sadalawpublications.com

Sadalaw

Decoding Nagpur violence: Aurangzeb Tomb Row : 69 Rioters Arrested,Section 144 Imposed

Trending Today Decoding Nagpur violence: Aurangzeb Tomb Row : 69 Rioters Arrested,Section 144 Imposed Six Supreme Court Judges Will Lead NALSA’s Legal Aid and Humanitarian Assistance Mission to Manipur Relief Camps UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Decoding Nagpur violence: Aurangzeb Tomb Row : 69 Rioters Arrested,Section 144 Imposed NITU KUMARI 20 Mar 2025 BACKGROUND The violence took place against the backdrop of escalating social and political tensions over Aurangzeb‘s legacy. The Mughal Empire emperor has continued to be a divisive figure in Indian history, with some groups endorsing his rule and others viewing him as a representation of oppression. The debate intensified following the publication of the Bollywood film Chhaava, which showed Aurangzeb’s killing of Maratha ruler Sambhaji. The film’s depiction of historical events heightened tensions and reignited discussions over the policies of the Mughal. In the weeks before the disturbance, groups like the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) and the Bajrang Dal intensified their attempts to have Aurangzeb’s tomb in Aurangabad razed. These groups argued that the tomb honored a monarch who they claimed had mistreated Hindu inhabitants. When politician Abu Azmi defended Aurangzeb’s rule, political rhetoric intensified even more, inflaming local resentment. 1. What Caused the Violence in Nagpur? The Nagpur riot was directly caused by false reports that the Quran had been set on fire at a demonstration by a right-wing party calling for the destruction of the tomb of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb in Sambhaji Nagar. The demonstration, which was coordinated by parties like the Bajrang Dal and the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), infuriated Muslim communities. A piece of fabric with the word kalma on it was purportedly burned by them. 2. Aurangzeb Tomb Row: What is it? The Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) and other right-wing organizations had called for the dismantling of the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb’s tomb. After the VHP and Bajrang Dal demanded it, security was increased at the tomb of the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb at Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar (formerly Aurangabad). 3. Were The Riots Pre-Planned? Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis on Tuesday called the Nagpur violence a “planned incident” and warned that those who attacked police “will not be spared.”“Specific houses, establishments targeted by mob; it looks like a conspiracy,” CM Fadnavis said in the state legislative assembly. Who is Fahim Khan, arrested for ‘inciting’ Nagpur violence over Aurangzeb’s tomb? Fahim Shamim Khan, 38, serves as the city president of the Minorities Democratic Party (MDP) in Nagpur. Though not widely known in mainstream politics, he has been an active voice in local affairs, particularly advocating for minority rights.Maharashtra Police have nabbed Fahim Shamim Khan, a politician from the local Minorities Democratic Party (MDP), as the main accused in the Nagpur violence that shook the city earlier this week. Khan allegedly provoked people and fanned rumors about the desecration of the Quran during a right-wing protest over Mughal emperor Aurangzeb’s tomb. How Khan ‘incited’ Nagpur riots? On March 17, some 250 members of the Bajrang Dal and Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) protested in Shivaji Putla Square outside Mahal Gate, demanding that the mausoleum of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb be removed from Khuldabad, escalating tensions in Nagpur.The protest and renewed animosity toward the 17th-century monarch are reported to have been sparked by the release of the film Chhaava, which shows Aurangzeb’s killing of the Maratha king Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. 4. Does Section 144 apply to the Mahal in Nagpur? Nagpur: Authorities have imposed Section 144 in Nagpur’s Mahal area after a brief episode of violence on Monday night, confirmed Police Commissioner Dr. Ravinder Singal.According to Nagpur Police Commissioner Ravinder Singal, the region is now subject to Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. Violent conflicts in Nagpur’s Mahal district on the evening of March 17 resulted in stone-throwing, vandalism, and arson events. While attempting to maintain control, several police officers were hurt. To regain control, the authorities used tear gas and stepped up security. Officials are asking locals to maintain their composure and refrain from disseminating false information, claiming that the disturbance was caused by a misunderstanding. To stop the situation from getting worse, Section 144 has been implemented in the impacted region. Protest The Bajrang Dal and Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) staged rallies in Nagpur. There were rumors that items with religious content had been set on fire. It appears to be a carefully thought-out strike. Nobody is authorized to take control of law and order. “Everyone must maintain Maharashtra‘s tranquility, as the Chhaava movie has stoked people’s ire against Aurangzeb,” the chief minister continued. The violence was attributed to “Aurangzeb ki aulad” by the VHP.VHP member Rajkumar Sharma told ANI, “riots were planned by the ‘Aurangzeb ki aulad’… They gathered in the mosque there; they planned to close their shops, loot the shops of Hindus and attack their houses. This was all planned, and an attempt was made to incite an issue which has no meaning… If the administration feels that the effigy of Aurangzeb was burnt, we have no objection to the administration’s action… this country will run as per the Constitution… But these ‘Aurangzeb ki aulad’ should also understand that this country will run as per the Constitution.” Incident Analysis Groups started throwing stones and burning cars on Monday night as violence broke out in Mahal, Nagpur. To keep things from getting

