome of this case could redefine India’s approach to personal laws. It reflects a growing demand to reconcile constitutional directives with the realities of a pluralistic society. Whether this leads to actual legislative action remains to be seen, but the conversation around the Uniform Civil Code in Tamil Nadu is far from over. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Madras High Court Seeks Centre’s Stand on Uniform Civil Code in Tamil Nadu Read More »

Uttarakhand High Court Orders Urgent Action on Prison Remissions for Life-Term Convicts, Pushing Prison Reform

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Uttarakhand High Court Orders Urgent Action on Prison Remissions for Life-Term Convicts, Pushing Prison Reform Custodial Death of Somnath Suryawanshi: Bombay High Court Urged to Order Court-Monitored SIT Probe One Nation, One Election: A Constitutional Reform or Threat to India’s Federalism? Madras High Court Rules False Sexual Allegations as Mental Cruelty, Grants Divorce to Husband President Approves Inquiry Into Former CJI D Y Chandrachud Over Alleged Misuse of Power Bokaro Launches Mobile Land Court to Deliver Justice in Rural Jharkhand Supreme Court Questions Centre on Surrogacy Rules 2023: Challenge Highlights Reproductive Rights and Constitutional Concerns Delhi High Court Restrains Unauthorized Use of “TATA” Trademark in Domain Names Bombay High Court Halts BMC Demolition Over Alleged Illegal Structures Amid Procedural Dispute Madras High Court Seeks Tamil Nadu’s Response on Facial Recognition in Policing Amid Privacy Concerns Uttarakhand High Court Orders Urgent Action on Prison Remissions for Life-Term Convicts, Pushing Prison Reform   Kashish Jahan 16 June 2025 The Uttarakhand High Court directs the state to form a Remission Board for life-term convicts eligible for release, spotlighting prison reform and the urgent need to uphold constitutional justice in India. Introduction: A Legal Turning Point in Prison Reform In a landmark move, the Uttarakhand High Court has taken strong judicial action to address the long-ignored rights of life-term convicts who are legally entitled to remission. Despite fulfilling all conditions for early release, many prisoners in Uttarakhand continue to remain behind bars—some since 2019 and 2021. The Court’s intervention brings renewed focus to prison reform in India, emphasizing the need for timely and fair implementation of remission policies. The Legal Right to Remission — and Its Denial What Is Remission in the Indian Legal System? Remission is a key provision in India’s criminal justice system that allows convicted prisoners to reduce their sentence based on good behavior and rehabilitation efforts. Although not an automatic right, it serves as a powerful tool for reintegration and reformative justice. Delay in State Action The Uttarakhand High Court found that several convicts, eligible for remission years ago, were still incarcerated due to the state government’s failure to constitute a Remission Board. This inaction violates legal obligations and raises serious concerns about the gap between policy and practice. High Court’s Directive — A Test of Accountability In its latest order, the Court directed the state government to establish the Remission Board within two weeks, signaling its intent to hold the government accountable. The Court also warned that non-compliance could lead to contempt of court or further judicial monitoring. Upholding Constitutional Values The judiciary’s proactive stance highlights the importance of upholding human dignity, even for those serving life sentences. The case challenges the state to align its actions with the principles of justice, fairness, and the rule of law. A Chance to Redefine Prison Policy Nationwide This case could become a turning point in India’s penal policy, urging other states to review outdated remission frameworks and ensure timely release for eligible prisoners. The ripple effects may lead to: Re-evaluation of prisoner rights across India Standardization of remission policies Renewed focus on rehabilitation and reintegration Conclusion: A Second Chance for Life-Term Convicts The Uttarakhand High Court’s move is a crucial reminder that justice doesn’t end with sentencing. By demanding timely remission for deserving convicts, the Court is championing a more humane and legally sound approach to incarceration. With the next hearing scheduled for June 20, 2025, all eyes are on the state government to act decisively—and to prove its commitment to both reformative justice and the rule of law. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Uttarakhand High Court Orders Urgent Action on Prison Remissions for Life-Term Convicts, Pushing Prison Reform Read More »

Custodial Death of Somnath Suryawanshi: Bombay High Court Urged to Order Court-Monitored SIT Probe

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Custodial Death of Somnath Suryawanshi: Bombay High Court Urged to Order Court-Monitored SIT Probe One Nation, One Election: A Constitutional Reform or Threat to India’s Federalism? Madras High Court Rules False Sexual Allegations as Mental Cruelty, Grants Divorce to Husband President Approves Inquiry Into Former CJI D Y Chandrachud Over Alleged Misuse of Power Bokaro Launches Mobile Land Court to Deliver Justice in Rural Jharkhand Supreme Court Questions Centre on Surrogacy Rules 2023: Challenge Highlights Reproductive Rights and Constitutional Concerns Delhi High Court Restrains Unauthorized Use of “TATA” Trademark in Domain Names Bombay High Court Halts BMC Demolition Over Alleged Illegal Structures Amid Procedural Dispute Madras High Court Seeks Tamil Nadu’s Response on Facial Recognition in Policing Amid Privacy Concerns Madras High Court Seeks Tamil Nadu Govt’s Response on PIL Challenging Facial Recognition in Policing Custodial Death of Somnath Suryawanshi: Bombay High Court Urged to Order Court-Monitored SIT Probe   Kashish Jahan 16 June 2025 The custodial death of Somnath Suryawanshi in Maharashtra prompts the Bombay High Court to consider ordering a court-monitored SIT. Explore the call for judicial accountability and police reforms in custodial violence cases. Tragic Custodial Death Sparks Demand for Independent Investigation The custodial death of Somnath Suryawanshi in Maharashtra’s Beed district has reignited national concerns over police brutality and custodial violence. The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court is currently hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by activist Prakash Ambedkar, urging the court to order a court-monitored Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the incident. Why a Court-Monitored SIT Is Crucial The PIL stresses that an impartial investigation is only possible through a court-monitored SIT, due to alleged police involvement in the death. Past probes conducted by local authorities have been criticized for lack of transparency and potential cover-ups. This situation highlights the urgent need for judicial accountability and an independent inquiry into custodial deaths. The Fight for Accountability in Custodial Violence Cases Custodial deaths violate fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which protects the right to life and personal liberty. Despite these protections, custodial violence remains a persistent issue in India, with many cases going unpunished. The Suryawanshi case is a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle to hold law enforcement agencies accountable and ensure justice for victims. Public Outcry and Legal Implications The tragic incident has sparked widespread public outrage and intense scrutiny from the legal community. Observers are closely watching how the Bombay High Court responds, as its decision could set an important precedent for future cases involving custodial violence and police accountability. Broader Impact on Policing and Human Rights This case is more than just an isolated tragedy; it represents a critical moment for the Indian legal system and law enforcement reforms. A thorough, transparent investigation could reinforce the message that no one, including police officers, is above the law. Moreover, it underscores the need to uphold human rights at the core of all policing activities. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Affirms Right to Anticipatory Bail Across States in Matrimonial Disputes: Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Rules on Governor’s Limited Discretion to Withhold Assent and Summon Punjab Legislative Assembly | State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Judgment on Chargesheets: Not Public Documents, No Mandatory Online Upload by Investigating Agencies | Saurav Das v. Union of India (2023) Sada Law • June 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Custodial Death of Somnath Suryawanshi: Bombay High Court Urged to Order Court-Monitored SIT Probe Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote