sadalawpublications.com

A DYNAMIC LAW JOURNAL

Menu

Sadalaw

Justice BR Gavai Recommends Justice Surya Kant as Next Chief Justice of India

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Justice BR Gavai Recommends Justice Surya Kant as Next Chief Justice of India Kerala High Court Backs Lulu Mall’s Right to Collect Parking Fees Madras High Court Reinforces Natural Justice in Family Arbitration Mala Etc. Etc. vs. State of Punjab & Others – Enhancement of Compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 The Supreme Court Upholds Limited Judicial Review under the Arbitration Act of 1940 and Restores the Arbitral Award in a Contractor Dispute Criminal Appeal Challenging a Conviction for Murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code M. SIVADASAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRs. & ORS v. A. SOUDAMINI (DEAD) THROUGH LRs. & ORS. (2023) Satbir Singh v. State of Haryana & Others Niranjan Das @ Niru Das @ Mahanto vs The State of West Bengal Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) vs Superintendent of Central Excise and Others Justice BR Gavai Recommends Justice Surya Kant as Next Chief Justice of India Palak Singla 29 October, 2025 Introduction Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai has formally recommended Justice Surya Kant as his successor, following the judicial seniority tradition. Justice Surya Kant, currently the second-senior-most judge of the Supreme Court of India, will assume charge as the 53rd Chief Justice of India on 24 November 2025, succeeding Justice Gavai, who retires on 23 November 2025. Background & Significance This recommendation aligns with the established collegium seniority norm in appointing the Chief Justice of India. Justice Surya Kant is set to serve for approximately 14 months, until his retirement in February 2027. Notably, this marks the first time a jurist from Haryana will hold India’s top judicial office — a historic milestone. Who is Justice Surya Kant? Early Life & Education Justice Surya Kant was born in Hisar, Haryana, and has had an illustrious legal career leading up to the Supreme Court. Judicial Career Former Chief Justice of the Himachal Pradesh High Court Elevated to the Supreme Court of India Known for progressive judicial philosophy and constitutional rulings Landmark Judgments He has played a key role in important constitutional cases, including those related to: Article 370 Sedition law Gender equality and civil liberties Succession Timeline Event Date Justice B.R. Gavai retires 23 November 2025 Justice Surya Kant assumes office as 53rd CJI 24 November 2025 Expected retirement February 2027 Estimated tenure ~14 months Conclusion Justice Surya Kant’s elevation represents continuity in the Supreme Court’s leadership and marks a historic first for Haryana in India’s judicial history. His tenure is expected to focus on constitutional integrity, judicial reforms, and strengthening civil liberties. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Δ Case Laws Mala Etc. Etc. vs. State of Punjab & Others – Enhancement of Compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Sada Law • October 17, 2025 • Case law • No Comments The Supreme Court Upholds Limited Judicial Review under the Arbitration Act of 1940 and Restores the Arbitral Award in a Contractor Dispute Sada Law • October 17, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Criminal Appeal Challenging a Conviction for Murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code Sada Law • October 17, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Justice BR Gavai Recommends Justice Surya Kant as Next Chief Justice of India Read More »

Kerala High Court Backs Lulu Mall’s Right to Collect Parking Fees

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Kerala High Court Backs Lulu Mall’s Right to Collect Parking Fees Madras High Court Reinforces Natural Justice in Family Arbitration Mala Etc. Etc. vs. State of Punjab & Others – Enhancement of Compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 The Supreme Court Upholds Limited Judicial Review under the Arbitration Act of 1940 and Restores the Arbitral Award in a Contractor Dispute Criminal Appeal Challenging a Conviction for Murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code M. SIVADASAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRs. & ORS v. A. SOUDAMINI (DEAD) THROUGH LRs. & ORS. (2023) Satbir Singh v. State of Haryana & Others Niranjan Das @ Niru Das @ Mahanto vs The State of West Bengal Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) vs Superintendent of Central Excise and Others Konkan Railway Corporation Limited v. Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (August 17, 2023) Kerala High Court Backs Lulu Mall’s Right to Collect Parking Fees Palak Singla 29 October, 2025 Introduction The Kerala High Court has affirmed the right of Lulu Mall in Kochi to collect parking fees from its visitors, dismissing a writ appeal challenging this right. The decision reinforces the legal position that private commercial establishments may charge for parking, provided licensing norms are followed. The ruling was delivered by a Division Bench comprising Justices Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Syam Kumar V.M. Background of the Case Lulu Mall Kochi, one of India’s largest malls, offers over 4,387 parking spaces: 1,083 slots in the basement (as required under building norms) Remaining slots in a dedicated multilevel parking structure The dispute arose when visitor and film director Pauly Vadakkan was charged ₹20 for parking and subsequently challenged the practice along with co-petitioner Bosco Louis. Core Legal Issue The petitioners argued that: Charging for parking violates the Kerala Municipality Act and local building rules Commercial complexes must provide free parking as part of statutory obligations Their claim was centered on the belief that mall visitors are entitled to free parking facilities. Court’s Findings The single-judge decision earlier differentiated between: Parking Zone Legal Status Basement Parking (licensed under Section 475 of the Kerala Municipality Act) ✅ Fee legally permissible Multilevel Parking Facility (no license) ❌ Fee collection invalid The Division Bench upheld this reasoning, confirming that fee collection is valid only when proper licensing requirements are met. Mall’s Argument Lulu Mall submitted that: Construction and maintenance of large parking spaces involve substantial investment Additional expenses include security, surveillance systems, and facility upkeep No law prohibits a commercial establishment from charging reasonable parking fees The court agreed that private commercial complexes may recover reasonable operational costs. Final Outcome The Kerala High Court dismissed the appeal and ruled: Mall owners can charge parking fees if licensed under applicable municipal rules Lulu Mall may continue charging fees for licensed parking areas A detailed judgment will specify compliance details and conditions This ruling strengthens the principle that private property rights and public convenience must coexist, subject to statutory controls. Conclusion The judgment clarifies that paid parking in private commercial spaces is lawful, so long as licensing and regulatory requirements are satisfied. It sets an important precedent for malls, multiplexes, and large commercial establishments across India. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Δ Case Laws Mala Etc. Etc. vs. State of Punjab & Others – Enhancement of Compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Sada Law • October 17, 2025 • Case law • No Comments The Supreme Court Upholds Limited Judicial Review under the Arbitration Act of 1940 and Restores the Arbitral Award in a Contractor Dispute Sada Law • October 17, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Criminal Appeal Challenging a Conviction for Murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code Sada Law • October 17, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Kerala High Court Backs Lulu Mall’s Right to Collect Parking Fees Read More »

Madras High Court Reinforces Natural Justice in Family Arbitration

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Madras High Court Reinforces Natural Justice in Family Arbitration Mala Etc. Etc. vs. State of Punjab & Others – Enhancement of Compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 The Supreme Court Upholds Limited Judicial Review under the Arbitration Act of 1940 and Restores the Arbitral Award in a Contractor Dispute Criminal Appeal Challenging a Conviction for Murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code M. SIVADASAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRs. & ORS v. A. SOUDAMINI (DEAD) THROUGH LRs. & ORS. (2023) Satbir Singh v. State of Haryana & Others Niranjan Das @ Niru Das @ Mahanto vs The State of West Bengal Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) vs Superintendent of Central Excise and Others Konkan Railway Corporation Limited v. Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (August 17, 2023) Assistant Wild Life Warden & Anr. v. K. K. Moideen & Anr. (August 09, 2023) Madras High Court Reinforces Natural Justice in Family Arbitration Palak Singla 29 October, 2025 Introduction The Madras High Court has delivered a landmark ruling emphasizing that natural justice must be followed in all arbitration proceedings — whether conducted by professional arbitrators or respected family elders. This judgment arises from a dispute between two brothers resolved by a family-appointed arbitral panel. The decision reinforces that fairness, transparency, and equal opportunity to be heard are non-negotiable in arbitration under Indian law. Case Background A family dispute between two brothers was referred to a panel of elder family members acting as arbitrators.However, one party argued that the process deprived them of: Proper notice Fair chance to present their case Opportunity to counter the other side This led them to challenge the arbitral award before the High Court. Court’s Observation Justice N. Anand Venkatesh noted that Section 34(2)(a)(iii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 explicitly mandates: Every arbitral tribunal must provide a fair opportunity to be heard and maintain impartiality. Failure to adhere to natural justice can result in the arbitral award being set aside. Key Takeaways from the Judgment Family Arbitration Not Exempt from Law Even if arbitrators are elders or respected family members, they must comply with legal standards. Mandatory Principles Parties must receive: Proper notice of hearings Opportunity to present evidence Chance to rebut the opposing party’s claims Fair Procedure = Valid Award If a tribunal fails to observe due process, the award can be struck down — regardless of the arbitrators’ status or intent. Conclusion This ruling strengthens the integrity of arbitration in India. The Madras High Court made it clear:No tribunal — traditional or formal — can bypass natural justice.Every party deserves a fair, transparent, and impartial process. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Δ Case Laws Mala Etc. Etc. vs. State of Punjab & Others – Enhancement of Compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Sada Law • October 17, 2025 • Case law • No Comments The Supreme Court Upholds Limited Judicial Review under the Arbitration Act of 1940 and Restores the Arbitral Award in a Contractor Dispute Sada Law • October 17, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Criminal Appeal Challenging a Conviction for Murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code Sada Law • October 17, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Madras High Court Reinforces Natural Justice in Family Arbitration Read More »

State of Rajasthan v. Sharwan Kumar Kumawat (2023): Validity of Amendments to Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today State of Rajasthan v. Sharwan Kumar Kumawat (2023): Validity of Amendments to Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules Endocrinology and Immunology Lab v. E.S.I. Corporation: Application of the ESI Act to Pathological Labs Dinganglung Gangmei vs Mutum Churamani Meetei (2023 INSC 698): Supreme Court Oversight in Manipur Ethnic Violence YUKTI: Nationwide Mentorship and Internship Initiative for Aspiring Lawyers Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Salib @ Shalu @ Salim v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2023) Kishore Balkrishna Nand v. State of Maharashtra & Anr (2023) Avtar Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab (2023) Supreme Court Dismisses Haji Iqbal’s FIR, Ruling That a Civil Dispute Was Mishandled as a Criminal Case State of Rajasthan v. Sharwan Kumar Kumawat (2023): Validity of Amendments to Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 13 October, 2025 Introduction This case examines the legality and constitutionality of amendments to the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986, which replaced the “first come, first served” approach for mining leases with a delineation and auction-based system. The Supreme Court of India reviewed petitions after the Rajasthan High Court declared the amendments invalid. Facts of the Case Amendments notified on January 28, 2011, and April 3, 2013, introduced Rules 4(10) and 7(3), mandating delineation and auction of government land for mining leases. Applications received prior to January 27, 2011, were generally rejected unless special circumstances applied. Petitioners like Sharwan Kumar Kumawat contested the changes, citing breach of reasonable expectations, lack of hearing, and infringement of vested rights. Rajasthan High Court initially held the amendments invalid. Issues of the Case Are the amendments to Rules 4(10) and 7(3) of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 constitutionally valid? Do applicants for mining leases acquire any fundamental or vested rights? Do the amendments violate principles of natural justice or legitimate expectation? Were the amendments intended to evade previous High Court orders? Judgment The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the amendments. Key observations include: 1. No Fundamental or Vested Right in Mining Submitting an application does not create a vested right. Mining leases are not a fundamental right. Rights to government land and mineral resources are strictly regulated by statute. 2. Legitimacy of Amendments The State can amend rules to ensure equitable, transparent, and open practices, including online auctions. Amendments aim for better mineral regulation and fair distribution. 3. Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation Public interest supersedes legitimate expectation. Beneficial amendments cannot be contested merely because they contradict preconceived notions. Applicants have no inherent right to a hearing before policy changes. 4. No Legal Malice Amendments reflect statutory policy changes, not attempts to override court orders. High Court rulings were limited in scope and did not grant overarching rights to applicants. 5. Dependency on Prior Cases State of Tamil Nadu v. Hind Stone (1981): No vested right from pending applications. Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. v. UOI (2012): No fundamental right to a mining lease. Kerala Beverages Corp. v. P.P. Suresh (2019): Reasonable expectations are limited in public interest matters. Conclusion The Supreme Court affirmed the State of Rajasthan’s authority and the legality of the amended rules: Pending applications do not create enforceable rights. Public interest and State authority override legitimate expectations. Transition to delineation and auction system is lawful and consistent with legislative and constitutional standards. This ruling reinforces the principle that natural resources are State-owned and their allocation must be transparent, equitable, and in the public interest. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws State of Rajasthan v. Sharwan Kumar Kumawat (2023): Validity of Amendments to Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Endocrinology and Immunology Lab v. E.S.I. Corporation: Application of the ESI Act to Pathological Labs Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Dinganglung Gangmei vs Mutum Churamani Meetei (2023 INSC 698): Supreme Court Oversight in Manipur Ethnic Violence Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

State of Rajasthan v. Sharwan Kumar Kumawat (2023): Validity of Amendments to Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules Read More »

Endocrinology and Immunology Lab v. E.S.I. Corporation: Application of the ESI Act to Pathological Labs

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Endocrinology and Immunology Lab v. E.S.I. Corporation: Application of the ESI Act to Pathological Labs Dinganglung Gangmei vs Mutum Churamani Meetei (2023 INSC 698): Supreme Court Oversight in Manipur Ethnic Violence YUKTI: Nationwide Mentorship and Internship Initiative for Aspiring Lawyers Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Salib @ Shalu @ Salim v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2023) Kishore Balkrishna Nand v. State of Maharashtra & Anr (2023) Avtar Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab (2023) Supreme Court Dismisses Haji Iqbal’s FIR, Ruling That a Civil Dispute Was Mishandled as a Criminal Case Supreme Court Upholds Insured’s Right to Reimbursement for Third-Party Medical Expenses Endocrinology and Immunology Lab v. E.S.I. Corporation: Application of the ESI Act to Pathological Labs PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 13 October, 2025 Introduction This case addresses whether a pathological laboratory falls under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) prior to the Kerala Government notification of September 6, 2007. The Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) claimed coverage from an earlier date, citing prior notifications. The Supreme Court clarified the Act’s applicability to diagnostic and pathology laboratories. Facts of the Case Inspection of the respondent lab on April 1, 1999, found 19 employees. ESIC issued a notice on April 1, 1999, claiming coverage. The lab contested the applicability under Sections 75 and 77 of the ESI Act. The ESI Court initially classified the lab as a “shop” under a 2002 amendment. Kerala High Court ruled that the ESI Act would apply only from September 6, 2007, following a specific notification. Issue of the Case Key Question:Whether a pathological laboratory qualifies as a “shop” under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 and is therefore eligible for ESI coverage prior to Kerala’s 2007 notification. Judgment The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court ruling and rejected ESIC’s appeal. Key points include: 1. Definition of “Factory” and “Shop” Referenced the Factories Act, 1948 and the ESI Act. Lab could not be considered a factory as it did not manufacture goods. “Shop” is undefined in the Act; ESIC’s attempt to classify labs relied on internal circulars, not legislation. 2. 1976 Notification Included shops employing 10+ workers. Court held pathological labs do not qualify as shops since they provide professional diagnostic services, not goods sale. 3. 2002 Memorandum and Circular ESIC cited internal circulars to claim coverage. Court emphasized that internal circulars cannot override statutory provisions. 4. 2007 Notification September 6, 2007 notification specifically included medical facilities, diagnostic centers, and pathology labs with 20+ employees under the ESI Act. Proper procedures, including Central Government approval, were followed. Labs are covered only from this date onward, not before. 5. ESIC’s Inconsistent Position The Court noted ESIC’s contradictory stance claiming prior coverage. Reinforced that official notifications, not internal communications, determine ESI applicability. Conclusion The Supreme Court reiterated that social welfare legislation like the ESI Act must be strictly interpreted according to legislative text and notifications. Internal circulars cannot substitute official statutory processes. Pathological laboratories, such as the respondent, became subject to ESI coverage only after the Kerala notification on September 6, 2007. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Endocrinology and Immunology Lab v. E.S.I. Corporation: Application of the ESI Act to Pathological Labs Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Dinganglung Gangmei vs Mutum Churamani Meetei (2023 INSC 698): Supreme Court Oversight in Manipur Ethnic Violence Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Salib @ Shalu @ Salim v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2023) Sada Law • October 10, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Endocrinology and Immunology Lab v. E.S.I. Corporation: Application of the ESI Act to Pathological Labs Read More »

Dinganglung Gangmei vs Mutum Churamani Meetei (2023 INSC 698): Supreme Court Oversight in Manipur Ethnic Violence

Leave a Comment / Case law /

Trending Today Dinganglung Gangmei vs Mutum Churamani Meetei (2023 INSC 698): Supreme Court Oversight in Manipur Ethnic Violence YUKTI: Nationwide Mentorship and Internship Initiative for Aspiring Lawyers Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Salib @ Shalu @ Salim v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2023) Kishore Balkrishna Nand v. State of Maharashtra & Anr (2023) Avtar Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab (2023) Supreme Court Dismisses Haji Iqbal’s FIR, Ruling That a Civil Dispute Was Mishandled as a Criminal Case Supreme Court Upholds Insured’s Right to Reimbursement for Third-Party Medical Expenses Rohit Bishnoi v. The State of Rajasthan & Anr. Dinganglung Gangmei vs Mutum Churamani Meetei (2023 INSC 698): Supreme Court Oversight in Manipur Ethnic Violence PRABHAT KUMAR BILTORIA 13 October, 2025 Introduction A severe humanitarian and constitutional crisis in Manipur prompted an appeal to the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Following the Manipur High Court’s directive to include the Meitei community in the Scheduled Tribes list, ethnic violence erupted, leading to mass evictions, human rights violations, and targeted attacks on women. The Court was petitioned to ensure the rule of law, accountability, and justice for victims. Facts of the Case On March 27, 2023, the Acting Chief Justice of the Manipur High Court recommended the Meitei community for Scheduled Tribe status. Tribal communities protested, claiming that ST inclusion would weaken their rights, resulting in widespread violence. Incidents included mass relocation, sexual assaults, murders, and arson. The Central Government deployed security forces and established relief camps. Multiple writ petitions under Article 32 highlighted safety, rehabilitation, medical aid, and police inaction. Supreme Court found the Central and State Governments’ reports largely insufficient. Issue of the Case Key Question:Whether the High Court of Manipur’s ruling on ST inclusion was constitutionally valid, and what steps were required to resolve the humanitarian crisis, uphold the rule of law, and protect fundamental rights, particularly of women? Judgment CJI D.Y. Chandrachud emphasized constitutional violations, administrative failures, and the urgent need for structural reform. The Court issued comprehensive directives: 1. Judicial Relief and Rehabilitation Committee A three-member judicial commission was established: Former Chief Justice Gita Mittal, Jammu & Kashmir High Court Justice Shalini Phansalkar Joshi, Former Bombay High Court Judge Justice Asha Menon, Former Delhi High Court Judge Committee Mandates: Monitor survivors’ health, especially women Supervise relief camps: food, medical care, psychological support, sanitation Facilitate family reunification, legal aid, and compensation (₹10 lakh for deceased tribal family members) Establish toll-free helplines and nodal officers 2. CBI Oversight and Investigation CBI to handle 11 FIRs regarding sexual offences Officers from Rajasthan, MP, Jharkhand, Odisha, and Delhi, including at least one woman Former Maharashtra DGP Dattatray Padsalgikar to oversee police and CBI investigations Investigate alleged police complicity 3. Special Investigation Teams (SITs) 42 SITs across affected districts, with separate teams for sexual violence cases Officers assigned from outside Manipur for impartiality SITs to visit relief camps, collect grievances, and ensure FIR registration 4. Guidelines and Standards for Investigation FIRs must be promptly filed; zero FIRs converted immediately Medical examinations under Section 164-A CrPC to be conducted swiftly Witness and victim statements recorded promptly Police and SITs must follow Supreme Court directives (e.g., Nipun Saxena case) Ensure legal aid, psychological support, and witness protection 5. Restoring Rule of Law Identify vulnerable areas and prevent further violence Publicize SITs and judicial committee roles in camps and communities Recover stolen weapons Prepare for trials outside Manipur if necessary Conclusion The Supreme Court reaffirmed its constitutional duty to protect equality, dignity, and life, especially for women victims of sexual violence. The judgment underscores transformational justice, highlights systemic failures in law enforcement, and ensures victim-centric relief, rehabilitation, and independent investigations. The Court emphasized that justice must be swift, fair, and accessible, even amidst public unrest, establishing a historic precedent for judicial and investigative oversight in ethnic violence cases. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Case Laws Dinganglung Gangmei vs Mutum Churamani Meetei (2023 INSC 698): Supreme Court Oversight in Manipur Ethnic Violence Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Salib @ Shalu @ Salim v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2023) Sada Law • October 10, 2025 • Case law • No Comments Kishore Balkrishna Nand v. State of Maharashtra & Anr (2023) Sada Law • October 10, 2025 • Case law • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Dinganglung Gangmei vs Mutum Churamani Meetei (2023 INSC 698): Supreme Court Oversight in Manipur Ethnic Violence Read More »

YUKTI: Nationwide Mentorship and Internship Initiative for Aspiring Lawyers

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today YUKTI: Nationwide Mentorship and Internship Initiative for Aspiring Lawyers Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Salib @ Shalu @ Salim v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2023) Kishore Balkrishna Nand v. State of Maharashtra & Anr (2023) Avtar Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab (2023) Supreme Court Dismisses Haji Iqbal’s FIR, Ruling That a Civil Dispute Was Mishandled as a Criminal Case Supreme Court Upholds Insured’s Right to Reimbursement for Third-Party Medical Expenses Rohit Bishnoi v. The State of Rajasthan & Anr. INDRA BAI v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. YUKTI: Nationwide Mentorship and Internship Initiative for Aspiring Lawyers 13 October 2025 The General Counsels’ Association of India (GCAI) has launched YUKTI (Youth Unchained Through Knowledge and Transformative Internships), a nationwide program aimed at nurturing India’s future legal talent. Announced on September 19 during GCAI’s conclave Nyaya Nirmaan: Reimagining India’s Legal Foundations for Viksit Bharat @ 2047 in New Delhi, YUKTI offers structured mentorship and practical exposure to law students across the country. Vision and Objectives of YUKTI Dr. Akhil Prasad — Co-Founder of GCAI — described YUKTI as “an investment in the future of India’s legal fraternity.” The initiative aims to develop lawyers who are not only legally competent but also innovative, ethical, and globally minded. The program focuses on: Mentorship by experienced legal professionals Hands-on internships across corporate, litigation, and regulatory domains Fostering integrity, innovation, and practical legal skills Launch Ceremony Highlights The YUKTI launch included a lamp-lighting session attended by: Harsh Malhotra, Minister of State for Corporate Affairs Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, Chairperson, Law Commission of India Sasmit Patra, Rajya Sabha MP Prof. (Dr.) Sudhir Krishnaswamy, Vice-Chancellor, National Law School of India University (NLSIU) Key discussions during the event emphasized the need for: Legal reform aligned with India’s vision of Viksit Bharat 2047 Reducing judicial and tribunal pendency Expanding legal education to include corporate, in-house, and technology-driven careers Expert Panel Discussions Transformation of the Legal Profession The panel included: Justice Arjan Kumar Sikri, Singapore International Commercial Court Dr. Rajiv Mani, Mahaveer Singhvi, advocate Mahesh Agarwal, Dr. Anshul Vikram Pandey Moderated by Mini Menon VandePol (Baker McKenzie) with inputs from Hemant Kumar (Larsen & Toubro) The discussion focused on career diversification, emerging roles, and opportunities for legal professionals in India. Legal Education and Youth Academics from Delhi University, Dhirubhai Ambani University, RGNUL, and NLU Delhi shared insights. Moderated by Prof. Ashish Bhardwaj (BITS Law School), the panel explored preparing law students for globalized, interdisciplinary legal careers. Commercial Law Damages Panel Chaired by Senior Advocate Gourab Banerji, the panel featured: Pinky Anand Sudhanshu Swaroop Sudha Rani Relangi The session focused on damages, dispute resolution, and commercial law trends. YUKTI’s Impact on India’s Legal Landscape YUKTI represents a strategic effort to bridge the gap between legal education and professional practice, empowering the next generation of lawyers with mentorship, skill-building, and exposure to real-world legal challenges. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases YUKTI: Nationwide Mentorship and Internship Initiative for Aspiring Lawyers Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

YUKTI: Nationwide Mentorship and Internship Initiative for Aspiring Lawyers Read More »

Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Salib @ Shalu @ Salim v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2023) Kishore Balkrishna Nand v. State of Maharashtra & Anr (2023) Avtar Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab (2023) Supreme Court Dismisses Haji Iqbal’s FIR, Ruling That a Civil Dispute Was Mishandled as a Criminal Case Supreme Court Upholds Insured’s Right to Reimbursement for Third-Party Medical Expenses Rohit Bishnoi v. The State of Rajasthan & Anr. INDRA BAI v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. Indian Government Fixes Critical Security Flaw in Income Tax E-Filing Portal, Preventing Major Data Leak Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention 13 October 2025 Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention The Supreme Court of India has issued notices to the Central Government, the Ladakh Administration, and the Superintendent of Jodhpur Central Jail regarding the detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk. The plea, filed by his wife Gitanjali Angmo, challenges the legality of his arrest under the National Security Act (NSA). Background: Arrest Amid Ladakh Protests Sonam Wangchuk was arrested on September 26, 2025, following violent protests in Leh demanding statehood, which tragically left four people dead. The arrest came after Wangchuk had led a 14-day hunger strike calling for dialogue with the Central Government of India. Supreme Court Proceedings A bench headed by Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice N.V. Anjaria will hear the matter on October 14. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued that the detention violates Article 22 of the Constitution of India, as Wangchuk’s family was not informed of the grounds for arrest, restricting meaningful legal challenge. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta defended the government, stating that the reasons were communicated to Wangchuk and disclosure to his spouse is not legally required. The bench requested the Centre to consider sharing details with his family. Current Status and Jail Conditions Wangchuk was transferred from Ladakh to Jodhpur Central Jail following his arrest. His wife has sought: Permission to visit him Assurance of medical support The government stated that Wangchuk had undergone a medical check-up with no health concerns reported. The judges advised formally approaching jail authorities for visitation rights. Protests and Statehood Demand in Ladakh The arrest coincides with renewed protests in Ladakh demanding: Statehood Inclusion under the Sixth Schedule for tribal autonomy and protection of land rights Tensions escalated on September 24 when parts of the protests turned violent, resulting in police firing and casualties. Key regional groups, including the Apex Body Leh and Kargil Democratic Alliance, suspended talks with the government due to a breakdown of trust. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Indian Government Fixes Critical Security Flaw in Income Tax E-Filing Portal, Preventing Major Data Leak Sadalaw • October 9, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Read More »

Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Salib @ Shalu @ Salim v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2023) Kishore Balkrishna Nand v. State of Maharashtra & Anr (2023) Avtar Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab (2023) Supreme Court Dismisses Haji Iqbal’s FIR, Ruling That a Civil Dispute Was Mishandled as a Criminal Case Supreme Court Upholds Insured’s Right to Reimbursement for Third-Party Medical Expenses Rohit Bishnoi v. The State of Rajasthan & Anr. INDRA BAI v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. Indian Government Fixes Critical Security Flaw in Income Tax E-Filing Portal, Preventing Major Data Leak Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad 13 October 2025 Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad JSA Advocates & Solicitors has announced the appointment of Saurabh Sharma as a Partner at its Ahmedabad office. With over 14 years of experience in corporate law, Sharma’s addition strengthens JSA’s presence in Gujarat and the GIFT City markets. About Saurabh Sharma Saurabh Sharma is a seasoned corporate lawyer with expertise in mergers and acquisitions, cross-border transactions, joint ventures, private placements, business transfers, and corporate reorganizations. He holds a law degree from Gujarat National Law University (GNLU) and is a member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI). Strategic Expansion in Gujarat and GIFT City Sharma’s appointment aligns with JSA’s strategy to bolster its corporate and regulatory practices in Gujarat and GIFT City. He will collaborate with Partner Rajul Bohra to support the firm’s expansion plans in the region. Expertise in Key Sectors Throughout his career, Sharma has advised clients in various sectors, including projects and infrastructure, logistics, manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, and technology. His experience extends to advising on financial regulatory matters, product structuring, blockchain and tokenization, and the establishment of financial institutions under the GIFT City regulatory framework. Educational and Professional Background A graduate of Gujarat National Law University (GNLU), Sharma continues to contribute to legal education as a visiting faculty member at his alma mater. He is also an active member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI). Leadership Insights JSA’s Joint Managing Partners, Vivek Chandy and Amar Gupta, expressed enthusiasm about Sharma’s appointment, highlighting his deep experience in M&A and regulatory work as a valuable asset to the firm’s offerings in the Gujarat market. Looking Ahead Saurabh Sharma’s appointment is expected to significantly enhance JSA’s ability to serve both domestic and multinational clients operating in Gujarat and GIFT City. His expertise will be instrumental in navigating the evolving corporate and regulatory landscape in the region. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Sonam Wangchuk’s Detention Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Sadalaw • October 13, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Indian Government Fixes Critical Security Flaw in Income Tax E-Filing Portal, Preventing Major Data Leak Sadalaw • October 9, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Saurabh Sharma Appointed Partner at JSA Advocates & Solicitors in Ahmedabad Read More »

Indian Government Fixes Critical Security Flaw in Income Tax E-Filing Portal, Preventing Major Data Leak

Leave a Comment / Live cases /

Trending Today Indian Government Fixes Critical Security Flaw in Income Tax E-Filing Portal, Preventing Major Data Leak Gujarat High Court Bar Seeks Transfer of Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal Over Filing Delays Supreme Court Strengthens Road Safety Measures Across India in Landmark Judgment Dilip Kumar v. Brajraj Shrivastava & Anr. (2023): Supreme Court Clarifies Magistrate’s Duty Under Section 202(1) CrPC Sandeep Kumar v. State of Haryana & Another (2023): Supreme Court Upholds Summoning of Additional Accused Under Section 319 CrPC Anbazhagan v. State (2023): Supreme Court Modifies Conviction to Culpable Homicide under Section 304 Part II IPC CCPA Finds Drishti IAS Misrepresented Success Stories of Candidates Advocate Rakesh Kishore Attempts Shoe Throw at Chief Justice B.R. Gavai in Supreme Court Why the Delhi High Court Is the Preferred Forum for Protecting Celebrity Personality Rights Plea Filed in Bombay High Court Challenging SEBI’s Approval for WeWork India’s IPO Indian Government Fixes Critical Security Flaw in Income Tax E-Filing Portal, Preventing Major Data Leak Palak Singla 09 October 2025 Introduction The Government of India has successfully mitigated a major cybersecurity threat in its official Income Tax e-filing portal, preventing what could have been one of the largest data breaches in the country’s digital infrastructure. In September 2025, security researchers Akshay CS and Viral discovered a serious vulnerability that exposed sensitive taxpayer information due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) flaw. The Vulnerability: What Went Wrong The flaw allowed any logged-in user to manipulate the Permanent Account Number (PAN) parameter in network requests and gain unauthorized access to the personal and financial data of other taxpayers. This meant that by changing the PAN value, users could access another individual’s confidential details without needing special permissions or credentials — a classic example of an IDOR vulnerability that compromises data privacy. Data Exposed by the Flaw The vulnerability potentially exposed a vast amount of sensitive data, including: Full names and residential addresses Phone numbers and email IDs Dates of birth Bank account details Aadhaar numbers Tax filing information Alarmingly, it also allowed access to data from users who had not yet filed their returns for the ongoing financial year 2024–25. Swift Action by CERT-In and the Income Tax Department Once the issue was reported to the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), the Income Tax Department of India acted promptly. By early October 2025, the vulnerability was patched and secured, effectively preventing any misuse or data breach. Authorities confirmed that no taxpayer data was compromised, crediting the swift coordination between security researchers and government cybersecurity teams. Scale and Significance of the Threat The Income Tax portal serves over 135 million registered users, with approximately 76 million tax filings recorded in the 2024–25 fiscal year. Had the flaw been exploited, it could have resulted in one of the largest data breaches in India’s digital history, exposing millions of citizens and businesses to risks such as: Identity theft Financial fraud Targeted phishing attacks India’s Growing Focus on Cybersecurity This incident highlights the growing importance of cybersecurity in government digital systems. With the increasing digitization of public services under initiatives like Digital India, experts stress that regular vulnerability assessments, ethical hacking programs, and bug bounty collaborations with independent researchers are essential to safeguard citizens’ data. Conclusion The swift response from the Government of India, CERT-In, and the Income Tax Department prevented a potentially catastrophic data breach. This case underscores the critical need for strong cybersecurity frameworks, ethical disclosure channels, and responsible vulnerability management — especially in government platforms handling sensitive personal and financial information. Leave a Reply Cancel Reply Logged in as Sadalaw. Edit your profile. Log out? Required fields are marked * Message* Live Cases Indian Government Fixes Critical Security Flaw in Income Tax E-Filing Portal, Preventing Major Data Leak Sadalaw • October 9, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Gujarat High Court Bar Seeks Transfer of Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal Over Filing Delays Sadalaw • October 9, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments Supreme Court Strengthens Road Safety Measures Across India in Landmark Judgment Sadalaw • October 9, 2025 • Live cases • No Comments 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

Indian Government Fixes Critical Security Flaw in Income Tax E-Filing Portal, Preventing Major Data Leak Read More »

Get A Quote
Get A Quote