Decoding Nagpur violence: Aurangzeb Tomb Row : 69 Rioters Arrested,Section 144 Imposed Read More »

Six Supreme Court Judges Will Lead NALSA’s Legal Aid and Humanitarian Assistance Mission to Manipur Relief Camps

Trending Today Six Supreme Court Judges Will Lead NALSA’s Legal Aid and Humanitarian Assistance Mission to Manipur Relief Camps UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Six Supreme Court Judges Will Lead NALSA’s Legal Aid and Humanitarian Assistance Mission to Manipur Relief Camps NITU KUMARI 20 Mar 2025 Update: 18 March 2025 Six Supreme Court judges will travel to the State of Manipur on March 22 in honor of the High Court of Manipur‘s duodecennial celebration, marking a significant step in bolstering the legal and humanitarian assistance for the state beset by violence. The special visit will be led by Justices B.R. Gavai, Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, M.M. Sundresh, K.V. Viswanathan, and N. Kotiswar Singh. The National Legal Services Authority‘s Executive Chairman is Justice Gavai. Manipur is the birthplace of Justice N. Kotiswar Singh. The visit’s goal is to highlight the importance of providing impacted communities with legal and humanitarian support. “Many people are still seeking safety in relief camps spread throughout Manipur, almost two years after the horrific sectarian violence of May 3, 2023, which claimed hundreds of lives and forced over 50,000 people to flee their homes. The Supreme Court judges’ visit emphasizes the continued need for these impacted communities to receive legal and humanitarian support. NALSA.” During the tour, Justice Gavai will virtually open the new Legal Aid Clinics in Imphal East, Imphal West, and Ukhrul districts, as well as Legal Services Camps and Medical Camps in every district of Manipur. Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) will also receive necessary relief supplies as part of this. IDPs will have access to essential services including healthcare, pensions, employment programs, and identification document reconstruction thanks to the Legal Services Camps, which will link them with government assistance programs. At least five major plans designed to meet the needs of the displaced population will be presented by each participating State Department. All of the aid camps will have Medical Camps run by a group of 25 Chennai-based specialists. For six more days, their services will be available to displaced families, guaranteeing ongoing medical assistance, treatment, and access to necessary medications. Notably, during the ethnic crisis, the Manipur State Legal Services Authority (MASLSA) and NALSA collaborated to help offer legal assistance. In order to help IDPs get government benefits, misplaced paperwork, and medical assistance, MASLSA also set up 273 Special Legal Aid Clinics in relief camps. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 7, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 4 Next »

Six Supreme Court Judges Will Lead NALSA’s Legal Aid and Humanitarian Assistance Mission to Manipur Relief Camps Read More »

UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police

Trending Today UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police NITU KUMARI 19 Mar 2025 SLP(Crl) No. 357 OF 2025 PUJA MANORMA DILIP KHEDKAR … PetitionerVersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI … Respondent Date of Judgment: January 15, 2025Presiding Judges: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma Justice BV Nagarathna Background of the Case Puja Khedkar was selected for the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) and assigned to the Maharashtra Cadre after clearing the 2022 Civil Services Examination (CSE). Initially, she wrote her name as “Khedkar Puja Deelip Rao” and claimed Other Backward Class (OBC) status in most of her attempts, except in CSE-2013, where she applied under the General category. In 2018, she declared herself as a candidate for the Persons with Benchmark Disabilities (PwBD) category, specifically under the vision impairment subcategory, while also claiming OBC non-creamy layer status. Allegations arose regarding fraudulent claims in her UPSC applications, leading to the registration of an FIR on July 19, 2024. According to UPSC, Puja Khedkar circumvented scrutiny over her excessive exam attempts by exploiting eligibility criteria. The Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances, and Pensions (DoPT) issued a show-cause notice questioning her refusal to be released from service under the IAS Probation Rules, 1954. On July 31, 2024, UPSC issued a press release stating that her provisional candidature for CSE-2022 was revoked, and she was permanently barred from appearing for future UPSC exams. After her arrest, she sought anticipatory bail from the District and Sessions Judge at Patiala House, which was denied on August 8, 2024. Following this, she approached the Delhi High Court, which also denied her bail plea. Case Analysis & Decision The Delhi High Court rejected Puja Khedkar’s bail plea on Monday, stating that the case represents fraud against both a constitutional body and society. Justice Chandra Dhari Singh ruled that “interrogation is necessary to uncover the full extent of the fraud committed against the nation.” The court highlighted that Puja Khedkar misused government schemes by forging documents to secure benefits meant for underprivileged sections of society. The judgment noted that: The investigation revealed that she was not eligible for the benefits she claimed. Luxury cars and multiple properties in her name indicated an attempt to misuse reservation policies. Her family held a prominent position in the state, suggesting possible collusion with influential individuals. The court cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in CBI v. Anil Sharma to justify her interrogation, arguing that her actions were part of a broader scheme to manipulate the system. Thus, her bail request was denied, and her interim protection from arrest was revoked. Conclusion On January 15, 2025, the Supreme Court of India granted temporary protection from arrest to Puja Khedkar and sought responses from the Delhi government and UPSC regarding her anticipatory bail plea. Her legal counsel argued that the Delhi High Court had made harsh observations against her while rejecting her petition. Puja Khedkar has denied all allegations of misrepresentation and fraud. However, the case underscores serious concerns regarding the misuse of reservation benefits in competitive examinations. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 7, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 4 Next »

UPSC Cheating Case : Complete Investigation Against Ex-IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Steadfastly, Supreme Court Tells Delhi Police Read More »

PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted.

Trending Today PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. NITU KUMARI 19 Mar 2025 Update: 17 March 2025 The Supreme Court of India today (March 17) denied Pradeep Sharma, a former Gujarat IAS official, his discharge in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), noting that money laundering is a continuous offense rather than a one-time incident. He was charged with using bribes to generate proceeds of crime while serving as Collector. He requested discharge, claiming that the alleged illegal activity that produced the proceeds of crime took place prior to the PMLA’s implementation. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) opposed the plea, claiming that money laundering constituted a persistent criminal offense. The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that since the alleged predicate offense took place prior to the PMLA’s passage, no money laundering offense could be proven. Rather, citing the ruling in Vijay Madanlal Chaudhary vs. Union of India (2023) 12 SCC 1, the Court ruled that money laundering is a crime that persists as long as criminal gains are hidden, put to use, or manifested as pure property. It is commonly known that crimes under the PMLA are ongoing, and money laundering doesn’t cease with a single incident; rather, it continues as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, put to use, or presented as pure property. According to the bench made up of Justices Vikram Nath and Prasanna B. Varale, “the legislative intent behind the PMLA is to combat the menace of money laundering, which by its very nature involves transactions spanning over time.” As long as unlawful gains are held, presented as legitimate, or reintroduced into the economy, the law acknowledges that money laundering is a continuous activity rather than a one-time occurrence. Therefore, neither the law nor the facts support the claim that the offense is not ongoing, and as a result, the High Court‘s decision cannot be overturned on this basis. The appellant’s argument is untenable, even when considered within the framework of the current case. The evidence in the file shows that the appellant has consistently and repeatedly abused his position of authority, which has led to the creation and long-term use of criminal proceeds. The appellant continued to be involved in financial transactions connected to the proceeds of crime after the original point of commission, as the respondent (ED) has successfully shown prima facie. A continuous offense under the PMLA includes the use of such proceeds, the purported layering and integration, and the attempts to portray such money as unadulterated. The Court further stated that the actions taken against the appellant are completely within the bounds of the law and cannot be challenged on this basis. The Court underlined that the PMLA was passed in order to fight money laundering, which by definition entails long-term transactions. As a result, even if the predicate offenses took place earlier, the PMLA may still be applied to acts that persisted after it was passed. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 7, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 4 Next »

PMLA | The Supreme Court ruled that the money laundering offense persists as long as criminal proceeds are hidden, utilized, or presented as untainted. Read More »

Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam

Trending Today Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam: Why do people keep falling in traps? NITU KUMARI 19 Mar 2025 Introduction:- Fraudsters impersonating police personnel in Mumbai caused an 86-year-old woman to lose more than ₹20 crore. From December 26, 2024, until March 3, 2025, the con artists tricked her into moving funds to multiple accounts by claiming that her Aadhaar card had been fraudulently used. If she didn’t comply, they threatened to take her and her family to court. After being put under “digital arrest,” the victim was unable to speak about the circumstances. The woman informed the police about the fraud after she became aware of it. The people implicated have been arrested after authorities tracked down the money transactions. The public has been cautioned by officials to be on the lookout for these types of scams. They stressed that neither UIDAI representatives nor the police request personal information or remote device access. They suggested that individuals report strange calls to UIDAI’s helpdesk at 1947 and disconnect them right away. Even with ongoing awareness initiatives, a lot of individuals still fall for these types of frauds. Psychologists and investigators point out that scammers employ psychological tricks to trick even tech-savvy people. Scammers frequently pose as law enforcement officials and tell victims that they have pending warrants or illicit goods in their names. To avoid being arrested, they demand payment or verification right away. “Using forceful tones and fake phone numbers, scammers pretend to be government agents or law enforcement officers in order to obtain personal and financial information from their victims. According to a senior cyber cell officer, scammers take advantage of the victim’s spiraling fear to control their behavior and instill a false sense of obligation. Investigators advise avoiding unwanted calls, confirming the callers’ identities, and never disclosing financial or personal information. They advise disregarding reports that say drugs were discovered in packages connected to the victim. “Tell your friends and family that there is nothing like digital arrest,” said a senior police official. Simply spread the message because preventing these socially planned crimes requires awareness. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 7, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 4 Next »

Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Read More »

Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices….

Trending Today Woman loses Rs 20 crore in Aadhaar digital arrest scam Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. NITU KUMARI 18 Mar 2025 Case : Laxmi Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Update: March 2024 The Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi city is at the centre of a dispute in court. While Muslims performed namaaz in the mosque and the surrounding courtyard, the Supreme Court of India struck a balance by permitting a selected Hindu priest to continue worshipping inside the Gyanvapi grounds’ cellar, or tehkhana. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud‘s three-judge panel determined that maintaining the status quo was “appropriate” in order to “allow both communities to offer religious worship.” In this manner, namaaz is offered on the mosque’s grounds. They protect the tehkhana. Chief Justice Chandrachud said verbally that the agreement would be upheld until the trial. The court mandated that neither of the disputing parties would alter the status quo. The Hindu plaintiffs, who are led by veteran attorney Shyam Divan, assert that since Satyug, the whole space of the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi has been a temple dedicated to Swayambhu Lord Shiva, referred to here as Adi Vishweshwar. They claimed that the Farman of Emperor Aurangzeb in the year 1669 destroyed the temple, which had previously been located on the Gyanvapi property. The complaint that the Hindus filed in a Varanasi court, according to senior counsel Huzefa Ahmadi for the management of Anjuman Intazamia Masjid, was only a ploy to invade the mosque’s property. Following the suit by the Hindus, who first sought a judicial declaration of their right to worship within the mosque premises, and then the “discovery” of a Shivling, the mosque managers have been engaged in a protracted legal battle. However, the Muslim side asserted that the building was a fountain. The courts had permitted a “scientific survey” and carbon dating of the building. The most recent events include two consecutive rulings by the Varanasi court permitting Hindu religious ceremonies to take place in the mosque’s cellar, which is accessible from the south side of the building. The Bench discovered that while Muslims may enter the mosque for namaaz from the northern side, the cellar could only be accessed from the southern side. Following the directives of January 17 and January 31, Muslims are currently offering namaaz without any restrictions. The Hindu priest’s puja offering is limited to the cellar area. The court clarified that it would be appropriate to preserve the status quo in order to allow both populations to practice their respective religions. The court emphasized that Hindus’ religious worship must be conducted in strict accordance with the guidelines in the January 31, 2024 decision and be under the Receiver’s safe custody as stipulated in the January 17, 2024 order. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 7, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 6, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 4 Next »

Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Read More »

Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection

Trending Today Supreme Court maintains a status quo on worship, allowing both Hindus and Muslims to continue their practices…. Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection NITU KUMARI 17 Mar 2025 Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 83/2025 RANVEER GAUTAM ALLAHABADIA – Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent(s) Date Of Hearing: 18th February, 2025Case Citation:Presiding Judges: Justice Surya Kant Justice N Kotiswar Singh Case Summary Ranveer Allahbadia, a YouTuber best known for his podcast India’s Got Latent, was the subject of multiple formal complaints and legal issues, including allegations that he was promoting obscenity and engaging in sexually explicit conversations. The Supreme Court intervened to defend his right to freedom of speech and expression. Ranveer Allahbadia was accused of making offensive and demeaning remarks during a podcast session in early 2025. The public was soon made aware of the remarks, which were deemed inappropriate and highly explicit. His remarks caused people to become outraged when the podcast aired, especially on social media. Significant public outrage resulted from his comments, which were considered offensive and degrading. Many First Information Reports (FIRs) were filed against Allahbadia in a number of states, including Maharashtra, Assam, and Rajasthan, as a result of these divisive remarks. Accusations of obscenity, vulgarity, and encouraging inappropriate behavior were the basis for these FIRs, which were purportedly in violation of several Indian Penal Code (IPC) provisions. Issues in the Case Whether Allahbadia’s comments crossed the limits of Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a)? Whether filing multiple FIRs is a violation of the principle of double jeopardy? Whether the comments made by Ranveer Allahbadia constitute obscene and indecent content? Observation “There Is Nothing Like A Fundamental Right On A Platter”: Supreme Court Says Rights Come With Duties “In this country, there is nothing like a fundamental right on a platter. Fundamental rights come with duties, and unless people understand their duties, we know how to deal with such elements,” Justice Kant asserted. The Bench of Justices Surya Kant and N.K. Singh expressed concern over the remarks made in the performance and said that even Allahbadia’s lawyer, Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, could not defend the language and expressions used. “The fact that nobody, including Allahbadia’s counsel (Mr. Abhinav), would also be able to defend the words chosen, expressions, and everything that was said in the show,” the judge noted. Justice Kant stated, “We are confident and hopeful that the petitioner has realized his mistake and has some repentance. We also know that some brainless people are writing articles in his defense in the name of freedom of speech, but we know how to handle them.” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta supported the Court’s concern over unregulated online content, remarking, “Something needs to be done; some kind of guidelines need to be laid down. We should not be competing with the vulgarity seen abroad. Our notions of morality differ from other countries. The difficulty is that in the USA, for example, the burning of the national flag is a fundamental right under the 1st Amendment; we have that as a criminal offense.” Supreme Court Ruling The Supreme Court, after hearing arguments from both parties, issued the following interim directions: Stay on Arrest: The court granted a stay on the petitioner’s arrest in connection with the filed FIRs in Maharashtra and Assam, on the condition that he assist with the investigation. Consolidation of FIRs: If any additional FIR had been registered in Jaipur (Rajasthan) based on the same allegations, the Court extended the stay of arrest to that case as well. Restriction on Further FIRs: The Court prohibited the registration of any further FIRs against the petitioner based on the same content aired on India’s Got Latent. Right to Protection: The petitioner was given the liberty to seek police protection in Maharashtra and Assam in case of any threats to his life or liberty. Travel Restrictions: The Court directed the petitioner to surrender his passport to the Investigating Officer of the Nodal Cyber Police Station, Thane, and barred him from leaving the country without prior judicial permission. Ban on Further Broadcasting: The petitioner and his associates were restrained from airing any new content on YouTube or other digital platforms until further orders. Conclusion The Supreme Court’s decision in Ranveer Gautam Allahabadia v. Union of India & Ors. is a prime example of a well-thought-out plan for balancing the rights of individuals with the interests of the state. The interim relief provided safeguards against any abuse of process, while the limitations guarantee that the probe proceeds without further provocation. This case is likely to set a precedent in addressing legal concerns related to digital content, multi-jurisdictional FIRs, and the broader implications of free expression in the digital era. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as sadalawpublications@gmail.com. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case laws ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 sadalawpublications@gmail.com • March 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional

Supreme Court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for ‘obscene’ remarks, grants interim protection Read More »

