sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Sada Law

India and Canada Diplomatic Row Escalates Over Alleged Involvement in Sikh Leader’s Killing

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today India and Canada Diplomatic Row Escalates Over Alleged Involvement in Sikh Leader’s Killing Supreme Court to Review Plea on Electoral Bonds Scheme India and Bangladesh Hold High-Level Border Security Talks to Tackle Migration, Smuggling, and Water-Sharing Disputes PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence India and Canada Diplomatic Row Escalates Over Alleged Involvement in Sikh Leader’s Killing Shristi Singh 30 September 2025 Introduction Diplomatic tensions between India and Canada have escalated sharply after Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau alleged that Indian agents might have been involved in the killing of Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar in British Columbia. The claim has triggered a series of diplomatic expulsions, suspension of services, and a freeze in bilateral talks, straining relations between the two countries. Background Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a pro-Khalistan activist and Canadian citizen, was shot dead outside a gurdwara in Surrey, Canada, in June 2023. India had declared Nijjar a wanted terrorist, accusing him of promoting separatism and violent extremism. Canada, home to one of the world’s largest Sikh diasporas, has long faced criticism from India for allegedly allowing extremist Khalistani groups to operate with impunity. The Allegations On 18 September 2023, Prime Minister Trudeau told the Canadian Parliament that “credible allegations” linked Indian government agents to Nijjar’s killing. He described the matter as a serious violation of Canadian sovereignty and urged Indian cooperation in the investigation. India firmly rejected the claims, calling them “absurd and motivated”, and demanded concrete evidence from Canada before making such accusations. Diplomatic Actions Canada expelled a senior Indian diplomat. India retaliated by expelling a Canadian diplomat of equivalent rank. India suspended visa services for Canadian citizens, citing “security threats.” Ongoing trade talks between the two nations were placed on hold. International Reactions United States & United Kingdom: Expressed concern, urging both sides to maintain dialogue and support transparent investigations. Australia: Stressed respect for international norms and due process. Civil Society Groups: Divided—some backed Trudeau’s stance, while others accused Canada of overlooking extremist activities within its borders. Legal and Political Implications International Law: If proven, the allegations could amount to a violation of sovereignty and trigger significant legal and diplomatic consequences. For India: Potential damage to its diplomatic image and relations with Western allies. For Canada: Trudeau faces domestic pressure for escalating tensions without presenting hard evidence, risking political backlash. Conclusion The India-Canada diplomatic dispute underscores the delicate intersection of diaspora politics, counterterrorism, and international diplomacy. As investigations proceed, the path ahead will determine whether the two nations can de-escalate tensions or face a prolonged diplomatic standoff. A balanced resolution remains crucial for protecting trade ties, people-to-people relations, and regional stability. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases India and Canada Diplomatic Row Escalates Over Alleged Involvement in Sikh Leader’s Killing Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court to Review Plea on Electoral Bonds Scheme Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments India and Bangladesh Hold High-Level Border Security Talks to Tackle Migration, Smuggling, and Water-Sharing Disputes Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

India and Canada Diplomatic Row Escalates Over Alleged Involvement in Sikh Leader’s Killing Read More »