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312

Trending Today ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration JAMMU AND KASHMIR POST ARTICLE 370 ANIMAL CRUELTY CONTROVERSY: HOW THE 2023 SCC DECISION AFFECT JALIKATTU ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 13 Mar 2025 Table of contents OVERVIEW OF THE CASE OF ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS V. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS BACKGROUND AND HISTORY OF THE CASE KEY PLAYERS INVOLVED IN THE CASE LEGAL ISSUES AND ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY BOTH SIDES ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT’S RULING IN 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE DECISION ON DEMOCRACY AND POLITICS IN INDIA CRITICISMS AND CONTROVERSIES SURROUNDING CONCLUSION: FINAL THOUGHTS ON THE ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER V UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS SSC ONLINE SC VIDEO OF SUPREME COURT VERDICT REFERENCES OVERVIEW OF THE CASE OF ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS V. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS The case of Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) v. UOI was a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by ADR, a non-political arrangement occupied towards transparency and accountability in Indian elections. The basic objective concerning this case search out challenge Section 33B (1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (RPA), that admitted governmental bodies to withhold facts about their capital beginnings, containing gifts taken from alien companies or things. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY OF THE CASE The petition was ground for one Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), two non-administration arrangements active towards electoral corrects in the country. The case generally disputed sure supplying of the Representation of People Act, 1951, that admitted political bodies to accept unknown gifts from things or associations through Electoral Bonds. This practice produced concerns about transparency and responsibility in governmental capital, that are critical details of a fair and democratic electing process. The culture chief until this case may be tracked back to the approvals made for one Indrajit Gupta Committee Report on State Funding of Elections in 1998.In order to address these issues, the commission submitted measures to a degree state capital of elections, revelation of electing expenditures by competitors, and better investigation over choosing loan. In line with these pieces of advice, Parliament passed important corrections to the Representation of People Act in 2002, individual being Section 29B (1) that made acquainted a new supplying admitting Electoral Bonds as an additional fashion for making gifts to governmental bodies. However, ADR and PUCL discussed that this correction was illegal as it went against fundamental law like transparency honestly existence, free and fair voting process sure-fire under Article 19(1)(a) and Article 14 respectively. They more argued that unknown gifts manage conceivably admit illegal services laundering actions through structure associations or external systems outside any responsibility. In reaction, the principal management protected their resolution to introduce Electoral Bonds by way of to advance gifts through legal and obvious channels. Thus, this case nurtured important questions about the balance between secrecy and transparency in electing capital, and allure affect fair and self-governing elections in India. The outcome concerning this case has the potential to shape future tactics had connection with voting loan and advance greater responsibility between governmental bodies and contenders. KEY PLAYERS INVOLVED IN THE CASE The case of Association for Democratic Reforms and Another v Union of India and so forth SSC Online SC has collect significant consideration and bred main questions about the duty of services in Indian campaigning. At the heart of this milestone case, there are various key performers the one has existed complicated in differing capacities. Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR): ADR is a non-political institution that was made in 1999 accompanying a dream to advance transparency and accountability in Indian government. Union of India: The Union of India refers to the main administration in this place case as it arrange accomplishing standards related to governmental capital and choosing processes. The Ministry of Law & Justice shows the joining before the Supreme Court as respondent no.1. Election Commission of India (ECI): In allure answer to this case, ECI contended that binding announcement grant permission bring about harassment or revenge against benefactors by rival governmental bodies. Law Commission: Law Commission refers to an executive party start apiece Government periodically burdened accompanying learning allowable issues had connection with choosing laws containing campaign finance rules. 5.Member Secretaries – Screen Scrutiny Committee (SSC) & Financial Affairs Subcommittee (FAS): These juries were comprised by ECI later taking afflictions against sure politicians and person in government who makes laws the one had purportedly taken different offerings outside prior consent from ECI. 6.Candidates/Petitioners: The main petitioners in this place case are ADR and Common Cause, presented by advocate Prashant Bhushan. The top court has admitted six additional individual competitors to intervene in the case, disputing their right to see the beginnings of capital taken by governmental parties. LEGAL ISSUES AND ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY BOTH SIDES The permissible battle betwixt the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and Union of India, and so forth, concerning connected to the internet examinations transported apiece Staff Selection Commission (SSC) has been a continuous issue. On individual help, ADR contends that the use of science in administering exams poses a risk to bidders’ data freedom and solitude. ADR’s debate is established Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, that guarantees similarity

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 Read More »

The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India

Trending Today ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2024 SSC ONLINE SC 312 The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration JAMMU AND KASHMIR POST ARTICLE 370 ANIMAL CRUELTY CONTROVERSY: HOW THE 2023 SCC DECISION AFFECT JALIKATTU The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India 13 Mar 2025 Table of contents Historical Evolution of India’s Intellectual Property Framework Colonial Legacies and Post-Independence Reforms The National IPR Policy of 2016 Legal and Structural Reforms in the 2020s The 2024 Patent Rule Amendments The Scheme for Facilitating Startups Intellectual Property Protection (SIPP) Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology: Balancing Patents and Public Health Information Technology and Electronics: From Piracy to Semiconductor Sovereignty Agriculture and Traditional Knowledge: GI Tags as Economic Multipliers Persistent Challenges in the IP Ecosystem Enforcement Inefficiencies: A Justice Delayed SME Exclusion: The Awareness-Access Gap The Innovation-Access Tightrope Digital Divide in IP Management Conclusion References India’s journey toward becoming a global innovation hub has been significantly influenced by its evolving intellectual property (IP) regime. Over the past decade, the country has undertaken substantial reforms to align its IP policies with international standards, aiming to foster creativity, attract foreign investment, and stimulate economic growth. Despite persistent challenges in enforcement and awareness, initiatives such as streamlined patent processes, specialized IP courts, and targeted support for startups underscore India’s commitment to leveraging IP rights (IPRs) as a catalyst for innovation. This report examines the multifaceted relationship between IP protection and innovation in India, analyzing historical developments, recent legal reforms, sector-specific impacts, and the challenges that remain in fully realizing the potential of IP-driven growth. Historical Evolution of India’s Intellectual Property Framework Colonial Legacies and Post-Independence Reforms India’s IP framework traces its origins to colonial-era laws, including the Patents and Designs Act of 1911, which prioritized foreign interests over domestic innovation. Post-independence, the government sought to rebalance this dynamic through the Patents Act of 1970, which excluded product patents for pharmaceuticals and chemicals to promote affordable access to medicines. This move catalyzed the growth of India’s generic drug industry but drew criticism for stifling innovation in high-technology sectors. The 1990s marked a turning point as India joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) and adopted the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, necessitating sweeping reforms to comply with global norms. The National IPR Policy of 2016 A landmark development came in 2016 with the launch of India’s first National IPR Policy, which consolidated patents, trademarks, copyrights, and geographical indications under the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT). The policy emphasized modernization of IP offices, digitization of application processes, and the establishment of the Cell for IPR Promotion and Management (CIPAM) to oversee awareness campaigns and enforcement strategies. While these measures improved administrative efficiency, gaps in enforcement and procedural delays persisted, keeping India on the U.S. Trade Representative’s Priority Watch List as of 2023. Legal and Structural Reforms in the 2020s The 2024 Patent Rule Amendments A major leap forward occurred in 2024 with amendments to India’s Patent Rules, which reduced the timeline for filing a Request for Examination (RFE) from 48 months to 31 months from the priority date. This change aimed to accelerate patent approvals, which had previously taken an average of 5–7 years. Additional reforms included simplified compliance procedures, inventor certificates, and discounted renewal fees for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). These amendments aligned India’s patent system with global standards, contributing to a 24.64% increase in patent filings and a 149.4% surge in grants between 2022 and 2023. The Scheme for Facilitating Startups Intellectual Property Protection (SIPP) Launched in 2016 and expanded in subsequent years, the SIPP scheme provides startups with subsidized legal support, fast-tracked examinations, and access to the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISCs. By 2023, over 5,000 startups had leveraged the program, filing patents in sectors ranging from biotechnology to renewable energy. This initiative has been instrumental in elevating India’s rank on the Global Innovation Index (GII) to 40th position, with the country recognized as an “Innovative Achiever” for 12 Sector-Specific Impacts of IP-Driven Innovation Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology: Balancing Patents and Public Health India’s pharmaceutical sector, valued at $50 billion in 2024, remains a global leader in generic drug production while navigating the complexities of patent protection. The TRIPS-compliant Patents Act of 2005 restored product patents for novel drugs, enabling multinational corporations like Pfizer and Novartis to protect innovations such as mRNA-based therapies. However, Section 3(d) of the law—which prohibits “evergreening” of minor modifications to existing drugs—has preserved access to affordable generics, ensuring 80% of antiretroviral drugs used globally originate from Indian manufacturers. Recent advancements in biotechnology are equally transformative: domestic firms like Biocon and Bharat Biotech filed 1,450 patents for CRISPR gene-editing tools and mRNA vaccine platforms in 2024 alone, with 35% involving cross-licensing agreements with U.S. and EU partners The Department of Biotechnology’s 2023 IP Guidelines further incentivize commercialization, mandating non-exclusive licensing for high-TRL (Technology Readiness Level) research and preferential terms for SMEs. For instance, the National Institute of Immunology licensed a novel tuberculosis vaccine candidate to three Indian biotech startups under revenue-sharing agreements, ensuring affordability while recouping R&D costs. Despite these strides, foreign R&D investment in Indian pharma declined by 22% between 2020 and 2024, attributed to uncertainties around compulsory licensing provisions invoked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information Technology and Electronics: From Piracy to Semiconductor Sovereignty Contributing 8% to India’s GDP, the IT sector has

The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting Innovation in India Read More »

Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024.

Trending Today Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Historic Verdict: Supreme Court Overturns 1998 Ruling P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), Ends Immunity for Lawmakers Taking Bribes for Votes on 4th March, 2024 Supreme Court Overrules Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd The State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of eligibility criteria Validity of LMV Driving License for Transport Vehicles Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration JAMMU AND KASHMIR POST ARTICLE 370 ANIMAL CRUELTY CONTROVERSY: HOW THE 2023 SCC DECISION AFFECT JALIKATTU Role of technology in transforming the Indian judiciary COMMON CAUSE v. UNION OF INDIA 2018 Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024 07 Mar 2025 Table of contents Case Summary Issues in the case Case Analysis Specific Direction Conclusion Writ Petition (C) No. 880 of 2017               Association for Democratic Reforms & Anr.                  …Petitioner          Versus         Union of India & Ors.                                      …Respondents Date of judgement:- 15th february, 2024   Presiding judges:-  DY Chandrachud CJ., Sanjiv Khanna BR Gavai, JB Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, JJ… Case Summary:- The Supreme Court, in a landmark ruling, struck down the Electoral Bond Scheme as unconstitutional, holding that anonymous political donations violate the right to information under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. A 5-judge Constitution Bench, led by Chief Justice Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, delivered a unanimous verdict with two concurring opinions. The Court ruled that transparency in political funding is crucial for an informed electorate and that the scheme’s anonymity undermines democratic principles by enabling quid pro quo arrangements. The petitioners challenged the scheme’s validity under Article 32, contesting amendments made through the Finance Act, 2017, and its classification as a Money Bill. The Court analyzed the right to information jurisprudence, emphasizing the link between economic and political inequality. It found that financial contributions to political parties significantly impact voters’ decision-making and that anonymity in funding hinders public scrutiny of potential policy influences. Rejecting the government’s argument that the scheme prevents black money in elections, the Court noted that alternative legal mechanisms, such as electronic transfers and Electoral Trusts, provide better transparency. Applying the proportionality test, it ruled that the scheme is not the least restrictive measure for achieving the stated objective. Consequently, the Court directed the immediate cessation of electoral bond issuance, mandated the State Bank of India (SBI) to disclose details of past bond transactions to the Election Commission of India (ECI), and instructed the ECI to publish this data on its website. Bonds still within their validity period were ordered to be returned and refunded. Issues in the case:- Whether the non-disclosure of information on voluntary contributions to political parties according to the electoral bond scheme and the amendments to Section 29-C of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951, Section 182(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, Section 13-A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is violative of the right to information guaranteed in Article 19(1)(a) in the Constitution. Whether unlimited corporate funding of the political parties as envisaged by the amendment to Section 182(1) of the Companies Act violates the principles of free and fair election under Article 14 of the Constitution. Case Analysis:- The Supreme Court examined whether the Right to Information (RTI) under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution includes access to details about financial contributions made to political parties. In doing so, the Court divided its jurisprudence on RTI into two phases. It emphasized that the RTI is not confined solely to government-related matters or public affairs but extends to information that is crucial for strengthening participatory democracy. Given that political parties play a vital role in the electoral process, as recognized in the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, transparency regarding their funding is essential for voters to make informed choices. The Court acknowledged that political equality is a fundamental constitutional principle, ensuring that both the electorate and elected representatives are treated fairly. However, despite constitutional guarantees, political inequality persists, largely due to economic disparities. Those with greater financial resources often have a disproportionate influence over political decisions, thereby undermining democratic fairness. The Court underscored the need to assess the significance of financial transparency in political funding, particularly in light of India’s legal framework governing political party finances. A major concern highlighted was the potential for financial contributions to create quid pro quo arrangements, where monetary support to a political party translates into favorable policy changes or licensing benefits for the donor. This close connection between financial power and political decision-making raises concerns about undue influence on governance. Voter access to information regarding political donations is crucial for evaluating whether policymaking is being swayed by financial contributions. The Union of India (UOI) contended that political parties receiving contributions through electoral bonds remained unaware of donor identities, as the bonds did not display names and banks were prohibited from disclosing this information. The Court, however, dismissed this argument, stating that the scheme was not foolproof. It identified several loopholes that allowed political parties to discern the identities of donors, thereby negating the claim of anonymity. Ultimately, the Court ruled that information regarding political funding is indispensable for voters to exercise their franchise effectively. By anonymizing political donations, the electoral bond scheme infringed upon voters’ right to information, rendering it unconstitutional under Article 19(1)(a). The Court applied the proportionality test to determine whether this infringement could be justified. Additionally, the Court examined whether restricting voter access to financial contributions was justified in the interest of curbing black money in elections. Applying the proportionality standard, it assessed whether the electoral bond scheme was the least restrictive means to achieve this goal. The Court concluded that the scheme failed this test, as alternative legal mechanisms such as contributions through cheques, bank drafts, and electronic transfers already existed to address concerns related to

Supreme Court Strikes Down Electoral Bond Scheme as Unconstitutional for Undermining Transparency and Democratic Principles on dated 15th February, 2024. Read More »