Supreme Court to Review Plea on Electoral Bonds Scheme

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court to Review Plea on Electoral Bonds Scheme India and Bangladesh Hold High-Level Border Security Talks to Tackle Migration, Smuggling, and Water-Sharing Disputes PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court to Review Plea on Electoral Bonds Scheme Shristi Singh 30 September 2025 Introduction The Supreme Court of India has agreed to review fresh petitions against the Electoral Bonds Scheme, reigniting debate over political funding and transparency in India. Introduced in 2018, the scheme allows individuals and corporations to donate money to political parties anonymously—a system critics argue encourages opacity and undermines democratic accountability. Background of the Scheme The Electoral Bonds Scheme was introduced by the Government of India with the stated objective of creating a “clean and transparent” channel for political donations. Donors purchase bonds through the State Bank of India (SBI). Political parties encash them through designated accounts. Donor identity remains confidential. While the government claims the scheme curbs cash-based donations and black money, opposition parties, activists, and civil society groups argue it promotes opaque funding, lack of accountability, and corporate influence in politics. Supreme Court’s Involvement Several Public Interest Litigations (PILs), including one by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), have challenged the scheme’s constitutionality. Petitioners argue: Violation of Right to Information – Citizens must know the sources of political funding. Unfair Advantage to Ruling Party – SBI’s government control could give ruling parties privileged access to donor details. Corporate Influence – Large corporations can anonymously shape policies through donations. The Supreme Court, while not delivering a verdict yet, has agreed to a comprehensive review and scheduled hearings in the coming months. Political Reactions Opposition Parties: Welcomed the Court’s move, framing it as a step toward protecting democracy. Ruling Party: Defended the scheme, highlighting its role in reducing cash-based, untraceable donations. Civil Society: Stressed the need for donor disclosure, arguing that transparency is essential for an informed electorate. Legal Significance This case holds major implications for electoral democracy and constitutional rights in India. Possible outcomes include: Striking down the scheme as unconstitutional. Modifying it with stricter disclosure and accountability mechanisms. Upholding the scheme while balancing confidentiality with public transparency. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s review of the Electoral Bonds Scheme marks a landmark moment in India’s political and legal discourse. Its decision will shape the future of electoral funding, transparency, and the integrity of democratic processes. Until a final judgment is delivered, the scheme remains at the center of a heated debate on whether it strengthens clean politics or deepens opacity in governance. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court to Review Plea on Electoral Bonds Scheme Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments India and Bangladesh Hold High-Level Border Security Talks to Tackle Migration, Smuggling, and Water-Sharing Disputes Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court to Review Plea on Electoral Bonds Scheme Read More »

India and Bangladesh Hold High-Level Border Security Talks to Tackle Migration, Smuggling, and Water-Sharing Disputes

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today India and Bangladesh Hold High-Level Border Security Talks to Tackle Migration, Smuggling, and Water-Sharing Disputes PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases India and Bangladesh Hold High-Level Border Security Talks to Tackle Migration, Smuggling, and Water-Sharing Disputes Shristi Singh 30 September 2025 Introduction India and Bangladesh on Monday began a new round of high-level border security talks in New Delhi, addressing sensitive concerns such as illegal migration, cross-border smuggling, water-sharing disputes, and crimes along the 4,096-km-long international border. Officials from the Border Security Force (BSF) and Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) emphasized greater cooperation, improved coordination, and reduced tensions, signaling renewed efforts to strengthen bilateral ties. Background The India-Bangladesh border is one of the most complex frontiers in South Asia. Spanning over 4,000 km, it cuts across rivers, villages, forests, and farmlands. Despite strong diplomatic ties, challenges persist over illegal migration, cattle and narcotics smuggling, border killings, and river water-sharing disputes.Illegal migration has remained a politically charged issue in India, particularly in states like Assam and West Bengal. Smuggling, meanwhile, continues to fuel cross-border tensions. Another unresolved matter is the Teesta River water-sharing agreement, which has long eluded consensus despite repeated negotiations.Annual BSF-BGB talks are designed to manage these operational and political issues. The September 2025 dialogue holds special significance as both governments face domestic pressures to ensure border security and economic cooperation. Key Developments The week-long talks were led by BSF Director General Nitin Agrawal and BGB Director General Maj. Gen. Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman Siddiqui. India’s Union Home Secretary Ajay Bhalla inaugurated the meeting, calling the border a “bridge of cooperation” rather than a barrier. Key issues discussed: Illegal Migration – India raised concerns and urged Bangladesh to tighten surveillance. Cross-Border Smuggling – Plans to curb narcotics, arms, and cattle trafficking, including drone surveillance and night-vision tools. Border Killings – Both sides reviewed civilian casualty incidents; India stressed a “zero-tolerance” policy. River Water Sharing – Revival of the stalled Teesta water-sharing agreement was explored. Joint Cooperation – Agreements on joint patrols, intelligence sharing, and training programs were reached. Maj. Gen. Siddiqui reaffirmed Dhaka’s commitment to addressing India’s concerns, stressing that Bangladesh values its partnership with India for regional stability. Issues Illegal Migration: Political and security challenge in India’s northeast. Smuggling: Undermines both trade and security. Border Killings: A sensitive humanitarian and diplomatic concern. Water Disputes: The Teesta issue impacts farmers on both sides. External Influence: Rising Chinese presence in South Asia adds geopolitical urgency. Current Status Talks concluded in a cordial environment, with both countries reaffirming commitment to long-term cooperation. While concrete solutions on migration and water-sharing remain pending, enhanced joint patrols, technological surveillance, and a renewed dialogue on Teesta represent tangible progress. Conclusion The September 2025 India-Bangladesh border talks highlight both challenges and opportunities in managing one of South Asia’s most sensitive borders. By prioritizing cooperation over confrontation, the two nations signaled a shared commitment to stability, trade, and regional trust-building. While issues like migration and water-sharing require sustained negotiations, this dialogue underscores that both sides are determined to chart a path toward stronger bilateral partnership. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases India and Bangladesh Hold High-Level Border Security Talks to Tackle Migration, Smuggling, and Water-Sharing Disputes Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

India and Bangladesh Hold High-Level Border Security Talks to Tackle Migration, Smuggling, and Water-Sharing Disputes Read More »

PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections Shristi Singh 30 September 2025 Introduction Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the National Urban Housing Mission 2.0 (NUHM 2.0) on Sunday, aiming to provide affordable housing solutions for India’s growing urban population. With a target of 30 million homes by 2030, the initiative is positioned as both a welfare policy and an economic booster ahead of the 2026 general elections. Background The mission builds on the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY-Urban), which began in 2015 with the goal of “Housing for All” by 2022. While it sanctioned nearly 12 million homes, execution challenges persisted, including funding gaps, delays, and land constraints. With urbanization projected to reach 40% by 2030, NUHM 2.0 represents a strategic expansion, integrating sustainability, technology, and private sector participation into the housing framework. Key Developments Target of 30 million homes by 2030 across metros, tier-2, and tier-3 towns. Expanded Credit-Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS): Cheaper home loans for middle-income groups. Green Housing: Energy-efficient designs, solar integration, and rainwater harvesting. PPP Model: Incentives for private developers to deliver low-cost urban housing. Digital Land Records: Nationwide digitization to streamline approvals and reduce disputes. Budget: Initial allocation of ₹1.5 lakh crore for the first five years, with special infrastructure funds for states. At the Vigyan Bhawan launch, PM Modi emphasized that housing provides not just shelter but “dignity, security, and empowerment.” Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman underlined the scheme’s role in stimulating economic growth while supporting social inclusion. Issues Land acquisition challenges in high-cost urban centers. Funding requirements: Analysts estimate total costs may exceed ₹10 lakh crore. Implementation bottlenecks: Past delays under PMAY fuel skepticism. Opposition criticism: Congress and others argue NUHM 2.0 risks becoming a political showcase without strong execution. Current Status The scheme has been officially launched, with immediate focus on state-level collaboration and private developer participation. Market reactions were positive, with housing sector stocks and cement companies gaining. Opposition parties, however, have demanded accountability on pending PMAY projects before new commitments are made. Conclusion NUHM 2.0 is more than just a housing program—it is a political, social, and economic statement ahead of 2026. If implemented effectively, it could address urban housing shortages, create jobs, stimulate multiple industries, and contribute to India’s climate commitments. However, success will depend on overcoming land, funding, and coordination hurdles. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

PM Modi Launches National Urban Housing Mission 2.0: A Renewed Push for Affordable Housing Ahead of 2026 Elections Read More »

MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teesta Setalvad: A Reaffirmation of Bail Jurisprudence MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Shivani Garg 30 September 2025 Introduction The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has firmly rejected remarks by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently pressed Russian President Vladimir Putin for clarity on the Ukraine conflict following steep U.S. tariffs on Indian goods. Claim by NATO Chief Rutte alleged that Modi reached out to Putin amid growing U.S. economic pressure, including a 50% tariff on Indian exports, suggesting that Washington’s measures were indirectly shaping Moscow’s calculations in Ukraine. He argued that such developments highlighted the effectiveness of economic sanctions and tariffs in altering geopolitical dynamics. India’s Rebuttal The MEA dismissed the NATO chief’s assertions as “factually incorrect and entirely baseless.” It clarified that no such demand was made by Modi in the manner described. The ministry further urged NATO’s leadership to act with “restraint and responsibility”, cau tioning against speculative comments that misrepresent India’s foreign policy engagements. Background & Context Modi and Putin last spoke on September 17, 2025, on the Prime Minister’s 75th birthday, with India reiterating its position that the conflict in Ukraine should be resolved peacefully through dialogue. India has consistently defended its independent foreign policy, balancing ties with Russia while maintaining strong partnerships with the United States and Europe. The U.S. recently imposed 50% tariffs on Indian exports, citing India’s sustained oil trade with Russia — a move seen as an attempt to exert indirect pressure on New Delhi’s strategic choices. Issues & Implications The episode underscores the growing use of trade and tariffs as tools of foreign policy. NATO’s claim risks straining perceptions of India’s diplomatic neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. India’s strong rebuttal signals its intent to safeguard strategic autonomy and avoid being drawn into competing Western or Russian narratives. Current Status India has not announced any new diplomatic engagement with Russia or NATO following the controversy. The MEA’s statement suggests that New Delhi remains committed to its balancing act — advocating peace in Ukraine, protecting its energy security, and resisting external pressures on its foreign policy decisions. Conclusion The MEA’s rebuttal highlights India’s sensitivity to suggestions that its diplomacy is driven by U.S. trade pressure. At a time when economic measures are increasingly deployed as instruments of global politics, New Delhi appears determined to assert its independence while managing complex ties with both Washington and Moscow. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

MEA Rebuts NATO Chief’s Claim on Modi-Putin Call Over Ukraine, Tariffs Read More »

Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teesta Setalvad: A Reaffirmation of Bail Jurisprudence LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MANDLA AND SINGH LAW CHAMBERS Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Shristi Singh 30 September 2025 Introduction In a major development for India’s financial sector, the Government of India has appointed senior bureaucrat and economist Shirish Chandra Murmu as the new Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). His appointment, effective from October 9, 2025, comes just days before the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting, where crucial decisions on inflation and economic growth are expected. Background The Deputy Governor’s role at the RBI is of high strategic importance, overseeing areas such as monetary policy, banking supervision, and financial regulation. Murmu, a 1979-batch IAS officer from the Gujarat cadre, brings decades of administrative experience. He previously served as the first Lieutenant Governor of Jammu & Kashmir after Article 370’s abrogation, and as Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, where his financial oversight role was widely commended. Key Developments The Ministry of Finance vannounced Murmu’s appointment on September 29, 2025. He will replace Rajeshwar Rao, who retires on October 8 after guiding the RBI during the pandemic. Murmu’s portfolios within the RBI are yet to be finalized, but he is expected to handle financial supervision and internal regulation. His appointment precedes the MPC meeting scheduled from October 1–3, 2025, where interest rate decisions will be taken amid high inflation. Market reactions were positive, with the Sensex rising by 200 points, reflecting investor confidence in policy continuity. Issues Economic pressures: Inflation stood at 6.4% in August 2025, above RBI’s target range. Growth forecasts have dipped from 6.7% to 6.2%. Global volatility: Rising crude oil prices, a weakening rupee, and global financial uncertainty continue to weigh on India’s economy. RBI–government dynamics: Historically, tensions over autonomy have surfaced; Murmu’s administrative and political experience may help balance this relationship. Current Status Murmu officially assumes office on October 9, 2025 for a three-year term. His immediate challenge will be contributing to RBI’s inflation–growth balancing act in the upcoming MPC meeting. Experts suggest RBI may keep the repo rate unchanged at 6.5% while signaling caution in future moves. Conclusion Shirish Chandra Murmu’s appointment as Deputy Governor of the RBI signals the government’s intent to strengthen central bank leadership with experienced administrators. His mix of governance, fiscal oversight, and political sensitivity equips him to navigate India’s pressing economic challenges. As the RBI faces tough policy choices, Murmu’s role will be pivotal in shaping India’s financial stability and economic trajectory ahead of the 2026 general elections. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Government Appoints Shirish Chandra Murmu as Deputy Governor of RBI: A Move Ahead of Critical Policy Review Read More »

Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teesta Setalvad: A Reaffirmation of Bail Jurisprudence LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MANDLA AND SINGH LAW CHAMBERS High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Shivani Garg 30 September 2025 Introduction The arrest of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk in September 2025 followed a violent turn in the ongoing Ladakh statehood movement. Long-standing demands for statehood and constitutional safeguards under the Sixth Schedule escalated into unrest in Leh, leaving casualties, property damage, and a deepening rift between the administration and local communities. The episode highlights the intersection of environmental activism, regional aspirations, and governance challenges in India’s newest Union Territory. Background Ladakh was carved out as a Union Territory in 2019 after the abrogation of Article 370. Local communities have since sought full statehood and inclusion under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides tribal regions with autonomy and protection of land, culture, and resources. Sonam Wangchuk, an internationally recognized climate activist and education reformer, became the prominent voice of this movement. On September 10, 2025, he launched a hunger strike to press for these demands, intensifying the agitation. Key Developments The protests had remained peaceful until September 24, 2025. Tensions escalated when two hunger strikers — an elderly man and a woman — were hospitalized. This inflamed anger among youth participants. Demonstrations in Leh turned violent: protesters clashed with security forces, torched a BJP office, damaged government property, and set fire to a paramilitary vehicle. Authorities resorted to tear gas and live firing to control the mob. Issues Whether Ladakh should be granted statehood and Sixth Schedule protections to address demands for autonomy, employment, and resource rights. The role of civil society leaders like Sonam Wangchuk in mobilizing protests versus allegations of incitement. Balancing regional aspirations with national security concerns in a strategically sensitive border territory. Current Status Four people were killed, and dozens (including civilians and police personnel) were injured. Authorities imposed curfews and tightened security in Leh and surrounding regions. On September 26, Wangchuk was arrested by Ladakh Police, accused of making provocative remarks that allegedly fueled the violence. The Union Government also cancelled the FCRA licence of Wangchuk’s NGO, SECMOL, blocking foreign funding. Wangchuk has rejected the allegations, calling his arrest a political move and warning that suppressing democratic voices may deepen unrest. Conclusion The unrest in Ladakh underscores unresolved questions about democratic representation, ecological sustainability, and development in the Union Territory. While the government frames the violence as law-and-order breakdown incited by Wangchuk, local voices see it as the culmination of broken promises and marginalization. The arrest has polarized opinion, raising concerns about the space for peaceful activism and the path ahead for Ladakh’s governance framework. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Sada Law • September 30, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA Sada Law • September 26, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Sonam Wangchuk Arrested After Violent Ladakh Statehood Protests Read More »

Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teesta Setalvad: A Reaffirmation of Bail Jurisprudence LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MANDLA AND SINGH LAW CHAMBERS High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Reha Bhargav Sep 29, 2025 Introduction The case Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi v. Union of India & Ors. dealt with the long-standing constitutional tussle between the elected Government of Delhi and the Union Government over control of “services,” i.e., the bureaucracy. Article 239AA grants Delhi a unique status as a Union Territory with an elected legislature. The key question was whether the Delhi Government has power over services, or whether this authority rests with the Lieutenant Governor (LG), acting on behalf of the Union Government. On 11 May 2023, a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held that the Delhi Government has both legislative and executive control over services, except for public order, police, and land. The judgment significantly reinforced the principles of representative democracy and federalism in the governance of Delhi. Background Delhi is a Union Territory but has a legislative assembly under Article 239AA. Tensions arose between the elected Delhi Government and the LG, particularly regarding the appointment, transfer, and disciplinary control of civil servants. After the Aam Aadmi Party won a massive mandate in 2015, the LG frequently bypassed or overruled the elected government’s decisions. Notifications and circulars issued by the Union Government further restricted Delhi’s powers, leading to governance deadlock. In 2018, a Constitution Bench clarified some issues but left ambiguity about “services.” The matter was referred to a five-judge Constitution Bench to determine whether Entry 41 of the State List (services) falls under Delhi’s control. Key Developments Petitioner (GNCTD) argued that Article 239AA empowers the Delhi Government to control all matters in the State List except police, public order, and land. Services are part of Entry 41 of the State List and not excluded, hence within Delhi’s domain. They contended that excluding services would cripple representative democracy. Respondent (Union of India) argued that Delhi is a Union Territory, and ultimate control rests with the President through the LG. They claimed that Delhi cannot invoke Entry 41 since it lacks a State Public Service Commission, and central control over services is necessary for national interest and security. Issues Whether the Delhi Government has legislative and executive control over services under Entry 41 of the State List? Whether control over services lies exclusively with the Union Government through the LG? Current Status (Judgment) The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the Delhi Government. The Court held that: Services fall under Entry 41 of the State List, and since they are not excluded by Article 239AA, Delhi has legislative and executive power over them. Civil servants must be accountable to the elected government, not the LG. The LG is bound by the aid and advice of the Delhi Council of Ministers in all matters within the legislative competence of Delhi. The Union Government cannot control services except for police, public order, and land. Conclusion The judgment marked a turning point in Delhi’s governance structure by affirming the democratic mandate of its elected representatives. By ruling that the Delhi Government controls services (excluding police, public order, and land), the Supreme Court upheld principles of federalism and accountability of the executive to the legislature. The verdict curtailed the LG’s interference in administrative matters and strengthened representative democracy in the National Capital Territory. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Sada Law • September 29, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Sada Law • September 29, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Sada Law • September 29, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Determination of Control over Administrative Services between the Elected Delhi Government and the Union Government under Article 239AA Read More »

Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teesta Setalvad: A Reaffirmation of Bail Jurisprudence LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MANDLA AND SINGH LAW CHAMBERS High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA Sep 29, 2025 Introduction The case of Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (PVVNL) vs. Raman Ispat Pvt. Ltd. raised crucial questions on the treatment of electricity dues in the insolvency and liquidation framework under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The dispute centered on whether PVVNL’s electricity dues could override the waterfall mechanism prescribed under Section 53 of the IBC or be treated as government dues. Background PVVNL supplied electricity to Raman Ispat Pvt. Ltd. under a 2010 agreement. The debtor defaulted on electricity payments, leading PVVNL to attach its assets in 2016. Raman Ispat entered insolvency proceedings, which eventually led to liquidation. The liquidator sought release of the attached property to sell it and distribute proceeds as per IBC. NCLT and NCLAT ruled against PVVNL, treating it as an operational creditor. PVVNL appealed to the Supreme Court, seeking priority treatment for its dues under the Electricity Act, 2003 and UP Supply Code, 2005. Key Developments PVVNL argued its dues were “secured” and had priority over other claims. The NCLT and NCLAT held that PVVNL was merely an operational creditor under IBC. Supreme Court examined whether electricity dues could be treated as government obligations or override the IBC waterfall. Issues Can PVVNL’s dues be treated as “secured” under IBC? Do the Electricity Act, 2003 and UP Supply Code, 2005 override Section 53 of IBC? Should PVVNL’s dues be treated as government dues with lower priority? Current Status (Judgment) PVVNL as Secured Operational Creditor: Due to the charge created under the 2005 UP Supply Code and contract, PVVNL was recognized as a secured operational creditor. Not Government Dues: PVVNL, though government-owned, is a corporate entity. Its dues are not government obligations under Section 53(1)(e). IBC Prevails: Section 238 of IBC overrides provisions of the Electricity Act. The waterfall mechanism under Section 53 is binding. Options for Secured Creditors: PVVNL can either (a) relinquish security and claim priority under Section 53(1)(b), or (b) enforce security outside liquidation, with leftover dues ranking lower. Rainbow Papers Distinguished: Court clarified Rainbow Papers applied to statutory government dues (VAT), not to dues of state-owned companies like PVVNL. Conclusion The Supreme Court reaffirmed the primacy of IBC over conflicting laws. PVVNL was recognized as a secured operational creditor but not a government creditor. The ruling ensures: Clear distinction between government dues and dues of government-owned companies. Consistency in applying the IBC waterfall mechanism. Predictability and fairness in asset distribution during liquidation. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Sada Law • September 29, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Sada Law • September 29, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Sada Law • September 29, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Defines Status of Electricity Dues in Corporate Liquidation under IBC Read More »

Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Determination of Ownership Rights in Adverse Possession: Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors. (2023) Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teesta Setalvad: A Reaffirmation of Bail Jurisprudence LEGAL INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT MANDLA AND SINGH LAW CHAMBERS High Courts in India Navigate Justice, Politics, and Social Equity Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Against PM Modi and Amit Shah Over CAA India Must Adopt Integrated Strategy to Become Global Arbitration Hub: Jimmy Yim Delhi HC Orders Removal of Social Media Posts on BJP Leader Gaurav Bhatia’s TV Appearance Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Nisha Kumari Sep 29, 2025 Introduction This case concerns the conviction of Shatrughan for the alleged murder of Jagat Ram in Village Lolesara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. The conviction under Section 302 of the IPC was based solely on circumstantial evidence and conflicting witness testimonies, without any direct proof or clear motive. Both the Trial Court and the Chhattisgarh High Court upheld his conviction and sentenced him to life imprisonment. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the conviction was sustainable in law when based on a fragile evidentiary foundation. Facts of the Case Jagat Ram was found with a deep neck wound and later succumbed to injuries. Prosecution alleged Shatrughan attacked him with a tabbal (chopper). PW-1 claimed to have seen Shatrughan fleeing with a weapon but did not witness the assault. Other witnesses (PW-2, PW-3, PW-4, PW-14) provided only hearsay accounts. Medical evidence confirmed a single fatal neck injury but failed to conclusively link it to the recovered weapon. The motive was unclear, and allegations of possible false implication by local authorities (including the Sarpanch) surfaced. Despite these weaknesses, both the Trial Court and High Court convicted Shatrughan under Section 302 IPC. Issue of the Case Whether a conviction under Section 302 IPC can be sustained solely on circumstantial evidence when: there is no direct eyewitness testimony, the alleged motive is unclear, and witness accounts are inconsistent and unreliable? Judgment The Supreme Court (Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah) delivered its judgment on 20 July 2023 ([2023] INSC 630): Absence of Direct Evidence – No eyewitness saw the actual assault. Unreliable Testimonies – PW-1’s account was inconsistent; other witnesses’ statements were hearsay. Incomplete Chain of Circumstances – The Court held that the chain of circumstantial evidence was broken and inconclusive. Lack of Motive – The prosecution failed to establish why the accused would commit the murder. Forensic Gaps – The medical and forensic reports did not conclusively link the weapon to the injury. Possibility of False Implication – Local political influence raised doubts about the objectivity of the prosecution. Outcome – The conviction was set aside; Shatrughan was acquitted and ordered to be released forthwith. Conclusion The Supreme Court reaffirmed that in cases based on circumstantial evidence, the chain of circumstances must be complete and point unerringly to the guilt of the accused. In this case, the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to unreliable witness testimony, lack of motive, and incomplete evidentiary links. The acquittal underscores the principle that suspicion, however strong, cannot replace proof in criminal law. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sada Law. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Sada Law • September 29, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Maintainability of an Election Petition and the Need for Substantive Material Facts under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Sada Law • September 29, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Upholds NIA Probe in West Bengal Ram Navami Violence Cases Sada Law • September 29, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Shatrughan v. The State of Chhattisgarh – Acquittal on Grounds of Weak Circumstantial Evidence Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote